Common Dreams NewsCenter

Net Roots Nation

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

China: Three Gorges Dam May Displace Millions More

by Antoaneta Bezlova

Beijing - As a trickle of environmental problems emerging from the Three Gorges dam area steadily grows into a deluge, Chinese authorities have begun weighing plans to relocate several million people to avert an ecological catastrophe.

Breaking with a propaganda tradition of extolling the virtues of the dam, which it likes to present as one of the symbols of China’s rising power, last month Beijing admitted publicly to “hidden dangers” in the massive project.1012 02

The dam, which has created a 640 km-long reservoir on the Yangtze River, suffers from landslides, silting and erosion that could accumulate into an environmental disaster if not quickly fixed, according to experts.

While this view has been upheld by environmentalists and independent observers for years, Beijing had suppressed domestic opposition to the project, focusing instead on the dam’s capacity to control seasonal flooding and generate hydroelectric power. The Three Gorges dam is now producing enough electricity each year to replace 50 million tonnes of polluting coal and reduce China’s carbon emissions by 100m tonnes.

So opponents of the project were duly stunned by Beijing’s surprise admission to the adverse aspects of the dam last month. “If no preventive measures are taken, the project could lead to a catastrophe,” the official Xinhua News Agency quoted Chinese experts speaking at a conference called by the government to discuss the dam issue.

On Friday, in a new development, Xinhua indicated that as many as four million people could be relocated.

About the same time that experts were convening to examine the negative ecological impacts of the project, the government of Chongqing metropolis in the reservoir region was putting forward a blueprint, which outlines the mass relocation of 1.17 million people from the dam area.

The original relocation plans as disclosed by the དst Century Economic Herald’ newspaper, call for the reduction of the reservoir population in order to “ecologically safeguard the dam area and create an important ecological barrier inside the Yangtze River basin”.

The resettlement, which local leaders want to complete by 2020, would bring the total number of people displaced by the Three Gorges project to 5.3 million.

Instead of moving people uphill to new land, the municipality of Chongqing — a large urban sprawl on the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, is planning to absorb uprooted farmers into the city proper and transform them into city dwellers. By giving up their land rights, relocated farmers would be allowed to apply for social security of urban dwellers.

“This second relocation programme will integrate the transfer of rural labour force into the urbanisation and industrialisation process,” Miu Wei, an official with Chongqing Development and Reform Commission was quoted by the paper as saying.

Beijing approved the relocation plan this week, lauding it as a step of “great importance to the environmental protection of the Three Gorges reservoir area”.

But the attempt to present the new resettlement as part of an accelerated urbanisation process has made some environmental observers doubt the motives behind it.

“Urbanisation has received the public’s nod and everybody sees it as part of China’s modernisation. Uprooting from the land and forcible relocation however, could be socially very sensitive,” said one Chinese expert who spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing reprisals in the tense weeks ahead of the Party Congress beginning Oct. 15.

“This second proposed resettlement raises more questions than it answers,” agrees Grainne Ryder, policy director of Probe International, Canada-based environmental advocacy organisation, in an e-mail reply to IPS questions.

“Behind this environmental and public safety rationale, there could be more land grabbing by Party officials in the works, by government officials and their cronies who want to ‘develop’ rural areas as tourist destinations, for their personal benefit, nothing to do with protecting the environment.”

Curiously, the disclosure of the relocation plans come shortly after Chongqing municipality and Chengdu, the adjacent capital of Sichuan province, were awarded the much coveted inside the country status of a “new special experimental zone”, which allows them to benefit from central funds and preferential policies. Perhaps even more importantly in a country with scarce land resources like China, it gives them a freer hand in making decisions on land management and urban planning.

As conversion of farming land has been strictly regulated in recent years and Beijing has cracked down on violators, only few controlled locations like the special zones have been legally allowed greater freedom to expand.

