EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History
- Collapse: Does Washington Bridge Expose the Crumbling of a Nation?
- Exclusive: Why I Spoke Out at Obama's Foreign Policy Speech
- Over a Million Signatures in Support for Sen. Warren's Student Loan Bill
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History
- Exclusive: Why I Spoke Out at Obama's Foreign Policy Speech
- Get Apocalyptic: Why Radical is the New Normal
- Obamas Under Fire for 'Personal Responsibility Finger-Wagging' at Black Audiences
Popular content
Today's Top News
British Leave Last Remaining Basra Base: What Was Achieved?
British forces have pulled out of Basra Palace, the onetime southern residence of Saddam Hussein that became the symbol of the UK's role in the US-led invasion. The British departure from their last remaining base inside the walls of Basra City, signalled their disengagement from the conflict and has highlighted a growing and public discord between Washington and London over Iraq, with the Americans claiming the move will severely undermine security.
The withdrawal itself took place with no fanfare or celebration. The troops from the 4th Battalion, the Rifles have been under a virtual state of siege, with constant rocket and mortar attacks, as they trained Iraqi forces to take over their duties.
Some of the 500-strong contingent who had already left had faced attacks on their way out, and the Ministry of Defence had attempted to keep the date of the evacuation confidential in an attempt to avoid what they term a full scale "fighting withdrawal".
The decision by the radical Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi Army, which had carried out repeated attacks on British troops, to call a ceasefire is believed to have played a part in determining the pullout date from the palace.
The UK military will now be based at Basra airport, in the outer fringes of the city, while what remains of the British-controlled south is handed over to the Iraqi authorities. The bulk of the force will then pull out of the country, leaving a reserve unit that would only be deployed in an emergency.
The palace was originally due to be handed over to Iraqi authorities in early August. But that was delayed under pressure from the Americans who remain unhappy about the pullout. They say, it will expose their supply lines from Kuwait as they take part in President George Bush's last throw of the dice in Iraq, the "surge" in Baghdad and the central area of the country. The British decision to resist further American pressure is being increasingly seen by the Bush administration as a sign of Gordon Brown's desperate desire to disentangle his government from the Iraq imbroglio.
In turn, the criticism from the US has become more vocal and strident. American officials have charged that the British have "lost the south". British exasperation at what they consider to be "unfair" American criticism surfaced in an article in The Washington Post, in the names of Defence Secretary Des Browne and Foreign Secretary David Milliband, saying "recent weeks have brought a lot of misplaced criticism of the United Kingdom's role in southern Iraq. It is time to set the record straight".
Critics say it has been an inglorious retreat and resulted in the danger that Basra and its inhabitants have been left to the mercy of murderous Shia militias.
British officials, on the other hand, insist that the base had been handed over to the Iraqi authorities who were now capable of providing security for their own people. The vast preponderance of the violence in Basra, the argument runs, has been directed at the foreign troops and removing them would lead to a decline in the bloodshed.
The people of Basra face an uncertain future. Hassan Ibrahim, a 48-year-old teacher, said: " There was criticism of the British because people felt they did not do enough to stop the criminals, some of whom are even in the police. But a lot of people also say that things could get much worse if they leave. One thing we are uneasy about are rumours that the Americans may come to Basra to replace the British. We see what is happening in Baghdad and we don't want that here."
Basra by numbers
1,628
Number of days the conflict has been running.
655,000 Civilian deaths in Iraq since the conflict began
168Number of British servicemen and women who have been killed in Iraq
Britain sent 45,000 servicemen and women to fight the war in Iraq in March 2003
18,000British troops in Iraq in May 2003 at the height of the occupation
6,800 Total number of UK personnel deployed in Iraq theatre
5,500 Number of British troops presently in Basra
In the past four months there have been around 600 rocket and mortar attacks on the Basra airstrip, where British forces are based
£5bn Overall cost to the UK of war and occupation in Iraq
12,000,000 - or 76% of the electorate - took part in Iraq's elections in 2005 345,000 Members of the Iraqi Security Forces trained by British and US forces
One Victoria Cross has been issued in Basra, to Private Johnson Beharry
212km of new water pipe laid in a £9m project which employed 2,310 people at its peak
24,478 short-term jobs created
336 schools, refurbishments and supply projects
© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

29 Comments so far
Show AllQu: "What Was Achieved?"
