Embattled DePaul Prof Norman Finkelstein Agrees to Resign
CHICAGO - A DePaul University professor who has drawn criticism for accusing some Jews of improperly using the legacy of the Holocaust agreed Wednesday to resign immediately "for everybody's sake."
University officials and political science professor Norman Finkelstein issued a statement announcing the resignation, which came as about 100 protesters gathered outside the dean's office to support him.
Finkelstein was denied tenure in June after spending six years on DePaul's faculty, and his remaining class was cut by DePaul last month.
His most recent book, "Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History," is largely an attack on Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz's "The Case for Israel." In his book, Finkelstein argues that Israel uses the outcry over perceived anti-Semitism as a weapon to stifle criticism.
Dershowitz, who threatened to sue Finkelstein's publisher for libel, had urged DePaul officials to reject Finkelstein's tenure bid.
Finkelstein, the son of Holocaust survivors, said in the statement that he believes the tenure decision was "tainted" by external pressures but praised the university's "honorable role of providing a scholarly haven for me the past six years."
The school denied that outside parties influenced the decision to deny Finkelstein tenure. The school's portion of the statement called Finkelstein "a prolific scholar and an outstanding teacher."
Finkelstein called that acknowledgment the most important part of the statement.
"I felt finally I had gotten what was my due and that maybe it was time, for everybody's sake, that I move on," he said at a news conference after a morning rally staged by students and faculty who carried signs and chanted "stop the witch hunt."
Finkelstein said, "DePaul students rose to dazzling spiritual heights in my defense that should be the envy of and an example for every university in the United States."
The professor would not discuss financial terms of the resignation agreement, which he said was confidential, but noted that it does not bar him from speaking out about issues that concern him, including "the unfairness of the tenure process."
He also said he doesn't know what he'll do next but came to realize before Wednesday "that the atmosphere had become so poisoned that it was virtually impossible for me to carry on at DePaul."
Dershowitz, too, was critical of the school. "DePaul looks like they caved into pressure," he said in a telephone interview. "The idea of describing him as a scholar trades truth for convenience. He's a man who is a propagandist and is not a scholar."
Still, Dershowitz said, "I'm happy he's out of academia. Let him do his ranting on street corners."
Dozens of supporters wearing T-shirts that read: "We Are All Professor Finkelstein" wondered about the long-term effects on the school.
"I think there's just going to be a longstanding sentiment of an injustice here," said Thomas Bellino, a 22-year-old student who has taken classes from Finkelstein.
Ronald Edwards, an untenured biology professor, said he was concerned, too.
"I think my colleagues and I need to ask if we get tenure at DePaul, is that something to be proud of? Maybe the answer is yes, but we need information before we can answer that question to be yes." And, he said, "Parents of students should ask themselves, 'Do I send my kid to a school where professorships are dubious, in terms of hiring and firing?'"
© 2007 The Associated Press
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
92 Comments so far
Show AllPaul B.
I think I understand why your ancestors and to some degree my ancestors came here. But, they brought that same system with them and without learning have created the same environmant here. There were no orphanages or homeless-landless people before this time.
I am disappointed that you have to ask "what I mean by keeping one's word". If you read the link it should be obvious. The fact that you do not understand the significance of one mountain out of 7.5 million acres escapes me as well. This is a significant lesson because the Constitution had already been written and nobody here left to go to another country.
If stewardship was the rule, most of the people here would be looking for a new home.
Treefrog: Most of my ancestors came here because they'd been rendered landless and propertyless by unsustainable economic systems that Europe has entertained since the Romans. Primogeniture being one of them. What do you mean by keeping one's word? There is no social contract today. There are run-amok politicians, carnivorous banks and S&L's, pillaged retirement funds, wars waged on false claim. There is no contract when the other party is crooked.
As for the examples I suggested, you are correct: they don't exist when it comes to real estate. They exist in most every place in the rest of our economy, however. Experts usually have a bailiwick, and this sometimes comes with ownership. In any case, I'm referring to a better and more sensible vision for the future, not the curse of the present.
For a glimpse, I'd recommend reading "The Man Who Planted Trees": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Planted_Trees
If you get a chance, the acclaimed Canadian animator Frederic Back produced an animated version which is, IMHO, required watching for anyone in the progressive/environmental movement. His "The Mighty River" is another one. Peerless & extraordinarily powerful.
In "The Man Who Planted Trees", there's a point at which our character asks Elzéard whether he owns the land that he's been rejuvenating for decades. He replies, speculating that perhaps it was parish property, or the owners didn't care for it, but that this was of no concern of his.
Just kibitzing - you know, being a kibitznik, as I am ... ;)
buffgunner, the first thing I thought when I read your initial post was "There's one born every minute." In case you're not aware, I have a Brooklyn Bridge I can sell you for half price, some Florida properties you won't have seen the like of before, and some premier Hawai'ian land with an awesome view - mostly of Mauna Loa erupting ... ;) You can really enjoy red-hot lava bombs landing on you, but only if you're a suicidally masochistic dimwit ... your call!?!
Let's see, the last time any of my Jewish ancestors was in the Middle East was at least two thousand years ago. The last time any of my Anglo-Saxon ancestors was in Greater Frisia (Flanders to Holstein), Jutland or (Lower) Saxony was at least sixteen hundred years ago.
According to the Israel Law of Return, there is a fair chance I have the right to "return" to Israel. If I ever tried that with the Belgians (South Greater Frisia), the Dutch (South Greater Frisia), the Germans (Saxon Confederation) or the Danes (Jutland, North Greater Frisia), I expect they would roll around the floor laughing their heads off - before sending me home in a straitjacket with firm instructions that I need a good course of anti-psychotic medicine.
The mere fact that Jews have maintained a presence in what is now Israel over the last two thousand years, doesn't alter the presence of Jews in Iraq for the last twenty-five hundred years, or their presence in Iran for a similar length of time. If Muslims - or Arabs - hated Jews that much, how come they lasted there so long? In England, for example, they were expelled in 1290 and didn't get (officially) back until 1956.
Another thing - I take a certain amount of pride in being a descendant of Sephardic conversos. We were part of the driving force behind the Golden Age in Spain. At that time, the Caliphate was a meritocracy, and Sephardim naturally rose to the top, along with their Muslim contemporaries. When you make such statements about Jews and Arabs, you not only repeat without thought Zionist slanders made to justify their destruction of the Arab-Jewish communities in their homelands, eg the Egyptian Jews, you also insult my ancestors, my family.
And I personally think that ranks as nasty a form of stereotyping Jews as anything you might get from the neo-Nazi cheap seats.
Paul B.
By this same logic, it is why your ancestors came to a new world for a new begining. Part of that new begining was keeping your word or acting with integrity. Or, put another way live by your own laws. If this doesn't graphically demonstrate a principle I don't know what does.
No where in the world that I can think of operates on the principle of stewardship, maybe you can think of an example.
Treefrog,
By that same logic, I should be back in Europe where my ancestors came from, occupying the lands the Romans/Prussian Junkers/etc. stole from my peoples. While I like that idea, it's never going to happen.
