Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
CBS Early Show Removes Anti-War Protesters from View in Kansas City
On August 10, the CBS Early Show came to Kansas City, Missouri.
Using Liberty Memorial Park, the Early Show was featuring the country western band Big & Rich, which is famous for "Save a Horse (Ride a Cowboy)" and for leading audiences in the Pledge of Allegiance.
When the local peace community heard that the Early Show was coming to the park, activists hoped to get their message to a national audience.
"I received an e-mail about the event and a flier from the Early Show inviting people to attend," says Ira Harritt, Kansas City area program coordinator for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC). "I rsvp'd, saying some people from the AFSC would be there."
Harritt recruited people to come and carry some AFSC "Cost of War" banners. These are seven feet long and three feet high, and they all give different answers to the question: "One Day of the Iraq War Equals." (Such as $720 million, or 84 elementary schools, etc.)
"We started assembling the banners in the park," Harritt says, "and immediately, a CBS staff person said, 'You can't be here. You can't have those here.' "
Harritt and the other activists challenged her, saying, "This is a public park. We have a right to be here," he recalls. And the anti-war activists had a lawyer with them who defended their right to be there.
They reached a compromise. The CBS employee, along with security, allowed them to stay in the park so long as they did not get into camera view.
"I promise you the TV cameras will not span this area," the CBS employee said.
That's not exactly what the protesters had hoped for.
"I was very disappointed," says Harritt. "CBS was censoring what messages Kansas Cityans were bringing to the Early Show."
Harritt says other signs were allowed to be seen on camera.
"One was supporting the Navy," he says. "One said, 'Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy.' There were signs for things for sale, and commercial signs."
Harritt finds that inconsistent and troubling.
"Given that the Iraq War is the most important issue on people's minds," he says, "that they wouldn't allow this opinion to be on the public airwaves means that they want to make sure that the messages don't conflict with the large multinationals that are profiting from this war."
CBS wouldn't even allow Harritt to circulate an anti-war petition where he wanted to in the park, he says. The petition was to defund the war and refund human needs.
"I had been circulating through the crowd of about 1,000 people collecting signatures," he says, "when this same CBS staffer came by and said, 'You can't do that.' I wasn't even in camera view. But she reported me to a security officer. He told me I had to leave. A person was signing the petition at that moment. When he finished, the security officer threatened to arrest me if I didn't move. So I moved."
Corva Murphy wasn't so lucky. She got handcuffed.
The 60-year-old activist is a member of Peace Works, an anti-nuclear-weapons group.
She and her husband, Everett, often join the AFSC members at peace rallies. And so they came to Liberty Memorial at 5:00 a.m. on August 10.
"We had our anti-war signs," she says. "My husband's is bright yellow with red letters. It says: 'Out of Iraq Now.' Mine says: 'If you like this war, you're going to love the draft,' and the words 'war' and 'draft' are in red letters."
Corva and Everett Murphy's son served in Iraq in 2005 as a Navy corpsman.
"He was in Mosul," she says. "He's OK, but if this war keeps going, he'll have to go back."
Corva Murphy says that's not the sole reason they are protesting. "We do it for all our sons and daughters, and all the innocent Iraqi people," she says. "That's why we're out there every chance we get."
At Liberty Memorial, Corva and Everett Murphy decided to stand near where Harry Smith was going to be broadcasting.
She says other people were holding signs, including ones that said, "I Love Big and Rich," and "Hey Dad, We Made It!"
But it was only their sign that was verboten.
"After a few minutes, somebody from security came and said, 'You can't be here.'
Then someone from CBS said: 'You have to put your signs down. CBS doesn't want any political signs.' "
Corva and Everett Murphy insisted that this was a public park, but they were told it wasn't.
"My husband said, 'Yes it is. Our tax dollars pay for this.' "
But a police officer responded:
"You'll really have to go. I'll escort you. Your friends are down below," referring to the AFSC demonstrators.
"He escorted us to where the Cost of War banners were," Corva says. "Then, my husband and I moved about ten feet back to where the steps started up to the main event. We stood there for about five minutes. And then security came again. They told us we'd have to move back and stand in the line with our friends. We couldn't stand where we were."
