EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Free-Lunch Foragers
Freegans' are a growing subculture that has opted out of capitalism by cutting spending habits and living off consumer waste.
NEW YORK - For lunch in her modest apartment, Madeline Nelson tossed a salad made with shaved carrots and lettuce she dug out of a Whole Foods dumpster. She flavored the dressing with miso powder she found in a trash bag on a curb in Chinatown. She baked bread made with yeast plucked from the garbage of a Middle Eastern grocery store.
Nelson is a former corporate executive who can afford to dine at four-star restaurants. But she prefers turning garbage into gourmet meals without spending a cent.
On this afternoon, she thawed a slab of pate that she found three days before its expiration date in a dumpster outside a health food store. She made buttery chicken soup from another health food store's hot buffet leftovers, which she salvaged before they were tossed into the garbage.
Nelson, 51, once earned a six-figure income as director of communications at Barnes and Noble. Tired of representing a multimillion dollar company, she quit in 2005 and became a "freegan" -- the word combining "vegan" and "free" -- a growing subculture of people who have reduced their spending habits and live off consumer waste. Though many of its pioneers are vegans, people who neither eat nor use any animal-based products, the concept has caught on with Nelson and other meat-eaters who do not want to depend on businesses that they believe waste resources, harm the environment or allow unfair labor practices.
"We're doing something that is really socially unacceptable," Nelson said. "Not everyone is going to do it, but we hope it leads people to push their own limits and quit spending."
Nelson used to spend more than $100,000 a year for her food, clothes, books, transportation and a mortgage on a two-bedroom co-op in Greenwich Village. Now, she lives off savings, volunteers instead of works, and forages for groceries.
She garnishes her salad with tangy weeds picked from neighbors' yards. She freezes bagels and soup from the trash to make them last longer. She sold her co-op and bought a one-bedroom apartment in Flatbush, Brooklyn, about an hour from Manhattan by bike. Her annual expenditures now total about $25,000.
"I used to have 40 work blouses," said Nelson, sipping hot tea with mint leaves and stevia, a sweet plant she picked from a community garden. She shook her head in shame. "Forty tops, just for work."
Freeganism was born out of environmental justice and anti-globalization movements dating to the 1980s. The concept was inspired in part by groups like "Food Not Bombs," an international organization that feeds the homeless with surplus food that's often donated by businesses.
Freegans are often college-educated people from middle-class families.
Adam Weissman, whose New York group Freegan.info has been around for about four years, lives with his father, a pediatrician, and mother, a teacher. The 29-year-old is unemployed by choice, taking care of his elderly grandparents daily and working odd jobs when he needs to. The rest of his time is spent furthering the freegan cause, he said, which is "about opting out of capitalism in any way that we can."
Freegans troll curbsides for discarded clothes and ratty or broken furniture, which they repair to furnish their homes. They trade goods at flea markets. Some live as squatters in abandoned buildings, or in low-rent apartments on the edges of the city, or with family and friends.
In recent years, Internet sites like Meetup.com have posted announcements for trash tours in Seattle, Houston and Los Angeles and throughout England. Some teach people how to dumpster-dive for food, increasing the movement's popularity. At least 14,000 have taken the trash tour for groceries over the last two years in New York. Another site, Freegankitchen.com, offers lessons for cooking meals from food found in dumpsters, such as spaghetti squash salad.
Though recycling clothes and furniture doesn't strike most people as unusual, combing through heaps of trash for food can be unthinkable to many.
One recent night, Weissman and Nelson led a trash tour through New York for about 40 experienced and first-time diggers, including college students, a high school teacher, a taxi driver and a former investment banker. One veteran handed out plastic gloves.
An employee at D'Agostino's supermarket in Midtown Manhattan had carried out the garbage minutes earlier. The clear plastic bags lining the gum-stained sidewalk bulged with bruised peaches, discolored eggplants, day-old poppy seed bagels and imitation crabmeat.
Careful not to rip the bags and risk angering store managers by creating a mess, some unknotted the ties and sifted through the garbage with bare hands. The bittersweet scent of cilantro, bananas and bread drifted into the air.