I've come to conclude that there's only one modern-day justification more sensible than monetary or even historical justification: stewardship capability. In my estimation, whoever can best steward land against waste, pollution, run-amok development, etc. is the only genuine "owner" of it.
by the way folks, here is the link for the dershowtitz/finklestein "debate" from democracy now, hosted by amy goodman:
http://www.democracynow.org/static/dershowitzFin.shtml
see if you agree with me that dersh comes off as a lazy, mean spirited plagiarist (as norman accused) in this discussion.
briefly, it begins with a long soliloquy by dersh about his new book and how wonderful a man he was to write it.
finklestein accuses him, right off the hop, of being a plagiarist and dersh freaks and threatens a lawsuit. he is ready to do that which he does so well, fling shit everywhere in the hope of distracting the point at hand, which was to discuss his book.
then dersh spends the rest of the time either hogging the mike, interrupting or backpedaling on every one of the points raised.
at once, it is the best and the worst of the trained jewish mind at work. derrsh is no match for norman finklestein, simple as that. i would suggest that dersh is simply old and lazy in his research and he is so yesterday. he should go back to trying to reclaim oj simpson's good name. because you know oj is innocent. that is dersh's best professional, considered opinion. so much for that.
there are so many millions of wonderful and kind jews in the world that i am worried how these kinds of news items washes over them simply because dersh is a jew.
he is also a lawyer, but let's not hate him at for that. let's not hate him at all - it diminishes us. let's treat him with the respect he deserves, which is none.
as norman so rightly put it during the radio show, "mr dershowitz i am not interested in you, not interested at all".
dersh has harmed the jewish community at large and he should consider a twenty year sabbatical in some religious school, so long as it is far removed from the rest of us people who are concerned about the plaestinian situation and want to have what dersh never will: some kind of resolution.
god love you norman finklestein!
Israel is a monster. Instead of parking the Jews in a land far from Europe, the Europeans should have made room for them in their midst and finally learned how to live with them. Not only did Europe give us the Shoah, it gave us Israel after that. As such, Europe never made good on its crimes.
I think the whole "God's chosen people" bit is part of the paranoia too. They were victimized as a people, and now many of them want to do the same to anyone they might percieve as a threat. And that sort of thing, along with the mistreatment of the Palestinians fuels anti-semitism. Not that I condone that either. People need to know that there are many jews who oppose all of this and see it for the injustice that it is. Not all of the people rooting for and egging on Israel are jews either, and not all of those people, in fact, I'd say most of them imo couldn't give a flip for jews.
I mean, does anyone honestly think that Pat Robertson loves jews?
Anyway, I'm sure David Horowitz is having a martini right now. After all, he's gotta crusade against that leftist conspiracy overtaking academia. Btw, I agree with the poster that Finklestein would do well to get away from the university culture. Part of the Left's problem is that it's too often insulated by it.
Finkelstein is the clear winner in this matter, although he lost his job in the process, because this case fully exposed the thuggishness of the Israel lobby.
The follwing was written by journalist Robert Fisk (Independent,UK):
Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines "anti-Semitism" as "opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel".
Come again? If you or I suggest--or, indeed, if poor wee Mary suggests--that the Palestinians are getting a raw deal under Israeli occupation, then we are "anti-Semitic". It is only fair, of course, to quote the pitiful response of the Webster's official publicist, Mr Arthur Bicknell, who was asked to account for this grotesque definition.
"Our job," he responded, "is to accurately reflect English as it is actually being used. We don't make judgement calls; we're not political." Even more hysterically funny and revolting, he says that the dictionary's editors tabulate "citational evidence" about anti-Semitism published in "carefully written prose-like books and magazines". Preposterous as it is, this Janus-like remark is worthy of the hollowest of laughs. – Robert Fisk
I wonder if Arthur Bicknell would define "anti-Christianism" as opposition to "neoconism: sympathy with opponents of the United States"?
The fact is: Not all Israeli Jews are Zionists and not all U.S. Christians are Neocons! Does Harvard Professor, Dershowitz have a pigeon hole for the rest of us?
Dershotwitz etc all are using this as an example to stop others from speaking out against Zionism. This is why the Finklestein case is so important and why its in the news. We need to show more support for the courage of Finklestein so that other professors and literati are not afraid to speak up and take risks.
Please let me know your ideas.
Perhaps it's time to add a new term to the vocabulary here. Since we so glibly (and inaccurately) speak of "Islamofasicsts," why not "Judaeofascists"? Clearly Dershowitz, who gained notoriety as the defender and enabler of multiple murderer OJ Simpson, and who has savagely come after Mearsheimer and Walt, along with Finkelstein, merits nomination for such a title. And clearly the supporters of a Likud outlook on the part of Israel and its supporters abroad have to admit that the state of Israel has become what it beheld--a new "yiddisches Reich." I should add here that an even casual reading of the Old Testament should lead invariably to the conclusion that Hebrews were Nazis several thousand years before Germans were Nazis. Captain Dreyfus would be ashamed. Oh, and--if you don;t like it, Al--sue me!!
The categorizing people into "races" is usually counter-productive. And very few races can be identified with one widespread and ancient set of relitious beliefs.
For example, Jews cannot be defined as a Semites. Judaism, like Catholicism, Protestantism, and Islam, is a religion that is followed by people of many different races and ethnic groups.
There are Moroccan, Ethiopean,Eastern and Western European, Latin American, Central American, Chinese, Syrian, etc. Jews.
Of course, there are wildly different Sephardic and Ashkanazi Jews.
Thus, if one equates Judaism with a racial category, Semite, one is following Nazi-based racial theories.
However, if one can make a DNA case for Semites actually being a racial category, than one could compare and contrast DNA with different ethnic groups that are labeled or proclaim themselves Semites.
I have no knowledge that a particular DNA configuration can actually define an individual or group as Semitic.
However, even if there is a case to be made for a Semitic racial category, it would still be hard put to conflate the Jewish religion (in all of its manifestations) to one race.
Paul B
Here is your rule of law:
The Six Grandfathers, Paha Sapa, in the Year 502,002 C.E.
http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/7/sixgrandfathers.php
There is a supreme court ruling here. The illegal occupation of the land in question is not a matter of money.
shakker: Being "the first" doesn't really matter anyway. The dead are centuries gone, and there's enough blame to go around. We need to get along with one another today. If the previous owners of my 1965 ranch home demand that I leave because they were there first, I'd give them a choice word or three.
Harkening to past ownership, history, etc. for claims of this sort inevitably put one at the doorstep of collective punishment and collective rewards. Both of which are contrary to any society based on rule of law.
Colleen
I agree with you that we are all connected by our common humanity. I think you have hit on something when you say that advantage is outsourcing justice in this instance. I very much appreciate your posts and your capacity to go beyond the issue at hand for context and understanding.
Thank you.
Regarding the discredited book, "From Time Immemorial", by Joan Peters that Dershowitz relied upon heavily (plagiarized according to Finkelstein) in his "The Case for Israel":
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/5249
Here's an excellent article for anyone interested in a concise analysis of the Dershowitz (the fraud) v. Finkelstein (the prolific scholar) issue that featured large in tenure debacle.
http://www.counterpunch.org/menetrez04302007.html
This is no surprise.
