Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Friends and Enemies
Jews would be well advised not to regard evangelical American Christians as their allies in a battle against Muslims.
That evangelical American Christians support Israeli government policies through thick and thin should come as no surprise to those who pay attention to Middle Eastern politics. And while it is well known that such groups support the Jewish homeland in Israel, believing it to precipitate the second coming, and oppose any land concessions to Palestinians, it is shocking nevertheless to learn quite how many people support such a view. According to pastor John Hagee, some 40 million people embrace evangelical thinking on the Jewish state's need to vanquish its Muslim enemies - Christian Palestinians, of course, being more friend than foe.
This is a serious problem not only for the Palestinians, but for Israel, whose chances of any peace settlement with its neighbours are greatly hindered by such a massive political lobby of people who probably know next to nothing about the intricacies of the Israel-Palestine conflict. However, what is perhaps more worrying is the readiness of certain Jewish groups to embrace such evangelical ideologies and trade on the notion that Israel's political climate is part of a wider conflict of cultures - the Jews and the Christians versus the Muslims.
A number of advertisements have appeared on Haaretz.com in recent weeks, attesting to this division. One such ad read: "Land of Judea. Settled by Israelite tribes. The land walked by Jesus. Now in Arab hands." By drawing attention to the Biblical nature of this West Bank region and a shared history between Jews and Christians, Arabs are then referred to as a present day threat to a Jewish-Christian unity.
Right-wing Jewish groups are quick to refer to the flight of Christian Palestinians from Bethlehem as though Muslim Palestinians are the enemy and Jews and Christians are united in their victim status. Judeo-Christian values are constantly referred to as though they are one and the same thing and that, in contrast, other peoples, and particularly Muslims, do not share these inherent values and are incapable of coming up with them on their own.
A few years ago, I was in Venice with my dad and we saw a chessboard in the window of a shop in the city's old Jewish Ghetto. The pieces were made up of rabbis and Jews on one side and Popes and Christians on the other and I remember my dad saying that that was the real battle - the Catholics were the Jews' real enemy, not the Arabs. He was joking, of course, but the point still stands that despite centuries of intermittent pogroms and persecution- and then the Holocaust - the advent of Arab Israeli hostility in the last century has led many to gloss entirely over the history of anti Semitism and conclude that Muslim Arabs are the real enemy and that Jews and Christians are natural allies.
I am not denying that there are serious divisions between Jews and Muslims in certain parts of the world, nor that there is no basis for hostility between Israel and Arab nations. Likewise, I welcome Jewish-Christian harmony, indeed wouldn't it be nice if we could all just get along? However, the focus on the Jewish-Muslim tension of the last 80 years and the good Jewish-Christian relations of the last 40 often deliberately inverts history, placing Christians as the eternal friend of the Jews and Muslims the eternal enemy, whereas the reality is rather more complex, with periods of calm and periods of conflict between all three religions throughout history.
By referring back to the Bible, and shared Judeo-Christian values and looking forward to the coming of the messiah, second or first, Jewish and Christian groups alike create a false continuum, an eternal union of religions, and reduce complex world politics to simplistic Manichean oppositions: Jews and Christians versus Muslims; enlightenment versus barbarism; good versus evil. Somehow the Jews who subscribe to such ideologies have placed themselves on the Christian side of the revived Crusades, whereas they were in fact always caught up in the middle.
And somewhere in the middle comes close to depicting the Jews' reality today. While Israel might be at the epicentre of the Middle East's turmoil, it is far too reductive to place it in a clash of west versus east. Likewise, the Jewish state is about nationalism, self-determination and independence, not part of a messianic development that will see Jews and Christians triumph and Muslims perish. The Israel-Palestine conflict demands a just resolution for both sides, not the convenient absorption into a wider conflict of culture which warmongers on both sides are willing towards world war three.
Right-wing Jews would do well to consider that despite Israel's current allegiances, the naturalisation of existent hostilities with certain Muslims as a timeless, unavoidable given, will do nothing to solve Israel's political problems. Islamist jihadis and evangelical Christians both view themselves as the bearers of truth and manipulate world events to bring about a final war between good and evil. Israeli politics are, and must remain, unconnected to such dichotomies and Jewish groups would do well to focus on solving Israel's problems as they exist in reality, rather than trying to curry Christian favour in exterminating the "eternal" Muslim enemy.
Josh Freedman Berthoud is a journalist and writer currently travelling through Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Golan, gathering research for a book to be co-written with Seth Freedman, planned for publication next year. You can follow his progress on the trip at www.40yearson.blogspot.com.
© 2007 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

30 Comments so far
Show AllAll religions that take a single, ancient book (or rather, set of texts) as the enduring, authoritative truth for all time, and that, in the process, ignore all the great ideas and fine books written in the past 1000 or 2000 years, are reactionary and benighted.
Fortunately, there are branches of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam which are not so riveted to a single text, not hostile to modernity, and which do not regard ancient prohibitions as immutable.
