Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
An Open Letter to America: All Power to the People
On July 1, 2007 I sought the support of regular Americans after receiving notification from the U.S. Air Force Reserve that they were threatening to discharge me on the basis of behavior that, in their words, is "clearly inconsistent with the interest of national security." The behavior in question is my outspoken opposition to the occupation of Iraq and the inadequate and inhuman response to the tragedy of Katrina.
As a result of the outpouring of support I received from all over the United States and from around the world, the Air Force backed down. Thanks to my brothers and sisters in the movement, I will end my service with the honorable discharge that I earned. I am eternally grateful, and evermore committed to taking on the powers that be for the powers that ought to be.
At first, when I informed the Air Force that I would fight their harassment, they threatened me with deployment to Iraq, or even prison time. Then with the tremendous circulation and widespread publishing of my first Open Letter, the Air Force realized if they were going to challenge me, they would have to challenge thousands of Americans from across the nation outside of Robbins Air Force Base in Georgia, on my hearing date.
Even now, after all the pain we have been through as a nation these last years, the reaction of the Air Force shows that when we are organized in the face of a government that does not represent us, we the people have the power.
Mine is the third case in which the military has backed down when the people have challenged their attempts to silence dissent. When former Sgt. Adam Kokesh spoke out after risking his life in Fallujah, Iraq, the U.S. Marines threatened him with a "less than honorable" discharge but backed down after many came out in support of Adam. When Marine Sgt. Liam Madden spoke out about this "war of aggression" in which war crimes were being committed, the Marines threatened him but again backed down when they saw organized opposition. The military now knows they will feel the wrath of the people if they threaten veterans who speak out against the occupation of Iraq.
The anti-war movement truly supported me in my case against the Air Force, which as a young African-American minister was so empowering to me personally that I pledge to increase my opposition to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. I pledge to continue my work in solidarity with the Iraqi people who are resisting U.S. occupation. I will not let the media spin that portrays all Iraqi resistors as insurgents linked to Al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, silence my moral support for the good people in Iraq who are fighting to free their land.
Indeed, I have just returned from a trip to the Middle East where I visited with Iraqi refugees. As a person of color, I have no issue with my brothers and sisters in Iraq. I also have no issue with the U.S. troops who serve with honorable intentions and so often join the military under the poverty draft. My issue is with the Bush Administration and our co-dependent Congress.
These are the six ways I see to oppose the U.S. occupation of Iraq: 1. Speaking out and creating an echo chamber of opposition; 2. Participating in acts of civil disobedience; 3. Joining the economic boycott led by the Iraq Moratorium beginning September 21st; 4. Casting your vote at the polls; 5. Giving direct aid to humanitarian programs for Iraqi refugees and internally displaced; and, 6. Counter-recruiting campaigns.
All these methods become effective when a critical mass of people is mobilized. The anti-war movement in the U.S. has yet to reach that critical mass. The critical mass that is necessary to have a real anti-war movement can be achieved by mobilizing those who are most oppressed by the U.S. government. We must link the struggles of the oppressed in the U.S. and in Iraq.
The displaced Katrina survivors and the displaced Iraqis is a good place to start. But it must go deeper than that. Literally, the money that was supposed to go to levees in New Orleans was diverted to the war in Afghanistan. The money that is being spent to kill Brown people in Baghdad is being diverted from programs that educate Black people in the U.S. For example, for what the State of North Carolina has sacrificed in war spending in Iraq, they could have provided nearly 600,000 students four-year scholarships at public universities.
I pray that our movement finds the strength of character to listen to the very oppressed for whom we claim to speak, and let the voices, ideas and actions of the oppressed drive a movement that can finally grow to that critical mass.
For Future Generations, Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr.
Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr. is the President of the Hip Hop Caucus, www.hiphopcaucus.org. The Hip Hop Caucus is a national, nonprofit, non-partisan organization meant to inspire and motivate those of us born after the '60s civil rights movement. Rev. Yearwood is also a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, www.ivaw.org. Rev. Yearwood serves on the board of Voters For Peace, www.VotersForPeace.US.

