EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
Popular content
Today's Top News
'The War'? I'm Sticking to 'Law and Order'
Documentary filmmaker Ken Burns may have done Latinos a favor: By initially excluding Latinos from his production of The War and grudgingly tacking afterthoughts on African- and Latino-Americans to his series, he has caused a chill to flash through our community that reminds us of our most basic truth: Things for Latinos in the twenty-first century are not good enough for us to be complacent.
The statistics bear this out: There are 41,926,302 million Latinos in the United States.
- 45% of Latino children under age 18 live in poverty (4,181,320 children);
- 30-35% drop out of high school;
- 20% of our students leave high school without a diploma or GED;
- Latinos account for 90% of all immigrant dropouts;
- In California, one of the few states for which there are available statistics, only 24.4% of the college-age youth are in college.
Latinos lag behind every other group in college graduation:
- 57 % completed a bachelor's degree.
- Only 28 % of those initially enrolled part-time finished a bachelor's degree.
Few Latinos have attained post-graduate degrees, a fact attributed to the low rate of college graduation: In California in 2000 Latinos comprised more than 30% of the state's population, but they were only 4.8% of the state's physician supply. Only 4.2% of new PhDs in history (my own field) in 2007 are Latino. I cannot tell you how many Latinos have earned PhDs in all fields. When I was in grad school, I heard it that 2% of all PhDs were Latino but I have not been able to find a credible statistic.
Was Burns merely thoughtless? Or did he ignore two major racial and ethnic majorities in the United States intentionally, (he also overlooked African-Americans) steeling himself for the firestorm that was sure to follow?
My father was fishing off a pier in San Francisco when he heard the news of Pearl Harbor. He enlisted in the Navy but was rejected because he was asthmatic. Not one to be deterred, he turned around and signed up with the Merchant Marines who ran the Liberty ships that carried supplies to our troops. He went down twice; the second time; the injuries were so critical that he was in a coma for months. When he left the hospital, he had a metal plate atop his skull where bone used to be. When he passed away, the Stars and Stripes adorned his casket. Folded, it now sits in my mother's dining room along with his service medals and photos.
I remember standing next to my father during at a baseball game, singing the Star-Spangled Banner with him, our hands over our hearts, and I could see the tears in his eyes. What was behind those tears? Nothing that he would ever tell us about. Like most people who went to war, he had little to say about it. My dad was a deeply emotional person. I am sure that the memories of the war and his injuries were part of the emotion but when he would try to describe what he saw and experienced, he would get choked up and the tears would start. There was no doubt in our minds that he had beheld horrors unimaginable to us in our safe, clean, American city. My father was not one to dwell on the discrimination Latinos suffered. His had done his duty as any patriotic American had.
With only a couple of exceptions, all of my father's friends in the mixed Salvadoran-émigré and Mexican-American community that I grew up with in San Francisco were World War II veterans: at least one was a former prisoner of war.
I'm Latina, middle-aged, and quite used to being invisible. Whether it's television, the movies or real life, I see many white people, some black, but rarely, a Latino/a. Nevertheless, Ken Burns' snub of Latino soldiers and sailors who fought in World War II cannot be borne in silence.
My father passed away eight years ago but I have been trying to imagine what his response would have been to the latest post-Brown v. Board of Education, post-Bakke, post-La Raza, post-Civil Rights Movement, and post-Farm Workers Ken Burns epic. I think he would shrug- off Burns as being ignorant. In my opinion, Burns' lack of knowledge about the pervasive, persistent effects of discrimination against Latinos is deliberate.
According to Ken Burns, he intended to depict the effect of the war on four towns, to get a sense of what American's suffered as a people, but that he was not trying to be comprehensive. So he picked four basically white venues. Why not include a Southwest town where the majority was Latino? Or for that matter, why not a mostly African-American town in Mississippi or Alabama? Or one that had both populations? Would it have been too much work to deal with the complexities of white American heroes who also happened to be bigots? Why not pick four vets from New York City where there are American veterans of all colors? How universal is a story that ignores some 30% of the population? Perhaps his next project should be on the desegregation of the Armed Forces; one that explicitly teases out the themes of heroism, racism, bigotry, and power in the military.
The invisibility of Latinos in a project such as The War contributes to society's unawareness of the real roles played by Latinos in America. We are not all "illegals," farm workers, busboys or factory workers who go to work daily in fear that "La Migra" will swoop down and deport us. Some have served bravely on foreign battlefields and died for our country.