Corva had, by this time, had enough.
"I said, 'Look, I'm standing here. I'm not moving. This is my right as a citizen.'
"They said, 'We'll have to call the police.'
"I said, 'You just call the police then. I'm not moving.'
"Two police officers arrived.
"One said, 'If you don't leave now, I'll have to arrest you.'
"And I said, 'You'll have to arrest me then because I'm not moving back.'
"He said, 'OK, I'm going to put the cuffs on you.'
"And I said, 'OK.'
She was not prepared for the cuffing, however.
"Was that ever a shock! They pull your arms behind you real hard, and put those cuffs on you immediately. Your arms are kind of jerked behind."
Though Murphy was handcuffed, she was not arrested.
She says she even asked the police officer to arrest her. "This will do our cause a lot of good if you do," she says she told him.
But she says he responded: "I'm not going to arrest you because I'm off duty and that would mean a lot of work for me."
After a while, the police officer took the cuffs off of her, but "he was always keeping his eyes on me," she says.
He was nice, though. "He even came by with a nice cold bottle of water for me," she says.
CBS said in a statement, "We had a huge, enthusiastic crowd that was very well behaved and appeared to be having a good time. We are unaware of any incidents."
Mary Vincent, who is on the local AFSC program committee and is a founding member of the Kansas City Iraq Task Force, says there is no doubt that CBS was clearing the field of anti-war signs.
"There was a woman with a CBS badge on who kept going back to the CBS trailer. And she told us, 'If those things get on the air, I'm going to lose my job.' " Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
© 2007 The Progressive



45 Comments so far
Show AllHeh, so this is "America's democracy". The majority's view on the war is not even allowed on TV.
Sorry, I meant to say the link is "Contact Us", not "Comments". It is also rather user-unfriendly, and the "Contact Us" link... you have to look around for it; it's not prominently displayed on the page I posted the link to above.
The 1st Ammendment on a sign? GENIUS! :)
Or better yet, just go to protests with the First Ammendment on your sign.
Imagine if they arrest you for that. You'd probably not need to bother with the courts, the negative press would eat them alive.
Write them, too!
Tell CBS that you believe they acted unconstitutionally, Anti-American.
And if you don't watch TV (like me) - tell em you'll buy one and NOT WATCH CBS!
Anyone know CBS other business affiliates?
"There was a woman with a CBS badge on who kept going back to the CBS trailer. And she told us, 'If those things get on the air, I'm going to lose my job.' "
This is the most important quote attributed to the above article as it shows who exactly is "censoring" the news!
People need to be more subtle.
Keep the signs reasonably small, such that they can be hidden under clothing or in an big purse. Have people with these signs scattered through the crowd, but not looking like any sort of organized group. Don't show the signs at all until you see a camera that's on, or that they are obviously setting up for a shot to point your way. When the camera is on, pull out the signs.
Those people will get their signs taken away by the corporate speech police. But that's why only some of the people do it the first time. Others slide in subtlely and take there place and pull out new signs the next time the camera is on.
Also useful is to have fake signs that are corporate approved. Look like and dress like the typical corporate-brainwashed moron who thinks holding up a Hi Mom! sign on TV is a cool thing. Then wait till the cameras are on and then pull out the sign with your real message.
This just what I would expect from a scab of Nation like the US of A. The only way to get real attention in the press is a RIOT. It was true in the 60's and evern more true today. CBS is just a propaganda tool of the fascist leaning government anyway. The one thing that hold true is that if it bleeds it leads. Violence is thier stock and trade. So start a riot of you want to be seen on right wing TV. You will learn to love the smell of burning rubber. Remember that the police work for the government and for industry. If you want to fight them you have to fight the police first. And so it goes.
No subtlety.
Our Bill of Rights are like muscles or brains: use them or lose them.
Be respectful, get a bullhorn license if the municipality requires it, etc. Play by the rules. But if arrested for simply carrying a sign, you should be able to fight that straight to the Supreme Court.