25 Comments so far
Show AllRev Yearwood, thank you for your letter. You are correct about the actions needed to stop this illegal occupation. You have shown great courage to take on the US Air Force. If we had more soldiers of your moral courage this war would have ended by now. We will continue the fight for what is right.
Maybe one day, the criminals in the white house will be charged with crimes against humanity in the world criminal court, as the Nazis were so charged at Nuremberg. I can only hope that day comes soon, although I don't hold my breath. A new spiritual consciousness must awaken to counteract the dark forces that currently run the world for their benefit. When critical mass occurs, the dark forces will be defeated forever.
Tax revolt...
No Taxes on 4/15/2008...
They can not put everyone in JAIL!!!
Another thought:
Until the US populace gets the courage to take to the streets and follow the example of Gandhi's non-violent marches and demonstrations nothing will change.
The people have got to WANT the Constitution restored enough to ACT accordingly.
If there is no such desire, there will will be no more US Constitution (except in name only).
Things will change only when the populace is alienated and hopeless.
Then they may :
STAND UP - for what they beleive to be right.
SIT DOWN - in the nearest street to bring transportaion, retail, everything to a standstill.
FIGHT - I hope like Gandhi's Pathan friend Badshar Khan(Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan) (check him out)a Pashtun nonviolent Muslim
FIGHT - Even if it means sacrifice to themselves to totally repudiate the oligarchy
FIGHT - As if their lives depend on active resistance - which they do
When people realize that they cannot ignore the actions of the government and realize they themselves are the government, only then is change possible.
What a shame to let cowardice bring down such a noble experiment of human governance!!
Here are some comments by a man who stood by Gandhi - Badshah Khan, who led a 100,000 person army of non-violent Pashtuns from the Khyber pass region. He was a Pashtun (Afghan) political and spiritual leader known for his non-violent opposition to British Rule during the final years of the Empire on the Indian sub-continent. He was a lifelong pacifist and a devout Muslim. He was known as Badshah Khan (sometimes written as Bacha Khan), the `King of Chiefs', and `Frontier Gandhi'.
"To me nonviolence has come to represent a panacea for all the evils that surround my people. Therefore I am devoting all my energies toward the establishment of a society that would be based on its principles of truth and peace." –
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
"Today's world is traveling in some strange direction. You see that the world is going toward destruction and violence. And the specialty of violence is to create hatred among people and to create fear. I am a believer in nonviolence and I say that no peace or tranquility will descend upon the people of the world until nonviolence is practiced, because nonviolence is love and it stirs courage in people." – Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan to an interviewer in 1985
His story is contained in 'Nonviolent Soldier of Islam: Badshah Khan, A Man To Match His Mountains', by Eknath Easwaran (Published by Nilgiri Press).
Also see NPR highlights:
http://www.npr.org/programs/musings/2003/jan/khan.html?sc=emaf
Muhammad Ali was not only the "Sportsman of the Century" but among the great American activists of the 20th century.
Rather than murder the innocent in Vietnam he gave up his title and $Millions in earnings to JUST SAY NO to imperial wars. One of the greatest athletes in history sat in jail demonstrating, not talking about, his profound moral, spiritual and political convictions that live to this day.
This is true courage just like those we now see in Iraq willing to lay their weapons down. They must have our support.
As Dr. King once said, "I have a dream"
Universal Altruistic Love To All !
Rev. Yearwood.. You have my respect and support for your stand. I pray your integrity and honor to your soul is contagious. I bow to your courage. Voting? I don't know..I'm positive Diebold is still controlling things. Pi_dpiper...so true, they can't jail everyone. I'm for any form of passive resistance. When millions refuse to pay the unlawful income tax, the IRS won't know which way to turn. Massive numbers are the answer. Some of the agents will walk away in frustration. May the God in everything unite us in our efforts.
This is a very heartening message at a time when many of us who opposed this war before it happened. Like many others I will not be satisfied until I see Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, and the rest of the neocon cabal who brought us this catastrophic war punished in the Hague for war crimes. Its so hard to get a real movement going now in the US because the people are exhausted, demoralized, and deeply ashamed of what our country has been doing during the Bush/Cheney years. We need to kindle our anger and get things moving before Bush and Cheney manage to leave office in the normal way. If congress won't impeach then we the people ought to take it on ourselves.
