EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'Masters of Austerity' Targeted as Blockupy Activists Shut Down European Central Bank
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Victory: Connecticut Becomes First State to Require GMO Labeling
Popular content
Today's Top News
Homophobes, Hypocrites and Haters
It doesn't take much for Americans to get on their high horse about homosexuals. The most recent pony ride comes amid the revelation that Idaho Senator Larry Craig was arrested in June following a game of footsie with an undercover cop in a men's room at a Minneapolis airport. According to the dizzying array of "experts" who have flooded the airwaves in the past week--almost none of whom, I might add, are gay--such foot-rubbing is evidently standard foreplay to bathroom buggery. Who knew?
The Craig controversy, which has led to his resignation from the Senate, is only the most recent in a series of sex-related scandals involving Republicans who consider themselves "social values conservatives." Last September Florida Congressman Mark Foley resigned after allegations surfaced that he had sent sexually explicit e-mails and instant messages to teenage pages. On the Saturday before the midterm elections, the Rev. Ted Haggard--named as one of the nation's "25 most influential evangelicals" in a 2005 Time cover story--stepped down as head of his 14,000-member mega-church after a gay prostitute claimed the pastor had repeatedly solicited him for sex and drugs.
Sex and sexuality figure prominently in modern American politics. From Clarence Thomas's confirmation hearings to Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings, much of the current political landscape--from right to left--has been shaped by public battles over private matters.
But the recent scandals involving Foley, Haggard and Craig are different for at least two reasons: First, they involve alleged homosexual acts vigorously denied by the accused; and second, they resulted in public shaming and professional resignation.
By contrast, consider the recent case of Louisiana Senator David Vitter, who issued a public apology in July after news broke that his phone number was on the "call list" of a multimillion-dollar escort service in Washington, DC. This is not the first time such allegations have been leveled against him; during his 2004 Senate campaign, Vitter was accused--by the Republican Louisiana State Committee, no less--of having had an ongoing affair with a female prostitute in New Orleans. Still, Vitter remains in office, a proud supporter of "mainstream conservative principles," according to his Senate website.
There is an interesting lesson here: If you're going to be a hypocrite, it pays to be a straight hypocrite. Just ask Rudy Giuliani.
But when it comes to Republican infidelity and sex scandals, conservatives like to dance around the charge of hypocrisy. On a recent Larry King Live panel, Republican strategist Cheri Jacobus had this reaction to the Craig resignation: "And if some people want to say he's a hypocrite, fine. If he is gay and still wants to keep...marriage as it is traditionally between a man and a woman, I don't think that makes him a hypocrite. And a lot of people are passing judgment, I think is rather unfair." Sensing, perhaps, that her logic was unclear, Jacobus added this tired refrain: "I'm sorry, but the king of all of this and the king of taking the sexual risks and getting the thrill from that [is] Bill Clinton.... As Republicans, we don't want to put the country through what Bill Clinton put the country through." This is textbook GOP strategy: Downplay the hypocrisy of right-wing politics by invoking both Bill Clinton's infidelity and Republicans' commitment to the sanctity of marriage. Forget that it was Craig--one of Clinton's most sanctimonious detractors--who famously called the former President "a nasty, bad, naughty boy."
Republicans can dance around the issue as much as they want, but their hypocrisy is clear. The rise of the modern Republican Party--the party of Reagan, not Lincoln--is due to the success of its persistent appeal to so-called "values voters," specifically, those who oppose abortion and same-sex marriage. In the last two election cycles, the GOP's destiny has been closely linked to homosexuality and the hysteria it inspires. Whereas George W. Bush's 2004 victory was energized by his cynical endorsement of a constitutional amendment defining marriage as "between a man and a woman" and the subsequent outpouring of evangelical voters energized by statewide ballot initiatives banning same-sex marriage, Democratic success in 2006 can be seen, in part, as a reaction to the Foley and Haggard scandals. It seems the only thing worse than gay marriage is a gay hooker.
Social values conservatives like to talk about "loving the sinner and hating the sin." But actions speak louder than words. The Republican Party, after a generation of pandering to its Christian evangelical "base," is very clear about its "values" when it comes to the lives of gay and lesbian people: They oppose our right to raise children, to live in safety, to work in peace, to serve our country and to marry our loved ones. In other words, they seek to deny us the fundamental rights of American citizenship. When it comes to standing with us or against us, they are very much against us.
This explains the hysteria that erupts every time the GOP's leading men are caught with their pants down with other men. But the real problem is not so much hypocrisy as hatred. The modern-day Republican Party hates homosexuals because so-called born-again Christians think homosexuality is a sin--more so than, say, poverty or war. But when it comes to people like Foley, Haggard and Craig, the tragedy is more personal than political: As gay men, they hate themselves even more than they hate the rest of us.
Timothy Patrick McCarthy teaches American history, literature and public policy at Harvard University. He is co-editor of The Radical Reader: A Documentary History of the American Radical Tradition (New Press). He is also gay, and has always been gay.
© 2007 The Nation
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllI recall reading that the Nazi leaders were characterized as being full of nancy-men.
christians have a hell of a time over sexual deviance, but when it comes to violence, they get down on their knees and worship the biggest mass muderer in the history of mankind. the god in the bible. go fiqure.