Since 2002, I've marched in every one of these these permitted, polite, police-supervised weekend rallies and marches in DC, New York, and Pittsburgh. Surely I would have hoped that they would have figured out by now that such actions are utterly ineffective, except for putting money into those big trash cans ANSWER sets out.
Why not widespread calls for mass UNPERMITTED, civil disobiedience and barricade actions, on a weekday, at key government facilities - starting with blockading every gate into the White House?
Has everyone forgetten Seattle - and WHY it was effective?
I know, the answer to that is that we are all welcome to do these things on our own, but only nice, polite, permitted, Saturday protests will get a good turnout.
BUT, has it ever occurred to ANSWER od UFPJ that there are a lot of us who are willing to risk our lives at the barricades to stop these vile atrocities, but only if we know we have thousands risking theirs along with us. They can simply taze and drag away my little "affinity group" and our effort would have been utterly wasted, but they can't remove thousands of us, and if they try deadly force, it could be the beginning of the end for Bush's little experiment in fascism.
10,000 persons engaged in such an action would be far more effective than two million of showing up for a Saturday of marching past empty federal buildings.
As the Wobbly's say, "Direct action get's the goods", not polite, pain-free sunny days on the grass of the DC Mall. Gandhi would laugh out loud at ANSWER's and UFPJ's useless strategy of "painless satyghara" over the past five years of unabated slaughter. Has it ever occurred to the organizers that "permitted" dissent is itself an oxymoron? What a horrific waste of these organizational resources!
So, I will not be in DC on September 15. I will gladly show up -
and be right in the front ranks, when ANSWER and UFPJ can organize truly effctive actions that follow the principles of nonviolent direct action.
CBS did wrong to censor your signs. A sign would have to be pretty clever to change my mind about an issue though. It can help inform someone of an issue they have not heard of.
The regime has nothing to fear from people who request permission to exercise rights.
We have a police state, why would the police authorities give anyone free reign to disempower THEM?
If the statements in the article are true you'd think the ACLU will get all over this. Won't arrest her because he's off-duty? Then he was impersonating a police officer in commission of a crime against civil liberties. Man, this one seems so easy.
>big actions get the numbers, blah blah
1. "500 mice are more effective than one lion."
2. There were 20,000 people in varying forms of civil disobedience and direct action on March 20th, 2003 in San Francisco. It ain't 500,000 people, but as we all saw on Feb. 15th, 2003, that doesn't always matter.
3. Further, as PJD said, "direct action gets the goods". You want to see the war end? Shut it all down! Then you'll see a response. Why? Economics.
4. Marches that aren't part of a larger strategy that is coordinated (not micro-managed, coordinated) and truly diverse in its nature both tactically and culturally will not get the desired result of ending the war. This is not just a matter of ethics or coalition building - it's also the way human systems, as part of nature, work.
5. Lastly, the problem isn't just the war - it's the capitalist model, and the military industrial complex that it spawned, mainstream media included (especially now, given who owns most of the media). Liberal reform at a grassroots level may be good in intent, but it's not effective in practice.
To PJD...
"Why not widespread calls for mass UNPERMITTED, civil disobedience and barricade actions..."
There will be a simultaneous, non-permitted, "Die-In/funeral", which is a civil disobedience action and those participating may risk arrest. All those who cannot afford to risk arrest will be able to participate in the permitted rally that will take place on the West Lawn of the Capitol Building.
Go to www.answercoalition.org and link to "To sign up for the Sept.15 die-in".
My only comment, and I've said it before, if you aren't part of this attempt to find a solution, you're just part of the problem. So, quoting you earlier: "I will gladly show up - and be right in the front ranks, when ANSWER and UFPJ can organize truly effective actions that follow the principles of nonviolent direct action."
Sounds like something right up your alley. :-)
Please join us.
""There was a woman with a CBS badge on who kept going back to the CBS trailer. And she told us, 'If those things get on the air, I'm going to lose my job.' "
This is the most important quote attributed to the above article as it shows who exactly is "censoring" the news!"
Yes, that's exactly it. Now if you ask the persons who could actually fire her if they agree with this censorship, they won't admit that they do. But the people who don't take part in such censorship find themselves unemployed quickly enough (on the rare occasions they ever get hired in the first place).