Answer:
1. A lotta needless deaths.
2. Tony 'Toadthrax' Blair got a pat on the head from lunatic Bush.
3. Yet more innocents in the world got murdered and crippled for life.
4. Inflammation of racial and religious tensions (worldwide).
5. The media sold miles of half-baked newsprint stories and lies, and TV sold lots of advertising space on the same pile of trash.
6. Halliburton-Corrupt & Co, made enormous profits.
7. The poor (as ever) suffered horribly.
8. The armed forces got to play REAL soldiers, and to experiment with their shiny new toys.
9. The arms salesmen and women made fat profits from their criminal activity, -as did the military research labs.
10. Cretins in religious garb got to spout even more vociferously, -thus furthering religious divides, and Iraq nows lies in tatters...
...and a hundred and one other travesties occurred, ~ all due to the menacing devils who conned an (almost) majority of sheeple into electing them, so they could wreak this havoc in the world.
Nice work boys, but don't come crying to us when all your dodgy deeds come back to haunt you for an eternity, when all that old *Karma* stuff creeps up and bites your bum!
~We told you right from the start this was a ruinous blunder, why the hell didn't you **listen?**
The coalition of the willing is all but gone, when will Americans exercise their freedom to disagree with the government and make them bring our troops home?
In view of the absurdity the schemes to bomb Iran while planning to provide arms to this volatile region, and the history of other ill conceived policies of this administration, one can only conclude that the arms merchants are instrumental in its conception.
After tolerating the actions of this theocratic administration, guided by special interests for over six years, Americans must assume blame for the resulting destruction.
kaukausus - hin und zaruck...
I asked JESUS,who wins what when you kill your own people and strangers in a distend land? he said,"SATAN".
Brown is not an American lapdog.
The Writing is on the Wall - read it and weep stupid Americans!
So where are the British troops going next? To participate in the coming debacle in Iran?
I've given up hope that anyone can stop this continued march to madness.
"I've given up hope that anyone can stop this continued march to madness."
Giving up false hope is the first step towards real hope, which asks how the next step in the general war will further opportunities for regime change (not just personnel change) in the US and the UK.
Why should we expect less from George. He doesn't mind China shipping us tainted goods that poison and kill our children as long as they continue to fund the war. The Brits should have known King George's wrath opposing his singular purpose in the name of democracy.
Prehaps that is what it will take to bring sanity back to our country. Get China to stop funding the war. Make King George raise taxes to fund it. His rich friends will soon demand we leave. I know that won't happen but it is a nice thought.
UN-common-dreams...My sentiments, Exactly!
I don't think countries not in the coalition of the willing have had Arab acts of terrorism on their soils, am I right?
Dear ezeflyer, (you who are, -unlike me, a true master of wonderfully succinct comment!) :)
I think you are for the most part right. Such countries as (eg) Sweden, don't have all the nonsense the UK and USA piddle around with, --building massive concrete blocks around numerous government buildings, hiring extra cops to guard public lavatories (-or whatever...)
They seem to enjoy a freedom from such fear-full stuff, which our demented 'leaders' have willingly, insanely inflicted upon us.
And shortly the killing In Basra will end. The Iraqis will settle their differences one way or another, without the help of the British troops.
Perhaps they will even manage to once again have elecricity and clean water. Unless our troops once again arrest the technicians from Iran who are invited to come and assist the people of Iraq in those endeavors.
Will our troops leave Iraq anytime soon? ____We'll see.__ I would not bet on it.
What was achieved? Death, destruction, destabilization of Iraq, economic disaster, pain, suffering, fear, hatred - that's what we contributed; that's what the UK contributed. Now we need to turn all that around, and it starts with each one of us. George Bush can't and wouldn't imagine such a thing - so we have to do it, each one of us, in our minds and hearts and souls. Let this never happen again, and let that begin with me.
Its pretty obvious, The Brits know that the US Asshole in Chief is going to attack Iran in a few weeks, and that Iran in turn will invade Iraq and attack any foreign troops there.
THEN all hell will break loose as the front spreads all the way from Afganistan to Iraq and beyond, and the Russians and chinese decide to jump in to preserve their own oil supplys.
the Brits are geting the hell out while the getting is good.
"The coalition of the willing is all but gone."
