Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Frances Moore Lappé's Recipe for Radical Renewal
Frances Moore Lappé has, for the better part of four decades, done her very best to guide the United States toward a more rational relationship with the planet and its inhabitants. It has not been easy work, and the current circumstance would suggest that it has not been nearly so successful as Lappé or the readers of her groundbreaking books would have hoped.
But the truth is that Lappé has succeeded, masterfully.
No popular intellectual has been so very successful in reshaping the character and content of debates about environmental and food policy as this remarkable woman. It is true that there are still deniers of the truths she advances. But they are increasingly isolated in the West Wing of the Bush White House. And their days are numbered.
The future belongs to Frances Moore Lappé -- who in on a national book tour that will take her to Burlington, Vt.; Madison, Wi.; St. Louis and Worcester, Ma., in coming days -- and to those who have been guided by her wise assessments of the most fundamental issues.
Lappé will always be known as the author of Diet for a Small Planet, the 1971 book that reshaped the debate about famines, food shortages and consumption. In it, the author argued that it was not patterns of over-population, bad weather or technological inadequacy that caused human beings to be denied the sustenance they required to survive. Rather, it was the unfair distribution of the world's resources and a deficit of democracy, which undermined the ability of citizens to make that distribution fairer and more responsible.
This simple calculus, which even now is neglected by many policy makers, was revolutionary. It returned the debate about how to deal with famines and related crises to the fundamental issues of inequality and inhumanity.
The response was unprecedented. More than three million copies of Diet for a Small Planet have been sold, and the 15 books Lappé has written in ensuing years have added nuance and perspective to her original arguments while taking the debate about the human condition to new and exciting places.
The value of Lappé's contribution is now broadly recognized. She has received 17 honorary doctorates from distinguished institutions, along with the global Right Livelihood Award and the Rachel Carson Award. "A small number of people in every generation are forerunners, in thought, action, spirit, who swerve past the barriers of green and power to hold a torch high for the rest of us. Lappé is one of those," says historian Howard Zinn. The Washington Post made the same point with the observation that, "Some of the twentieth century's most vibrant activist thinkers have been American women - Margaret Mead, Jeanette Rankin, Barbara Ward, Dorothy Day - who took it upon themselves to pump life into basic truths. Frances Moore Lappé is among them."
It would be easy to rest on such laurels.
But Lappé is not resting. She's out campaigning -- to renew civic and democratic values, to restrain corporate excess and governmental abuse, to stop fearing fear itself and to start embracing the radical responses that will make America and the planet as peaceful, as healthy, as humane and as fulfilled as our knowledge and our technology makes possible.
That's the "gospel" Frances Moore Lappé preaches in her terrific new book, Getting a Grip: Clarity, Creativity and Courage in a World Gone Mad (Small Planet Press), and on the national tour she's now on to herald its publication.
Lappé is saying what every presidential candidate should, and she is doing so with the boldness that is required if we hope to break with Bushism and shape a future worthy of a nation founded on revolutionary promise and a world that will only be set right if that promise is kept.
"I just want to go for it," Lappé asks in the introduction to Getting a Grip. "Why can't we have a nation - why can't we have a world we're proud of? Why can't we stop wringing our hands over poverty, hunger, species decimation, genocide, and death from curable disease that we know is all needless? The truth is there is no reason we can't. They say - whoever the "they" are - that as we age, we mellow. I don't think so. I'm getting less and less patient. Why? Because I realize that humanity has no excuses anymore. In the span of my own lifetime, both historical evidence and breakthroughs in knowledge have wiped out all our excuses. We know that we know how to end this needless suffering, and we have all the resources to do it. From sociology and anthropology to economics, from education and ecology to systems analysis - the evidence is in. We know what works."
Frances Moore Lappé is as right now as she has been in the past. It is time to go for it -- no half steps, no half measures. We have a name for the failures of the past: Bush. Now that the Bush era is ending, we need to name and claim the future.
John Nichols is a co-founder of Free Press and the co-author with Robert W. McChesney of TRAGEDY & FARCE: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy — The New Press.
© 2007 The Nation

15 Comments so far
Show AllWithout taking anything away from Frances Moore Lappe, I want to suggest strongly that we not leave the actual doing of the works of justice and compassion to the heroines and heros who are actively working out in the field, but that we who sit at our computer screens reading CD articles and responding to them get off our duffs and get out there. Others who merit out attention as exemplars are Marcia Odell, director of WORTH, a project that's turning poor women's lives around in Nepal, D. R. Congo, etc., building self-esteem and new confidence by forming women's self-sustaining groups for literacy, simple banking, saving/investing and training in entrepeneurship. Also read Three Cups of Tea about Greg Mortenson's work building schools for girls and boys in remote villages of Pakistan and Afghanistan. [He quotes Pakistani Brigadier General Bashir Baz: "Your President Bush has done a wonderful job of unting one billion Muslims against America for the next two hundred years." and "The enemy is ignorance. The only way to defeat it is to build relationships with these people, to draw them into the modern world with education and business. Otherwise the fight will go on forever."]
I would love to live in a country that I'm proud of and a country that the rest of the world doesn't fear. Let's make it happen!
I read Diet For A Small Planet in the 80's and became a vegetarian because of it. Now I'm rethinking because of Barbara Kingsolver's book, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. But Frances Moore Lappe is a great human being and I'm sure that her message of economic justice and fair sharing of resources doesn't depend on everyone living on soybeans.
Unfortunately, we have a couple of billion more people on this planet than we did in 1980. We need women to have control over their fertility, with much more birth control availability. Too bad the US under Bush is stopping efforts, both in the US and across the world.