Regarding "Judeo-Christian values" or "Judeo-Christian ethics" Please refer to Lis Riba's article "Regarding the term Judeo-Christian" www.osmond-riba.org/lis/essay_JC.htm. I quote from the article "The term
'Judeo-Christian' was invented during World War II, when Christians started realizing how rude it was to rail against the Nazis for violating 'Christian decency' since so many of the Nazi victims were Jewish."
She says in another part of the article "I think the term 'Judeo-Christian' is overused and usually misused. It really should only apply in certain very limited circumstance, because the differences between the religions are so broad and fundamental that its rare to actually refer to both at the same time." The Zionist spin makes the term sound almost biblical. It's not.
The rightwing evangelicals, in their ill-advised battle between good and evil in the Holy Land, have not seemed to notice they have brought about much evil, and very little good. Now our president is referring to WW111 as if it is just another part of our big game over there. One cannot help but wonder why the evangelical`s are so enthralled with the Jewish people , as they have rejected the evangelical`s Jesus Christ. They could do so much more good if they would work for peace in the world rather than taking sides and pushing for conflict.
Never give religious groups the right to kill. That right is reserved exclusively by the state for good reason. It must be a state where religion and state are clearly seen to be separate and tolerance of other religions is practiced and enforced.
An example of how insane a society becomes when the state and the religion are completely entwined would be Israel.
Is that what USAer's want for themselves?
I have a recurring fantasy in which I become Emperor and lease the entire Middle East to a landscaping company which grinds all the shrines and mosques and temples and grottos and wailing walls and holy rocks of those silly-assed material-historical religions into decorative gravel. Everybody knows God lives in music and arithmetic, not out on some stupid football field.
Jesus is reported to have said in Luke 6:27-28, "But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who mistreat you."
It seems to me that Christians who follow some other message about wars, and taking sides, and hating people of this group or that group somehow missed the whole point. Jesus spoke so simply as for his words and his real teachings to be understood easily by children. And yet grown men and women often just wander off somewhere else in large numbers, following after miscellaneous "theologians".
The shared "victimhood" of Jews and Christians is sickening. Today, these two groups are among the oppressors of Muslims throughout the world. But their victim mentality allows them to oppress others while calling it "defense."
Blood shed over a collection of Bronze Age stories.
Ah! The Holy Land!
American Evangelicals and American Christian Fundamentalists and definitely "friends" of Israel if by friends you mean "people who are anxious for the complete destruction of Israel as part of WWIII, End Times, and the Second Coming when all Jews who do not convert to Christianity will go to hell."
So, Israelites and Jews, these "Christians" are your good friends if by "friends" you mean people who can't wait for you to either convert or go to hell.
Nice friends.
Amongst other sources, a recent NYT Magazine article ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/magazine/28Evangelicals-t.html?ref=magazine ) seems to suggest that the evangelical movement in the U.S. is losing ground and that its right-wing political alliances, in particular, are increasingly troubled.
If true, it will be interesting to watch the reactions of their erstwhile "allies and friends" on the Israeli front. The "sinking ship" image comes to mind.
Those christians should be ashamed of what they are supporting. A state that is terrorizing women, children, and men. A state that murders whenever it feels like it, this is hardly anything that God wants, or needs. There are many Israeli's with a conscience, and it is unfortunate that they do not have the government's ear. Instead, there are murders and evil, sick, politicians supporting a vicious agenda that is destroying innocent lives. Those so called christians should be ashamed and humiliated by their support of such behavior.
I recently re-read the Gospels and cannot comprehend how these people can claim any connection, much less allegiance, to Jesus. He was clearly a pacifist and socialist, opposed to everything they stand for. America's flirtation with neoconservatism and Christian fundamentalism has been disastrous, indeed criminal.
Messiah isn't someone that the dragon can destroy.
Messiah is a song of jubilee.
Messiah isn't something that the serpent can deploy.
Messiah is a song of jubilee.
Between veils and crosses are hidden lies, sneaking suspicions, and alibis.
The dragon guards the serpent's diddle
So the prophet must write/right a riddle.
Will you listen?
ONE "voice"
Someone said his eyes were green,
but an eye defect of blue was seen.
Oh camera come true to the blood-stained screen
Of Solomon's silver and Babylon's queen
Cycles that forward keep circling back
to reason a writing of writ
to find the time that we all lack
to find the time to fit
I hate to be insulting [but sometimes I must]
Shut out the truth
silence the Host
play the part of the holy ghost
control the things that they need most
then rape their souls from coast to coast
Do I sound miserable?
Oh, by the way,
I have an anagram for "Christians United for Israel"
>>> Direful Satanic Shrine Riots
Oh, by the way...
yOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW
In Poland under the communist regime, people determined that the appropriate response to their situation was to envision what what they wanted their lives to be and to live that way.
Thinking of the quip about democracy: If the people lead the leaders will follow.