Two women who worked next door at a nail salon came outside and stared. A few first-time tour-takers stood away from the group, looking self-conscious.
"We encourage people who have never opened a bag before, just try it," Nelson told the group. "Go ahead."
A few began filling backpacks and plastic bags with food that looked fresh enough to eat: heads of lettuce, tubs of party dip, baby arugula salad mix, avocados, shiny red and green apples, corn on the cob -- mere scraps in the estimated 50 million pounds of food that New York throws away each year, including at least 20 million pounds that go to the poor.
"Whoa, someone found the soy milk!" said Cindy Rosin, 31, a freelance graphics designer. "Good find."
One person pulled a bag of Purina dog chow from the pile. Another found a bunch of grapes.
Two men in dark dress slacks, button down shirts and shiny shoes approached the trash tourists. "Pardon me, what is this?" one asked. "Vegetable justice?"
"It's over-consumerism," said Gracie Janove, 19, an anthropology student with a crescent moon pendant hanging around her neck. Janove, who participated in her first dumpster dive during a trip to France, frequently searches the trash of New York bakeries for pastries and the garbage of grocery stores for fruit.
The two men walked away, laughing.
D'Agostino's, Trader Joe's and Whole Foods -- freegans' most popular dumpster diving sites -- donate edible food to agencies that prepare it for the poor, according to their spokespeople. But freegans and food experts say a large amount of edible food still gets thrown away. Smaller businesses don't always have agreements with food banks, they say, or they have not taken time to donate.
"We have found canned goods, completely wrapped pastas," said Nelson, who recently salvaged piles of parsley, lettuce, onions and a potted plant from a Whole Foods' garbage.
Sometimes grocery stores don't sell food because there was an error in the processing, and though the product may be edible, it is the wrong color or shape, said Beth Osborne Daponte, a senior research scholar at the Yale University Institution for Social and Policy Studies who served on the Hunger in America 2006 task force.
The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that Americans create 245 million tons of waste a years, about 12% of it food. Much of the food that stores throw out is still edible at the time of its expiration date.
"We shouldn't be wasting as much as we do," Daponte said. But, she added, "to go dumpster diving, you also have to be willing to take the risk. Some of the food might be great. Some might be contaminated."
Supermarket officials say food found in their trash should not be eaten.
"Food items are disposed of because they are inedible or not otherwise safe to donate," said Ashley Hawkins, a spokeswoman for Whole Foods.
The store's guidelines about what is edible, Weissman said, may be unrealistic, adding that at home, people wouldn't throw away a banana with a few brown spots.
As Nelson and Weissman helped guide the scavengers to their next stop on the trash tour, a D'Agostino's employee brought out a big bag of doughy, plump, sweet-smelling bagels.
The experienced freegans glanced at the bag and kept walking. Instead they led the group across the street to Daniel's Bagels, voted one of the best bagel shops in New York by one online site.
"We're picky freegans," said Deirdre Rennert, who would not reveal her place of work because of the stigma attached to living off dumpster groceries. She once took home a salmon carcass from D'Agostino's trash and made ceviche, and admitted she was somewhat surprised she did not get sick.
Daniel's had closed at 9 p.m. and its storefront was lined with black trash bags. The group sniffed and squeezed the bags. They opened the ones that felt soft and smelled of bread fresh from the oven. They discovered pounds of bagels: onion, pumpernickel, cinnamon raisin, sesame, sourdough.
"Usually you will find a bag that has got the coffee remains with the bagels," Rosin told the diggers. "If they are nice, they will separate them."
Nelson scooped up two bags of bagels to freeze for later.
A few doors down, on the outdoor patio of a swanky restaurant, people sipped glasses of wine over half-eaten platters of pasta and salad, mostly ignoring the trash diggers, waiting for busboys to take away their leftover food.
Since she upended her lifestyle, Nelson has learned how much she can live without. She still buys toilet paper and food for her two cats. She hasn't bought clothes in three years. Nor has she set foot in a supermarket to purchase eggs, vegetables, fruit, bread or coffee.