Not to get off topic, but I read an interesting article on Yahoo where Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is stepping in to negotiate with leftist Columbian rebels (FARC) on behalf of the ultra-conservative right wing Uribe Administration to persuade FARC to release hostages. Apparently the FARC is holding hostages, three of whom are "Americans who work for Northrup Grumman on a drug surveillance mission and whose plane crashed in 2003." Since when was Northrup Grumman indoctrinated as part of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)??
Ridiculous. This boob joins the Air Force - a military organization - signs on the dotted line to follow the orders of the officers and NCOs appointed over him, accepts payment, and then refuses to fulfill his obligation. I'd say this guy is a bit of a crook himself.
Don't you see? He's owed someone else working to support him.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice requires any member of the armed forces to refuse an unlawful order. If this bullshit war in Iraq is not unlawful, damn if I know what would be. Every soldier that took part in the that mess could easily be labled a war criminal. Idealism unfortunatly, has not much to do with our current reality.
Veteran '66-68
agree with john freeman, above, and celebrate rev. yearwood's victory. together, we can end the occupations of afghanistan and iraq. let's do it.
vietnam war vet and member, veterans for peace
Sorry Mr Freeman, the UCMJ DOES NOT require any member of the armed forces to decide this on their own. They don't have all the answers any more than you do. If it were so, any service member would just refuse to do anything they didn't like - and that would have ended our country long ago. "Every soldier that took part in the that mess could easily be labled a war criminal" - and this is your real belief - you hate any military member that isn't a traitor. Admit it -it'll make you feel better! :-)
Buffgunner wrote:
>>This boob joins the Air Force - a military organization - signs on the dotted line to follow the orders of the officers and NCOs appointed over him, accepts payment, and then refuses to fulfill his obligation.>>
I believe the only way Rev. Yearwood needs to "fulfill his obligation" is to adhere to the Constitution and his conscience. His oath is to the Constitution not to his superiors. He doesn't have to follow illegal orders. Article 6 (2) declares that "treaties made" are the "supreme law of the land." The UN Charter is one such treaty. Article 2 (4) prohibits the use of force against other member states. Iraq was not preparing to attack us and so UN Charter Article 51 was not in play. Therefore the invasion is a crime against peace according to the Nuremberg precedent. Yearwood, like Lt. Watada and several others, is a person of law and conscience. Bravo to Yearwood.
And bravo to you Earthian for pointing out faster than I could (with better facts to boot!) to the buffgunner what should be obvious to anyone. No matter what you sign up for, if the orders you are given are clearly illegal and you conscience tells you it's wrong, it is your duty to your Country to disobey those orders. Cheers to Rev. Yarwood!
Buffgunner, I hope that your not assigned to my neighborhood after martial law is declared and open warfare against the citizens of the USA becomes reality cause you seem like the type who would follow those orders.
Regarding the legality of refusing illegal orders:
http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~nstanton/Ch1.htm
 >> Field ManualÂ
   No. 27-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYÂ
WASHINGTON 25, D.C., 18 July 1956Â
Article 7b:
b. Force of Treaties Under the Constitution. Under the Constitution of the United States, treaties constitute part of the "supreme Law of the Land" (art. VI, clause 2). In consequence, treaties relating to the law of war have a force equal to that of laws enacted by the Congress. Their provisions must be observed by both military and civilian personnel with the same strict regard for both the letter and spirit of the law which is required with respect to the Constitution and statutes enacted in pursuance thereof.>>
Regarding the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) here is the text from Article 90:
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-law.htm#ucmj
www.jag.navy.mil/documents/mcm2000.pdf
>>14. Article 90—Assaulting or willfully
disobeying superior commissioned officer
(2) Disobeying superior commissioned officer.
(a) Lawfulness of the order.
(i) Inference of lawfulness. An order requiring
the performance of a military duty or act may be
inferred to be lawful and it is disobeyed at the peril
of the subordinate. This inference does not apply to
a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the
commission of a crime.
p. 296, Article 90>>
Note what it says about patently illegal orders under (i).
While court cases on this during the first Gulf War (Ange v. Bush and United States v. Huet-Vaughn) did not favor soldiers deciding entire decisions by the president were illegal, and may not favor Lt. Watada, this is a legitimate fight, and patently illegal invasions need to be confronted as Rev. Yearwood has done.