Hey Pat d -
There NEVER was a coalition of the willing. There has only ever been a coalition of the coerced and arm twisted governments in Eastern Europe - Poland and the Czech Republic for example. then there were the coalition of the war booty party from UK and Australia. The rest of them tried to appease Bush from reneging on trade deals and other treaties if they did not help out in some way as did Japan. No one went willingly except the UK and Australia who expected their own corporations to make money on the venture. The rest weere all coerced under threat, both veiled and open.
At last the Brits show that they are smarter than Bush and his claque.
I don't think Iran will be another Cambodia, completely different situations and era.
Not the first time the British have pulled out of Iraq. A good link for those of you who are history buffs:
http://tinyurl.com/2el75
Bosnia, Serbia, Albania, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovenia. Each and every one are tied firmly by the oil pipeline promises and plans of King George the Totally Bonkers. A classic mass-murderer, George cares solely for his own personal gratification and glory. He has been supported by such evils as Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice.... and on and on. It is time for everyone in every country to simply tell him NO! Will he listen? Of course not! But maybe we can defuse him, somehow, some way.
I too would like to know an astrologer's opinions, too long have we been under a patriarchal opinion. The zeitgeist movie, expalins alot of what I have always felt. We, as gaurdians of Gaia, need to unite. Men have too long driven us into ever more male-aggressive conflicts. My own Shaman has given me understanding of my dreams in where I am taken by Lakota edlers to a well. The well is not only a life-giving source of water, but a source of sacrement.
It took UK a long to realise the futility of being involved in a war that has simply paralysed a nation. The UN should begin finding a solution to the disastrous BUSH/BLAIR CATASTROPHE in IRAQ. The UN reaction to the current crisis in the Middle Eastern Region can aptly be described as that of a toothless lapdog.
'What was acheived'
Nothing.
I am sick and tired of other countries blaming the American people. It is YOUR countries that pay tribute to our corporations and our elite that run them. We have no power here at home as long as you kiss ass to American corporatism for jobs. When your governments allow US corporations onto your soil and you take a job, you are funding the war and providing funds to the corporate elite and opposing the anti-war movement in the US. Until all nations boycott *ALL* US corporations, the war will continue.
In this regard, Venzuala has it absolutely right. So for the rest of you Brits and others who accuse Americans, you can shove it up your little pooper shoot until you stop your greed for US corporations and jobs in your own countries. Blair was the prefect example of such sickness and corruption. His kissing ass to Bush was enough to meke any American puke at the thought of the Brits and their subserviance. In your tolerance for Blair, you disgraced and defiled your own country.
It is all you other nations with US corporations on your soil - it is YOU who are supporting the US corporatism that is behind this world domination. It is YOU that are causing the war. It is you that are causing the blood shed. If countries all across the globe would force American corporatoins to leave their soils, the dominion would end.
But no, you have to have your jobs right? You got to have more money, right? And in so doing you provide cheap labor and huge profits for these same corporations. It is you that are support the corporatism and the elite that are raising hell all around the world.
It is YOUR greed, not the average American here at home, that is funding the suffering of the average US citizen from our loss of jobs (outsourcing) and loss of empowerment in the middle class of America.
If you other nations forced our the US corporations from your soils, it would bring our jobs back home and empower us (the average American people) to make a real difference. When our corporations know you will work for them, they use your labor as weapons and leverage to threaten our jobs and suppress working Americans here at home.
Until you do your part, the American people cannot do their part. So stop putting the blame on us when it is YOU who are funding the corporate elite, their huge profits on cheap labor, and their empowerment to raise hell around the world.
The Last American
What a vile, heinous lie this entire war has been. How can these "people" sleep at night. They must de-humanize us the way soldiers do to each other in order to not have a problem creating so much murder, when it wasn't even truly necessary. I guess to the Rockefellers, Rothchilds, etc., we are not even the same species in their eyes.
A change from lab dog Blair to one of reason and conscience Brown. Brits have some sense and decency, too bad fellow Americans don't expect more...Coalition of the Willing not much to begin with, is pretty much a farce like this needless war/occupation of Iraq.
Jesus spoke to Bush to be decider. Are you sure you are reading the same bible?
Jewish bible..OT says eye for an eye
Christian bible.. NT says give the other cheek
I say the above are right with one exception..OIL oil oil oil oil oil oil oil