Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Resisting Ban on Cluster Bombs
BRUSSELS - The U.S. is leading efforts to resist a complete ban on cluster bombs, human rights activists have complained.
But a conference called by European governments in Brussels Tuesday is regarded as a step towards an international agreement on eliminating cluster weapons -- in which hundreds of small 'bomblets' are packed together.
Although an accord appears likely to be reached during 2008, activists are concerned over diplomatic manoeuvres by Washington to ensure that it will not be too stringent.
Representatives of the U.S., the world's number one user of cluster munitions, have been holding bilateral discussions with some European governments recently in a bid to water down any potential accord. The Bush administration has observer status at the Brussels conference, though it is a Europe-led initiative.
In February this year, a number of governments and humanitarian organisations joined forces in Oslo to urge that a legally binding international accord on banning these weapons should be finalised in 2008.
"Almost 90 countries have joined the Oslo process," said Stan Brabant from Handicap International, one of the groups most vociferous in opposing cluster bombs.
"We believe it is a very strong process, that it's unstoppable," he told IPS. "Have the U.S. efforts been successful? So far, not really. But we shall keep a very close eye on what they are doing."
Branislav Kapetanovic, a former member of the Serbian army, lost his arms and legs in an accident in November 2000 while he was trying to clear cluster bombs dropped by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) the previous year. His hearing was also damaged, and he was blinded for several months.
"These weapons are monstrous, and they cannot be controlled," he said. "A total ban is the only way to go. No exceptions, no excuses."
Cluster bombs were the focus of international attention again during the war in Lebanon last year. In the last 72 hours of that conflict, the Israeli defence forces used about four million cluster sub-munitions.
The weapon has a long history.
Cluster bombs were first used by the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany during the Second World War. In the intervening six decades, they have been found in at least 25 countries.
Over these years, some 5,500 people are officially known to have been killed, and 7,300 maimed by these bombs. But the real death toll is believed to be considerably higher. Virtually all of the confirmed victims were civilians.
Because cluster bombs can lie undetected long after they have been discharged, they are known to continue killing even when a war is over.
In Iraq, a minimum of 50 million sub-munitions have been used in U.S.-led operations between 1991 and 2006. About 3,000 casualties have been identified because of these weapons.
Within Europe, Britain, Germany and France have sought that the future agreement should provide exceptions for their weapons.
Britain, which dropped 755 cluster bombs on Serbia in 1999, was condemned for its stance by members of the European Parliament (MEPs) last week when they approved a formal resolution calling for a total ban on cluster bombs.
"Diplomatic moves by the UK government and others to suggest there are 'dumb' and 'smart' cluster munitions must be given short shrift," said British Liberal MEP Liz Lynne. "They all kill and maim."
Belgium, Norway, Hungary and Austria, on the other hand, have all taken steps to eliminate cluster bombs by introducing moratoria or bans on them.
Mark Hiznay, a specialist in arms issues with Human Rights Watch, said that Russia has also been opposed to international prohibition. Russia has been accused of explicitly targeting civilians in the breakaway republic of Chechnya with cluster bombs.
"Russia has articulated the view that these weapons are critical for it, now that it has downsized the military," he said, adding that Russia has used cluster bombs "extensively both overseas -- in Afghanistan -- and on its own territory in Chechnya."
Hiznay said that cluster bombs are a relic of the Cold War, and Russia should deem them obsolete now that the Soviet Union has been dissolved. This view, he said, is widely shared by military officers.
When arguments are made in favour of cluster bombs, "the military is not able to keep a straight face," he said. "These weapons are 20 to 30 years old, so they would have to get rid of them anyway."
The bombs which Israel dropped on Lebanon last year were made in the 1970s, and their failure rate was "predictably high", Hiznay said.
In the month after the Aug. 14 2006 ceasefire in Lebanon, cluster bombs caused an average of three casualties each day. Two casualties were caused each day on average for the remainder of the year. Many of the victims were simply walking through their village.
© 2007 Inter Press Service



33 Comments so far
Show AllPlease don't ban cluster bombs because we may need them to win the next election!
Punish great patriot Raytheon? In the war of terror, cluster bombs have been used to liberate (permanently) women and children in Afghanistan and Iraq and Americans have jobs. Success!
Not only the next election, how about all those civilians, who just want to live in peace? Why should they have a safe and secure life, the more we can spread these little treasures around the globe, the more powerful the west will become, more feared, more respected as a true benefactor to humanity.
It amazes and astounds me how these leaders can have any defence for such a weapon, long after hostilities have ceased, continue to kill, and injure innocent civilians, the most tragic is when it is children. Israel's use in Lebanon comes to mind, where I read the other day, how a young girl was severely injured by a bomblet. Another example how the average person is viewed by these monsters in power, regardless of the country, who use these weapons.
Cluster bombs are not the only weapon that will kill after a war is over. The DU we have spread over the planet will be kiilling for the next four billion years, ___ or forever.
I'm all for banning cluster bombs, but wish the same efforts were being taken to ban DU use which will kill multi-millions over the next five to ten years.