Read Noam Chomsky's "understanding power". he touches on this. Universities are an agent of the state because they receive funding from the state and corporations.
buffgunner: Since "semite", according to the German scholars who invented the term a couple of hundred years ago, applies to the descendants of the mythical figure "Shem", including Arabs, Assyrians, Hebrews, etc.,
what do you mean by "anti-semitism"? If you are referring to Arabs as well as Jews, as you should be, then does anti-semitism refer to all Arabs, whether Christian, Muslim, atheist, etc.? Does it apply to atheists born to Jewish mothers, or theists born to atheist, formerly Jewish mothers? I'm having a hard time understanding your meaning!
Please clarify. SALAAM WA SHALOM!
At this point it is not possible to determine who the first people were in the land now referred to Israel and Palestine, however it seems that the second people there killed them or enslaved them and took the land. Probably just how the Canaanites, Jebusites, Philistines and others got it. They were there when Abraham and later Joshua and the gang moved in.
However there may have been ancestors of Abraham there before who didn't have a press agent. Trying to correct history makes the middle east an unsolvable problem.
There is money and power to be had by stirring the pot in the middle east - the past has as little to do with the problem as religion. Greedy power seekers of each 'professed stripe' are using people as pawns to meet their own goals at any cost.
here is the link for the shlolo ben-ami/finklestein debate on the history of the palestinians:
http://www.democracynow.org/finkelstein-benami.shtml
ben ami was chief israeli negotiator at the oslo accords and camp david and he agrees with these points:
zionists purchased about 7% of palestine by the early 20th century from absentee landlords who lived in turkey
at some point they chose to get the rest through force - because they could
in 1948 the israelis conducted a genocide on the palestinians to cleanse the country, ironically cleanse palestine of the palestinians.
israel is in violation of international law which states that there is a right of return for displaced persons after a conflict
i can see the rise of antisemitism all around me as this relatively small number of people exert their murderous agenda on the rest of the world. people are getting frustrated everywhere and one gets a little woozy wondering where this all going.
jesus christ, the palestinians allowed the jews to move into their country and now they have no country. wow!
by dershowitz's judgement oj simpson was innocent and any fucking idiot who thinks like that is about equal to the republican presidential wannabe's who think that creationism (which dictates that the world is 5 thousand years old and that man walked on the earth with the dinosaurs) explains the history of the world.
this scummy little prick dershie has brought down a very honorable and intelligent man in finklestein and we are the worse for it.
i am not surprised to see anti jewish posts all over this web site (and many others) and i expect to see more.
even pogroms in the us.
good work dersh!
ldavin September 6th, 2007 1:59 pm
"Seriously, what is the difference between racism and anti-semitism? is one or the other worse?"
The truth is no. In the US and Israeli corporate media being anti semitic is worse than racism if you hear them tell it. This is why there can be no real covnersation regarding the slaughter of Palestinians by the IDF and the stolen occupied territories.
The biggest hold up to peace in the Middle East is the US blind support of anything Israeli. There is to be no concessions to the Palestinians as far as right odf return for those who were forcibly removed from their homes by the Zionist terrorist groups now calling themselves the nation of Israel.
Example - when Rachel Corrie an American working to help feed Palestinians was run down by an American made IDF bulldozer and killed - Bushwhack told her family that he was "sorry but she should not have been in a war zone."
This was eerily the same thing former President Reagan told the family of a civil Engineer working in Nicaragua in the 1980's teaching the locals how to irrigate crops. He was cut down by CIa and Contra mercenaries (Read - murderers - like Bush/Cheney/Reagan/Clinton et al).
Calling anything anti Israel anti-semitic or using anit-semitism in place of simple racism is nothing more than AIPAC propaganda. Racism is ignorant regardless but anti semitism (according to those who decry its existence each day) is used to create the false illusion that being anti Jewish is some how worse than anything else.
It is part and parcel of why there is no peace in the Middle East. The use of anti semitism is almost laughable in some respects. Consider that the jewish Israeli's are all descendants of the same people as the Palestinians. In fact had Israel never been created as a nation in 1947 (no nation of Israel ever existed before then - in previous times the 2 nations existing in this place were called Judah and Samaria never Israel) there would still be Jews living in the area today. Palestinians invited the holocaust survivors to come to Palsetine and live with them in peace after WWII.
Zionist terrorists like Sharon, Gurion and Meir would not accept peace then, nor will they now. They blew up the Brits HQ's in the King David hotel to start with and then began a systematic purge of all things Muslim calling it Palestinian.
Though, aside from Right-wing fundamentalist extremists anticipating End Times--it is Jewish interests promoting, no bullying and buying their spin as consensus.
Where is all the $ for the muscle coming from? Gentiles? Jews allegiance to Israel is exploited over the truth. Even the new D congressman in my district panders to the growing Jewish population at the expense of all other issues. And the views he obediently echoes are the exact same as the Republican view on the topic. On this issue there is no light between the 2--all are united.
That is power.
DePaul caved to anti-semitic accusations against a son of Holocaust survivors by a guy who wrote a book that Finkelstein criticized in his own book?
Not only is it ridiculous politically but also appears to be a new age of rival professor wars.
Can only hope this will give Finkelstein some sympathy to his voice.
Good luck my friend, there are many of us behind you who know the truth.
"...and it would appear that Americans Jews are held up to far tighter standards than gentiles, when it comes to Israel."
Very true. Sure, far too many Jews are uncritically supportive of Israel, and disregard or are overtly racists with regard to the Palestinians. But, isn't this the case for a large majority of all USAns?
I really hoped that DePaul would do the right thing, and not railroad Dr. Finkelstein as the University of Colorado railroaded Ward Churchill-- although Finkelstein's work is highly controversial, he doesn't have the murky scholarship issues and problematic public personality which Churchill's detractors leveraged in order to provide a fig leaf of justification for Churchill's pretextual discharge.
It's a return to the pusillanimous academic conformity and cowardice witnessed in the McCarthy Era.
I admire Dr. Finkelstein for displaying grace and integrity in the face of his employer's appalling and shameful capitulation to improper pressure and subsequent decision to deny him the tenure he obviously richly deserved.
In the highest Roman Catholic tradition, DePaul officials applauded when Alan Dershowitz tore into Finkelstein's buttock like a rabid Doberman pinscher, then complemented his assailant's tireless attack by kicking Norman's other cheek. How the DePaul elite must have enjoyed the spectacle of a Zionist gladiator vainly trying to take down a Jewish opponent! It combines the best traditions of the Roman Empire and the Spanish Inquisition.
And when Dershowitz failed to best his opponent on the field of combat, the authorities rewarded him anyway by neatly dispatching Finkelstein from behind.
Live, Jesus, in our hearts forever!
Treefrog
Land issues and old injustices and their subsequest outrages seem to carry on through the generations. How to get people to coexist and to live side by side is an issue that has yet to be resolved. But as someone here at Common Dreams once wrote in a post, All war is civil war. We are all one and the same.
We are all humans.
We are killing ourselves with our own hatreds for one another.
In my view, I try to set up principles that I try to apply across all the divisions that we humans make for one another. I like the rule of law where all are equal and issues are decided based upon principles that attempt to resolve injustices. But then you get someone like a Dershowitz, who perverts the law and social order to protect and further the interests of one particular group. He does not seek justice, he seeks advantage.
