Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Extremism Normalized: How Americans Now Acquiesce to Once Unthinkable Ideas
- From the Archive: We Are the Patriots
- The Solution to Citizens United That No One Is Talking About
- The GOP Economy and Scorched-Earth Obstructionism
- Scientists Tell Senate Panel: Climate Change Is Here and Disaster Costs Will Be Huge
Popular content
Today's Top News
Warming Is Seen as Wiping Out Most Polar Bears
WASHINGTON -- Two-thirds of the world's polar bears will disappear by 2050, even under moderate projections for shrinking summer sea ice caused by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, government scientists reported on Friday.The finding is part of a yearlong review of the effects of climate and ice changes on polar bears to help determine whether they should be protected under the Endangered Species Act. Scientists estimate the current polar bear population at 22,000.
The report, which the United States Geological Survey released here, offers stark prospects for polar bears as the world grows warmer.
The scientists concluded that, while the bears were not likely to be driven to extinction, they would be largely relegated to the Arctic archipelago of Canada and spots off the northern Greenland coast, where summer sea ice tends to persist even in warm summers like this one, a shrinking that could be enough to reduce the bear population by two-thirds.
The bears would disappear entirely from Alaska, the study said.
"As the sea ice goes, so goes the polar bear," said Steven Amstrup, lead biologist for the survey team.
The report was released as President Bush was in Australia meeting with Asian leaders to try to agree on a strategy to address global warming. Mr. Bush will be host to major industrial nations in Washington this month to discuss the framework for a treaty on climate change.
The United Nations plans to devote its general assembly in the fall to global warming.
A spokeswoman for the White House declined to comment on the report, saying it was part of decision making at the Interior Department, parent of the survey.
In the report, the team said, "Sea ice conditions would have to be substantially better than even the most conservative computer simulations of warming and sea ice" to avoid the anticipated drop in bear population.
In a conference call with reporters, the scientists also said the momentum to a warmer world with less Arctic sea ice - and fewer bears - would be largely unavoidable at least for decades, no matter what happened with emissions of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide.
"Despite any mitigation of greenhouse gases, we're going to see the same amount of energy in the system for 20, 30 or 40 years," said Mark Myers, the survey director. "We would not expect to see any significant change in polar conditions regardless of mitigation."
In other words, even in the unlikely event that all the major economies were to agree to rapid and drastic reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases, the floating Arctic ice cap will continue to shrink at a rapid pace for the next 50 years, wiping out much of the bears' habitat.
The report makes no recommendation on listing the bears as a threatened species or taking any action to slow ice cap damage. Such decisions are up to another Interior Department agency, the Fish and Wildlife Service, which enforces the Endangered Species Act. That decision is due in January, officials have said. The wildlife agency had to make a determination on the status of a threatened species because of a suit by environmental groups like Greenpeace and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
In some places, the bears have adapted to eating a wide range of food like snow geese and garbage. But the survey team said their fate was 84 percent linked to the extent of sea ice.
Separate studies of trends in Arctic sea ice by academic and government teams have solidified a picture of shrinking area in summers for decades to come.
A fresh analysis by scientists of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to be published Saturday in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, says sea-ice coverage of the Arctic Ocean will decline by more than 40 percent before the summer of 2050, compared with the average ice extent from 1979 to 1999.
This summer the ice retreated much farther and faster than in any year since satellite tracking began in 1979, several Arctic research groups said.
John H. Broder reported from Washington, and Andrew C. Revkin from New York.
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
Comments
The Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines.

26 Comments so far
Show AllYeah, two thirds or maybe three thirds of the humans will be gone along with the polar bears. ___ Seems fair.
When children in the future see their first stuffed Polar Bear. they will excitedly ask their mom if there is a real bear like that. And the mother will respond "No dear, it is just a toy."
StudentsForTheEarth.org
When children in the future see their first stuffed Polar Bear. they will excitedly ask their mom if there is a real bear like that. And the mother will respond "No dear, it is just a toy."
What future?
KEM - You know there will be a future - humans just may not be part of it, though. On the other hand, aneroebic lifeforms (methane breathers) may have their chance to evolve at last, and they'll find a lot of interesting fossils. Perhaps of polar bears, or perhaps of - well, us.
Ya ever wonder what the future archeologists will think when they find remains of the silicone stuffed "beauty" queens of today?
I'd Never thought about what the archeologists might think. I know one sweetheart gal friend of mine who had to bend over to stuff her boobs in her bra, thought anyone who wanted an artificial 38DD was unaware of the pain in the back big boobs can be.
They fit the rest of her nicly though.
Global warming? Pshaw!
By the time our God-given (and tax-advantaged!) SUVs burn up all the Iraqi and Iranian oil that our Godly leaders guided by the Lord's own hand have captured through indiscriminate mass slaughter of the heathen unsaved, Jesus Hisself will come back to reward the faithful for protecting Israel by rapturing them straight the fuck off the face of this Earth.
Zing! Jes' like dat. Hallelujah! Only the Left Behind need be concerned about global warming.
So who needs a polar bear save to render his fat into something useful? After all, once the first Sandals Resort opens in Greenland there won't be much call for the fur.
If you render it's fat Trippin, never eat the polar bear's liver. It is so loaded with vitiman A, it will slowly kill any who eat it.___ Howz dat for trivia?
There is no Planet B!
