EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bush Plans War on Iran
The Sunday Times of London is reporting that the Pentagon has plans for three days of massive air strikes against 1,200 targets in Iran. Last week, Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, told a meeting of The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal, that the military did not intend to carry out "pinprick strikes" against Iranian nuclear facilities. He said, "They're about taking out the entire Iranian military."
Bush has already set the wheels in motion. With Rovian timing, Alberto Gonzales' resignation was sandwiched between two Bush screeds - one aimed at ensuring Congress scares up $50 billion more for the occupation of Iraq, the other designed to scare us into supporting war on Iran. As Gonzales rides off into the sunset, the significant questions are who will take his place and how that choice will facilitate Bush's occupation of Iraq and attack on Iran.
One name that's been floated for Bush's third attorney general is Joe Lieberman, the "independent" senator from Connecticut. Lieberman, who advocates the use of military force against Iran, was the only person Bush quoted in his August 28 speech to the American Legion. Bush called Iran "the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism" and pledged to "confront Tehran's murderous activities."
Gonzales greased the Bush/Cheney wheels for torturing in violation of the Geneva Conventions, illegally spying on Americans, and purging disloyal Bushies.
Similarly, Lieberman would ensure the Justice Department mounts a vigorous defense of a war of aggression against Iran. And Bush would get a two-fer: Connecticut's Republican governor would appoint a Republican to fill Lieberman's seat, returning control of the Senate to the GOP. A Republican-controlled Senate would direct the agenda, thereby furthering the Bush/Cheney plan.
Lieberman is closely affiliated with American Israeli Public Affairs Committee. "AIPAC leverages its power by an alliance with the Christian Right, which has adopted a bizarre ideology of 'Christian Zionism,'" according to University of Michigan professor Juan Cole. "It holds that the sooner the Palestinians are ethnically cleansed, the sooner Christ will come back. Without millions of these Christian Zionist allies," Cole added, "AIPAC would be much less influential and effective."
During the 2004 election, a 100% "AIPAC voting record" was Lieberman's litmus test for an acceptable presidential candidate. As the House of Representatives was on the verge of passing a resolution that would've required Bush to consult Congress before attacking Iran, the AIPAC lobby stopped it in its tracks.
Bush's WMD-hyping against Iran is déja vu in the run-up to Operation Iraqi Disaster, where he played loose and fast with the truth about Iraq's alleged WMDs. His statement that a nuclear Iran could put the region "under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust" conjures up his images of a "mushroom cloud" in the hype-up to Iraq.
How inconvenient for Bush that the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) just found Iran's uranium enrichment program is operating well below capacity and is nowhere near producing significant amounts of nuclear fuel. The IAEA report says Iran "has been providing the agency with access to declared nuclear materials, and has provided the required nuclear material accountancy reports in connection with declared nuclear material and facilities."
Iran and IAEA agreed on a plan with a step-by-step timetable of cooperation to settle unresolved issues. The agreement said there were "no other remaining issues and ambiguities regarding Iran's past nuclear program and activities," and characterized the accord as "a significant step forward."
"This is the first time Iran is ready to discuss all the outstanding issues which triggered the crisis in confidence," said IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei. "I'm clear at this stage you need to give Iran a chance to prove its stated goodwill. Sanctions alone, I know for sure, are not going to lead to a durable solution"
In 2003, when Dr. ElBaradei reported there was no evidence that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear program, the White House was not pleased. And as Saddam Hussein became more cooperative with the weapons inspector, Bush became "infuriated," according to Bob Woodward.
Bush's vow, "We will confront this danger before it is too late," is the Iran incarnation of his illegal preemptive war doctrine, which he inaugurated in Iraq. In a clear signal he is seeking regime change in Iran, Bush called for "an Iran whose government is accountable to its people, instead of leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons."