Sitting in her hardwood-floor apartment furnished mostly with remnants of her former life -- a sofa with slightly torn fabric, an elaborate collection of books -- she wore a plain T-shirt and faded dark jeans cut off below the knee.
The place is decorated with a few items she found in the trash: a chair, CD rack, rug and headboard in her bedroom.
Her cupboards were full of food she did not pay for: cake mix, turkey gravy, curry mix, sweet rice. The freezer contained oatmeal bread, lime and cucumber sorbet, tomato basil soup and bagels. Everything was retrieved from the trash.
"Just because it's two or three days past its pull date, it's not like it's Cinderella's coach and it's going to turn into a pumpkin at midnight," she said.
Last year, Nelson asked her family if she could make Thanksgiving dinner out of foraged food. They found the idea odd at first, but agreed, and ended up enjoying an elaborate feast.
Nelson used to love browsing department stores or buying new books or shoes.
Now she finds satisfaction recovering 20 rosemary-seasoned roasted chickens from a dumpster outside of the Gourmet Garage, or sharing conversation over a lunch made from garbage.
She has never been happier.
Copyright © 2007, The Los Angeles Times
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

36 Comments so far
Show Alliammyself,
I understand they're making a point. What point exactly? The point of intentions or the point of procedure? I think this is what megustahoy was calling attention to.
Are they working to end waste, or going along with it. That is, because they consume waste, they will starve if waste is reduced. Freeganism is possible because food waste exists; it is a lifestyle which the industry of capitalist procedure maintains. Wasteful capitalism supports freegans.
The onus is to show how this lifestyle actually changes procedure, and it must be something a little bit more precise than the easily satirized and mocked - yea dude, lets have a hippie jamfest and raise awareness that changes the world, dude. If only sociological procedure, of which capitalism is, could actually be changed through awareness raising. Can you think of an instance where it worked?
How is the peace movement related to Nixon and Kissinger's Vietnam ending "decent interval"? How effective was it in stopping the Cambodian escalation?
The only scenarios that I know of that have worked in changing the institutional aspects of society are those that have involved large scale civil disobedience. Even then, does it produce the desired results or does it elicit oppressive counter-reactionary procedure? How long before freeganism is considered corporate terrorism by a hack appointment at HS?
I know this is a lot to lay at the feet of the freegan ethos, but honestly, but do we not have something of a farcical tableaux here.
Then again, perhaps I will stop the gears of capitalism by wearing sandals and not washing my hair. That'll put my education to best use.
Thank you Madeline. Your lifestyle choices are, of course, not going to catch on with the masses, but with any luck you'll open some eyes.
Freegans rule!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live on less than $14,000 a year, in Los Angeles, and that seems like plenty sometimes. Americans are so spoiled and ignorant/brainwashed when it comes to materialism.
Perhaps the Freegans--and anyone else interested--might want to get together with Food Not Bombs:
www.foodnotbombs.net
Only stupid people starve in America.
Are you kidding me? These people are the epitome of capitalism. They have the privilege to not work--live for free, and they're considered heroes? My mother raised a family of 4 never earning more than $17,000 annually, and it wasn't out of choice like it is for these "freegans" it was out of necessity... These people are not making any point, other than looking ridiculous.
megustahoy,
Epitome of capitalism? Are you kidding us?! Maybe these folks are not to your taste, but they are doing something that they believe in and making a positive statement at the same time. Even the guy who lives with his parents is looking after his grandparents and reducing the load on this planet by a small, yet necessary amount. Would it be better to warehouse his grandparents in a nursing home while he works to support the current capitalist system?
Why is it that some people want change, yet turn up their nose at everyone who is living change? What is it they're so afraid of?
These people ARE making a point whether we're comfortable with it or not.
¡No seas tan cerrado!
How is making poverty look like a choice an instrument for change?