CBS = Censoring Broadcasts for the State
We should march on every local CBS station in the nation in protest of this.
Has anyone visited the CBS web site to try to deliver a note of protest about this? I did, and found the site incredibly user "unfreindly" when it came to offeirng opinons. Nowhere did I find a slot to say that, as of this day, I won't be watching CBS news again, or any of its shows. Not that I found them entertaining or uplifting anyway. In fact, just opposite
CBS? How do you spell CBS? I never watch that fascist propaganda channel - it was too much like watching Faux News or a broken clock.
CBS sickens me and I will not buy any product which supports the airing of their TV programs! Join me! Free speech for ALL and stop buying sponsoring CBS products. That's a language they understand! They may not make it easy for us to communicate with them, but refusing to buy products that sponsor their air time,....well, that's another story! You have the power to spend OR NOT spend your dollars on things that support their programming. Don't they say that 'money speaks?'
King George and Katie have no ratings. Now the Early Show has joined the State run programming.
With luck the sponsors will grow tired of the low ratings and cancel them all.
Last night I had a dream that at a particular moment, everyone walking or driving across the Golden Gate Bridge stopped. Those in cars got out, and stood in silence with the walkers, while from either side at the middle of the bridge, 'dummies' in effigy of Bush and Cheney were tossed over the sides. Everyone broke their silence, cheered, then quickly got back in their cars and drove on, or continued their walk across the span. No one could get onto the bridge to stop the protest. It lasted only a few minutes, but the event was recorded by a number of cameras to keep the memory alive. It was a great dream! I wonder if CBS would keep this off their broadcasts? As a reminder, YouTube is there for anyone to film and post events so don't forget your camera!
"No people can be both ignorant and free."
Thomas Jefferson
CBS cannot be guilty of "censorship". They are a corporate entity, and can air or not air whatever they desire, within the bounds of FCC regulations.
Now, if they have been threatened, coerced, or bribed by a government entity to not air certain things, then that government entity would be guilty of censorship.
A good example is not one network has shown any flag-draped coffins coming in from the Iraq War. Go figure.
rupert murdoch is a traiter to the american people. he would have done hitler proud.
mine got through Peace-atari. I clicked the contact us link at the bottom of the page.
Nothing, NOTHING works until you hit the enemy in his
pocketbook. I don't believe that we Americans are ready to sacrifice and suffer some pain in order to inflict pain
on corporate America.
Christmas is near. How about 1) refusing to purchase anything made in China as a gift 2) giving our kids only 1
'special' toy each and lots of cardboard boxes and 3) presenting our loved ones with meaningful, homemade
gifts-- big in heart and small in price-- this year?
WalMart, Toys 'r Us, Harry and David, FAO Schwartz, UPS, the USPS ( send e-mails, not cards ), state revenue departments, would all see major losses. The MSM would actually report on this. Since we commoners wouldn't be carrying signs, we wouldn't have to worry about handcuffs and such. And we could donate some of the money we saved to charitable organizations that need our help.
We, the people, actually have the cure for the military-industrial complex' immorality in our own hands. Are we willing to grab on and make a difference?
Reggie,
Yes, CBS is guilty of censoring the signs of the protestors, when CBS chose to broadcast from a public location they gave up the right to prohibit public access to their production. Either no signs should have been allowed or all signs should have been allowed (within obscenity boundaries).
To exclude signs expressing one side of A POLITICAL OPINION is the essence of censorship.
I wish MoveOn or some other organization would organize a protest at every local CBS station in the country.
Not only is CBS guilty of censorship, the MSM acted as the cheerleader for the invasion of Iraq, they have the blood of a million innocent Iraqis on their hands and are every bit as guilty of war crimes as Bush, Cheney, Rice or Adolph Hitler.
Great thought Pippilin! Also, please consider gift options such as found at Oxfam.org and arborday.org.
Oxfam has a wonderful program most children would love as a gift.