Here is a serious problem regarding this that few address:
http://www.counterpunch.org/halle06162007.html
Conniff and Rothschild are frequent writers on CD. Same goes for journalists at the Nation that take the position that any criticism Of Israel is anti-semitic, as in the case of ANSWER and possibly what might be behind the undermining of Sheehan's campaign.
The question has to be asked: What role do Progressive Jews play when their indoctrinated allegiance to Israel (my country right or wrong) betrays their progressive values?
I won't hold my breath in anticipating a forthcoming response. I know there won't be one.
It never ceases to amaze me that so few people, as the number of Jewish people in the entire world (about 13.5 million), can cause so much trouble. Look at the disproportionate amount of wealth they control, especially the Zionists, who will not be satisfied until they dominate the whole world. A recent study shows the Zionists now control 40% of the world's gold supply, and they certainly have no qualms about using these resources to initiate 'false flag' wars. If you want to see some really really scary people & events, from a current & historical perspective, try Googling Zionism Mossad 911.
Here are some examples of fine representatives of pro-Semitism:
Consider the words of Israeli's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, a man that is portrayed as a hero in the American media:
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting off of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population."
Consider the words of an average fourteen year old Israeli named Orri Joseph Avraham:
"I am a Jew. I am an Israeli. I am a Zionist, and I am both racially and intellectually superior to you, the non Jew. For your lies, your pathetic stupidity, and your anti-Semitism, your people will suffer under punishment of the world's future super power, Israel! Jews are superior to dirty blooded non-Jews like you… Beware, for your kind will come to fear us. The coming thirty years will make your eyes twitch my Gentile… I am a Jew, you are not. I have the privilege of having God by my side."
Consider the words of the Israeli writer Benny Morris:
"I'm trying to be realistic. Preserving my people [Jews] is more important than any universal moral concepts."
Consider the words of Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg:
"Jewish blood and a goy's blood are not the same."
Or Rabbi Yaacov Perrin:
"One million Arabs are not worth one Jewish fingernail."
I'm so glad some earlier poster pointed out that Jewish people have no exclusive claim to being called Semitic. I have no ax to grind against the Jewish people. A substantial portion of the Jewish community (Torah) freely admit that to adhere to the higher law of their religion they must reject the foundation of a Jewish 'state'. I do have much to say, however, about how it it every decent human's duty to reject Zionism, because of their goals, and methods used to achieve them. They are thugs just as much as radical Christian & Islamic fundamentalistic terrorists are, and the world won't be resolved toward peace until these three errant entities are crushed. If this, buffgunner, makes me what you so wrongly label anyone who disagrees with you as being 'anti-Semitic, this is a distinction I wear proudly. You obviously haven't done due diligent research into these matters, or your spirit of free thinking has been clouded by emotional attachments.
Buffgunner there were plenty of people in the land of Israel/Palestine before and after the Jews.
Interactive historical map of the Middle East:
http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/EMPIRE17.swf
By the way the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Macedonians,Sassanids, Seljuks, Crusaders, Byzantines, Ottomans, and European Colonialists all ruled over the Israel/Palestine area on the map during different periods in world history. The biblical Israel was only a short time out of all of this and the Egyptians and Assyrians were there even before the Jews. Honestly no one group can lay claim on that territory based on this timeline map.
Here's a guy who simply states what everyone in their gut knows and gets shot down by the very mechanism he's meticulously documented. Dershowitz should be ashamed. Reversal of misfortune.
True, but silence is complicity.
Much of it is tribalism, no doubt-Any Jew who criticizes Israel is "self-hating" and any Gentile who does is 'anti-semitic".
But...
Last night I caught some C-Span coverage of 2 Jewish politicians posturing in front of the empty House with their charts and blow-ups and their rhetoric about poor widdle Israel and my blood was boiling. The issue is taboo--and other issues in other areas, the Religious Right, the frigging Nazi Pope, etc are not--there is open discussion and challenge to the stinking lies and deceptions. This issue owns our body politic, drains the taxpayer dollars and arguably send US children off to die in ME wars. And it is ALL of a Right-wing - extreme Right-wing mindset.
And I agree, the backlash could be history repeating itself. You know the circumstances are there.
buffgunner said:
"Look at what used to be major Jewish populations in all the Arab countries."
Jews, Christians, Sunni, and Shia all lived quite peacefully in Iraq until the fellow responsible for the one secular society in the Middle East decided his country ought to be able set whatever prices on its oil his government wanted. Now any Jews, Christians, Sunni, and Shia that can flee the hell the country has become do.
Oh, and look what used to be major Palestinian populations in what is now called Israel.
buffgunner said, September 6th, 2007 4:06 pm
"I see antisemitism is quite prevalent here - as is the rewriting of Middle East History. Jews were in Israel long before Arabs and have had a continuous presence there for thousands of years."
buffgunner
Gunning down your perceived enemies while in the buff, buffgunner? Sorry, buffy, but it is you and the Zionists that are rewriting history. There are many Jews who are not Zionists who do know the history and are apalled by what the invading European Jews and their government of Israel have done.
Put on some clothes so you don't further embarass yourself, buffy, and read again how the Jews were a Semitic people, Mesopotamians, living along the Tigris River which used to flow on the east side of the city of Ur. Abraham, a man of some means, apparently, because he had a herd of cows and a sizable family, led his tribe some 600 miles west, poked around the land of Canaan, went over into Egypt for awhile where he quite likely found a well-organized body of folks along the Nile he didn't dare take on in battle, and returned to Canaan. There, old Abe, gave one of his sons, named Israel, a chunk of Canaan, and gave another son, Judah, the remaining chunk.
Except, the land of Canaan was not Abraham's to give: it had been long settled by folks called Canaanites. You can know those Canaanites were there and plentiful because the writings in the Jewish Torah recalls how the Jews slaughtered them: entire towns and peoples, killed anything that moved, like Captain Medina's boys in Mai Lai.
Conquest, slaughter, genocide, is how the Jews got Canaan the first time around. Then in 1946 people who called themselves Jews went back and conquered Canaan again, now called Palestine, in the good old way of their ancestors by conquest, slaughter, and genocide, a process that continues even now. Now it is the final solution by Jews not of Jews.
DNA studies finished recently showed that many of the current inhabitants of Lebanon are descended from the original Canaanite peoples who lived in the area long before the Jews. If some, many, most, of the people called Palestinians have or don't have direct blood lineage with the ancient Canaanites, as do the nearby Lebanese, it certainly doesn't give the Jews any legitimacy to the land where they slaughtered the original Canaanites or drove them up into Lebanon.
The Holocaust of the Jews in Europe was a horror that the civilized world said should never happen again. The "civilized world" that could stop the new Holocaust by the Jews of the people they found in Canaan, now called Palestine, are standing by and letting it happen again. Worse, some countries, notably the United States are accomplices in this new Holocaust.
As for Zionism, well, the Jewish god said they could have all the land between the Tigris and the Nile. Check it out: that takes in land of several countries. And, yes, there are fanatical Jews that want it, want it all. Christians and Muslims don't have a corner on fanaticism.
A good thing that fuhreedom-lovin' amurkins are bravely torturing & murdering people half a planet away so that Dershowitz can enjoy his freedom to get his critics sacked from their academic posts.
It is not enough not to criticize Big Brother AIPAC. You must love Big Brother AIPAC.