Not consuming? Nelson lives off of her savings that she accured while making a six figure income with barnes and noble, Weissman lives off of his parents income (a very good one at that, his father is a doctor, and his mother isn't a homemaker). Yeah he takes care of his grandparents, and that's very noble, but there are people out there who take care of their needy loved one's as well who still have to pay the rent, pay the bills, and pay theirs and their needy loved ones necessities, and they are only making 6.25 and hour at best with state sponsored assistance (ie IHSS)
Taking a vow of poverty falls extremely short of making a point unless you really get rid of all your worldly belongings (including savings and rellying on your parents). What they are doing is making poverty seem like a vacation because believe it or not there are people out there who live on $14,000 a year in LA as Happy Day proudly proclaims, and have absolutely nothing but those $14,000 to fall back on if there is a death in the family, or a medical emergency, or the childbirth.
No soy cerrada (but I love how you assume I'm a man and use "cerrado") I've got nothing against taking a stance against consumerism. Hell I haven't gone shopping for clothes in over a year. But to make a movement out of living in poverty and saying it's happiness is disgusting.
Habre los ojos iammyself, don't let these fools fool you.
Ha ha ha.
One of the most significant economic processes of the last forty years is the continuing destruction of the middle class, driving them into the working poor. O heaven sent mirth, that we have college educated middle class people doing it on their own gumption and calling it a lifestyle of protest. What do you say JP Morgan?
Morgan: Well, unless they chase the moneylenders from the temple and end it all in crucifixion, it doesn't really have much of a sting, does it? As a philosophy, mind you.
Andrew Carnegie: I once had a mistress who was an heiress who liked to stand in soup lines. She said it connected her to the people - the honorable poor.
Morgan: What a gentle soul.
Carnegie: And brilliant too. I had her lecture to all my workers about the small footprint lifestyle. Kaloo kalay! Soon all my workers begged to be in soup lines too. After awhile, I stopped paying them anything at all.
Morgan: Oh right, sir. That must have been when you shifted to an indentured servitude system.
Carnegie: God bless...rather, I should say Gaia bless feudalism.
Dumpster diving isn't glamorous nor is it my cup of tea (pun not intended), but it does highlight the absolute grotesque waste that this society produces. That these people live off of the waste is a testament to their cunning.
I work in a "health food" store and see the waste every day. I do my part not to waste and do bring home some stuff that would wind up in the dumpster. I have also lived in third world countries and have seen true poverty and dumpster diving by necessity. Our gross excesses are created on the backs of many of those in third world countries. I salute anyone who shows us the sheer amount of waste (and these people are salvaging perfectly good food!) that our society produces. It's an interconnected web, and we had best understand that.
I don't see this as a black and white issue as do some. It's a lifestyle choice and a statement that makes some uncomfortable. Better to come to terms with your discomfort and the reasons than excoriate others who are living another way. And, oh, by the way, are these people hurting you in any way? Other than making you squirm, how are they hurting you? Maybe, because they're not out producing more consumable items for your chochke shelf...?
Mis ojos està n abierto, hermana - y mi mente tambien.
What would be more virtuous is to simply create less waste, and buy local.
My grandmother, one of my biggest heroines, lives on a small island off the coast of Spain (Menorca - declared a Biosphere Reserve). She recycles everything, takes the slops to the pigs, walks to the green grocer, the fishmonger, the butcher etc. When she visits her sister on the other side of the island she takes the bus. She's 86 years old. She buys fresh bread and when it gets stale she uses it in soups, or fries it up as croutons or makes breadcrumbs out of it. When I first visited her as an adult she was appalled at the wastefulness that I exhibited as an American, laughed at me when I complained that the fruit was bruised or that a fly had landed on something "lo que no mata engorda," she would say "that which does not kill me makes me fatter."
When you make a soup in Spain, you don't get the broth from a can: you boil the meat, drink the broth, and then eat the freaking meat and veg you used to make the broth.
Old greens go to the pigs, and you get cheaper meat and delicious sausages in return. Old bread and cereals go to the chickens, and you get cheaper eggs (organic eggs, with yolks so rich that they're almost red!) in return.
My abuelita isn't an eco-warrior: most people behave like this in Spain. Many of the dishes make good use of basic, garden vegetable ingredients such as garlic, tomatoes, onions, etc. because that's all that people could afford for centuries, yet they are some of the richest dishes in the world, and Spaniards are some of the healthiest eaters in the world.