Chengdu has already taken tentative steps in this direction. It has recently relocated 33,000 peasants from their land, clearing it to build what it has termed a new “green” commercial-residential town, The East Mountain.

Chongqing too, needs more land and funds as it struggles to tackle the legacy of the Three Gorges Dam. The city is by some reckonings the biggest urban sprawl in the world, customarily described in China as a “village within the city”.

Since its elevation as China’s fourth centrally-administered municipality ten years ago, it has grown phenomenally, sucking in millions of rural poor at a rate of two million migrants a year.

The urbanisation rate though, remains low and local leaders fret about the rise of slums. Chongqing has a population of 31 million, 80 percent of whom still live in rural areas. The social makeup is also reflected in the grossly uneven GDP growth. While some of Chongqing’s 40 county-level administrative districts are booming, others are merely scraping by.

The construction of the controversial dam, which began in 1993, involved a much criticised at home and abroad forced relocation of 1.3 million people. This first batch of farmers, whose homes were inundated by the rising waters of the dam, was resettled locally by moving them to new land at a higher altitude or promising them jobs in the vicinity of the dam.

But the relocation process was beset with problems and marred by corruption and fraud scandals. In their latest report from January 2007 Chinese auditors said they believed some 37 million US dollars has been embezzled from funds earmarked for resettling residents displaced by the project.

Displaced people soon found out there was little unused land in the dam area and only few of the promised jobs materialised as more and more of the region’s obsolete industrial enterprises were declared defunct.

“In the end, more than one million people ended up roaming the mountain and hillside regions, which we now see has created a serious damage on the environment and caused grave soil erosion,” the 21st Century Economic Herald quoted Zhang Xueliang, a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference in Chongqing, as telling the Chongqing meeting.

“There has never been a proper assessment of the first resettlement, the total cost to people and the economy,” says Ryder. “Without honest appraisal of Three Gorges resettlement to date, local officials are in the dark recommending this second move, and will likely provoke more conflict and social unrest.”

(*This story is part of a series of features on sustainable development by IPS-Inter Press Service and IFEJ-International Federation of Environmental Journalists.)

© 2007 Inter Press Service

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

12 Comments so far

  1. colbalt October 12th, 2007 5:03 pm

    If “the scientists/experts” can’t even predict the environmental damage from a large dam, how can they foresee the impact of something as complex as genetic engineering- gm foods, etc?

  2. PolarBearLady October 12th, 2007 7:24 pm

    What the heck are they thinking?? I think the Chinese communist government is either heartless, completely ignorant, arrogant, greedy or all of the above.

    What the heck are they thinking?? Not only will this insane Three Gorges Dam ruin the environment, it will probably wipe out the few innocent fish left in the very polluted Yangtze River. In addition, thousands of innocent Chinese people will be probably thrown into extreme hardship.

    What the hell are is the Chinese government thinking???!

  3. kengarjagalouski October 12th, 2007 9:25 pm

    PolarBearLady:
    eighty five thousand million thousand watts of electricity..

    which will light several 100 watt light bulbs..
    ‘n run a hair dryer or two..
    ken

  4. jungleboy October 12th, 2007 10:13 pm

    What is really sad is that the many enviromental studies that have been done on the area before the building of the dam had been completely ignored by the government. Peter Matthiesen in the ‘Birds of Heaven’ said with his compatriots, that the herons that land seasonally in the area, many of the species, are facing extinction before the dams’ completion, destroying the cleanliness of the area and restricting the water flow can only make it worse and leave less habitat. This is one of the biggest dams in the world. I don’t really know if any are bigger.

  5. Jian October 12th, 2007 10:23 pm

    Moving out the indigenous people, the so called peasants, from the land, we uproot its guardians and when the urban lose touch with nature it is easily usurped by the unconscionable as is anything that we don’t attend to.

  6. weiji2001 October 12th, 2007 11:10 pm

    The reality is that China’s “central” government can barely govern its regional governments. What really happens beyond Beijing and Shanghai is anybody’s guess, so little is the accountability and transparency of local leaders.

