Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Don't Ask, Don't Kvell
I'd been enjoying a good chuckle at the YouTube video documenting Mitt Romney's transformation from dedicated pro-choice advocate in Massachusetts to die-hard abortion foe on the Republican hustings when Larry Craig gave us that come-hither foot tap.
The dog days of August haven't been livelier since we spent the summer of 2003 talking about Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum. He was, followers of the Republican war on gays might recall, a conservative senator from Pennsylvania who enlightened us with his thinking about sodomy by opposing what even the conservative Supreme Court has legalized, as well as speaking out against the right of consenting adults to commit adultery. Santorum threw into his definition of marriage-the interview centered on gay marriage-what matrimony is not: "It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog or whatever the case may be."
Santorum's doggie discourse was but one of the lamentable stumbles on his way to defeat last November. Since then, Republican sex-capades have taken on more of a freak-show quality. Who could have predicted that after Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., got caught sending lewd instant messages to young male congressional aides, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., would have his name turn up on the rolls of the D.C. madam? And there was no way-none at all-to predict that there would be not one but two Republicans-besides the disgraced Craig, there's a Florida state senator previously affiliated with John McCain's presidential campaign-who would get caught compromised in a men's room stall?
As someone who does not believe gays are inherently immoral or deranged, and who finds Washington sex scandals enticing because they hold the potential for that bipartisan participation so elusive in the halls of Congress, I have but one wish: Don't bring 'em on.
I do not like seeing people humiliated, especially when wives and children must endure the mortification alongside the misbehaving men in their lives. I don't take any joy in pointing out, again and again, the hypocrisy of closeted gay Republican politicians targeting homosexuals as political wedge issues, whether the cause is keeping openly gay people out of the military or keeping them from civil unions. I am repulsed by politicians who promote abstinence before marriage and then fail to abstain from sex outside their marriage.
Of course they are hypocrites. Worse, they deliberately hurt people for political gain, promoting legislation and constitutional amendments and making all sorts of offensive speeches for the sole purpose of pumping up "the base"-that inordinately small slice of the American electorate that really wants to dwell on this instead of, say, how to get out of Iraq.
But really, this hypocrisy story is getting pretty stale.
And so, with the knowledge that neither side in the great refighting of the sexual revolution is particularly happy with this solution, I offer this thought: Can we please stop talking about sex?
Stop attacking gay people. Stop using birth control policy as a weapon that harms women's health. Accept that abortion is legal, and needs to be in order to prevent the greater tragedy of thousands of women who would otherwise die or harm themselves through illegal abortions. Besides being spared a few tawdry headlines (OK, there will always be some) we'd be done with the double-speak now heard on the Republican presidential campaign trail, as Romney and others explain just why they were for legal abortion before they were against it.
As far as I can tell, the only group of voters that wants to keep sexual voyeurism in our politics is the very group that indirectly leads so many Republican lawmakers down the well-trod path to the microphone to confess their sins and beg forgiveness: social conservatives.
If they're as grossed out as the rest of us by the mere thought of an aging senator playing footsie with the vice squad in a bathroom stall, then they've got the power to set us free. Not that politicians should be free to abuse (as Foley did) or violate the law (as Craig has admitted). But they should be free to be openly gay or to mess up their marriages, just like everybody else.
So what if all politicians took a new pledge? Instead of promising to uphold "family values," they could promise to value the right of Americans to live our personal lives with a measure of privacy, dignity and access to the healthcare needed to safeguard our well-being-and society's.
Marie Cocco's e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.
© 2007, Washington Post Writers Group
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

19 Comments so far
Show AllI'm quite certain the author MEANT "kvetch"! Noted that, immediately, myself.
Thank God MSNBC has given us Joe and Tucker to lead the Basher's Parade! And of course the rest of the MSM has given them a pass.
the problem with using the bible as a standard? george w. bush!
I don't understand the headline, "Don't Ask, Don't Kvell". Kvell means "to beam with pride", doesn't it. Who is beaming? Or does the headline writer mean kvetch, "to complain"?