Obedience is good. Resistance is bad. You can't know everything, so just obey. Thanks for clarifying, buffgunner.
As was pointed out on another thread, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, there was a Soviet nuclear submarine that received orders to launch, then lost communication contact. They disobeyed their orders, and surfaced instead, only to find out the orders had been countermanded.
Of course, for the super-patriot, it is always much easier to see that NAZI soldiers, or Communist soldiers, or any other soldiers except our brave soldiers, might disobey evil orders. It is of course INCONCEIVABLE that our soldiers could ever receive evil orders. We ar, by definition, the good guys, so blind obedience is good.
Ba-a-a-a-a. Thanks MtnGoat.
Watch the good Lennox Yearwood here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3j5oMsOAWQ
You want K-Street?….I'll give you K Street!
"Things are bad"
"How bad are they "?
"When you see thousands of well informed adults pouring out their souls, to address the scarcity of redress, all the time knowing that any significant change is ever faster fleeting, and it has come to the point that the only constructive contribution you can make to the discussion is to say 'psycho-babble'……………..that's how bad."
"But, is it wrong to want change"?
"No".
"Is it wrong to discuss that deep, heart felt desire with others"?
"No".
"Have you given up"?
"No".
"Do you think it's all,……….just too late?"
"Pretty damn close!"
"Sure sounds like you've given up to me".
"No, just deeply schooled in the means that bring about the end known as complacency"
"Why complacency"?
"Because it's the last, most logical refuge"
"Is there no other 'most logical' alternative"?
"Yes, one"
"Well, what is it"?
"K ucinich"!
Dennis J Kucinich-- how we can all PUSH for a return to democracy in the USA. "Let's work through it , ya'll!"
Rev. Yearwood is on the board of PDA too along with other noted activists and progressives:
http://pdamerica.org/about/board.php
If you have ever heard Rev. Yearwood speak, you would know exactly why they didn't pursue this! The man can bring the house down -- even get us rule abidin', conflict avoidant, privileged progressive people without color on our feet and ready to do some serious business!
I'm sort of disappointed...it would have been amazing to see him go head to head with those guys (not really disappointed - actually quite relieved, but you know what I mean - it would have been very interesting!)
So the Rev. can speak eh? I wonder where the wisdom is coming from, it sounds awfully familiar to me! You sound blessed Rev.! A great deal of people don't understand what a blessing it is to have God in your mind and heart. Of course, I feel that is why there is so much greed, death and destruction anyways, because if people truly had God in their minds and hearts the desire to do what they do simply wouldn't be there. Those things serve no purpose other than self destruction.
The most important point of the Rev's. letter for me is that he recognizes the situation for what it truly is........oppression. Oppression is the cause of poverty in this world. There is absolutely no excuse for it!
In my honest opinion, Pi-dpiper hit the nail right on the head with his non-violent suggestion! That is what truly going to make those in control listen.
Willybear, I am going to use your quote and put a few more words to it; "May God unite us all in wisdom and love in defeating oppression for ourselves and for the world."
I was just thinking what kind of message it would send if USA citizens gave their income tax money to refugee's and victims of Katrina instead of supporting the corporate military and paying interest to those responsible for financing of all the killing that has taken place in the last 40 years?
There are many members of the military who have not followed illegal orders or have even been given any illegal orders. There are occupations for example medical or machinery maintenance especially occupied by the National Guard who could have logically assumed that they would only be used for actual legitimate purposes.
It is fair to say that Bu$h the inferior took advantage of people who joined to help in emergency situations. Congress and the courts have allowed this administration to commit war crimes in their corruption and degenerate morals.
When their was a draft Mennonites served as medics even though they were pacifists and refused to bear arms.
All those who serve in the military under legal and moral orders are to be respected. All those who have received illegal orders or whose position would cause them to commit war crimes also deserve respect if they refuse to follow those orders.
Many of my tax dollars go to good use. If I could direct my tax dollars they would all go to universal health care and none to war.
Because the evil bastards pervert my good intentions by using my tax dollars to oppress others is not my fault.