More Schools Are Riding An Eco-Friendly Green Wave
Jacob Chapman wants to plant a rooftop garden at Olathe South High School. He encourages classmates to recycle plastic bottles and paper. And he would like them to reduce their use of disposables in the school cafeteria."Our school is farther along than some, but I'm sure we could do more," he said.
Chapman, 18, like other students around the nation, is a green kid who is working to make his school greener as he learns more about the environment.
And bit by bit, Matt Riggs of the Mid-America Regional Council is seeing Kansas City-area school districts start to practice what they teach.
Riggs, the outreach coordinator for MARC's solid waste management district, said the shade of green varies, but many districts are reducing energy and water use, taking steps to reduce school-bus emissions or building green buildings.
What pleases him most are when those practices are linked to what kids learn in the classroom.
"Then the school becomes the model by which kids can see things in action," he said. "... It's more of a holistic approach."
In the North Kansas City district, for example, the new Staley High School will be a giant teaching tool, said Jeff Vandel, the district's assistant director of operations and maintenance.
"Each student who attends that school will learn about environmental issues, and specifically how that school is environmentally friendly," he said.
Scheduled to open next year, Staley High is expected to earn Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, certification for its energy-saving and earth-friendly construction.
Blue Valley schools started using the best practices defined by the U.S. Green Building Council even before buildings could earn a LEED designation, said Dave Hill, the district's executive director of facilities and operations.
Hill said that as the growing district added buildings, planners oriented the structures for maximum daylight, chose adhesives and floor tiles that did not emit fumes and chose windows and mechanical systems that saved energy.
With each new building, the district fine-tunes the design based on what worked and what teachers and parents preferred, Hill said.
Blue Valley was the first district in the nation to receive the Environmental Protection Agency's Indoor Air Quality Tools for Schools Model of Sustained Excellence award. But Hill said that the main reason for going green is it's the right thing to do.
"Not only is it good for the environment, but most importantly for us, it creates exceptional learning environments for kids," he said.
Going green can save money, too.
Fifteen years ago, Olathe schools began controlling thermostat settings and installing energy-saving lights, said Bob Courtney, the district's energy manager.
New buildings - 21 in the last 15 years - were built with energy efficiency in mind.
Courtney said that although the district has nearly doubled the square footage of its buildings since 1992, electricity consumption has risen only 45 percent, and natural-gas use has increased only 2 percent.
But Courtney likes to measure the energy savings another way: with a computer program that calculates it in terms of trees and cars. Over the last 15 years the district's efforts have had roughly the same effect as removing 39,400 cars from the road or planting 81,700 acres of trees.
Still, at least one parent wonders whether schools could do more, particularly in the cafeteria.
Jerri Campbell of Olathe said she was surprised to see disposable trays, plates, bowls and flatware when she ate lunch earlier this year with her daughter, a first-grader at Ravenwood Elementary School.
"They're teaching children to use a product for 10 minutes and then throw it away," Campbell said.
Campbell said she would like the district to investigate other options: reusable trays, dishes and silverware or more earth-friendly disposables.
Scott Kingery, Olathe's director of food services, said that the district put a great deal of research into the decision to switch to polystyrene trays eight years ago.
Kingery said reusable trays use up water when they are washed. Paper products cannot be recycled because they are soiled with food. Kingery said that when the polystyrene trays go to landfills, they don't biodegrade - but that also means that they don't leach chemicals into groundwater.
"Polystyrene was chosen because we feel that it probably has the least negative impact on the environment," he said.
The disposable lunch trays caught the attention of Tim Oberhelman's student naturalist class last year at Olathe South. The students, including Jacob Chapman, gathered a day's worth of the trays that stood 22 feet high. The students then considered how they might keep the trays out of landfills.
Their best answer? Reduce use.
"If you're just getting a slice of pizza, all you really need is a plate," Chapman said.
His interest in the environment stems from a love of science and the outdoors. Chapman carpools to school, and belongs to the Eco Club, which leads recycling efforts.
And with the approval of administrators, Chapman hopes to make the rooftop garden a reality. It would help insulate the classroom over which it is built, clean the air and capture rainwater that otherwise would run off into the parking lot.