I would not watch The War. If Burns cannot see the many Latino soldiers, sailors, and Marines who fought and died in World War II, he need not look for us in his audiences either.
Rosa Maria Pegueros (pegueros@uri.edu) is an associate professor of Latin American History and Women's Studies at the University of Rhode Island.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

31 Comments so far
Show Allezeflyer wrote: "Instead of dividing us into latinos, blacks and whites, why not just say Americans."
Because nobody should have to forget their history, their culture, not just the injuries their communities have suffered but the accomplishments too, in order to be an American. If other Americans long ago chose to be content with generic American history and culture, that's their right. But please don't expect Latinos, Native people, African or Asian Americans, or for that matter the Amish or the Hutterites, to do the same. And please don't look down on them when they find it necessary to speak out about injustices they continue to face because of their allegiance to their family, community, culture, and history. This doesn't make them un-American.
57% of Latinos complete bachelor's degrees? That seems pretty good to me. I think the statistic for American society as a whole is something like a quarter to a third.
"According to Ken Burns, he intended to depict the effect of the war on four towns, to get a sense of what American's suffered as a people, but that he was not trying to be comprehensive. So he picked four basically white venues"
We Euro-americans learn that non-racism consists in treating blacks, latinos, asian-americans fairly WHEN they come to our notice; but being unconsciously exclusive is itself racist -- i.e., "we'll treat you as one of us until you 'make trouble'" by calling attention to racially-based inequities. Therefore, the majority of whites respond to all critique of this training as if personally attacked. We are the links in the grid, which our racist training renders invisible to us.
Well, I want to see a segment devoted to poor farmboys from Alabama. Yeah, that's right! I want a segment that says this boy was from a farm in Kentucky--that one from Alabama--we could call the segment "White crackers and those with a 1/4 of Creek Indian blood." This farm boy's grandparents were from Wales--that one had ancestors from Scotland. Now the bloody Irish will scream, if we don't include them!!!
The Blacks have a beef because they were sequestered into a separate unit because of their skin color--they were not allowed to be all in it together. But did they make someone with a name like Sanchez join a seperate unit? Not to my knowledge--I could be wrong. If they did, then they should point out "the fighting Pancho Villas" or whatever they called their unit--maybe Lantinos for Juarez--as I find Juarez more of a hero-type--but then, lantino NOT from Mexico would probably have objected to such a name. But I tink they were all lumped in together with the soldiers from everywhere else, weren't they--yankees from Chicago, Indians from out west? They were all seen as so much cannon fodder. A German bullet didn't care if your ancestors were from Wales, Scotland, or Venezuela--you were just as dead if it hit you. If an AMERICAN of latino descent (and what is with the "latino"moniker anyway--doesn't that just signify that you were conquored by the Conquistidors from Spain?) joined the army, I'm sure he got the same crappy treatment as the rest of the GIs--and whoopti-friggin-do, the VA will give you a flag when they die. They asked me if we wanted one after my father's death. Why should I want that???? He did what he thought was right when he fought in the Pacific because he was AN AMERICAN. Dave Dellinger was a pacisfist who went to jail. Frankly, I've just as much respect for his not going into the military. He went to jail because he did not believe in war. BE AN AMERICAN first and foremost whatever you choose. Any latino who joined the military then should be prasied for being an American who fought for his country. Or I suggets we need to do segments on everyone who has a different heritage--racially and culturally. Maybe we need to do a segment on the Greek Americans, the Italian Americans, the Czech Americans, the German Americans, and yes, there were a lot of Japanese Americans who fought in that war. Get over it--shhhhsh!
there are thirteen congressional medal of honors given to hispanics in w.w.2 sevearl of them born in mexico. good for the hispanics demanding that their sacrifice by acknowledged. others could have demanded the same. burns is nothing but a film maker.
"...Burns lack of knowledge about the pervasive, persistent effects of discrimination against Latinos is deliberate."
Professor Pegueros, I'm a white guy, so maybe what I have to say is already suspect, but "deliberate" - I don't think so. Not deliberate as in having made a conscious decision not to know about the effects of discrimnation, but sadly unconcious because it is inbred, part of our acculturation as white guys of a certain age.
Excellent article. Thanks, Professor.