The US has a history of not signing treaties that would lead to peace or hurt the success of our weapons industry.
Hey, don't forget about mines.
The total bastards in charge of our military and white house tend to resist everything that is fair and good.
It's time for the barbarians to be run out of washington forever - horror to the oligarchy!
It's time for peace on earth, and Dennis Kucinich!
Since everyone they kill or injure is an 'insurgent' or a 'terrorist' it shouldn't really matter.
The United States and Israel are big fans of cluster bombs as they are proven to kill and maim more people than ordinary bombs.
Stories about the effects of cluster bombs ought to be accompanied by photos of the women & children maimed by these vicious weapons. That great Democratic patriot Bill Clinton did not ban the U.S. military from using them. What are the names of the companies that manufacture them? Where are these companies? What are the names of the company officers?
Why is it that "Compassionate Christians" are in favor of Cluster Bombing Children but against the Rights of a Child? It must be their Family Value that they call No Child Left unmaimed. Or unmurdered.
Mines, cluster bombs, DU, nuclear warheads and missiles. Just like the treaties the world has signed to minimize or eliminate these things, the "United" States either abstains or votes no on them all because it would interfere with the profits of the arms industry.
If our fields and backyards were strewn with cluster munitions and some roads and fields were strewn with buried land mines. If half of Joey's little league team was missing hands, legs, eyes and hearing because one of them was shagging a grounder and stepped in the wrong place, perhaps We the People would finally sit up and take notice, but the war industry and their puppets in the Congress and Executive would still ignore or excuse it on some grounds or other. Profits uber alles.
This debate has gone on for decades with no result, because "the big boys" have veto power or the deciding vote, or just plain don't give a damn what the rest of the world says or thinks. It is just business, the bottom line and maximum profit for the minimum outlay.
Pardon me while I puke.
Bobo should know where to find the names of the companies that manufacture cluster bombs. Just look on the list of Hillary's campaign contributors.
We gotta get rid of these sick bastards running this place.
dlnelson...I might add that the US slso has a history of not ADHERING to ANY treaty they have ever signed.
I don't get it. Why all the fuss and resistance to an international ban on cluster bombs?
The U.S. is a signatory to lots of other international agreements, like the Geneva Conventions, U.N. Charter, etc., prohibiting things like torture and wars of aggression. I understand that they are thus supposed to become "supreme law" according to Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. But they don't seem to be much of an inhibiting factor or problem of any real sigificance to the current U.S. administration. So why not just sign this one too and ignore it like all the rest?
Surely the U.S. isn't going to wimp out now and start allowing minor considerations like its obligations under international law to get in the way of its divinely awarded manifest destiny.
I swiped the comment by Arvy (above) and sent it to my local paper. So should you all.
Thanks, Arvy
@motamanx: You're welcome. Thank you for the very nice compliment.
What Would Hitler Do?
The article did not mention that the US has been using the CBU's since at least the late 50's. My first exposure was as an infantry soldier slogging thru the S. VN jungle in 1965, when we began to see "Pineapples" hanging from trees in areas that the USAF had worked over prior to us entering on foot. The CB's tail fin assembly would often catch on a tree limb or branch and the damn nasty things would just be hanging there for who knows how long until the wind or a unsuspecting person disturbed it. They are filled with 100's of pea size pellets that go out in all directions to kill or maim the victim.
The US has still not signed or ratified the landmines treaty, either. Clinton refused to do so on the advice of the military, although a large number of retired generals and admirals had endorsed it. Our Israeli allies are avid users of cluster bombs, too, especially in Lebanon where they killed and maimed thousands of women and children. It's a rich irony that the world's self-appointed guardian of democracy and human rights has such a shameful record and is that the most vociferously, devoutly Christian population on earth rakes in so much cash as the world's leading arms merchant, peddling death and destruction to odious regimes worldwide while singing "Jesus Loves the Little Children" at Sunday school. At least Hitler was upfront about his values.
[welcome back Kem!]
__________________
It's almost as if some 'biblical' sorta thing is going on in the world?
I'm not a Christian, but seem to recall a bit in the bible about the "wheat being sorted from the chaff" - and then the chaff being tossed out to burn, etc.
Elsewhere in the Bible it speaks of the "lukewarm" type of people being "spewed out".
Looking at the world today, I see large groups of people who have (voluntarily) dedicated themselves to creating nothing but HARM to their fellow human beings. Apart from numerous (most?) cruddy politicians, there are the likes of those who have invented countless *diabolic* (devilish) weapons, which do nothing but hurt 'god's children'.
Then it seems there is a huge swath of people who might be termed, 'lukewarm' - in that they are neither this nor that, they just kinda consume [ "Work, Buy, Consume, Die!" ] and, 'take up space on the planet' as a teacher once put it.
Lastly, there are billions of basically good-hearted folk, - those who go through life trying (variously) to help their fellow beings in masses of different ways.
The majority of Common Dreams folks seem to fall into this bracket, alongside everyone from teachers, nurses, cleaners, therapists, artists, writers, social workers, good food suppliers, and a myriad other roles, which are all based on trying to HEAL and HELP, not *hurt* others...