Jezebeezus, what a bunch.
Colleen
What is hard to recognize is that this is an historical issue that is yet unresolved, so it remains a current issue as well. Most everything in that article that happened over a hundred years ago, still happens today. It is happening in Iraq and there is more than oil at stake. Trade agreements by Paul Wolfowitz will indenture the people and that is why they fight. Bush and Cheney are more than I wake up call they are a great big warning sign.
Honestly, I think Finkelstein will do more good outside of academia. Granted, future students lose out on having a great teacher, but academia these days is so cautious, so dry, so completely irrelevant to the real world, that people like Finkelstein (and Churchill) who truly believe in rational inquiry and speaking truth to power are better off as "independent scholars".
Have anyone noticed or wondered why is it that all candidates for president do not dare to critize the acts of agression of the Israelis against the Palestinian terretory and its people??. because it would be political suicide. LOOK out for the Jewish lobby.
Leave it to Dershowitz to be despicable even his moment of "triumph."
Harvard should hire Finklestein.
balakirev: thanks for two great posts; the first gave a view I hadn't looked on before.
obmaj: I don't have any clue as to the power structure of Harvard, but wouldn't it be great if that fine institution could find a position for Mr. Finkelstein? Hey, even a temporary visiting position or something. This act would help to restore some of their own credibility after sitting on the cowardly sidelines. And give him a room next to the ambulance, er- SUV chaser.
To get a good idea of the type of academic trench warfare that goes on (in general) read the first sections of Steven Pinker's "The Blank Slate." (nature vs. nurture)
Treefrog
Great link. Thank you, it was very informative. Its interesting how people want particular peices of land and claim them for their heritage. Its a shame how America does not live up to the treaties signed with the native American tribes. I have to think that Bush and Cheney in their thinking use this historical lack of respect to justify their own lack of regard for the law.
I wounder if thats the Mexicans intent in crossing the rio Grande as what some refer to as illegals.they are simply taking back the land that they believe belongs to them,that they were in the southwest first.I wounder if they would refer to Dershowitz as a gringo. Its amazing what people do in the name of religion!
OW:
"JC: It's more a matter of the right to tell the verifiable truth than just the freedom to speak your mind that is with increasing success being banned on US academia.
And once the rot sets in, it infects the entire body."
How true !
Headed out the door, I threw out a one-liner.
The rot has been growing fetid mold for several decades in both academia and media.
Example: At U.C. Berkeley, once an epicenter of dissent, they began purging progressive instructors and professors without tenure as early as 1968 if they were outside/beyond the acceptable limits of theory/truth. This has been a pervasive process throughout the nation, as a generalization. Hence, the 21st century student tends to be dumber than a box of neocon rocks despite their ability to perform efficiently in an acceptable academic monkey mode of conformity.
Finkelstein has been crucified by his own !
And speaking of truth versus mere speech, let's not forget Hunter Thompson, wrote from a mindset of absolute integrity and altruistic anarchistic passion presenting distilled "truth" while deviating from apparent facts and decorating a very dark world with syntactical works of luminous art and prophecy.
And how strange, in later years his innocent prankster face began to resemble the Dalai Lama with kindness and wisdom.
If I remember rightly, Democracy Now also interviewed two very well known Jewish historians. They both agreed that Finklestein was accurate and correct in everything her said in his books, but that his style of writing could be deemed inflamatory. Unlike their own books which essentially agreed with him but are dry and academic.
That is the real reason Derhowitz is trying to ruin Finklestein, because people other than scholars actually read Finklestein's books. He does not want the public at large to learn the truth on these issues.
I hope some more fearless University will offer Finklestein a position. We should all write to Harvard and ask them to fire Dershowitz for plagerism and meddling in the affairs of another school.
The author of "The Vanishing American Jew" seemingly wants all critics of Israel to disappear as well. Hmmm.
It amazes me how some people can accuse a jew (if the name Finkelstein 'aint jewish...) of being an anti-semite?
I keep seeing people write about the "Israeli lobby". While Zionists have some clout in regards to this, imo it's the elites who truly cause and benefit from all of this. And they seem to be a bunch of WASPS.
Israel is a pathway towards Westernizing the Middle East. If they can make the rest of the Middle East like Israel, they can do business there. It's imperialism.
Also, while I think that some jews hide behind The Holocaust and dredge up the undeniable hell they've been through as a people, I also think that same hell fuels Israel's injustice towards the Palestinians. Imo, it's paranoia, and I believe many jews just see themselves as a people trying to survive in a world that they feel is still hostile towards them. And that survival is something they won't compromise on. So whenever they are attacked, they retaliate twofold. Whenever someone publicly decries their policies, they try to stifle that voice.
Not that I excuse it. I've been called an anti-semite myself here on CD and elsewhere for my views on Israel. I don't even think that Israel has a right to exist. Their homeland should be somewhere in Europe. But I think that people also need to keep in mind what things may drive Zionism and I don't think that it's Empire alone.
Vern,
You touch on many interesting points, and it would appear that Americans Jews are held up to far tighter standards than gentiles, when it comes to Israel. Though maybe it's just a purging at certain levels: no criticism of Israel allowed in government, academia, or higher-level civil service. I'm still unsure what it really is to be Jewish. Is it a religion? A race? A way of life?
It does involve "towing the party line" dynamics. Here in Minnesota we've had a number of Jewish Senators or candidates for that office (Paul Wellstone, Rudy Boschwitz, Norm Coleman, Al Franken). I distinctly remember Boschwitz slamming Wellstone for marrying a Christian, and not raising his kids as conservative Jews. Boschwitz evidently saw this as political ammunition, but it backfired and he lost his bid.
I've wondered if so many American Jews remain silent on their extreme right-wing in the way that moderate American churches remained largely silent on the likes of Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, the whole right-wing evangelical/theocratic movement, etc. It would take someone in one of those faiths an awful lot of courage to stand up and call the right-wing bluff: "Pat Robertson is no Christian", for instance.
If you step out, I suspect, you may find yourself with virtually no friends at all. Best just to keep quiet, and hope the pendulum doesn't swing too far one way (Israel nukes a neighbor or wealthy zionists plunge the Western world into bankruptcy) or the other (widespread rise of anti-semitism).
Though I'm unsure this approach is wise. It may well be the unchecked extreme right/powerful that cause an anti-semitic backlash in general, and all Jews will suffer -- progressive or no -- because of the way this dynamic has played itself out historically.
Interesting that Dershowitz never sued Finkelstein's publisher as he threatened. That would have been the best way to discredit him assuming he could have made a good case. The assumption is probably telling about why he didn't.
The assumption became very tenuous when Finkelstein and Dershowitz faced off in a "debate" on Democracy Now regarding the claims in Dershowitz's book. The lawyer lacked convincing arguments in his own defense.
So Dershowitz makes the case that Finkelstein shouldn't get tenure and the Pro-Israeli lobby, both lay and professional, support the effort. And a university belonging to a church which now bends over backwards to live down its appalling history of Antisemitism denies Finkelstein tenure and suspends his classes during his terminal year, not because of his scholarship, but because of his "style."
There really is no ambiguity about what happened here.