We have won. Humans have won the competition for food, space, clean water. Evolution has made us the animals who could compete most successfully. So we still compete for bigger boobs, more money, more status, more recourses, more drugs, more toys, more more more.
We can't stop any more than the tiger can change his stripes. It's killing us and everything else and we know it but we are what we are. So we compete compete compete: war, football, business.
Free will we call it. It is neither free nor what any sane animal would will for it's self.
KEM - Did you watch the PBS/NOVA program on global dimming? Here's the link to the transcript -
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3310_sun.html
Serious business in itself, but it also struck me that it could be the solution to the decline in the plankton count. They didn't mention this in the program, but if the plankton are getting less sunlight, they can't do their thing (photosynthesis) and thus sustain themselves as well as make oxygen.
Everyone should read this. I (and some others) posted this earlier in the week, but the thread is out and it's gone now.
It's all up to the individual.
THE POLAR BEAR DEMISE
How many more dead canaries in the coal mine will be required before its too late to reverse the destruction.
Unless the USA, the largest emitter of carbon pollution, seriously undertakes the meaningful measures necessary to curtail our contribution to greenhouse gasses, the less industrialized & third world nations will have no incentives to control their emissions. This can never happen until Americans render ineffective the special interests and their supporting administrations that have prevented the necessary reforms through deception and fabricated science--albeit with the aid of an apathetic populace and defaulting legislators.
Contrary to their assertions, the measures to reduce carbon pollution can only improve our economy and security by reducing our oil imports while improving our health & quality of life.
By placing unlerned and corrupt individuals in the presidency over intelligent and principled candidates, those apathetic Americans deserve the worst government and environment that money can buy --ie such as Regan the great communicator to the ignorant) over Jimmy Carter; and Bush (chartered by God and oil) over Al Gore. Need I say more?
Robert Settgast, what incentives are you talking about? As the people of india and china find new found income , they are going to follow in our footsteps. Consumerism, corporatism. I'm sorry, I just feel so fatalistic because it seems that the only way we can motivate the public is through the touchy, feely image of a cuddly polar bear.
There are a lot of these "canary in a coal mine" examples. Where on the food chain will it end?
GRANDMA, thank you very much for that link, I read the entire script. I'm sure the global dimming would have an adverse effect on the Phytoplankton, along with most other plant life on Earth. Some of the more delicate plants we have in our gardens have shown serious signs of sickness in the past ten or so years, it has been most noticeable to us this past season. As has the decline in bird and inscect life.
Phytoplankton would seem to be about as delicate a plant as I can imagine, they're a microscopic life. I believe their steady rate of decline is a combination of, man made pollution and poisons, such as chemicals and atomic waste. Thirdly, this global dimming phenomenon. A triple threat one could say.
We do have one fact that is un-arguable. That is, if the phytoplankton reduce another 15 to 20%, much of life on Earth will die. If they decline by a total of 40%, or another 28%, humanity will certainly become extinct in a very short period of time, (like a month or less). In that event, with man made pollutants pretty much ended, except for the long lastng atomic wastes we'd leave here, the planet may have a slight chance of survival.
Of course if the methane gas in the Arctic is released from the thawing permafrost, all bets about the planet's survival are off the table, __ as Nancy Pisser-osi would say. Our only real hope as far as I can see, would be a benevolent King or Queen of the world taking over next year. So,____ we are screwed and we did it to ourselves.
Damon13, cuddly? ____ Nope D-13, polar bears by nature are instinctively evil, yet very intelligent animals who do not need seals in their diet to survive. They are omnivorious and will gladly kill and devour a human or munch on the tundra's plant life. They are cute though and some will develop a friendship with an Arctic fox. Did you know that every Polar bear is a lefty, they always use their left paw to snag a seal. Satan is left handed too. ( More trivia than is necessary! )
Since nothing we can do now will stop global warming from continuing, we could stop the hand- ringing and do something useful. the least we can do is feed them with airlifted meat -we have plenty of that, it neednt be filet mignon.
Shame on you BARLIS, you offer a fair proposal, then you re-nig and keep the choice cuts.
Have you ever tried a deep fried San Francisco hot dog, on a butter toasted bun, with natural peanut butter, Miracle whip mayo and sweet relish for the dressing? ____ It's yummier than filet mignon.
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/earthlings.htm
PEACESISTER
'earthlings' says it all. humans are psychopaths. and we deserve all we are going to get. how did we evolve into this? i could only watch as far as the puppy mills. i've seen it all before on PETA videos. it's too disgusting for words.
COCO, I am certain that you are not a psycho.
Damon13 is, ___ not too sure about myself.
Ah, the human folly! We pretend the life of luxury while pursuing the politics of power -- and all the while the planetary frying pan in which we live gets hotter and hotter. I truly suspect we humans are soon to be toast! Ironic, but we have had a huge hand in designing and selling the toaster that's gonna cook us!
all passingers place your head between your legs and kiss your ass good-by
KEM PATRICK
right i am not psycho. however i am very very angry at the greedy, grasping, bible bashing bastards who are destroying our planet in the name of MONEY..............i hope they are the first ones to get it in the neck.
as for you, i don't know either. till i meet you i never will. and even then.................. people cannot be trusted. i would trust a cat more than a human.................
Coco, you don't mean that. Not everyone.
Were you betrayed or hurt by someone close? You can trust me, ____ and I've always liked a little puss too.
Dang WORKRENO, I tried that and now I can't straighten up. We're not all Bushes, he can stick his head right up his rear.