These freegans live in big cities, full of stench and pollution. If they really wanted to demonstrate how people can extricate themselves from capitalism, they would move out to the country and grow a garden.
My wife and I live in suburbia. We bought a condo right when the market collapsed, but we are fortunate to have a fixed-rate mortgage. It is our plan to purchase a country house in Maine and plant a big fat garden. For meat, there's always tasty venison!
Freeganism? Interesting, but stupid. Ideas like that are what keep people from identifying with liberals. Just because something is done on the fringes of society doesn't make it a progressive virtue. Watch the documentary Dark Days to see what subsistence foraging is really like.
"These freegans live in big cities, full of stench and pollution. If they really wanted to demonstrate how people can extricate themselves from capitalism, they would move out to the country and grow a garden."
Sigh...yeah, that's what we should all do.
Don't come to Maine, the deer are fleeing.
" I have also lived in third world countries and have seen true poverty and dumpster diving by necessity. Our gross excesses are created on the backs of many of those in third world countries."
This is where we clash you see... I didn't have to travel or live out of the United States to experience the third world. I lived it here. Growing up, my mother raised a family of 4 (not including herself) on an income of no more than 17k a year. We had chickens in our back yard we ate those chickens, we ate the eggs they laid, we grew some fruits and vegetables as well. I lived in an extremely poor neighborhood and continually saw dumspter diving, and was never grossed out by it as a matter of fact I understood its necessity and was fortunate and privileged enough never to have to do it. As a union organizer I traveled across the united states, visiting people in their homes in the run down projects of Chicago and Detroit, I visited them in their overcrowded and falling mobile homes in Las Cruces, and I visited them in their dilapidated rural homes in Benton Harbor. All these folks live in third world conditions in my backyard and your backyard. I see how overconsumption and wasteful consumption is hurtful to US citizens, I can only imagine the terrible conditions its created abroad.
Their "life style choice" does not make me squirm, hell I'd gladly join in on the dumspter diving if I could afford the risk of getting sick and if I felt uncomfortable with my privilige. What does make me squirm, what does make me extremely angry, is that they are making poverty look easy. They are creating an image of poverty as choice, and that my friend, is an extremely dangerous image to create of the people who actually are poor.
Like "Ireneus" stated before where would this "life style choice" be if unscrupulous wasteful consumption did not exist? Are they really taking a stance? If capitalism didn't create wasteful consumption then there would be no dumpster to dive. The fact that they are "making a point" simply and solely by living off of others' garbage proves their support for wasteful consumption. All they are doing is trying to absolve themselves of the guilt they feel for having privilige. If there were no dumspters to dive into they would go on about their business working a 9-5 with a 6 figure income.
The onus is to show how this lifestyle actually changes procedure
Yes. The point is not to opt out of production, leaving it to others and living on the waste, but to both produce and consume in a way that is sustainable.
A garden is a good start, composting, using one's human waste for fertilizer, learning how to regenerate the water we use and make it re-potable. We could grow the trees we need to build our houses.
Those of us who have come out of poverty have a negative response to the college educated who think it's cool to live on waste, because they glorify having nothing. "Slumming it" is only fun for those who can call daddy when they get in trouble.
Freegan. A fun name. But one doesn't have to 'join' anything to live according to conscience. When I first got some goats and pigs around 1972, I asked the people at the local grocery stores if they'd set aside produce that they would be pitching out. They agreed, and we scheduled a time. When I came late a couple of times and they told me its out back in the dumpster, I finally drove around back. Oooo... That began three decades of 'saving' things from dumpsters to use myself and give to family, friends and neighbors. Flowers particularly got delivered to widows I knew who were living alone. When foraging in supermarket dumpsters uninvited, I have been run off by produce managers and threatened with calls to the police. And police have told me to go. I learned to drive up slowly and look around first for police cars. It is such a positive thing to do, and feels so 'right', but I was being told that its wrong and even criminal. Everything I do in life I would want my child to see (if I had one). This is a dilemma.