I really do not understand the surprise over Ken Burns ignoring of the non-European parts of American history. He is Euro-American, and he grew up in a world of White privilege. Plus he makes documentaries for a corporate controlled "Public" Broadcasting System that barely acknowledges anyone not of West European descent.
He is a part of the system, so why be surprised?
And should the people be outraged? Yes! Because, Latinos, African-Americans, East-Euro-Americans, and the Native Americans, plus the Japanese- and Chinese-, etc. -Americans are when they are acknowledged at all, are treated to a display of West-European "White" condescension.
Why are all these people dropping out of school? And are they trying to blame other people for the fact that they chose to drop out?
What are people thinking when they choose not to complete school? Do they think there will be good jobs awaiting them?
Maybe they don't have bachelor's degrees because they never finished high school.
I'm sorry, but I don't see how a white boy being up to his ass in mud in the jungles of the Philipines (putting quinine in his drinking water trying to keep from getting maleria) felt all that privileged. Let's face it, if you are white and poor, you are no different than anyone else who is poor, Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot when he came to that realization and began to preach it. Knowledge can be dangerous.
I used to work with a bunch of doctors who treated patients at the V.A. "They're nothing but a bunch of drunks." I heard that constantly from those doctors. "We're just spending tax dollars on drunks." They would say. Naturally, this pissed me off. "If you had seen what those guys have seen, and done what many of them have had to do, you would probably drink a lot, too!" I told them, as I tried to shame them--but chickenhawk doctors who get to go to medical school INSTEAD OF TO WAR often have no idea of what veterans go through and it is hard to shame them. I say stop with the white/black/latino crap and just work to improve the lot of all of these people who have been injured by these god-awful wars. We just spent 300 comments on another Burns site trying to pop the baloon which glorifies war and tries to sucker young people into it. Yeah, go on. Fly the baloons, send up airplanes that write LATINOS WON WAR WAR II AREN'T THEY BRAVE AND WONDERFUL!. Maybe lots of Latino kids will get a patriotic rush and run down to join up. I hope not. But glorifying war can't lead to anything good. In my opinion, this article stinks and is a red herring. We know Latinos will fight, hell dubya is offering many of them citizenship if they will fight in this war. The question becomes: what are you fighting for? Who are you willing to kill to get a citzenship paper???? The very statistics this articles gives regarding drop-out rates, poverty rates, etc. for Latinos make them easier prey for military recruiters: citizenship, sign-on bonuses, etc. One last thing Latino young people need is for war to be glorified and that they feel they have some sort of macho image to live up to.
I just want to agree with everything holymoly said. Well done.
Me too. Do we always have to have a SPECIAL mention, like "and by the way, some of these people were black, or women, or ________"? Can't they just be people?
I haven't watched much the show because I don't like the glorification of war. and I don't particularly like the "greatest generation". The ones who brought us the conservative, hypocritical 50's. I don't see why living thrugh the war makes them so great. They had no choice!
I personally think that the Baby Boomers are the greatest generation- they have made a huge difference in how many people live (myself included) and have made protesting war a normal thing to do.
Maybe if more people like that had been around in the years before WWII they would have brought the Nazi atricities to peoples' attention BEFORE a war was started!
Thank you for raising my consciousness. I completely missed the exclusion of Latinos in the TV series.
As a historian, I must agree with Rosa and go beyond what she said and label Burns a propagandist.
I apologize for writing when I am angry. I make too many typo's and spelling errors. I'm going to have to start pulling up the word processor and pasting into this editor--but sometimes I am so angry, I just fire off.
Thanks for the feedback and for bearing with the errors. I'd much rather people emphasize Hispanic/Latino writers or music. I, for one, even like to hear Julio Iglesias sing his old songs from 25 years ago--you know, "Soy, de un lugar donde viento...se calma llegar??? I think, if I remember correctly?- --"you know the REALLY OLD ALBUM where he has a straw hat on and he has a straw in his mouth? and I was thinking he looked sexy hot in a cowboy kind of way-- And then there was the other one I had just called "Soy"-I love that music--but it sounds Spanish "country" if there can be such a thing so a lot of people probably don't like it. Of course, I like his more modern stuff too, but there is something about those albums I really, really, like. Nostalgia, I think. I knew I had listened to that album too many times when my dad (yeah, the WWII veteran) was shaving one morning, and he started singing "mi amor es mas joven que yo..." abentmindedly--and he didn't know a word of Spanish!!! Yep! I thought, as a young woman giggling in the other room, "I've listen to old Julio one too many times in this house when my dad is singing in Spanish!
