Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Gruesome Ethnic Sorting Focuses on Baghdad's Sunnis
Dr. Rafal Badri had heard the stories of displacement and murder before: A family member executed at a Baghdad checkpoint because his last name was recognizably Sunni. Friends and relatives forced to move, to flee to Amman or Damascus or to other parts of Baghdad, harried from their longtime homes because of sectarian identities few considered important just a few years ago. Families rent asunder by those same divisions.
But the Cleveland doctor said "the story never hit home as strong with me, as much as it did" three weeks ago, when he learned of the gruesome fate of one of his best friends from childhood, a Sunni man who was abducted from his home with his two eldest sons.
Sabah Abboud al-Naimi was an apolitical military officer from a Sunni tribal family famed for its orange groves north of Baghdad.
But this summer, he and two sons were snatched from their home in a Shiite neighborhood of Baghdad. In front of the younger boy, the father and brother were tortured and then murdered.
This was neither random violence nor murder for gain, said Badri, who left Iraq about 25 years ago, when he was 29.
Instead, al-Naimi and his son were executed solely to broadcast a sectarian warning to other Sunnis to vacate their homes in the Shaab neighborhood in northeast Baghdad.
"The son was sent back home with the message that, You people do not belong in this neighborhood, and you are going to serve as the messenger to tell everybody, in advance, that if they don't leave, they will deserve similar fate.' "
Badri believes the message was heard by other Sunnis, who packed up and left.
The al-Naimi murders didn't make it onto the news in Baghdad or the West. But the killings duly took their place among the many assassinations well known to the families, friends and neighbors of the victims.
"There are hundreds of crimes worse than that," said Moayed Kalaf, of Solon, a retired civil engineering professor who also knew al-Naimi in Iraq.
Although the perpetrators of this murder never were identified or caught, Kalaf believes al-Naimi and his oldest son were executed by one of the major Iranian-backed Shiite militias that control most Baghdad neighborhoods.
"It seems it's a common thing now -- a standard thing now," said Kalaf. "Nobody cares."
Except that, Badri, Kalaf and other Iraqi Sunni émigrés in the Cleveland area care very much.
They, and many of the Sunnis remaining in Baghdad, worry that the deaths signal a coming bloodbath among minority Sunni Arabs now bearing the brunt of ethnic cleansing throughout Baghdad. They perceive the nation's weak, Shiite-led government as deeply hostile to Sunni ethnic interests and unwilling to rein in the death squads.
The signs of trouble extend beyond the killings of a few men.
Refugee groups report that the pace of displacement in Baghdad is accelerating, even as the U.S. troop "surge" tamps down violence in some neighborhoods. That displacement is heavily weighted against Sunnis, who are crowded into smaller and smaller sections of town.
In mid-August, Adnan al-Dulaimi, a leading moderate who heads the largest Sunni bloc in the Iraqi parliament, issued an impassioned appeal to other Arab countries to stop what he called a "genocide" against the capital's Sunnis.
In an e-mail to the Associated Press, and later in a news conference at his home in the Adil neighborhood of west Baghdad, al-Dulaimi accused Iran of arming the Shiite militias that daily lob mortars into his and other Sunni districts throughout western Baghdad. He called it a campaign "to eradicate the Sunnis."
U.S. forces appear equally alarmed. The U.S. military started its surge in Baghdad last spring largely aiming to fight Sunni insurgents in the capital's hard-line Sunni neighborhoods. But soon U.S. troops were building walls and barricades around Sunni and some Shiite enclaves.
More recently, U.S. forces also began paying newly minted Sunni militias, complete with snappy uniforms and patches, although the militiamen bring their own guns, to patrol their enclaves' streets.
U.S. officers deny that their Safe Neighborhoods Initiative has a sectarian cast. Yet they've also quietly switched their emphasis from going after Sunni extremists to primarily targeting Shiite militias. These militias, tied to a number of Shiite politicians and believed armed from Iran, operate with impunity in mixed neighborhoods, expelling Sunnis as part of a racket to seize apartments, property and other assets.
Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, the No. 2 U.S. commander in Iraq, told the Associated Press last month that 73 percent of the most serious anti-U.S. attacks in Baghdad in July -- those that either wounded or killed U.S. forces -- were carried out by such Iranian-backed militias.
A team of reporters from the New York Times that fanned out into 20 Baghdad neighborhoods concluded that "mixed neighborhoods are sliding toward extinction."
At least 35,000 Baghdad residents have fled their homes since the surge began, the Times reported, citing aid groups' estimates.
The latest U.S. National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq identified this cleansing as one possible cause of a drop in interethnic Baghdad violence: There simply are fewer neighbors of the opposite sectarian group to kill.
But Cleveland's Sunni émigrés warn that any such numbers are suspect.
"One morning in the area where my [relative] lives, there were 12 bodies," said one Sunni professional who didn't want his name used for fear of retribution against family members in Baghdad. "When it was on the news, it was reported as six bodies only, and this is only a small area in Baghdad, like Solon in Cleveland."
One murder that did get wide attention in the West was that of an eminent London-trained immunologist who had been on a sabbatical in Australia. In late March, he returned to Baghdad, hoping to see his baby son, born during the six months he was overseas.
But Dr. Khalid al-Naib was betrayed after stopping at Baghdad University.
While trying to reach his Shiite wife across town, he was waylaid by Shiite gunmen, "shot and thrown in a Dumpster," said one of his friends, Dr. Riadh Almudallal, of Solon.
"He didn't even have a chance to see his son."
Such developments feed deep-seated Sunni fears that "Persians" within Iraq's Shiite community are being used to impose Iranian dominion over Iraq.
Yet in a pattern eerily reminiscent of the degradation of Sarajevo's civil society, Shiites, too, now imagine Iraq's Sunnis in league with outside enemies. Even the language of Iraq is changing, with new phrases that refer to the ethnic cleansing and sectarian retribution.
Fears rise like a viper and entwine with ancient grievances, so that the unmixing of a once-mixed population now has a momentum all its own.
"My two brothers are married to Shiite girls. My sister is married to a Shiite gentleman. And we never thought there was a difference, because all of them, they have the same prophet, the same Koran," said the Sunni professional who didn't want his name used.
"You know the herd instinct," he added. "If a leader can attract the feelings and emotions of the masses, he can send them to hell, and that is what is happening in Iraq, exactly."
"I can't see, in the near future, any light," he went on. "It is a cave full of darkness, as long as this government is there."
Badri says he doesn't blame U.S. forces for lifting the lid off a cauldron of hate that existed prior to the Americans' arrival. But he and other local Iraqi Sunnis believe that America -- and the rest of the world -- now have a moral obligation to protect Baghdad's threatened Sunnis from possible annihilation.
Regretfully, he said, that could include partition.
"Nobody would have ever thought that Iraq can be divided, or there are people that are willing to divide Iraq as much as they are now," said Badri. "But if division occurs, it is in the name of preserving precious life. Nobody needs to die, neither Iraqis nor Americans. And if division -- which I am totally against -- is going to help save lives, then [so] be it."
Sullivan is The Plain Dealer's foreign-affairs columnist and an associate editor of the editorial pages. To reach Elizabeth Sullivan: bsullivan@plaind.com, 216-999-6153
© 2007 The Plain Dealer

10 Comments so far
Show AllThis gruesome dismemberment of a once sophisticated, ethnically mixed, intermarried, secular society is precisely the one openly advocated by President Emeritus of the Council of Foreign Relations, Professor Leslie Gelb, and enthusiastically parroted by Senator Joseph Biden. It is referred to as the Biden-Gelb Option of 'Ethnic Cleansing'.
As our favorite Neo-Con, Michael Ledeen, once philosophized: "Sometimes it is instructive to take and throw some shitty little country against the wall."
The take home message for the rest of the resource-rich, Third World: Defy us, express independence of foreign policy and sovereignty over your natural resources and watch your museums and treasures burn, your scientists and poets tortured and executed, your mothers and sisters in the streets and your children starving and torn from their culture and homes. This killing is deliberate social engineering dressed up as the colonial civilizing mission of the United States. It has less to do with Iran and infinitely more to do with the hegemonic ambitions of the US and Israel.