In fact, I've been here in Vietnam since the invasion of Iraq and poverty is the norm nationwide. A LOT of people are roving about opening up every little bag of garbage to salvage paper, metal, plastic and food. At the same time, the acceptable (proper) thing to do is to never finish your drink or food in a public place. This is for reason of 'face'. Huge amounts of food served at restaurants (from expensive to very cheap) get pitched-out - I looks like about 20%. I've never, ever seen someone take left behind food directly off of a sidewalk eatery table, although the streets are full of unemployed, impoverished people. Again, this is for reason of 'face'. This uneaten food does go to animals (pigs, chickens and dogs, all of which are eaten by people).
If a 'Freegan' organization exists, I hope that it offers legal advice and even assistance to foragers who get arrested for taking 'garbage' in the US.
Perhaps I should have just said that I lived way out of the city, had a huge, wonderful garden, and drove into the suburbs to work construction, making several hundred dollars per day. On the way home I'd often stop at dumpsters that I discovered (by looking) were likely to contain good things. I 'needed' nothing I took. I kept it from going to the landfill, and used it, either by eating it, giving it away, feeding animals, or burying it in the garden. By the way, the packaging of big name foods is also useful for 'refunding', a potential source of income.
So, why don't we just call CommonDreams what some want it to be: a repository for people who say the system sucks, but shit on anyone who tries to live another way.
Jeezus, what is the matter with you people? Don't like diving, don't do it!
What really gets me is how persnickety we are about people who are doing absolutely nothing illegal, immoral, or wrong. They are living their lives the way they see fit, and some are doing it for ethical reasons, yet you arbiters of everything correct and good excoriate them for doing something you don't have the guts to do.
This discussion really highlights, for me, how far we really have to go before we even approach sustainability. I don't have to see a freaking documentary - these people are doing it!
Foraging worked for humanity for millions of years before farming came along. That was about 10,000 years ago. Since then, population has exploded and we are left with 6+ billion people and dumpsters full of food.
Why can't you folks come clean and just admit that it grosses you out and makes you uncomfortable and therefore are judging others by your discomfort?
"The onus is to show how this lifestyle actually changes procedure"
Bullshit! There is no onus - there is only a group of people living their conscience. If you don't have the guts to do it, then don't, just admit that you are squeamish about this and are therefore going to judge others based on your discomfort.
Is this what Liberalism is all about? Are these my people?
I think there should be a law requiring restaurants and markets to give their close-to-expiry food and overstock to homeless shelters and soup kitchens.
I wish I could have had some of that pate. :) I've never had it.
"Americans are so spoiled and ignorant/brainwashed when it comes to materialism."
Yeah, as if we all have money to burn.
However,I will say that people CAN be very wasteful when it comes to food. I can't tell you how many people I have worked with that bought food, put it in the fridge in the break room and just forgot about it. When I buy food, I eat it or give it away. That's money down the drain.
One guy at my job bought a loaf of white bread and left it sit somewhere for a week. No one wanted to touch it since "it was Jerry's". Ooooh. I decided to take it home with me. I didnt want it to go to waste. The next time I saw the guy I gave him 2 bucks for the bread.
He couldn't even remember why he bought it.
I can understand how some would see this as weird or silly though. And you'd really have to be careful as Daponte said, especially when it comes to meat. I don't know if I'd be willing to subject myself to this.
And I'll admit to being leery of picking through garbage. Yuk. But sadly enough there are people put there who fall through the cracks and feel they have no choice but to tolerate horrid odors and...eh I won't go there.
I can also see how some people are cynical about this upper-middle-class person taking a vow of poverty. To me it's akin to rich college kids hanging out with homeless people or giving them sandwiches or new carts. Assuaging of guilt maybe? Does it really help solve the problem of homelessness?
Of course if she is making people think about their consumption habits, maybe she's onto something.
Avocados? Wow. I thought those went bad fast.