The poetic justice - that a GOPathological got caught by the out of control security state he and his "tough on crime" cohorts built - is a warning to the rest of us. Footsie is now illegal, and "to protect and serve" means to conduct "gay sting" operations, as opposed to, say, protecting our borders, making sure the Chinese aren't poisoning us, catching Osama, stopping corporate economic terrorists from stealing what little "we the poor people" have left, arresting the Domestic Enemies to our Constitution presently in control of our government...
Nope - the future of our civilization rests upon the success of Operation Fear Of Gays.
Question: are there "lesbian stings" too?
Hardly a day passes that Bush or other Republicans don't quote scripture. Although the Bible addresses HYPOCRISY frequently, the Republicans never select those paragraphs.
Larry Craig is not only a HYPOCRITE, but a wishy washy HYPOCRITE. Within one week Craig has:
1) repeatedly claimed he is not gay, despite multiple solicitations for gay sex, and
2) pleaded guilty and now says he is not guilty, and
3) announced a September 30 resignation and now says he won't resign on September 30.
The biggest problem is not Republican behavior, its Democratic Party apathy. During his 2000 campaign Bush accused the Democrats of using "fuzzy math". During the 2004 campaign he accused Democrats of being "wishy washy". Reality: The Bush regime has devised the fuzziest math ever seen and there have been no shortage of examples of wishy washy Republicans.
Unfortunately, the Democratic Party strategy is to let the clock run out until 2008 and not address the fuzzy math, hypocrisy and wishy washy behavior that is demonstarted every day by Bush and other Republicans.
I'm not convinced that Craig is gay.
I think it more likely that he believes he is entitled to solicit sexual gratification anytime, any way he chooses.
He's lucky he wasn't caught at the petting zoo.
WTF is the Republican "Wholesome family values" agenda? Since every normal person on this planet has some sort sexual desire that another person may find weird or offensive, then all of this moronic talk about morality is simply hypocritical nonsense.
Here's what David Vitter said after he got caught:
"This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and from my wife in confession and marriage counseling."
OMG how stupid do you think people are? He forgot to include "It's a good thing I'm not accountable!"
Here's senator Craig's statement:
"First, please let me apologize to my family, friends, staff and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho. I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I regret my decision to plead guilty and the sadness that decision has brought to my wife, family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans."
Sure it was a poor decision to plead guilty or admit anything. You are part of administration in which NO ONE is held accountable. Why bother with the truth. Spread it on thick don't forget to get a few shots of you near a church.
Homophobes, hypocrites, haters, serving their masters, the Iron Heel.
US culture is wound tight as a drum over nothing.
Sex abounds, but love, though given some lip service, is so poorly understood that it simply scares the hell out of all too many people.
So much is made of nothing that it is, from certain angles and distances, completely laughable.
Everyone's too serious about all the wrong stuff.
Russ, you said it and I agree totally. As long as they can make mountains out of molehills, we will hopefully miss seeing the real mountain, which is the destruction of our constitution and our country. Bush and his band of right-wing hypocrites are doing almost the exact opposite of the teachings of Jesus, but it is working great for them as long as gullible people will get on their band wagon. Religion has such a great power over people that they fail to use their common sense. God will not be pleased with those using his name to obtain their own selfish desires.
Regarless of the final outcome of the Craig issue, I have one observation and that is the length of time before this hit the MSM. I suspect that if this had been a Democrat, then we would have found out about it the same day. This tells me that the MSM is owned by the Republican party.
How did it ever come to pass that the GOP, whose Presidential candidate campaigned in 2000 on a pledge to restore moral clarity to the Oval Office, ended up promulgating a torture/interrogation regimen that featured posing naked detainees in homoerotic piles and tableaus at Abu Ghraib, and dressing them up in womens' panties there and at Gitmo?
Even more intriguing, how did it happen that the Democratic Party candidate in 2004 against George Bush (the Commander in Chief who personally approved implementation of these bizarre, sexually depraved harsh interrogation techniques) never mentioned this obvious "moral values issue", or the trashing of the Geneva Conventions protections, during the entire campaign?
Torture was an issue that deeply disturbed many Americans, including many devout Christians in Bush's evangelical base. Why all the silence about the sexual deviance embodied in these official interrogation tactics, and so much huffing and puffing about Bill Clinton and Larry Craig?
Bill from Saginaw
Locust's comment is worth amplifying:
"I'm not convinced that Craig is gay.
I think it more likely that he believes he is entitled to solicit sexual gratification anytime, any way he chooses.
He's lucky he wasn't caught at the petting zoo."
Maybe the Minneapolis police should hire some undercover llamas and aardvarks...
And let's not forget inanimate objects.
Senator Craig arrested for humping a door knob!
"How was I supposed to know that door knob was a cop?"
I don't really care about the sexual life of Mr. Craig. Sex is a personal issue and should stay that way as long as it involves consenting adults.
What I do care about is the hypocricy. Right now (and almost always) this happens to be those who talk so much about God, the Bible, and the wrongness of homosexuality. I'm sure the Democrats also have their share of the same types.
It just goes to show, (to me anyway) that those who talk the most about it are the very same ones doing it.
This nonissue pales in comparisom with the multitude of problems the world faces today. Playing footsie in an airport bathroom is nothing. Death and an out of control Executive branch are far more serious matters.
Why waste more than a mention of this career destroying action by one man when the world is facing such dire issues?