The world will take note, arm themselves and resist. They are very good learners.
"These groups will not "live in peace", as equals, no matter what is done. "Peace" has only come in the past by suppresion from Saddam"
Those French and English can never live in peace; they'll always kill each other. French & German can't live in peace. Peace only comes from repression.
Or the myth that "Jews and Arabs have always been at each other's throats for centuries."
It's all racist bilge pumped up from the darkest bowels through the most vile orifices into public discourse in order to justify imperial subjugation.
"The New Orleans 'solution'." Now being exported.
Bligh,
From you I learn that the Shia are a tribe and the Sunni are another tribe and these tribes cannot live together - even though 30% of marriages were mixed before 'Shock and Awe'. Tell me, when is the Baptist tribe going to clear out all the Methodists from their mixed neighborhoods in our 'Tribal States of America'? When are the gray-haired, hearing-aid sporting Presbyterian tribe members going to burn down the Parochial schools near their churches? I mean, tribes...doesn't the Bush Family constitute a tribe within our tribal nation?
Dichterfreund, I agree with you. It is racist bilge - fit for colonial good ole boys to spew after a few drinks in the Green Zone. I remember very well when the old Belgian Mercenaries, who were training Meo Tribal Mercenaries in Laos, would philosophize like Captain Bligh in the bars of Vientiane. Bligh is mourning his own lost colonies in his mind.
"I would point Dichterfreund to a map for a geography refresher that Germans, French, and English ALL HAVE THEIR OWN COUNTRY. "
Obviously you have no knowledge of history or geography, since all these countries are amalgams of varied ethnicities; Germany was the most recent, and as one French statesman quipped on the prospect of German reunification "Two Germanies are good; three or more would be better".
"Last time I checked, the English were not having to share their country with either the French or Germans, and Vice Versa."
The last I checked, there was something called the European Union, with a single European currency, and apart from th eindividual naitons wanting to preserve autonomy against a neo-liberal economic regime, a greater mixture than at any time since the first stirrings of nationalism some centuries ago.
"Pointing out that the fighting in IRAQ is along sectarian lines is not racist. Also pointing out that the country of IRAQ was a ill advised artificial construct of the British is not racist either."
But maintaining that they can't govern themselves because they have religious differences IS racist.
"IRAQ could live in peace after the occupation, but only if the various sects put aside their differences and start identifying with all being IRAQIS first, whatever group second"
Why should anyone feel allegiance towards a national identity as defined by the British & now the Americans?
Wow, never knew I HAD colonies to lose. Sorry about your assertion that I don't know history or geography, not true.
I know that Germany,for example, is made up of not two or three groups, but dozens. Frisians, Bavarians, Thurgians, ect. They all have one thing in common however, they all identify themselves as Germans. Same principal with the various groups in England and France. The European Union has not abolished any sovereign states, to my knowledge.
I never said that the Iraqis couldn't govern themselves, they seemed to do that with the Baathist regime that you all seem to think was some sort of model template of governance. My point was that they will not govern themselves with EQUAL rights to the minority groups unless they all put some sort of common identity ahead of the identity of their own factions.
And thank you Dicterfreund, for making my point that it is unlikely that they will embrace the identity of "IRAQI" since it is a national identity created by the British in 1920. Meanwhile, the bombings and assasinations will continue after the Americans leave, as Sunnis fight for a return to power and the others fight either for autonomy (Kurds) or power themselves (Shias).
This arguing, well meant or not, distracts from the article.
Majorities of all divisions in Iraqi society want the US outta there
The illegal invaders have failed to provide protection to civilians. The policies of the invader are doing more harm than good. The invaders have armed both sides. Why?
We still do not know who blew up the mosque in Samarra, the event which provided the impetus for the internecine battles.
Well, Curmudgeon, I will agree with you there. It is time to leave Iraq to the Iraqis.