Ken Burns is a sweet little white lapdog obedient to the corporate masters that keep PBS funded. His version of Lewis and Clark was another racist historical whitewash.
The release of a WWII documentary at this time is a veiled attempt to legitimize America's current war crimes and generate respect for Amerika's imperial military.
WWII was also about oil.
Rosa, I hope you realise that by making such a big deal about being Latino that you actually are acting in contrary to progression of true race equality.
This article is not progressive, it is divisive. You are just continuing to highlight the divide between people of different backgrounds.
Your article is full of ethnic generalizations; I am surprised that commondreams decided to post it.
You just seem insecure about your own ethnicity.
Who picks a fight with Ken Burns? The guy wouldn't hurt a fly.
I think it's just sad that so many Latinos and native americans feel compelled to join the military because of the lack of opportunities for them. They are chewed up and spit out and not even appreciated for their service.
CLARIFICATION:
The statistic of 57% graduating from college means 57% OF THOSE WHO STARTED COLLEGE.
As for the privilege of standing waist-high in swamps with leeches, etc. The point is that when you are excluded from something that is considered a rite of passage, such as fighting for your country in a war, it sets you apart and deprives you of respect from and privileges among your peers. The mere fact that Latino and Black men fought for our country and then are "included" in a documentary without being recognized is disrespectful on its face. I don't make these rules and mores: They exist and to deny that is absurd.
"Your article is full of ethnic generalizations; I am surprised that commondreams decided to post it."
NAME ONE.
JConrad: Great post.
http://www.cafepress.com/warposter/23098
I'm married to a Hispanic female, therefore my daughter is 50% Hispanic, so I have some empathy to all the discussion. That said, one cannot tell a good story and be an encyclopedia. Burns tried to tell the story of WW II because a recent survey of HS seniors revealed only 50% even knew who we fought in the war and these results went acoss all racial lines.
So maybe the documentary wasn't perfect, but at least he tried to tell the nation what happened. I applaud him.
T Comer
And referring to Burns as a corporate lapdog is insane.
He's an outspoken critic of the Bush administration and his documentary clearly showed a war that had to be fought in contrast to one going on today that didn't.
T Comer
Instead of dividing us into latinos, blacks and whites, why not just say Americans.
To holymoly:
Conquistadors did not conquer the ancestors of our Latino/a U. S. citizens -- those were the populations of the native civilizations of the Americas (Aztecs, Incas, etc.)-- they were victims of a campaign of "Christian" enslavement and genocide. Three centuries later it was warmongering U.S. imperialists, in the process of stealing one third of Mexico's territory (primarily for the purpose of expanding Dixie's slave economy), who dispossessed the people who remain a neglected, often oppressed minority in "the land of the free." Yet they have enlisted to fight in all U.S.A. wars in numbers well in excess of their proportion of the overall population. Is this because of patriotism, or due to lack of opportunity in our (their) society? This is just one of the questions that a comprehensive and careful study of any of our many wars should address. Ken Burns is an inspired artist, storyteller, and historian on his way to becoming an American institution; however, he and his team are certainly not above criticism.
I don't think Ezeflyer meant that people should forget their heritage. It's just so contradictory that people want to be treated as equals and then when they are, they complain that they weren't recognized as different!
It's like me wanting to be a prize fighter even though I'm a woman,wanting to be treated just like everybody else and be given the same opportunities everybody else has. Say I fight a really good fight and they talk about it just like they would anyboby else's prizefight. Then I go and say "Hey, you didn't mention that I'm a WOMAN"! You can't have it both ways. Do you want people to always treat you as "different", with all that that entails, or not?
Absolutamente Meredoo.
This isn't about being recognized as different. It's about being recognized at all, or rendered invisible. If there were a bunch of women who struggled to make it as prizefighters, an arena I assume is mostly male-dominated, and then Ken Burns did a documentary about prizefighters featuring men only, leaving out any mention of these women, I'd say they were *not* being treated as equal.
From what I understand, the country had much fewer Hispanic immigrants back in the 40's. Immigration has come in "waves" with most of the immigrants before 1950 coming from Europe.
Perhaps there just weren't many Hispanic soldiers back then!