Freeganism is a valid form of protest and a productive practice. People who say otherwise are just bitter supporters of capitalism who want these people to work at kmart for five dollars an hour and barely be able to afford to eat instead of taking what is free that no one else wants and would, yes, actually cause more harm by ending up in a landfill if they didn't take it. It is good to refuse to participate in the injustice and slavery of america, and instead to follow one's concience; when there are perfectly livable buildings sitting around collecting dust, why not live in them; shelter is a human right. When there is perfectly good food sitting in a dumpster, why not eat it; food is a human right, and there is no excuse for denying these results to some and thereby creating an unequal society. If you don't like freeganism, then fix the distribution systems of the world to bring about equality, otherwise, you are on the side of walmart and whole foods.
http://www.dreamingearth.net
and i dont shop at walmart
just a comment -- from someone who used to eat out of the trash not to make a political statement -- but because i was hungry...
when i was homeless in new york city it was common to go hit the trash cans looking for take out boxes, etc...
there was always competition... places like st marks st. would be hit up constantly -- I can tell you that if i had ever seen someone leading a class on dumpster diving -- while i was out there panhandling to eat something that wasn't out of trash for once.. i would have been pissed (understatement)
to the person who hasn't seen people eating off of plates at sidewalk cafes: are you kidding me?
-- why it isn't as common is because a waiter or manager will call the cops on you for freaking out their customers -- it would be admirable if everyone left there to go boxes on top of trashcans so you don't have to go rifling through them along with the dirty needles, piss, and hepatitis..
i spent xmas eve 98 with the worst case of food poisoning ever due to dumpster diving
-- anyway, today i'm a contributing member of society and all that jazz and would much rather spend the buck i earned on fresh food than have to scavenger it out of a trash can -- I applaud those who hit up grocery trash cans for vegetables and such, there is always plenty of barely tarnished food in there that can be taken home to cook
-- Personally, due to 'been there done that' syndrome & understanding that some need that shit more than me -- I choose not to dumpster dive or go to soup kitchens
And it is kind of a mockery.
But why waste it?
ladies and gentlemen, enjoy all the food salvaged from trash bins. you can have my share. this article is misleading and, well full of garbage. please do not equate freeganism w any form of social protest. methinks thou dost protest too much. enjoy living the life of a scavenger while living off your savings (from corporate america no less..) this is what happens when yuppies internal wiring goes haywire..
Megustahoy, Antidote, Flint: My sentiments precisely.
Iammyself: you can smirk at the concept of 300m Americans producing their own food all you like, but the fact remains that its the only viable, sensible, sustainable response to the current system of consumer capitalism; a capitalism that behaves as if the earth and its resources were infinite.
The deer are fleeing because of urbanization, not because of hunters.
"it would be admirable if everyone left there to go boxes on top of trashcans so you don't have to go rifling through them along with the dirty needles, piss, and hepatitis.."
Or maybe not even that. Just leave them on a stoop or something or some safe, clean place where people can find it.
I do not think rotissere chickens are safe to eat. They have been on the heat all day. A lot of groceries use the roasted chicken to make soup-this gave me diarhea and I would never eat it again.
Dumpsters are encrusted with bacteria. Canned is o.k but I would not trust fresh.
Better to misrepresent yourself as a charity and the store will leave the garbage in a cart in the recieving room.
Where I worked charities were suppose to come by and pick up. A lot of the food had to be tossed because they never did.
Why don't they give the employees free meals? They are not concerned about shrink when they want to impress the district manager visiting.
Where I live dumpsters are locked. Too many people tossing illegally.
I do think there is too much waste.
A good place to go is to the clothing bins. They seem to have them in every store lot. The bins do not say where the clothes are going. I bet the clothes are being sold and the profit is going into someone's pocket. Lots of times you can find more things like books and computers. Happy diving. I would never quit a job. She should keep working and invest in gold.
At least these Freegans will be well practiced when things really go crazy because we Americans sat on our thumbs thinking things were never going to change. I guess we can fiddle for a little longer anyway before we get burned.
IAMMYSELF
i totally agree with you. people are so petty and judgmental. if you dont' like it, don't do it. but don't criticize. there is so much waste it's obscene. food thrown out cos it's the wrong colour or shape. my god, some people on this planet don't have WATER............