Colleen
The provisions of the Fort Laramie Treaty are disputed but it is only one. (a rather large issue though) The Interior department handles all land leasing and royalties for Indian land and has mismanaged the affairs. When ordered by a federal judge to produce the records, they (Gale Norton) was in contempt of court. Her under secretary said the records were lost.
Thank you for the link it is very interesting.
Here is another from that site.
The Six Grandfathers, Paha Sapa, in the Year 502,002 C.E.
http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/7/sixgrandfathers.php
Thanks again!
Dershowitz supports torture -- !!!
Look, criticizing Americans isn't anti-American any more than criticizing Israel foreign policy isn't anti-semitic . . . . it's merely criticizing Israel's foreign policy!!!
I can only hope that we can somehow get this Professor returned to campus -- and STOP Israel and America's current fascist leaders.
This is not only a shame, it's a wakeup call to the fact that free speech is almost dead in this country. Dershowitz is a fine one to talk about anything. As far as I am concerned, he lost all credibility when he published his defense of torture a few years back. I will preface the following by saying that not only am I a Jew, but I do wish Israel to continue to exist. Mr. Dershowitz's absurd defense of some of Israel's worst acts of violence against Palestinians is inexcusable. In my opinion, he is as much a religious hypocrite as a Pat Robertson, Falwell, et al.
Long ago when I was faculty I discovered that a) universities are businesses and b) the business of universities was to make money. Students were incidental and only made capitation money for the university. Money was made by developing patents and beginning new businesses. Anything that smacked of diverting attention from those two goals was discouraged. Writing books creating divisiveness of a religious or philosophical kind was discouraged because it might divert money away from the university that was trying very hard to get whole estates from past graduates who might have objected to the pro-or con approach of the books.
If a faculty member wrote a book it became university property because it was written on university time and with university equipment. Same thing for ideas and patents. Oh, the prof got a pittance. But, no prof survived who went against the common perceived weal.
Now things may have changed...but considering we are now a nation committed to having big business support the people who govern us and big business makes the laws the people they govern support and vote for, I doubt it.
Soon we will have no more faculty voices, strong or weakly dissident, no ordinary people who will disagree with anyone who is stronger for fear of irrational retaliation...we have become a nation of Bush-bullies and that is no different from our government and its intent on ruling the world.
It's a shame that Harvard won't fire Dershowitz, who has long sounded like an Israeli agent. Finkelstein was speaking the truth, which is supposedly an academic objective, while Dershowitz is lauded for arguing Israel's phony "case".
Dershowitz, is a true propagondist and a charlaton.
It is a sad day for America to have allowed the Israeli Lobby to succeed in silencing one of the few voices of reason when it comes to the Israeli Palestinian conflict.
Treefrog
The Lakota tribe has a strong argument that it owns Mount Rushmore. They were granted that land with a treaty with the US government.
"The Treaty of Fort Laramie from 1868 had previously granted the Black Hills to the Lakota in perpetuity." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Rushmore
Well in actuality the federal government has never accounted for the billions of dollars they owe and manage for native americans. There was a suit not long ago that the interior department and Gail Norton specifically lost the records.
Not to mention territory that was never succeeded or compensated.
I think native americans rightfully own Chicago and and the University of Illinois or at least the land they are built on.
buffgunner
Israel is somewhat of an ethnically hierarchical society within its Jewish community. (This observation doesn't include the vast ethnic inequality between Jewish and Palestinian Israelis.)
Most of the top government, business and military positions tend to be filled by people of Ashkenazi (or European) Jewish ancestry.
Many of the lower rungs of Israeli society are occupied by Jews of color (i.e., Ethiopian,), those Jews indigenous to Israel and some Sephardic Jews).
So, the ethnic hierarchy within the Jewish community and that between Jews and Paletinian Israelis suggests that Israel shares common characteristics with other European settler states.
Even though there were indigenous Jews in pre-Israeli Palestine, they tend to be found at the bottom of the wealth and power pyramid. So, the indigenous Jew theory for Israel's existence doesn't pan out.
If the above theory was correct, indigenous Jews would be proportionally represented at all levels of Israeli Jewish society...not over represented on the bottom tiers.
However, if the indigenous Jew theory was correct, it would not excuse the consequent ethnic cleansing, mass murder, massive destruction and ethnocide of the Palestinians.
Its strange that an American should think anyone should own land based upon continuing occupancy going back thousands of years.
In that case you should give your land to native Americans. You have no right to the land in America based upon your own argument.
How the Palestinians were driven out of Israel is an issue that is at the heart imo of how to bring justice to that area of the world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestinian_exodus
"Historians have given different reasons and assigned different responsibilities for the Palestinian exodus. The answers to these questions could have important consequences for the future of these refugees and their descendants, as well as to other Arabs and Jews in Israel.
The following theories have been proposed:
* That 'Arab leaders' endorsed, encouraged or planned the refugee flight was the official line taken by the governments of Israel, assigning the main responsibility for the exodus to calls made by local and foreign Arab leaders.
* The 'transfer principle' theory, proposed by the Israeli New Historians (mainly Benny Morris), contends that the displacement of the population was a consequence of a common line of thought in Zionist politics that emphasized the transfer of Palestinian Arabs as a precondition to the establishment of a Jewish state.
* The 'master plan' theory, proposed by Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi, claims that the Palestinian exodus was planned and organised in advance by Jewish authorities.
* The 'two-stage explanation' is a theory brought forth by Yoav Gelber, which distinguishes between two phases of the exodus. Before the Arab invasion, it explains the exodus as a result of the crumbling Arab social structure, and after the invasion as a result of actions by the Israeli army during the campaign in the Galilee and Negev.
According to Bernard Lewis, it is possible that all of the explanations are partially true of the exodus in general and perhaps even singularly "true of different places."[24]
felix4321, There was no 1967 illegal invasion of Palestinian territory. That land was occupied as a result of an ARAB attack.
History has shown that the Arabs are far less likely to tolerate a different people than the Jews are. Look at what used to be major Jewish populations in all the Arab countries. Arabs in Israel have more rights than anywhere in an Arab country.
The fact is many of the Jewish faith are anti-Zionist. But the Zionists have a stranglehold on free speech and expression.
Let me get this straight: a Jewish poli-sci prof writes a book challenging another profs pro-Israeli treatise, which probably attempts to justify all the horrible shit Israel has been engaging in for the last four decades since they illegally invaded and occupied Palestine territory, and he not only is denied tenure but gets sacked and his publisher threatened w/ libel by said pro-Israel prof.
Actually, it's even worse than that.
Dershowitz, in writing In Defense of Israel plagiarized a pro-Israeli book by Joan Peters that had been soundly condemned for its falsehoods, From Time Immemorial, which intended to prove that the Palestinians didn't even exist as a people, and therefore whatever the Israeli government did to them was justified. Finkelstein was acting as a good academic by pointing out the plagiarism, so who loses the prospect of tenure? Finkelstein. Who stays on even though plagiarism is allegedly one of the worst things you can do as a professor (that is, unless you're defending Israel)? Dershowitz. Cornel West was hustled out of Harvard with far less cause than an actual case against Dershowitz.
What is "anti-Semitism"? A crime against man and nature.