I understand the author's feelings, but I don't think that this particular docmentary is a good example of exclusion. It appears that she is justifiably angry about people thinking poorly about Hispanic immigrants and ignoring their contributions.
So I basically agree with you, ronwaniente. This is sort of like documenting prizefighting back in the 40's and getting mad because no women were mentioned.
It would be one thing if there were tons of Latinos in the U.S. and therefor in the military at the time. But I don't think there were!http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1999/3/99.03.01.x.html
Even the author's own father wasn't in the military.
I have not watched much of the show but I did see Asian Americans mentioned in just the half hour I watched. I don't think this is a good example of a white man purposefully excluding the accomplishments of another group.
Heart,
1) 'Latino'
that fundamentally is an ethnic generalization
the point was that true equality doesn't distinguish the difference
this type of hyperactive racial insecurity writing makes progressives look petty
"The War" is just being used as a segue into the nteenth manifestation of the same "I am latino and feel latinos are treated unjustly" poli sci deadline term paper quality article she has been writing for x years in order to get published
much more important things for us to be focusing our energies on here
like for example, the pending bottleneck of the human race as a result of the warming of the world's oceans
I am amazed at the number of people who have criticized "The War" after saying that they had watched only a small part of it.
I was a child during the war. Even though I far away from any fighting, the series jogged my memories. Of course, children back then were more realistic. If we didn't have the artificial violence on TV, we did see the actual violence on the newsreels at the movies and hear about it on the radio. We also knew people who were killed or injured. It was a terrible time.
The series does not glorify war. It is incredibly realistic. It does more than anything else to argue against Bush's attempt to equate WWII with the "War on Terror".
Gee, I watched "The War" and saw Blacks, Latinos, poor Whites, Asians, Polynesians all depicted in a positive light.
I have to agree with HughJass somewhat. I was born and raised in the SW for most of my 60 years. IMO, no matter how much the Latino population is acknowledged via hiring quotas, given special education programs (Spanish speaking) or by the progress they owe to no one but themselves, they'll always complain how "whitey" discriminates.
Three nations have classified their citizens by "race" with breakdowns as to "how much" with melanin deficient Aryans at the top of the shit pile. Three nations: Apartheid South Africa, Nazi Germany, and the United States from about 1640 to the present. It's who we are. Aryan Supremacy is bread to the bone. "History" is only about us. That's why we spell Justice, "Just-US". Here's the point:
Melanin deficient Aryans are a dying segment of American population. Yup. White guys going the way of the dodo. Extinct. By 2050 (less time than you think) white guys are going to be a minority on Master's Corporate Slave Plantation. That means there will be openings for people the color of the earth to take their place as Overseers on Master's Plantation.
As Overseers, they will have two jobs: Steam shovel the wealth of America into the hands of the top 1/4 of 1% of households (still overwhelmingly white) by any means necessary; and to keep the Races, the Genders, & the Classes in their place. It is what Overseers DO.
Most folks of any color in America don't actually believe in Democracy. Those that did, when they did, were hounded into silence or suicide, they were falsely imprisoned, or they were summarily executed. It's our shared history within living memory for aging boomers. Can't claim ignorance. From the mid-50's to the present, they been dropping like flies. Who remembers George Jackson, Fred Hampton, Mark Clark, or even Medger Evers anymore? Or cares? Who cares about what was done to Judi Berry or Jeronimo Jijaga Pratt? Anybody remember Leonard Peltier? These and hundreds more are the pantheon of American martyrs, and that's without getting to the Celebrities who are known by their initials.
Hispanics will become the dominant majority based on their birthrate. If the numbers hold, 54% college graduation will give you a real edge although you will always compete with a statistic that hounds Black people to this day: Unemployment for Black High School GRADUATES is 30% higher than for white DROP OUTS. Fact. 2007. This stuff is just flat undeniable.
But that brings a question. Do our college graduates see themselves as "Citizens", members of a participatory democracy, or do they believe in Wealth, Power, & Privilege? Do they believe in the right of inherited wealth to RULE like my Aryan ancestors? Or do they just want their piece of the carcass? That will decide the kind of world your children and grandchildren live in. It ain't looking good. Master can run a feudalistic Corporate slave plantation with people of any skin color. They just have to be willing to use the whip as Master directs. If they do, they will put RF chips into the bodies of your children to "mark" them, just as easily as any psychotic white guy, "It's my job. If I don't do it, somebody else will."
Should prove to be our epitaph.
Peeces.