    The only practical solution for China is to split into 3 to 5 autonomous regions, each with its own central government. And also to give up its imperialistic expansionist plans to annex Taiwan, part of India, and several disputed islands.

  7. swampus October 13th, 2007 1:31 am

    Is it just me or has there been a dramatic increase in the use of the phrase “communist China” in the mainstream media (TV) in recent weeks?

  8. RadicalConfucian October 13th, 2007 4:28 am

    In Mencius Book 1 ch. 3 Mencius describes the basics of benevolent government. It is intstructive to see how far the current communist leadership has strayed from this age-old Confucian ideal:

    不違農時,穀不可勝食也。數罟不入洿池,魚鼈不可勝食也。斧斤以時入山林,材木不可勝用也。穀與魚鼈不可勝食,材木不可勝用,是使民養生喪死無憾也。養生喪死無憾,王道之始也。五畝之宅,樹之以桑,五十者可以衣帛矣。雞豚狗彘之畜無失其時,七十者可以食肉矣。百畝之田,勿奪於時,數口之家可以無饑矣。謹庠序之教,申之以孝悌之義,頒白者不負戴於道路矣。七十者衣帛食肉,黎民不饑不寒。然而不王者,未之有也。

    If you do not defy the agricultural seasons, it will be impossible to eat all the grain. If fine-meshed nets do not enter the pools, it will be impossible to eat all the fish and turtles. If axes enter the mountain forests according to the season, it will be impossible to make use of all the wood. If it is impossible to eat all the grain, fish, and turtles, and it is impossible to use all the wood, this makes the people take care of the living and mourn the dead without regret. Taking care of the living and mourning the dead without regret is the beginning of the Way of Kings.

    Let households with five mu be planted with mulberry, and fifty-year-olds will be able to wear silk. Let chickens, pigs, and dogs be raised without missing their season, and seventy-year-olds will be able to eat meat. Do not deprive fields of one hundred mu during their season, and families with several mouths will be able to go without hunger. Pay attention to what the schools teach, expand it to include the duty to be filial and brotherly, and those whose hair is turning gray will not carry loads in the road. There has never been a ruler whose seventy-year-olds wore silk and ate meat and whose common people were neither hungry nor cold, and yet did not practice kingship

  9. RadicalConfucian October 13th, 2007 5:38 am

    swampus and wishfulthinker,
    I also sensitive to China bashing in the american MSM and in political circles. We should not follow the Orwellian strategy of “finding a perpetual enemy” in the “despotic orient”. However, as critical thinkers we should call it like it is…China is a communist run country..and there are many atrocious human rights abuses/and animal rights (herons are not expendable)…so don’t be too sympathetic to the Red Star in the East. What we should try to do as Westerners is better inform ourselves of China’s traditional systems of thought and try to implement some of these ideas in our own political maelstrom in hopes of improvement. For instance, if we can quote Confucius with ease, then our criticisms of current Chinese policies will look less like “China bashing” and more like informed critique.

  10. catseyes October 13th, 2007 4:43 pm

    I think that is why we are seriously fucked… Unless the west stops its corporate imperial ambitions (big fat fucking chance, unless something huge happens soon in the “free” world), the rest of the world will try to counter, as their choice is either to be economic slaves or try to show europeans they can crush and pillage like the best of them.

    When resources run out and the environement/food chain collapses the whole thing is gonna come down like a deck of cards and the real “fun” can begin. Oh yeah doom and gloom blablabla, i dont think people realize how fucked we are.

  11. brianct October 15th, 2007 3:20 am

    Its called ‘devilopment’ and its what people have been led to believe they really want, by those who control our destiny.

  12. brianct October 15th, 2007 3:23 am

    Note, china is NOT a communist nation any more. Its a capitalist one, but one that is politically like its inperialist past. Just as soviet russia turned into a neo= tsardom.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org