The Hopi have noted that we have lived through a time of learning what it means to be animals, now we are learning what it means to be humans.
The conflictive occidental interpretation of evolutionist perspective holds that beneath our skin we are animals and cannot survive without laws because of it. My understanding of traditional indigenous perspective hold that human beings are human throughout and regard all life from that perspective reflecting our capacity to be, remember, steward and learn.
Darwinian 'survival of the fittest': fit for what exactly? It would seem that we are evolving to a human perspective of fit stewardship. Our condition of 'dominion' in Abrahamic tradition would seem less to be allegiance and more simple allignment with and inclusion of that which fosters life.
We are the human institution of all of our perspectives. It would seem that ultimately there is only one culture on the planet, that of life. Each 'tribe' has evolved with the culture of love codified in its bones as conscience despite our fears and traumas.
The Mayan greeting of 'In Lakhe' - roughly translated as 'I am another yourslf' reiterates a reciprocity of being that far exceeds simple human interaction. It is in the oriental wisdom of the Tao te Ching, normative perspective of Christ, Islam (peace), the Judaic sepheroth structure, to note only some traditions. Some regard it as an 'economy of reciprocity' freeing the notion of 'economy' to dynamic of a steward humanity. Imagine remembering definition of 'economy' as that of the global 'household'.
In the 30s-40s Martin Buber in *I and Thou* distilled an aspect of this noting "My you acts on me as I act on it".
Perhaps one of our greatest challenges is to remember and to remember deeply, beyond the point of spin off into distortions, lies and war. Each 'moment' is accrual of the experience leading up to it and shaping what will have been; literally making history. Humility, from this perspective, seems to be a tremendous strength. It allows us to observe in wonder across the divisions and recognize the creature that is humanity whithin the creation - looking back at us, already journeying together.
The fable of the blind men feeling the elephant and describing from different perspectives became very rich when I realized that the structure of the fable doubled back on its image of being unable to see in a situation of analysis, by saying nothing about listening. A silence about not hearing.
old goat
sweet, but shot
I am god and you are a fuckencapitalist idiot
Have you no soul?
I'll will give your sorry capitalistic "hate niggers" "hate everyone
A Phined youer pine box - your hateful soul,
but why should we be arguing.
what are/do you COMMAND?
Have you no soul?
Fuck off idiot {laymen Latin dummy)
Do you want my address?
Israelis will still take the Christian charity donations, money and any political support they can.
What does the money sometimes go to?
Rec centers and playgrounds in illegal communities as apposed to food and water for the hungry Palestinians.
http://www.cfoic.com/childrenprojects.jsp
How perverted.
Apparently "The good Samaritan" has been extracted from the Bible these days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan
Samaritan: living almost exclusively in Kiryat Luza on the holy Mount Gerizim near the city of Nablus (Shechem) in the West Bank
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritan
Richard,
Great comments;
but I think they'd be more appreciated in a literary blog...
"And while it is well known that such groups support the Jewish homeland in Israel, believing it to precipitate the second coming, and oppose any land concessions to Palestinians, it is shocking nevertheless to learn quite how many people support such a view."
Not so very-shocking -- at least, not when considering who backed/rehabilitated Scofield, who then published and helped-annotate his 'dispensationalist'-bible, and who followed by distributing it (free) throughout 'America's Heartland'...
Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, all have the same thing in common they believe in an invisible supreme being.
While I am more serious about my beliefs and will tenaciously defend the existence of Santa Claus, The Toothfairy, and the Ester Bunny.
But so help me if you insist that your god is better than my imaginary person this could lead to war between us.
maelstrom November 4th, 2007 11:14 am wrote:
"Richard,
Great comments;
but I think they'd be more appreciated in a literary blog…"
MY RESPONSE:
Fair enough, maelstrom,
I don't always respond in "literary" ways.
NOW, let me think out loud here, for a minute:
I'm not sure what my November 4th 7:32 and 7:37 AM posts were about. Did I go off and get drunk and come back after an hour and 46 minutes? The messages make no sense to me. Funny though, the previous of my "literary" pieces where written under the influence of cannabis.
Alcohol is legal and cannabis is not?? Weekends in hospital emergency wards stink of alcohol, yet we never see patients that are fallen down drunk, stunned, violent, and reckless as a result of using cannabis.
All three of the Abrahamic religions have but a few things in common - most notably their use of suppression and prohibition, yet these are the very keys that have locked them too within the gates of hell. Surely the use of force is most ungodly to those who are neither atheist nor theist.
Together both Religion and State hold up the fiery swords of prohibition - which of course, is merely another form of suppression - keeping people from their trees of life.
[They let us drink rot, and they even set up government shops where you can buy rot juice. BUT, they imprison us for using fresh herbs that tweak the imagination - especially when considering a strategy for victory over the abominations that prevail against the ninety-nine point nine percent of us who are not rotten people.]
J I hope this isn't too literary for this thread, that it causes others to appreciate the message less.
Thank you,
richard k