Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraqis Sue Blackwater for Baghdad Killings
Blackwater USA is facing a lawsuit over the September 16 killings in Baghdad's Nisour Square. The largest mercenary company working for the US State Department in Iraq, Blackwater may soon need more lawyers on its payroll than it has armed operatives in Baghdad.
Even before its operatives opened fire on a crowded Baghdad street in mid-September, allegedly killing seventeen Iraqi civilians and wounding twenty-four others, Blackwater faced two wrongful death lawsuits in the United States stemming from its activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, a federal investigation into arms smuggling accusations and a mounting Congressional inquiry. Now the stakes have gotten even higher for the politically connected mercenary firm.
The families of three Iraqis killed in the Nisour Square shootings have filed a major lawsuit in a US federal court in Washington, DC, against Erik Prince's firm, charging that Blackwater's actions amounted to "extra-judicial killing" and "war crimes." The case was filed by veteran lawyer Susan Burke in conjunction with the Center for Constitutional Rights and attorney Shereef Hadi Akeel.
"Blackwater's repeated and consistent failure to act in accord with the law of war, US law and international law harms our nation and it harms Iraq," says CCR president Michael Ratner. "For the good of both nations, as well as for countless innocent civilians, the company cannot be allowed to continue operating extra-legally, providing mercenaries who flout all kinds of law." The suit is believed to be the first US case brought by Iraqi civilians against a private armed military company, though Burke is also suing the US contracting firms Titan and CACI for their alleged role in the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib.
The three Iraqis named in the lawsuit who were killed on September 16--Oday Ismail Ibraheem, Himoud Saed Atban and Usama Fadhil Abbass--had fourteen children among them, one an infant, according to Burke. "Needless to say, we are very interested in holding this company accountable and in pursuing the lawsuit vigorously," she said. Another plaintiff, Talib Mutlaq Deewan, was injured during the incident. The lawsuit "seeks punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish Erik Prince and his Blackwater companies for their repeated callous killing of innocents."
The suit comes just days after the Iraqi government released its official report on the Nisour Square shooting. In the report, Baghdad calls on US authorities to hand over the Blackwater shooters to be prosecuted in Iraqi courts. The government also wants Blackwater to pay $8 million to each of the seventeen victims' families, totaling $136 million, an amount the government report says is warranted "because Blackwater uses employees who disrespect the rights of Iraqi citizens even though they are guests in this country." Iraq backed off initial demands that the company immediately leave the country, saying it wanted Washington to sever all contracts with Blackwater within six months.
Blackwater and the State Department have both shrugged off the Iraqi investigation, saying that judgment should be withheld until the official US investigation is complete. But that process has already proven to be severely compromised. Not only did a Blackwater contractor write the State Department's initial report on the incident on official government stationary; many witnesses have not been interviewed, and vehicles containing forensic evidence have not been secured even though the investigation is wrapping up, according to CBS News. "A lot of that evidence has been destroyed," retired military analyst Col. Steve Lyons told the network.
Burke says she filed the lawsuit after being approached by some of the victims' families. Her legal team in Baghdad has already begun gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses. The lawsuit alleges that at the time of the Nisour Square shootings, Blackwater was no longer protecting a State Department official, having already dropped off the official under its protection prior to arriving in the square. "We allege that Blackwater personnel were not provoked, and that they had no legitimate reason to fire on civilians," says Burke. "We look forward to forcing Blackwater and Mr. Prince to tell the world under oath why this attack happened, particularly since a Blackwater guard tried to stop his colleagues from indiscriminately firing." Shortly after the incident, a US official told the Washington Post that at least one Blackwater operative at the scene "drew a weapon on his colleagues and screamed for them to 'stop shooting,' " indicating that even Blackwater personnel thought the situation had spiraled out of control.
The suit contains seven counts against Prince and Blackwater. Two of them, war crimes and extra-judicial killing, are being brought under the Alien Tort Statute, which allows for litigation in US courts for violations of fundamental human rights committed overseas. The other five counts are wrongful death; assault and battery; negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent hiring, training and supervision. Attorney Burke says this case is bigger than the four plaintiffs she is representing. Ultimately, through legal discovery, she wants to expose what the suit alleges is a pattern wherein "excessive and unnecessary use of deadly force by [Blackwater] employees is not investigated or punished in any way."
"We are going to get at the internal corporate files, the e-mails, the memos to expose the corporate culture that is leading to all this death and destruction in Iraq," Burke says. "What these Iraqi families are doing is a civil service to all Iraqis because they don't want anyone else to be killed by Blackwater."
Jeremy Scahill is the author of the New York Times bestseller Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He is currently a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow at the Nation Institute.
