Common Dreams NewsCenter

Summer Reading

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Toss Your Briefs at the Guys with Briefcases

by Antonia Zerbisias

Two weeks ago, when Panties for Peace hit the news, the bloody crackdown on Burma’s pro-democracy protestors last month made a brief comeback in the world’s consciousness.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper reported that activists, “exasperated at the failure of diplomacy to apply pressure on Burma’s military regime,” were protesting by “sending female underwear to Burmese embassies.”

According to the Thailand-based Lanna Action for Burma, senior general Than Shwe, whose troops bludgeoned unarmed monks and nuns, is very superstitious. The dictator and his minions “believe that contact with a woman’s panties or sarong can rob them of their power.”

Doesn’t matter if the lingerie is clean or dirty, the fact that it’s feminine makes it emasculating.

(Not that it stops Burma’s state-sanctioned rape.)

And so we have panty power.

Cute - although strict and total economic sanctions, by everyone, including China, which vigorously trades with Burma, might be more effective. Naming and shaming the companies, including Canadian corporations that do business with these brutal bastards, might pressure them to stop starving their people of food, medical care and basic human rights.

But economic sanctions against a non-Middle Eastern state just aren’t as newsworthy as they used to be.

No wonder Panties for Peace received some play. In the media age, even peace needs clever marketing.

Hundreds of thousands can turn out for marches in cities all over the world - as has happened on many occasions since the White House first planned its attack on Iraq - and the news media won’t deign to print a picture.

But if one CodePink member - former Texas Grade 4 teacher Desiree Fairooz - waves a red-painted hand in U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s face, as she did last Wednesday, that’s front-page news.

Not coincidentally CodePink, probably the best-known peace group in the U.S. despite the greater size and scope of others, is a “women-initiated” movement whose members have been repeatedly arrested for non-violent acts such as delivering petitions to the United Nations.

Founder Medea Benjamin first came to my attention five years ago when, as then I columnized, she and a cohort “stood up and interrupted U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who was in the midst making his (WMDs) case against Iraq before Congress.

“`Inspections, not war!’ they cried, before being hustled away by Capitol police.” CodePink was founded shortly after that.

This month, Benjamin and sister CodePink activist Col. Ann Wright, who resigned from the U.S. Army to protest the Iraq invasion, were barred from entering Canada.

They were barred because our border officials found their names on the FBI’s crime database, which is supposed to list “individuals who have been charged with serious and/or significant offences” - not peace protestors who committed misdemeanours and got off with fines.

But that’s life today in George W. Bush’s, er, Stephen Harper’s Canada.

Of course, Bush has been beset by women since he moved into the Oval Office. Female activists and protestors - and not just those fighting for so-called feminist issues such as abortion rights - have grabbed more media attention than men.

From Dixie Chick Natalie Mainse’s onstage outburst against Bush in 2003, to the “Jersey Girls” who agitated for an investigation into their husbands’ deaths in the World Trade Center, to Cindy Sheehan who camped out at Crawford, Tex., after her son was killed in Iraq, women have spearheaded the peace movement.

“Women do catchy things so they attract media attention,” says Ottawa computer consultant Corinne Allen, whose YayaCanada.com is the go-to website for Canada’s peace movement.

But, she adds, “Maybe more women are being noticed more than men, but I don’t think they want peace more than men.”

“Right now, we are the most outraged,” CodePink founder Benjamin tells me, hours after her arrest for merely holding up a two-fingered peace sign while Fairooz confronted Rice in the congressional hearing room (watch video). “A lot of us are thinking, `What kind of world are we leaving for our grandchildren?’”

That said, complains Benjamin, women don’t get any respect: “I have two master’s degrees. I’ve travelled all over the world. I’ve worked for the United Nations. I’ve been to Iraq five times - but I have never been called (by the networks) on these issues.

“I think women are at a disadvantage of being taken seriously from an expert point of view but as activists we have an advantage.”

They certainly do if they take it all off, as the women of Boobs Not Bombs do, or as Lady Godiva famously did to protest a tax her husband imposed on his people in 11th-century England.

Getting naked has worked in all sorts of causes, against fur or for trees, as calendar girls here and abroad have proved.

And sex - or the lack of it - sells.

Sure, ancient Greece’s Lysistrata-led withdrawal of wives’ conjugal services until the Athenians came marching home from Sparta was a figment of playwright Aristophanes’ imagination, but real sex strikes have since worked in places as disparate as Poland, Colombia and Turkey.

It’s enough to make some of us want to reach out to Laura Bush and Lynne Cheney - or some errant intern in the West Wing.

Where’s a thong when you need it?

Which brings us back to panties.

Listen, if there was a chance in hell that sending an entire Victoria’s Secret warehouse to Rangoon would usher in democracy, I’d max out my credit cards to do it.