Check it out here: http://www.oxfam.org/en/donate/unwrapped
The National Arbor Day Foundation also has a fine gift program where you can "give" a tree: http://www.arborday.org/join/TICTIM/index.cfm?trackingid=306
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/earlyshow/main500202.shtml
This link will take you to a page, and if you scroll down about halfway, on the right side of the screen there are a series of links, one of which is for "comments". I was able to ... let them know how I felt about their anti-democratic tactics. However, when I clicked send, the little box said, "Not the page you are looking for? Due to recent changes in the Website, blah blah blah."
So I re-sent it, this time under "comment" rather than "complaint." Same thing. I am not sure if the letter got through.
Not that it does any good anyway, but this story just pissed me off so much! How dare they? It's a PUBLIC SPACE. Since when did morning TV shows earn the right to order arrests, or to threaten people with arrest?
"Free press" my arse!
It looks like more and more individual action -- at one's own timing -- will have to be necessary.
Put your thinking cap on ---
I agree: QUIT WATCHING MAINSTREAM TELEVISION PROGRAMS. ALL OF THEM.
Looks like CBS and the rest of them would have wanted to censor a giant Mission Accomplished sign also. It didn`t turn out to be very smart either. Maybe they should try printing the news instead of attempting to influence it.
Feeble sloganeers foiled by CBS!
Sheeply protesters blocked by two policemen!
Timid bleating fails to stop the war!
It's all sort of pitiful.
CBS has a long and dishonorable history of
censorship since the earliest days of electronic media. They alone instituted the
loathsome requirement of loyalty oaths during the McCarthy period. They purged their liberal
commentators at the behest of smear publications of that era such as RED CHANNELS,
while not so much as giving the victims a hearing...despite their scholarship or credentials. Among those who were drummed out
was William Shirer, author of THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH. Interestingly,
Shirer was not even allowed a candid parting
word to his many loyal listeners, but merely
a terse, scripted. and CBS censored statement. He described it as similar to
his broadcasts from Berlin during the Hitler years when some little Nazi sat poised at the controls ready to cut him off if he varied from his script by one word. That was CBS
in 1947. (Read this for yourselves in Mr.
Shirer's TWENTIETH CENTURY JOURNEY, VOL. III). This is CBS in 2007. Same Nazi corporation.
As COMarc said early on in this thread: "People need to be more subtle".
Honestly, that was my first thought, too. It's almost as though they wanted to fail.
Perhaps a few participants got a nice education out of the experience: "Welcome to the USA's corporate media- here's a little taste of censorship". Was that the only goal? A tiny consciousness-raising moment for a select few?
Why did AFSC alert CBS to their presence before the TV show?
There really is such a thing as being TOO polite. This group wasted an excellent chance to get a good message across. A little stealth (and advance research) could have REALLY paid off.
Observing this lack of courage by the "anti-war" movement is PJD, who suggests that we need UNPERMITTED responses to the war and other recent atrocities. YES!!!!
In Matt's example, CBS staffers reacted just as we would expect them to do- how could that have possibly been a surprise?
I can't help finding fault here with AFSC for not knowing better, and for failing to exert any real leadership.
Sadly, I find many well-established peace groups- including AFSC- to be lacking any direction for courageous and bold new action.
And ANSWER's idea of having people "sign-up" in advance to do a die-in?
You have GOT to be kidding!!!!
We cannot plan any more safe, peacenik versions of Disneyland. We can no longer quietly march in circles around our city centers. People are dying ugly and horrific deaths here and all over the globe thanks to US foreign and domestic policies. WHEN will our actions match the seriousness of what is taking place?
Where is the REAL resistance?
The liberal media strikes again!
What I don;t get is where does CBS get off saying what is "allowed" and what is "not allowed." For example:
QUOTE: "We started assembling the banners in the park," Harritt says, "and immediately, a CBS staff person said, 'You can't be here. You can't have those here.' "
and
QUOTE: "I had been circulating through the crowd of about 1,000 people collecting signatures," he says, "when this same CBS staffer came by and said, 'You can't do that.'
