Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Press Must Remain Proud and Free
Another reason to be smug: Canada is a shining example of press freedom. This country does less to censor the news than all but 17 other nations in the world.
So says Reporters Without Borders, which monitors how the news is strangled and mangled around the globe. In many countries, reporters who cross powerful politicians, business leaders, paramilitary groups or crime syndicates risk being kidnapped, beaten or killed. In others, the censorship is more discreet: laws prohibit full reporting or laws shut down the private press in favour of state-owned media that report only state-sanctioned news.
Eritrea is the worst in the world, according to the annual report released this week. Iceland is the best. Canada is number 18, above the United States (48), France (31) and the United Kingdom (24).
Of course, no international index should be taken too seriously. This one is based on a questionnaire sent to 15 international organizations and more than 100 journalists and press observers. Some will quibble with the questions asked or how they were weighted. Others will question the integrity or knowledge of those who filled out the form.
No doubt many will be offended that the United States, with its celebrated First Amendment, ranked below Nicaragua and Bosnia. (A U.S. blogger was jailed for refusing to turn over photos to police, U.S. courts have ordered several reporters to reveal sources and an Al-Jazeera cameraman is being held at Guantanamo.)
But the trends are clear - and valid. The stable, prosperous countries of northern Europe generally won the highest ratings, and countries at war had the lowest. In Iraq alone, more than 200 reporters and media assistants have been killed since the war began in 2003.
Not quite time to break out the champagne at home, though. The day before the report was released, the Toronto Star revealed that the Prime Minister's Office had plans for a new media centre in Ottawa. At first glance, this appears to be an ego-driven tussle between the Prime Minister and the reporters who cover him.
It is not. The friction between Harper and the parliamentary press gallery is an important issue that goes to the heart of maintaining a free press.
The background: Shortly after he was elected Prime Minister, Stephen Harper tried to change the rules for press conferences at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa, which is controlled by the press gallery. He insisted that his staff be allowed to choose which reporters could ask him questions, instead of the reporters themselves deciding.
It is important to note that this is not a partisan issue. Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin launched the same system outside Ottawa. When he held press conferences with regional reporters while travelling, he insisted his staff call on reporters by name.
The battle over who gets to question the prime minister turned into a feud that created an enduring chill between the Prime Minister's Office and the reporters who regularly cover him.
The Star's Tonda MacCharles reported this week that the Prime Minister's Office asked civil servants to draw up a $2 million plan to renovate a vacant shoe store in downtown Ottawa into a new press conference centre, this one to be controlled by the Prime Minister. The plan has been shelved, at least for now.
This is the system used by the president of the United States - and many other countries. It is a bad one, and here's why.
The real issue is not who gets to ask questions, but what questions get asked.
If Canada adopts the U.S. style, the Prime Minister will be able to call on friendly reporters and avoid reporters who ask difficult, necessary questions.
Most of the world wishes U.S. President George W. Bush had been asked a few more pointed questions before the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. Many wish he could be asked some now.
Questions are not just important, they are fundamental to democracy. Even before writing, publishing or broadcasting, the work of journalists begins with questions. If reporters can't freely question political leaders, press freedom is diminished, and so is democracy.
Canada may be a proud number 18 in the Reporters Without Borders annual index, but it must be vigilant in protecting that freedom.
Kelly Toughill, a former writer and editor, is an assistant professor of journalism at King's College in Halifax.
© Copyright Toronto Star 1996-2007
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



8 Comments so far
Show AllOf relevence here is the CIA's domestic media program, known as Operation Mockingbird. Please read this thread. Its solidly researched, the word illuminatti is never mentioned, and you will be amazed a the quotes at the bottom of the thread. It is from Spartacus/ Education Forum
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmockingbird.htm
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=5142
Jack London wrote over a hundreds years ago in IRON HEEL: "You have forgotten the editors. They draw their salaries for the policy they maintain. Their policy is to print nothing that is a vital menace to the established. The press of the United States? It is a parasitic growth that battens on the capitalist class. Its function is to serve the established by moulding public opinion, and right well it serves it."
Hoa binh
Try denying the holocaust in Canada and you will find out how "free" their press is.
During a plot to overthrow our government by wealthy elite industrialists in 1933, right after Roosevelt started his campaign to spread the wealth with the New Deal, and replace it with a fascist state modeled after Mussolini's this statement was made to General Smedly Butler, two time Medal of Honor recipient, whom the plotters thought would go along with their treasonist act but instead Gen. Butler exposed it:
MacGuire (the front man for the plotters) assured Butler the cover story would work: "You know the American people will swallow that. WE GOT THE NEWSPAPAERS (Caps mine). We will start a campaign that the President's health is failing. Everyone can tell that by looking at him, AND THE DUMB AMERICAN PEOPLE will fall for it in a second…"
Now think about this. This was in 1933 when there were still hundreds of independent newspapers (supposedly) and STILL the elites knew they could fool the "dumb" American people. And if it wasn't for the courage of Butler the plot would have succeeded.
Today the elites don't need to overthrow the White House, their fascist is already in place and the media today is under much more control then they had in 1933.
Most censorship is extralegal, if not illegal. Rich, powerful and well-connected media owners exert pressure on editors and journalists. And anyone who expresses anti-Bush opinions is at risk, as Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame know all too well. Blackmail, intimidation of friends and family of dissenters and other unlawful means are being used. The Congress, including its sitting members currently running for the presidency or reelection, must demonstrate their sincere committment to democracy and human rights by fully and immediately restoring our constitutional liberties, revoking the immunity they have granted to wrongdoers, and holding public hearings.
"FREEDOM of EXPRESSION FOR ALL" is a bedrock essential to democracy.
The importance of 'Freedom of the Press' pales into utter insignificance in comparisn to "FREEDOM of EXPRESSION FOR ALL".
Control of the media and of the "entertainment" industry, in all their various forms, into a very few hands, is extremely dangerous and odious in the extreme. Such control exists in Canada and the US, as in other so-called 'Free and Democratic' societies.
"FREEDOM of EXPRESSION FOR ALL" is greatly feared by those who wish to control. It is feared by all dictators. Thus,it is feared by Harper. It is feared by Bush and by his puppeteer Cheney. It was feared by Stalin and his disciple Sharon.
True "FREEDOM of EXPRESSION FOR ALL" would result in the exposure of the Money Masters, the Cheneys, the Bushes, the media moguls, the Enrons,the Haliburtons, and by the warmongering Pentagon and military-industrial people.
"SonOfPowerslave" cites a classic example.
The freedom of the press is backed by the will of free people, this does create an obligation on the the press to be free of partisanship and censorship. In that the news of the day is important to free people it must be honestly told news otherwise it is of no value.
I also wanted to see the Danish cartoons that caused the followers of the "religion of peace" to riot and kill. But, no American paper would publish them...