But, if you ask me, it’s better to fling the contents of our drawers at our leaders until they’re men enough to take a stand.

azerbis@thestar.ca

© Copyright Toronto Star 1996-2007

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

9 Comments so far

  1. st john October 31st, 2007 2:28 pm

    I would like to share this short excerpt from a longer piece that gives a new twist on what is happening in the “world”. The masculine has lost its true power by relegating the feminine to second-class status. Now is the time for the balance of Yin & Yang to come into play.

    “He who goes by the name of Jeshua[Jesus] is my[Mary Magdalene] counterpart, the male manifestation of the Christ. I am the Feminine nature, the dancer/singer Woman who makes round and full what was once hard and flat.

    Blessed Mother Mary is the strong and gentle nurturer. I, Mary Magdalene, am the Feminine that shakes people up, disrupts staid piety…and strips boy-men of their false sense of power. For those who dare, my embrace initiates those who are willing into Manhood.

    The world of physical matter cut me out of their hearts and psyches. Without me, passion became madness, celebration spiraled into insanity, and lusty sensuality was reduced to obscene acts of pillaging and sex. The Masculine psyche took possession of men, women and children, perverting and destroying joy, the sacred heart, innocence, beauty, movement, and the rich abundance of spirit. Today the stench of that perversion fills the nostrils of humanity.

    Turn away from male-infested ways. Fly to the land of sweet perfumes, where deep round urns of milk and honey nourish ailing souls. Breathe in the musk of Woman. Array yourself in beauty. Adorn your body with sensuous cloths. Anoint your flesh with fine ointments, and swath your being in brilliant colors. Send the rich incense of your presence before you, announcing the entrance of Woman into the dark and filthy rooms of perversive powers. Cleanse what has been tainted. Make new again what was crushed in the reckless dash for domination and control.

    Wake up, dear ones. Wake up and rouse the world out of its vile torpor. You are Beauty. You are Sensuality. You are fierce Love. Explode the tired myths of oppression and deception. Everything required is already yours.”

    peace,
    st john

  2. Treefrog October 31st, 2007 3:06 pm

    What a pleasant surprise. Thank you.

  3. Daniel David October 31st, 2007 3:09 pm

    There is little to nothing that could advance the real interests of women worldwide more than a liberal female president in the United States of America. Okay, but not Hillary, you say?

    Would you prefer Laura Bush? I cannot dismiss a last-minute “Draft Laura” movement in this country as a sneaky possibility if Mrs. Clinton is nominated by the Democrats. If that were to happen, the stakes would be high with Republican men running one woman to try to defeat the “liberal” woman who could (and don’t think they don’t know it) spark a worldwide women’s revolution in politics.

  4. Poet October 31st, 2007 4:41 pm

    Daniel David in one brief post raises eloquently (though it was not his intention)why all should “just say no to Hillary”. Nobody with a lick of sense could believe that were Laura Bush president she would be anything other than a mouthpiece for her husband.

    We have already had 8 years of Bill Clinton meddling with America and we don’t need anymore of it as he hides behind his wife’s skirt. In the names and memories of Lurleen Wallace and Evita Peron lett’s just say “no” to Hillary and Bill.

  5. Mr. Duncan October 31st, 2007 4:59 pm

    Hillary sure helped women’s rights in Iraq, by voting for the war. More of that, please!

  6. principessaflamenco October 31st, 2007 5:54 pm

    Daniel David,
    On every issue written on this forum, you find a way to post your Dems commercial. Ok, we get it, you LOVE them. Now, write your opinion on the issues featured on the article above, and please stop believing you will convince us that the dems are better than the republicans, or to vote for them.
    (and by the way, why don’t you cheer more for Kucinich? he is the only decent candidate).

  7. Daniel David October 31st, 2007 10:10 pm

    principessaflamenco,

    The article was about underwear. It’s hard to stay on that topic. As for Democrats, I actually don’t “love” them. But I do see where the election of 08 is headed, to Republicans again, and I intend to go down fighting for a different result.

    And, I really would love to see Dennis Kucinich elected president. He’s the best of the bunch, but unfortunately polling near Chris Dodd and below Stephen Colbert. This is a tad of a problem in real elections.

  8. rgmccon November 1st, 2007 1:05 am

    When have you seen a “Real Election”? Not lately, eh?

  9. cromerovich November 1st, 2007 2:45 pm

    I have a technical solution to the problem. Take those laser guided smart bombs with the hundreds of sub-munition canisters known as cluster bomblets and replace the explosive part with panties. The detonator could be left in with some wadding to eject the aforementioned panty on impact. Each bomblet could probably hold about 20 panties and after ejection in the thousands could cover entire compounds at a time. Strategically dropped panty carpeting targeting the junta thugs, should, if this article is correct, render them powerless and allow them to be removed (the junta that is) peacefully.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org