Unfortunately, foraging is not a choice but a necessity for more and more people. So is shoplifting, stealing from one's employer, and skipping essentials when they can not be had by one of these methods. The poor must scavenge what they can from the rotting, bloated corpse of the American capitalist system in order to survive. There is a remarkable amount of food to be found in the dumpsters of restaurants and supermarkets--much of it fortunately still packaged for those of you who are squeamish--but unfortunately, it is harder to "find" life-saving medicines or the cash for a hospital stay. It is also illegal in many cities to take food out of dumpsters--the system wants you to buy, not to take. It's time we started taking, any way we can.
of the many aspects about food, we have largely disconnected ourselves (or been disconnected by the system into which we were born) from taking part in the planting, nurturing, and harvesting of the plant world and its becoming our sustenance. even hunters and gatherers took part in this process, which we find ourselves left only at the end of the loop, that of consuming.
it seems this underlies the difficulties we have in making sense of so many things relating to food: money, nutritive and aesthetic value, ease of preparation, and so on. the dots don't connect for many of us because we neglect to remember each step in how food both arrives to us and where it ends up again, back in the earth. this is not something that only naturalists and hikers should ponder: it's the life cycle that repeats everywhere, without exception. the differences are in the ways societies either distance themselves from the actual raising or finding of food by maintaing systems whereby middlepeople are the major conduits of the food scheme: chefs, waitstaff, grocery clerks, truck drivers, corporate executives, etc. it is this tendency since the industrial revolutions that has us in the predicament we are in, that is, having both too much and not enough food.
too much because of all the waste which is unquestionably evident in all sectors of american and western society--witness the freegans scavenging of such. too little because poorer nations are continually being squeezed by world bank policies to become even less self-sufficient in food production and adopt disastrous neoliberal strategies, such as taking people off of farms and into urban centers, leaving the land to be farmed by megacorporations which deplete the earth (there should be a huge outcry against this from so many more people) and making ever more people live in ever more compressed urban settlements, competing for the shrinking number of forms of employment.
the solutions to these problems must involve many things, including urban farming, localizing and regionalizing food economies, safety nets for those without access to food production, the enforcement of anti-sprawl measures, increased vigilance about the dangers of non-whole food manufacturing, and laws to stop corporations from issuing patents on seeds which deprive farmers from being able to raise food from their own seed stock. this only begins to deal with some of our food issues, but to not begin would be even more shortsighted.
Wow this is hardcore!!
I could never see myself going this far but I am impressed with your dedication.
If anything, it will at least make people strive to cut back on unecessary consuming and actually think about what they throw out.
TROY
no it won't, cause the people doing the unecessary consuming don't read articles like this, or visit websites like this.............. dream on.....
What have YOU done to opt out of capitalism?
While I admire their brave taste in activism it does smack of yuppie values throughout. I personally know of folks who do this out of need and eagerly await a time when they will be able to buy groceries. This is a real issue for many in rural America as well.... particularly Native Americans living in the streets of border towns.
The conditions of poverty (homelessness, hunger, health) are very real to our poor (working poor too, I might add) and it does nothing for them to give it a fashionable threatment such as this.
There are better ways... each of these folks could invite a homeless family for a meal and provide cooking/prep lessons along the way.
.
Find it strange she buys cat food. She could always go to gas stations and take toliet paper and maybe paper towels too, just don't be obvious about it.
I worked at a grocery and the owner wouldn't allow me to give away the dented cans to the employees because he said they would be dropping them on purpose. As far as produce went, he'd rather let it rot than let me reduce the price because the customers will wait. Off course he is an Asshole, with prices to high even I didn't shop there with my 5% employee discount.
During WWII, the government, in order to give the folks at home something to work toward, proposed the idea of the victory garden. Help the war effort and grow some of you own food. They didn't expect to amount to much, but thought it might prove useful.
The eventual governemnt study found that at one point these backyard gardens were producing 17% of all the truckable produce in the U.S. Remeber that is the U.S. economy on a war footing. A kitchen garden would prove useful for anyone who has the space and a couple of hours a week.
Of course my concern is independence, not the leftist knee-jerk anticapitlist screed you find here.