What is racism against black people and other minorities? Business as usual.
felix -
The story of the Khazars is easily available if you look for it. I learned of it from a book called "Catastrophe: An Investigation into the Origins of Modern Civilization" by David Keys which outlines a hypothesis that a volcanic eruption so disrupted plant life in the world that mass migrations resulted.
Any good world atlas should illustrate another poorly known fact. Israel is the second Jewish state of the 20th century, not the first. The USSR gave them an autonomous state several hundred miles N of Vladivostok. I only learned this on NPR about 10 years ago. This was founded ~ 1930. Technically, not a country, but a long way from Moscow and with a great degree of autonomy. It faded away, as the appeal of land in Palestine was too strong.
gde,
thanks for the info. very interesting. any recommendations for books re: the cultural and religious history of the area?
In protest, I will not hire Harvard grads until they fire Dershowitz.
this is just one more nail in the coffin of the United States of Israel, sorry, America.
Harvard should be proud that a law professor meddled in the affairs of another University. Do you think the Harvard snobs would not go crazy if a professor from another University tried what Dershowitz did?
Norman can be added to the another University professor ward Churchill who was dismissed by the University of Bisons as free speach, critical thinking and free thought are all going the way of the do do bird.
Question: DO WE HAVE A COUNTRY LEFT?
Buffgunner: The Jewish religion predates Islam, but it does not mean Jews predate Arabs in the region. The Jews wandered a long time before they settled in Israel, and others lived there too. Significantly, most Jews in Israel are not descended primarily from the Israelites of yore, but rather from the Khazars, a much larger kingdom by the Caspian that converted to Judaism out of political expediency. Thus, they are less Semitic than the Palestinian Arabs.
Slightly off topic, but very related: NYT story on "Isreal Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy". Or watch the debate at:
http://www.scribemedia.org/2006/10/11/israel-lobby
Part of their debate is about America's inability to even talk about Isreal without reaching for anti-semitism.
buffgunner: "Jews were in Israel long before Arabs and have had a continuous presence there for thousands of years."
Interesting, but irrelevant, unlesss you would also support the Native American tribes reclaiming their ancestral land.
Dershowitz is a peculiar person. He has defended murderers like OJ Simpson and thinks animals should have rights similar to human beings and then he turns around and supports the torture of humans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Dershowitz
"In his Rights from Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights, he writes that, in order to avoid human beings treating each other the way we treat animals, we have made what he calls the "somewhat arbitrary decision" to single out our own species for different and better treatment. "Does this subject us to the charge of speciesism? Of course it does, and we cannot justify it, except by the fact that in the world in which we live, humans make the rules. That reality imposes on us a special responsibility to be fair and compassionate to those on whom we impose our rules. Hence the argument for animal rights.""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dershowitz-Finkelstein_affair
See the above link if you want to read in more detail some of the arguments between Dershowitz and Finkelstein. Where a number in Dershowits's book was 2,000 to 3,000 and it should have been 200,000 to 300,000 Dershowitz claims it was a typographical error.
Those numbers refer to the number of Palestinian Arabs who fled Israel from April to June in 1948.
Those are human lives that are being discussed and a number of such importance should not be wrong because of a typographical error. There is no excuse for that.
This next is the counter argument to the limited use of torture which Dershowitz advocates:
"William F. Schulz, the executive director of the U.S. section of Amnesty International, finds Dershowitz's hypothetical ticking-bomb scenario unrealistic because, Schulz counters, it would require that
"the authorities know that a bomb has been planted somewhere; know it is about to go off; know that the suspect in their custody has the information they need to stop it; know that the suspect will yield that information accurately in a matter of minutes if subjected to torture; and know that there is no other way to obtain it."[26]
buffgunner (nice handle, by the way) you wrote: "I see antisemitism is quite prevalent here - as is the rewriting of Middle East History. Jews were in Israel long before Arabs and have had a continuous presence there for thousands of years."
Two counterpoints: 1) the first part of your statement does nothing except enforce Finkelstein's hypothesis; and 2) BFD if the Jews were in the area long before the Arabs that in no way justifies the 1967 illegal invasion of then Palestinian territory--which was/is condemned by the UN--or the atrocities that have been perpetrated by the US-Israeli combine, which by the way are no different than the atrocities committed by the Nazis when it gets right down to it.
Just bc I strongly disagree w/ ethnic cleansing and bigotry regardless of the perps and the victims doesn't make me an anti-Semite and what about Finkelstein? Were your parents survivors of the Holocaust? Don't you think he has a bit more insight and credibility than most of us when it comes to calling Israel out?
Plying the Holocaust CARD is the best weppon used to get thier way in American politics.In the mean time, they play HITLER in the Middle East.They just smile as they kill.Besides 12,000,000 died so all togeter they are all colaterial damage of world war two.In Bush's terms.
Why not just cut out the middleman, and have Israel directly appoint all USA Professors? That way the zionist can have complete control over all US and expense of bribing congressmen and presidents?
I think Alan Dershowitz is his own worst enemy. I can't help it I don't like him and honestly I think he is a bigot. If this brings about a new level of fairness in the discussion of issues then both sides deserve recognition.
If you are a student of DePaul transfer out now! Your school does not believe in freedom of speech.
MESA annoucement on free speech and academic freedom:
http://www.mesa.arizona.edu/about/academic.htm
4 September 2007
The Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, C.M., Ed.D.
President De Paul University
1 E. Jackson
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Fax: 312-362-7577
Dear President Holtschneider:
I write on behalf of the Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) and its Committee on Academic Freedom to express our concern and dismay at what appear to be your university's multiple and egregious violations of generally accepted standards of academic procedure in handling the tenure case of Professor Norman G. Finkelstein.
The Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) was founded in 1966 to promote scholarship and teaching on the Middle East and North Africa. The preeminent organization in its field, the Association publishes the International Journal of Middle East Studies and has more than 2700 members worldwide. MESA is committed to ensuring academic freedom and freedom of expression, both within the region and in connection with the study of the region in North America and elsewhere.
As you will remember, the Committee sent you a letter dated April 10, 2007, in which it expressed its grave concern about the politicization of Professor Finkelstein's tenure case as a result of the campaign launched against him by Professor Alan Dershowitz of the Harvard University Law School. In that letter we urged you to ensure that Professor Finkelstein be evaluated for tenure at DePaul solely on the basis of his scholarship, his teaching, and his service to his university and professional communities, and that all aspects of Professor Finkelstein's tenure process adhere to generally accepted procedures and standards. We regret that you did not choose to respond to that letter.
Unfortunately, developments at DePaul since that letter was sent indicate that proper procedures and standards were not being adhered to in Professor Finkelstein's case. As a consequence the Committee now feels compelled to write you again, because in the aftermath of DePaul's decision to deny tenure to Professor Finkelstein your administration appears to have violated accepted academic procedures and standards in at least two ways.
First, we deem unacceptable your administration's refusal to permit Professor Finkelstein to pursue a formal appeal of the decision to deny him tenure. As you no doubt know, such a right of appeal is accepted by most leading institutions of higher education in this country. Our concern about this arbitrary and unjust decision is shared by your own university's Faculty Council and by the American Association of University Professors, among others.