I'm not one to give myself airs of superiority, but those who do so, -the self-righteous religious and political leaders, are, -(to my mind) some of the *least* credible / likely to ever receive any kind of 'heavenly endorsement' -more especially when we see the damage that they and their type so unconscionably inflict upon innocent people right across the planet.
And their endorsement / use of vile cluster bombs is a case in point...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If anyone wants to try to get a handle on *what* or *who* might be considered as Biblical 'wheat or chaff', one can simply ask the question: "If Christ were roaming the USA today, with whom would he most likely align himself and hang out with?"
Patently, he would NOT be endorsing in the slightest the inventors, sellers and deciders involved with cluster munitions, -those who so terribly maim little farming kids, etc, ~ right across the world.
Nope!
Nor would he be backing the loony, egomaniac *evanjello-head* dollar-hungry preachers who prate on about all things phoney, backwards, and upside-down. - More likely he'd get his 'scourge' out, and whip them, - as well as their 'money-lender' high-powered crooked business and politico friends; -right outta the mega-churches, and then out of the country. ~ Maybe right off the planet!
However, any Christ type figure WOULD, -assuredly, be backing all those (internationally) who constantly call for more compassion, and less bitterness, separativeness, less hatred, -and for an end to such wicked, wasteful, and insane warfare in this world.
~ I think that kinda includes most of you lot who read and write here?
Wave: ~ you're on heaven's cameras!
:)
Thank you for the welcome back Un-Common-Dreams. It is fun to be back and am delighted to see you're still here. Where are Siouxrose, Kathyodat, Coco, Paul Smith, Aamon,and so many others? I had trouble logging on Saturday so I wrote an E-mail to the Common Dreams editor and he was able to repair the computer glitch right away.
I hate to say it, for from childhood I was always so proud and thankful to be an American. Not now,____ so many things our government has done worldwide since the end of WW2 is shameful, criminal and outright disgusting. Corrupt and sinful things done prior to that time in history could have been and should have been righted. Any good things accomplished don't come close to outweighng the bad.
As for being the best and most powerful nation, our day wll come and I fear it will not be long in coming.
One sad thng about humanity is, we are really all the same, different tribes but still all the same. Those lines we draw on maps don't really exist, we the people of the world are all the same, all have the same desires of having our children have a fair and decent chance at life. Those we allow to rule or have put into power are not the same. Fear, distrust jealousy and greed cause most of the problems and we as a nation are guilty of those deadly sins.
OOPS, I didn't mean it's sad we are all the same, I mean it is sad we don't treat each other that way and also insure we have leaders who are not crazy.
"dlnelson…I might add that the US slso has a history of not ADHERING to ANY treaty they have ever signed."
I seem to recall some over-adherence to the SEATO, once...
Peanut clusters are the bomb!
"What would have happened if millions of American and British people, struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey [part of the Rockefeller empire] managers shipped the enemy's fuel through neutral Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars' worth of business with the enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan [the Rockefeller family among others?] Or that Ford trucks were being built for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler's communications systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT built the FockeWulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops? Or that crucial balI bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U.S. War Production Board in partnership with Goering's cousin in Philadelphia when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or deliberately ignored?."
Charles Higham, researcher, about U.S.-Nazi collaboration during WWII
Excerpts Trading with the Enemy The Nazi - American Money Plot
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Trading_Enemy_excerpts.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com
What else needs to be said: Its a mad,mad,mad,mad,mad world!!
Kem Patrick: Those lines we draw on maps don't really exist, we the people of the world are all the same, all have the same desires of having our children have a fair and decent chance at life.
I agree; this is the essence of the matter. We are all in the same boat and how someone in our boat is treated, will one way or another affect the rest of us. We're in it together and don't let them divide us!
When it comes to money, too often large businesses, and politicians have no morals, scruples, or conscience, it is all about profits, and whether it is Hitler, or some other despot, the history is there, the proof is there, and it is disgusting. People's lives are of no more value than a piece of tissue paper, thrown into a waste basket by some of these people.
Psychopaths love power, and control, and how they achieve their goals will not be hindered by any human emotions. What is important is that they achieve what they want, and it does not matter who gets hurt or dies. It has nothing to do with capitalism, socialism, communism, it is the people who get into power, and how they use their power to achieve their aims, that is the problem. Too often their goals are about profit, and not the well-being of their fellow citizens.
Killing is our most important product.
libertas fugit, 3:55 pm:
"Mines, cluster bombs, DU, nuclear warheads and missiles. Just like the treaties the world has signed to minimize or eliminate these things, the "United" States either abstains or votes no on them all because it would interfere with the profits of the arms industry."
And let's not forget to mention the Small Arms Agreement, which the US--in the person of John Bolton--singlehandedly prevented. We certainly wouldn't want to trample on the rights of gun-runners and narco-terrorists, would we?
Everyone that has stock in the companies that make murderous devices is as guilty as the manufacturer, the politician, and the pilot who cause them to be deployed.