Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
EU Climate Flight Plans 'Deluded'
European Union proposals to reduce the climate impact of flying will not work, a report concludes.
The EU plans to include aviation in its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
But analysts at the Tyndall Centre, a prestigious UK climate research body, say this will have minimal effect without a major rise in carbon prices.
Friends of the Earth (FoE) which funded the study wants mandatory efficiency goals for aircraft, tax on aviation fuel and curbs on airport expansion.
"We delude ourselves if we believe the proposed framing of the EU ETS is in keeping with the EU's own and repeated commitment to limit climate change to a 2C (3.6F) rise," said Kevin Anderson, director of the Tyndall Centre's energy programme.
"The current aviation ETS proposal must be significantly strengthened so as to drive down emission growth rates and force the adoption of more efficient aircraft technologies and operation."
Priced too low
The ETS began operating in 2005. Current plans call for inclusion of flights within Europe by 2011, extending a year later to all flights originating or ending on the continent.
Tyndall and FoE believe this would be too late. By 2012, they say, carbon emissions from aviation will have increased by at least 25%.
Another criticism is that the current price of carbon is too low to make any impact on flying.
Carbon is currently trading at about 20 euros (£13.50; $27) per tonne. The Tyndall analysis suggests that even a price of 300 euros per tonne would bring only a moderate increase in ticket prices and a moderate fall in passenger numbers.
"Other political measures are also needed to tackle the growing climate impact of flying," commented FoE's aviation campaigner Richard Dyer.
"This should include VAT on air tickets, a tax on aviation fuel and opposition to new runways."
Globally, aviation accounts for between 1% and 2% of greenhouse gas production, but rapid economic growth in Asia and the burgeoning cheap flights industry in Europe make it the fastest rising source of emissions.
© 2007 BBC
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


4 Comments so far
Show AllAt least the EU is thinking about this. What is being done in the US?
Just imagine if all energy costs were not allowed as a business deduction and there were no corporate subsidies for energy.
A switch to a tax on the gross proceeds of every corporation with deduction for other taxes paid ONLY would force corporations to see the cost in energy.
It won't happen here nor will a carbon tax until we have tried all the things that will make the environment worse.
Just read a very interesting article which addresses the intimate relationship between ecological sound policy and economic growth.
http://www.culturechange.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=118&Itemid=1
It seems to me the focus on flying is rather misplaced. Flying contributes about 2% of CO2 emissions. Even with the projected increase worldwide in air traffic this will only rise to 3%. With a concerted effort, and after pissing off a whole bunch of people we might succeed in getting a 30% reduction in that (at best). The net effect is going to be minimal. Shouldn't we be focussing on those areas that will provide larger returns for our efforts, like vehicles, housing, and power generation all of which contribute a much larger share?