As much as I admire writers such as Lappe... and of others like Pollan... I can't find it in myself to want to get back to living life on 25 acres with a mule. A long-time former idealistic chef, still stuck in the big city, I had to leave that industry because the foodstuffs I was able to economically obtain in a landlocked market such as Dallas left so much to be desired.
Today I struggle to reconcile all those old progressive ideals with the knowledge that I'd just as soon write about... or dream about... them... while I go about living the yuppie lifestyle I've grown tired of.
Also, I find zero comfort in supporting any of the mainstream presidential candidates this coming year. Only Ron Paul promises real change.
The ideas of localism hold little magic for me; and I have no desire to even know my neighbors. Our big city farmer's market is as fraudulent and fake as can be... full of brokers and poisoned food... and administered by corrupt city officials.
Oh well, I guess living in suburbia is about as dreary an existence as one should expect. Maybe I should have acclimated myself to a life of toil and misery long ago.
American life is as bleak today as I've ever known it.
Bu$h the inferior thinks that new soylent green product looks good.
Great to see this....Lappe's Diet for a Small Planet started one revolution 30 years ago....and now we're ready for the next wave. She, along with Riane Eisler, who just wrote "Real Wealth of Nations" (www.realwealtheconomy.com) are courageous enough to say--more of the same won't work--time for something else. They both are showing the way--let's get behind them!
Between a Diet for a Small Planet, and a visit to a slaughterhose in the mid 1970s, I have been a vegetarian ever since. Since then I have lived on 3 continents, lived in cities, suburbs, and now work harder than I ever have living frugally and independently at 7,500' in New Mexico. A rich, full life that I would not trade for anything. When something works in your life, why change it?
In scanning the internet looking at snall scale participatory activity at the grassroots I came upon an organization that grew up on the vision of Lappé.
Catalytic Communities: www.catcom.org
Networking urban projects in the favelas in Rio de Janeiro from urban organic gardening to information sciences. Do you have a small scale project that you'd like to network information with neighbors 3,000 miles away? The site is self explanatory. If you think extreme poverty means stupidity - meet my teachers.
Frances Moore Lappe's web site is here: http://www.gettingagrip.net/ It contains a nifty little eight minute video on the Clean Election law in Maine.
"Lappé will always be known as the author of Diet for a Small Planet, the 1971 book that reshaped the debate about famines, food shortages and consumption. In it, the author argued that it was not patterns of over-population, bad weather or technological inadequacy that caused human beings to be denied the sustenance they required to survive. Rather, it was the unfair distribution of the world's resources and a deficit of democracy, which undermined the ability of citizens to make that distribution fairer and more responsible."
"This simple calculus, which even now is neglected by many policy makers, was revolutionary."
Well.....with all due respect to Frances Moore Lappe and her wonderful book, this "revolutionary" idea was not entirely hers.
Long before "Diet for a Small Planet" was published, R. Buckminster Fuller was making this argument. In 1969 he started the World Game, which went well beyond food supply to include all scarce resources and plot population trends in order to figure out a way to sustain spaceship earth's population. Fuller said he wanted to "make the world work for 100% of humanity in the shortest possible time, through spontaneous cooperation and without ecological offense or the disadvantage of anyone."
This became part of the impetus for his concept of "ephemeralization" - (doing more with less), in order to increase the standard of living for a growing population despite the spaceship's limited resources. Fuller coined the term in 1938.
http://www.buckminster.info/Strategy/GrandStrategy.htm
He made the case, as did others, and Frances Moore Lappe. But it has all fallen upon the deaf ears of capitalism -- the "Grunch of Giants" if are familiar with Bucky's work.
"Either war is obsolete, or men are."
R. Buckminster Fuller
Speaking of what is neither holy, roman nor an empire...at present we are using food for fuel. When was that ever calculated in by anyone.
But way back then, F.M. Lappe brought the idea of complimenting incomplete proteins into our diets to form a complete protein meal (likely saved millions of vegetarians from a diet that even a turtle would find inadequate).
However it would still take many years before a biscuit would be made by complimenting and forming complete proteins in each biscuit which now used to actually save millions during famines. I bought her book back then and combine a complete protein to 'boost' the incomplete in a meal. Macaroni and meatballs! It was due to the pressure of the many people who by then understood maximizing the protein content of a meal which finally made this happen. Those biscuits are a success. They taste good too.
F.M. Lappe... should receive considerable credit for making protein completion part widely understood which eventually saw such a lifesaving biscuit made. By coincidence the people likely as not used one of the editions of her books to explain it for them. Give that lady a basket...of biscuits.
I've read the biscuits really help... she should be honored that such biscuits are made.
Most of today's GWoT/post-ColdWar nonsense can be summarized in it's birthright, and succinctly, by George Kennan of the U.S. State Department -- in 1948:
"The US has about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. In this situation we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and daydreaming, and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford the luxury of altruism and world benefaction. We should cease to talk about such vague and unreal objectives as human rights, the raising of living standards and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better."
See the Lappe movie about how to renew democracy:
http://gnn.tv/videos/82/Clean_Elections
"But Lappé is not resting. She's out campaigning — to renew civic and democratic values, to restrain corporate excess and governmental abuse, to stop fearing fear itself..."
What a wonderful phrase, "to stop fearing fear itself." This tells me that it's normal to be afraid of change, but that we need to do what we feel we must do despite our fear.
Wouldn't it be glorious if we could make a pact to do what we KNOW is right despite our fear and despite knowing that people out there will use our fear to try to manipulate us?
"Courage is not the absence of fear. It is acting in spite of it." Mark Twain (I believe).
Bless her heart. She has hope and confidence. We should too. We should get behind the clean elections "movement" in full force.
http://www.just6dollars.org
and
http://www.PublicCampaign.org