WTF "you can't do that"?? Seig f-ing heil you-- traitorous backstabbing corporate fascist ba$tards! I don't want to DARE hear a f-ing "conservative" tell ME I am not "patriotic" because I don't support some goddamn farce of a war with the government giving handouts (TO THE SUPER RICH, not the poor), and consenting the Constitution to the flames. These people would call *us* "traitors"???
F*ck you, every one of you, because YOU people are the traitors, whether its a corporate schmuck in CBS or some mindless automaton nodding right along with Bush (you murderous 27% left out there). Traitors, every one of you.
OK, I'm finished ranting. And I don't feel any better.
Does anyone here honestly believe that civil disobedience can stop the Running of the Fascists? Maybe, in theory, if several million people were willing to completely blockade Washington D.C.
No, I think in the long run only severe pain of some kind will cause a drastic change in course. My money is on one of two possibilities: a violent uprising in response to the declaration of marshall law or a devastating economic collapse.
Get a gun and learn how to use it. Hone up on basic survival skills. Only the strong will survive.
Cheerio!
This is a disturbing story on many levels, especially as we come to a congressional vote on extension of funding for the occupation of Iraq, and as Bush beats a drum for the bombing of Iran.
Once again, the news is being managed to ensure the White House and neocons get their way, and once again counter-voices are suppressed.
I recommend that Ms. Murphy consider a lawsuit against CBS and the law enforcement individuals and agency that cuffed her, also any individuals involved in suppression of her rights to freedom of expression. Ms. Murphy would be doing all of us a favor by not letting these tyrants off the hook. I'd be happy to send a contribution toward legal fees.
Who watches that bunch of has been's--not me and I don't watch Katie either.Now why don't you join me in not watching and let the CBS Bushies play to or with themselves
What do they expect in the land of the free? Free publicity. Like everybody else you have to pay for your message.
I am an escort at a women's reproductive rights facility. We have protestors who express their freedom of speech rights - they stand on a sidewalk outside of our clinic's fenced area. They sing hymns, pray and otherwise express their opposition to abortion. On the other hand, there are about two-four dozen regulars who stand directly in the walkway between our parking lot and the clinic's back door. They touch people, attempt to block the entrance and have posted some of pictures and names on websites that advocate murdering abortion providers and those who assist them. Our local newspapers always cover these protestors but they're very careful not to show them when they're making young women cry or jumping in our faces with their doctored "abortion" photos. I am not shocked any more by how the media censors news. They want us all dumb and complacent and interested only in bands/celebrities/etc. What do you expect from them; they're all part of huge corporations.
RobertBaldwin September 6th, 2007 12:43 am
CBS has a long and dishonorable history of
censorship since the earliest days of electronic media. They alone instituted the
loathsome requirement of loyalty oaths during the McCarthy period. They purged their liberal
commentators at the behest of smear publications of that era such as RED CHANNELS,
while not so much as giving the victims a hearing…despite their scholarship or credentials. Among those who were drummed out
was William Shirer, author of THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH. Interestingly,
Shirer was not even allowed a candid parting
word to his many loyal listeners, but merely
a terse, scripted. and CBS censored statement. He described it as similar to
his broadcasts from Berlin during the Hitler years when some little Nazi sat poised at the controls ready to cut him off if he varied from his script by one word. That was CBS
in 1947. (Read this for yourselves in Mr.
Shirer's TWENTIETH CENTURY JOURNEY, VOL. III). This is CBS in 2007. Same Nazi corporation.
Really?
Please explain what happened with Edward R. Murrow and Senator Joseph McCarthy on March 9, 1954.
Corva Murphy says: I am watching the Bill Moyers re-run of the run-up to the war and am thinking: Why don't a group of parents who have lost children in this war wage a law suit against the NY Times and Judith Miller. I am sure there are parents who feel exactly as we do...that the reasons for this war were a total fabrication by the administration, the Neo-cons, and the press who did their bidding. Like in the movie "Amazing Grace" we must think of a "work-around," something totally out the bounds of normal procedures, so that we can really get the attention of the press...and how better than to sue "the paper of record" and one of their own. Maybe this is a better plan than working for impeachment. I am sure there would be a lot of money out there to back up a law suit like this! What do you think?
Corva Murphy, handcuffed in KC