It also could capture something else, Chapman said.
"Kids could go out after school and help with it. It will catch more kids' interest than just sitting in a classroom."
For more examples of how schools are turning green, go to KansasCity.com.
© 2007 Kansas City Star
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
8 Comments so far
Show AllHemp makes biodegradable composites.
Plastic is bad, eh? Why don't you go rip the plastic shunt in your grandmothers heart out?
While you're at it, please stop using your plastic keyboard. It's annoying us.
Ok..
that part about polystyrene just shows how ignorant so many folks are about plastics in general.
Where did he get his information???? Polystyrene is the LEAST?? impactful? BS!...
Uh. It NEVER EVER EVER EVER biodegrades guy.
If you used PAPER... you could have COMPOSTED IT!!! DOH!
You can use RECYCLED paper and COMPOST IT.
There are ways to be resourceful with your water too!
Catch the GREY water you used washing the dishes and use it for other things.. If you use biodegradable soap it can be recycled for other non drinking purposes.. You could water plants etc..
I swear. Folks are jsut so stupid.
I had a cashier at Wild Oats attempt to "lecture" me on how PAPER bags were wastful and bad because they cut down trees (not if they were recyled paper).. adn plastic was MUCH better. UH. NO.. Plastic stays in the environment indefinately
There are these thigns called NOODLES. They are tiny bits of plastic.. The smallest pieces. they cover our oceans. Fish and sealife are eating them thinking they are plankton. BAD BAD BAD.
PLASTIC IS BAD.
PLASTICS Don't make things possible.. they cause environmental destruction. Don't use styrofoam ANYTHING anymore. Tell your local restaurants to STOP using it.
Read:
The biggest environmental health concern associated with polystyrene is the danger associated with Styrene, the basic building block of polystyrene. Styrene is used extensively in the manufacture of plastics, rubber, and resins. About 90,000 workers, including those who make boats, tubs and showers, are potentially exposed to styrene. Acute health effects are generally irritation of the skin, eyes, and upper respiratory tract, and gastrointestinal effects. Chronic exposure affects the central nervous system showing symptoms such as depression, headache, fatigue, and weakness, and can cause minor effects on kidney function and blood. Styrene is classified as a possible human carcinogen by the EPA and by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). A voluntary compliance program has been adopted by industries using styrene. The US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration unsuccessfully (a federal court overturned the ruling in 1992) tried to limit the amount of worker exposure to styrene to 50 parts per million (ppm). According to the Styrene Information and Research Center (SIRC), they still encourage their member companies to comply with the 50 ppm exposure limit. This program would reduce styrene exposures to a 50 ppm TWA with a 100 ppm (15 minute) ceiling. MORE:
http://www.earthresource.org/campaigns/capp/capp-styrofoam.html
I tried to edit my comment at 11:48, but a message appeared which indicated that I was not allowed to do so.
I was going to change the last sentence ...
andersdl October 3rd, 2007 11:48 am.
I agree, but …
ZPG is no longer enough. We really need to reduce the population because the earth cannot properly support the population we have now, let alone improve standards of living or maintain biodiversity. The new aim should be One Child Per Family (OCPF) for two or three generations.
andersdl October 3rd, 2007 11:48 am.
I agree, but ...
ZPG is no longer enough. We really need to reduce the population because the earth cannot properly support the population we have now, let alone improve standards of living or maintain biodiversity. The new aim should be One Child Per Family (OCPF).
If all the energy wasted in destroying the earth went toward greening it, it would be paradise. Ecology is good economics. Vote Green.
I was Chapman's age in 1970 and participated in the first Earth Day. The students at my high school embraced many of the same ideals addressed in this article, plus a few more like zero population growth (ZPG)and appropriate technology (AT). Although I have continued to practice those ideals, few others of my generation have.
By 1980 anybody mentioning ZPG or AT was viewed with suspicion. Unless ZPG and AT are revived, Chapman's generation will be fighting the symptoms of the problem and not the root of the problem.
Eco-friendly schools are the wave of the future. Let's hope we see more of them. But this article fails to mention if Mexico is participating in this form of education. We can only speculate!