Second, we feel obliged to register our distress at reports that your administration has, just a few days before the beginning of the fall semester, suddenly decided to prevent Professor Finkelstein from teaching during his terminal year at DePaul, taken away his office, and put him on paid administrative leave. As you surely know, it is customary to permit faculty who have been denied tenure to teach for one final year. Your administration's abrupt decision to prevent Professor Finkelstein (who is by all accounts an outstanding teacher) from doing so, without his agreement and despite strong objections from members of your own faculty and student body, strikes us as high-handed, if not vindictive.
However one judges Professor Finkelstein's qualifications for tenure, it seems clear that DePaul has mishandled his case in a variety of ways and has repeatedly violated generally accepted standards of academic process and fair play. In so doing your administration has in effect given aid and comfort to those who seek to undermine the academy as a bastion of academic freedom and as a forum for the open and critical discussion of issues of vital public concern.
We live in a time when scholars, teachers and institutions of higher education across the United States are facing extraordinary pressures and vituperative assaults from individuals and organized groups based outside the academy and pursuing narrow partisan agendas, particularly with respect to United States policy in the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is therefore highly distressing that you and your administration at DePaul have in this case signally failed to adhere to accepted standards of academic procedure or to protect the rights of every member of your faculty.
We therefore call on you to promptly reconsider and reverse both of these arbitrary and misguided decisions, in order to undo the damage already done to DePaul University's reputation as an institution of higher education and to help protect the norms of academic life and the principle of academic freedom that your university professes to cherish.
Sincerely,
Zachary Lockman
MESA President
I see antisemitism is quite prevalent here - as is the rewriting of Middle East History. Jews were in Israel long before Arabs and have had a continuous presence there for thousands of years.
this is what happens when you criticize Israel or Jews. There are a whole slew of people that have been railroaded because of that. And that is why the lawmakers are cowardly when it comes to criticizing Israel's atrocities.
Dershowitz does his ranting from Harvard, but that doesn't make him any less of a raving idiot. The guy distorts everything to do with Israel and zionism. For DePaul to cave into the zionist lobby is shameful. I hope students steer clear of that "bastion of censorship" and let it rot away. And P.S. to buffgunner--no Jews--especially not New York Jews--were in Israel "long before Arabs."
For people's information ...
1) "Beyond Chutzpah" was published by UC Press one or two years ago in spite of heavy presssure. Newspapers reported that Dershowitz even tried to get Gov Arnold - who is ex officio member of the Regents - to use his influence to stop UC Press from publishing the book. To the great credit of UC Press and their administration they did NOT cave in. They had the manuscript reviewed line by line for potential mis-statements that could give any ammunition to Dersh. A few small edits were made and UC then proceeded to publish this fine book. One of the most useful things in it is the appendix which includes myth vs documented references on major events in Israeli history.
2) The issue is not ethnicity nor religion; it is injustice and colonialism. If we criticise Israel we are NOT "criticising Jews". Many of the most eloquent critics of Zionism happen to be Jewish. I recently returned from Palestine and Israel where I saw Israeli Jews on the front lines of non-violent resistance demonstrations against the Wall and Occupation in general.
What a f^%$ing joke. Finkelstein, the son of Holocaust survivors, writes a book essentially stating the obvious. Nobody in their right mind could deny "that Israel uses the outcry over perceived anti-Semitism as a weapon to stifle criticism."
Let me get this straight: a Jewish poli-sci prof writes a book challenging another profs pro-Israeli treatise, which probably attempts to justify all the horrible shit Israel has been engaging in for the last four decades since they illegally invaded and occupied Palestine territory, and he not only is denied tenure but gets sacked and his publisher threatened w/ libel by said pro-Israel prof. Hmmm. I love it when reality proves your point for you and you don't have to do anything except state the absurdities known as reality.
Well it won't be long now before the US War Machine starts its bombing sorties over Iran and then Iran can start volleying rockets into Israel and then we'll have WWIII on our hands all this will become academic (pun intended).
To me, the imposition of the state of Israel into the newly formed quasi-states of the late Ottoman Empire was and is a calamity.
It has been a calamity for both the indigenous population and the, mostly, immigrant Jewish population.
Before the creation of Israel, most secular and believing Jews did not have to spend organizational time, effort and energy to defend the increasingly negative actions of this theocratic state.
Instead, many became the independent and creative voices within whatever society they were members of. Of course, some became ideologues, or apologists for the whatever elite was in power. Yet, because there was the real historical experience of hideous persecution, a tradition (and high regard for)literacy, education, logical debate about religious matters and belief in the life of rightousness, some Jewish citizens became the moral voice of their society.
In fact, countries, such as Germany, are finally realizing German Jews were important contributors to German cultural, scientific and technological acheivement. Without their contributions, 19th and early 20th century Germany would have been much less. They were, in many ways, Germany.
Sadly, many of today's Jews have committted themselves to an aggressive, theocratic nation-state based on Jewish citizenship. It was born in terrorism, violent injustice and the consequent rewriting of history in order to cover its many crimes.
The crimes continue, grow and need more and more apologists and ideologues to defend them. In addition, many Jews now leave their own countries in order to live in Israel. This means that Israel needs to procure more water, farmland, etc. at the expense of its neighbors.
As a result, many countries -and the world as a whole- have lost the prophetic tradition based on decrying injustice, the beauty of David's harp and poetry, and access to the accumulated centuries of spiritual and practical wisdom.
Like the U.S., Israel has received little negative feedback for its unjust actions. No consequences. No lessons learned.
For example, when European settlers invaded and occupied what is today the U.S., the native peoples fought back. And the fighting techniques used were sometimes brutal. However, most of the actions of Native Americans actually affected few average Euro-Americans.
But the actions of Euro-Americans had an enormous affect on almost all Native Americans.
No negative feedback. No consequences...but, in the longterm, maybe?
This a huge body-blow to Academic Freedom...the very Core of Academia. This is also a Clear example of the severely attenuated 1st Amendment right of Freedom of Speech. Abusing the Legal Process with threats of Civil Suit to prevent this Man from exercising his Constitutional Rights is despicable, and SHOULD result in the Disbarment of Dershowitz for the Illegal and Unethical Practice of the "Law". Time to wake up... the Bloodless Coup is nearly accomplished here. Thought Police, Indeed !
Sad day when there's more free-thinking allowed on blogs than at universities...
What's the purpose of a modern university where there are more taboo topics than here? Reminds me of what I once heard someone say about the university "The last of the great medieval institutions."
If you like to eat sausage, don't ever watch it being manufactured.
If you respect academia, don't look too closely at university tenure and promotion practices.
using Dershowitz's logic, he should also resign. see how he is a teacher at havard and has written a book expressing his opinion.
A sad day, a bad day!
JC: It's more a matter of the right to tell the verifiable truth than just the freedom to speak your mind that is with increasing success being banned on US academia.
And once the rot sets in, it infects the entire body.
Idavin, here is a link to a string of articles that will fill you in on the continuing saga of the Israel lobby versus Professor Finkelstein:
http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/09/06/finkelstein
Read his books. They are excellent -- and eminently readable.
If Anti-Semitism is racism against Jews, what it the term for racism directed to black people or Asians or Orientals?
Seriously, what is the difference between racism and anti-semitism? is one or the other worse?
The above is an actual question as I am ignorant in this regard, if someone would be kind enough to venture an answer I would be grateful.
Thanks