Copyright © 2007 The Nation
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


11 Comments so far
Show AllBlackwater has to be stopped. I posted a short dialogue I had with one of their "employees" a couple days ago. This same person was a customer of mine again last night and I spoke with him and his "boss" at length. One must understand, these people are radical Christians and fully believe this is a "holy" war. Why they feel they need over $1,000 per day to fight a holy war I'm not quite sure but nevertheless, it's a holy war if you ask them. It feels almost surreal to be plying people like this with alcohol (I'm a bartender) in order to better understand their motives. The two I've met are SCARY, let me be clear on that! They hate ALL muslims and think Timothy McVeigh is a hero. Their answer for everything is at the end of a gun.
The conversation turned ugly when the regular customer whom I've spoken with about politics on several occassions, explained that I was a "liberal" and follower of Marx. His "boss" spat out the word "liberal" like he had just been told I was Al Queda. They then went on a diatribe of how Obama or Clinton will be assassinated if they are elected! Oh yeah, they firmly believe Obama is a muslim mole! This is the mentality you are dealing with, be afraid, be very afraid.
Oh yeah, I forgot to add this tidbit. We had an inicident in the parking lot at work a couple months ago where a group of 20 somethings were threatened with a gun in the parking lot after an altercation with another patron. The blackwater guy admitted to me that it was in fact him that threatened them after they had supposedly threatened him physically. These guys are loose cannons and they are among us already...
Searing indictments are welcome, but companies like these are well fortified. They'll receive a mild wrist slap from any so-called regulatory agency in the majority of cases. This is a good way to attack organized crime however.
re kristina40:
did either of your patrons personally threaten to assassinate obama and/or clinton, or was it idle speculation? it seems to me that the latter might be just the usual barstool bs, but the former is something the secret service would surely be interested in. we're agreed blackwater must be stopped, maybe this is a way in. i can see the headlines---"bush's hired killers for christ held in assassination plot."
I understand Ken Starr was hired by Blackwater. He wants a change of venue from State to Federal court. you can read about this by searching -Blackwater Ken Starr-
The next contract - no bid if possible- will just be ramped up to cover the legal cost and fines.
They need to include jail for each person who shoots a civilian and for the boss for not having correct safety procedures in place.
Is there any law or justices left in the United States of Israel,by which any Iraqi could hope to get even a hearing, let alone the right to cross examine, and obtain evidence. I would wish that the plaintiffs to the current Blackwater incident will get every chance. However Mr Bush only has to say "they are all enemy combatants" and have every one of them can be locked away without any recourse. And that is if they are "citizens" of the US. As Iraqi nationals, their rights of appeal and argument would be slim. To Guantanamo with each of them. Every male Iraqi over the age of 12 (puberty, sort of), of no importance to the USI, is a terrorist, and according to the Bush Torture and Occupation Bible, they are to be exterminated. So naturally all those suing could be counter-sued as terrorists. I would expect the plaintiffs to be fortunate to escape with their lives.
The terrorist USI occupation acknowledges no code of practice of treatment of prisoners, and no standands of treatment non-USI citizens. Best practices so far are torture, bombing and depleted Uranium. In Vietnam, agent orange was best practice. Unfortunately there are no standards to hold the behaviour of Blackwater and the US occupation up against. And the USI justice , which mediates for the rich and powerful, do not want any precedents by setting any standard of care for victims of their wars. The only courts of law jurisdiction of any relevance, might be international and the UN, which the USI does not recognize. The costs of reparations of any real meaning would bankrupt the USI for generations. Only a world wide trade embargo could make them stick. The only weapon the plaintiffs have is the wish of the US to avoid bad publicity. Regardless of the course of injustice, the USI media will keep it out of the news.
hazmat, no, they alluded to it but didn't threaten to do so themselves directly. I like the headline though...
Kistina, when I started describing BushCo as Nazis a few years ago, all the "responsible liberals" -- like Barney Frank in another context -- rolled their eyes, "That's the sort of talk that turns people off." These are thugs & killer with just enough apocalypse-juice poured in the cocktail of money & bloodlust to fuel their drive to fascism.
"ne must understand, these people are radical Christians and fully believe this is a "holy" war. Why they feel they need over $1,000 per day to fight a holy war I'm not quite sure but nevertheless, it's a holy war if you ask them."
What's so holy to a neo-crusader as cash? As for most traditional Americans, getting rich proves to them that God's on their side.
It gets better, today he was back in and wants me to WORK for Blackwater...Can't you just picture, crazy, Wiccan, liberal me working for them? I need a drink...maybe three.
"holy war" seems like the ultimate oxymoron.