I know that kvell has the desired sound, but the meaning doesn't seem to fit (in my opinion).
The next time you hear a politician promise to protect "traditional family values," keep your kids away from him...especially the boys.
We could, you know, talk about all the good things about sex.
I really don't care if people are gay or not. But, Larry Craig, as a Republican Senator, voted to kill hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq, many of them babies, for greed and power. Jesus preaches forgiveness, but for the sake of the children of Iraq, the evil people who caused their deaths must be removed from power, by any means fair or foul. Stop the killing is the first priority; forgiveness is later.
Gay rights is important. The right of children to live to be old enough to know if they are gay or straight is far more important.
Yet again Republican fundafacists give Christianity a black eye. If they love God so much why do they keep abusing Him? Indeed, they do not love God, but hate all, even themselves (apparently). To these people, religion has become a club with which to beat others over the head so they can feel superior in their own sick souls and their own worthless little lives.
Jesus Christ, if you'll listen, taught compassion was the essence of Godliness. Let's stop calling these idiots religious and call them what they are: facists!
Bravo, Marie! I was going to make an inappropriate comment about Republican men doing their part to keep the abortion rate down by engaging in public bathroom sex with other men, but hey ... I'm all in favor of the whole country growing up and getting over sex as being the most important topic of discussion, at least in the political arena.
You know, there is a positive side to all this sexual scandal brouhaha. As the parent of an adolescent who is coming of age during this sordid-sex-as-news era, I would like to thank all these political officeholders and the news sources for providing my child with all the information she needs now, at the age of 12, to realize that being obsessed with sex is a really dumb thing. Thank-you for making my child realize things that parents usually are unable to do, simply because of the "I gotta rebel against every value my parents put in front of me" nature of the parent-(pre)teen relationship.
Here Here!! About time someone stood up and said it. Get out of peoples' lives and pay attention to the job of fiscal management. Someone else's adult sex habits are their business, not mine and not yours. Not that I'm sad to see Larry Craig get booted for lying...he should have been booted for soliciting the Senate pages.
Someone else's abortion is their life-transforming decision and thankfully, not mine, since it would rend my soul to have to deal with it and it surely must rend theirs. Not my business...not your business.
If you've been elected to serve your country, start doing it by creating jobs, protecting the environment, and protecting the nation by bringing our troops home within our own borders. Oh, yes, there IS that little matter of obviously unfinished business that you better get started in the next few days...IMPEACHMENT!
Amen. Preach it, sister! If a law does absolutely nothing towards making the problem go away, i.e. sodomy laws, it has no business being on the books. We need to recognize that there are far more significant issues of justice and morality out there then whether two people sleep together, male, female or gay. Open your Bible at random and it is unlikely to be a passage about sexuality, but far more likely to be about mistreatment of the poor or misuse of violence. The social conservatives use their Bibles to call other people to be what they would like themselves to be and Sen. Craig demonstrates frequently are not, but never use their Bibles as a standard for their own behavior.
Imagine how conflicted the man is who was raised to be good little christian, one who waits for marriage to have sex (of course having to take himself in hand after a steamy everything but date - even though he also knows the taking of himself in hand is also wrong from what he was raised to believe - and after he's married and the children intended are all born, it's off to seperate beds. Yet the urge doesn't diminish. Can he risk sending his dear wife to hell to if he talks her into continuing to have sex, without having more children? No. So he goes to a prostitute if he's straight, or does what Craig did if he's gay and needing to be straight. This way they can blame Satan for leading them astray, or blame it on the prostitute and willing gay because everyone knows they're already hell-bound.
I feel sorry for these conflicted "good christians" who are trying to follow their god's laws, especially since that god also gave them those dasterdly needs that just won't go away.
With all the sadness in the world, and all the violence and unecessary wars, plus accidents and disease, if two people of the same sex find happiness with each other, more power to them. Live and let live. When man learned the art of controlling another's behavior with a superstitious belief system, religion was born.
The biggest hypocrites of all time are the Republicans. They have lied so many times the line is blurred between fact and falsehood for them, and the public is increasingly turning away from their selfish policies and condemnations of everyone else who disagrees with the pernicious agenda they unraveled decades ago.
I could never understand Log Cabin Republicans, but I guess for some, the love of money and power is all important.
As for family-values,( another false Republican cliche ) why did they refuse to pass The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) last month in the Senate? Any legislation which helps working people is usually voted down by Republicans.
The Master once said, "by their works shall ye know them" ...we sure do.
Who cares if a person is gay, or straight, bisexual, or asexual? Who cares if a person is a celibate, or a nymphomaniac? Unless you are interested in having a sexual relation with them, why would you care about that part of their personal life?
The United States has a perverted interest in the sex lives of other people. Where else in the world would the police set up a sting operation to catch people engaged in dirty doings. Where else would anybody want to read all about a politician's private philandering. Canada, South America, and Europe all have a big laugh every time we have another sex scandal. They really yuck it up when all the bible thumps start shaking their fingers of condemnation.
The government spent sixty million dollars investigating that silly little incident with President Clinton. You might have thought Fort Knox had been robed. The crime was not that he got a little on the side, but he lied about it. The big peace of evidence, in this crime of the century, was the Blue Dress. Remember the Blue Dress? Doing DNA tests on the Blue Dress Stain, to see if it belonged to Bill, was the same as smelling the behinds of everyone in a room to find out who farted. I mean, who the hell cares?
I think conservatives believe that sex is terrible and immoral. They all do it, just like everyone else, but they feel guilty. I guess they think god only reads the headlines, so by putting the spotlight on someone else, may be god will overlook their little weaknesses.
The bible by the way has very little to say about sex, but quite a lot to say about sticking one's nose in other peoples business. The Puritans are long gone, but their legacy lives on.
Hmmm, I have to agree with gde. Here in Vermont we have civil unions. My partner and I CU'd 5 years ago, mainly for the fiscal benefits. Would we rather be married? Sure. We're being denied the federal rights that go along with marriage. BUT, here's what's pissing me off. We have so many people in Vermont concerned with Iraq, impeachment, healthcare, stagnant wages etc. And these issues are SO VERY IMPORTANT. But our state legislature, in some kind of twisted ploy to keep us from discussing these issues, has decided that NOW is the time to revisit gay marriage. Now, when our children our dying in Iraq. Now, when wages are so low and manufacturing is moving out of our state at an alarming rate. Now, when we should be acting to impeach, pushing for universal healthcare, getting the hell out of Iraq. Now we have to talk about gay marriage.
Quite frankly whether or not my partner and I can get married is the LEAST of my concerns.
great posts all. why is it that the christians are so interested in other peoples sex lives? mabey one of you christians could enlighten us.
good article. but next time, check your use of yiddish. i think you meant kvetch.
"Why is it that the Christians are so interested in other peoples sex lives? May be one of you Christians could enlighten us." The Jews were the first to make laws in regard to peoples sexual functions. These laws were incorporated in Roman Cannon Law. Roman Cannon Law was passed on to the Christians. Although these laws were on the books for centuries they were almost never enforced. It was well into the middle ages when Conservative Catholicism took hold. It was believed that the good things in life were God's gifts and the bad things were God's punishment. Syphilis was introduced and was rapidly spreading across Europe. Church and state set forth to control the sexual functions of all people. Sex became Bad Bad. Sex was so bad that the mother of Jesus couldn't have had sex. That's when the Virgin Mary was invented.
Mark Twain once said that, "Tradition was the passing on of bad habits from one generation to the next." So here we are today.
Same sex unions are a small issue, which quickly become a big issue for the above reasons. I think this is being used to take the focus off the more important thing. That is impeachment. The only way to end the war, and make this a free country again, is to impeach Bush and Cheney. It looks like Wacko Bush is moving fast to bomb Iran. We must move faster. I don't think lesbian, and gay couples need their unions recognized if they are dying of radiation poisoning. We must put all of our efforts to impeachment, as if our life depended on it, because it does.
thanks john j.