Barnett Rubin reported on Global Affairs blog that one of the leading neo-conservative institutions has "instructions" from Dick Cheney's office to "roll out a campaign for war with Iran in the week after Labor Day; it will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects. It will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they don't think they'll ever get majority support for this - they want something like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is 'plenty.'"
Bush/Cheney created the White House Iraq Group (WHIG) to lead a propaganda campaign to bolster public support for war with Iraq. The White House decided to wait until after Labor Day of 2002 to kick off WHIG's mission. Chief of staff Andrew Card explained, "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August." Five years later, they're marketing a new and even more dangerous product - war with Iran. British military historian Corelli Barnett says "an attack on Iran would effectively launch World War III."
Our military spending has reached $1 billion every 2-1/2 days and we are borrowing $2-1/2 billion per day. Bush is mortgaging our children's future security and wealth. We have lost more than 3,700 soldiers in Iraq and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died.
We have already seen how easily Congress caves in to AIPAC. It's up to the people. As Noam Chomsky said, "The most effective barrier to a White House decision to launch a war [on Iran] is the kind of organized popular opposition that frightened the political-military leadership enough in 1968 that they were reluctant to send more troops to Vietnam."
Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and President of the National Lawyers Guild. Her new book, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law, was just published. Her articles are archived at http://www.marjoriecohn.com.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

100 Comments so far
Show AllPeople often debate who wrote the better dystopian novel. Orwell or Huxley? Well, at this point I would say neither.
Sinclair Lewis was the closest to the Hole; a Black Hole that is. "It Can't Happen Here", published in 1935, portrays the same socio-political threats and degradations of a well-coordinated Fascist takeover not unlike the one we face today.
It could have happened by force in 1933, if key members of the Wall Street Gang had had their way (see The Plot to Seize the White House by Archer (republished 2007), but with the advances in the Methods of Manufacturing Consent a club is no longer necessary. Coordinated propaganda campaigns with the right amount of marketing--sports, sex, violence, and unbridled consumerism, which in the MSM are all kind of the same thing, right?
We are experiencing the unavoidable aftershocks of massive social earthquakes, "hot zones", if you will, reverberating outward and BushCo is riding the Wave looking for more terra to stomp on. Join us or U R Fucked. Look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Cambodia, Loas and next Iran. Read Lewis' account and get your passports and visas in order.
IMPEACHMENT
impeachment is the only way to get rid of the mess in Washington We must demand it. But the people seem to have no way to contact their Representatives when their emails are not delivered and when their phone calls are politely ignored. Any ideas anyone.?????? STRIKE FOR IMPEACHMENT NOW
Charles Shaw, wouldn't writing 'tens of thousands' be appropriate, if the number was 700,000? That's ten thousand, times seven, or 'tens of thousands'. I think it is. ___ Do I mis-understand your point?
Hi there Claudius,___ yes indeed. I agree with you. China could easily survive without any of our buying their 'American made' goods. After America dropped to the status of a forth world nation, China would continue on and not have to worry about our using the world's natural resources. They already have our technology, there would be plenty of other country's to purchase their goods.
If I were a leader of China and America attacked Iran, I'd dump the treasury bills and laugh. I might do it fairly soon even if Iran was not attacked. The Chinese are a very patient race of people and they would know how to survive a world wide depression, they have enough food supplies to do so. Durng the Korean war, their troops each carried a two week supply of food, a long ribbon of pressed cooked rice, mixed with peas and dried fish, wrapped in rice paper and burlap. We don't know how to survive that way, and this isn't 1929.
Who'd of thunk it. A frat boy from Texas could bring down the good ol USA!!!! Kind of like Lee Harvey Oswald. Who'd of thunk a loser with a $17 cheap imported rifle would blow Kennedy's brains all over Texas. What is it about Texas anyway? 2 Presidents with no brains both in Texas? Hmmmm?
Ya gotta admit one thing. Bush being President is exciting!!! He's taking us places weve never been before some people are finding religion,some are leaving the country some are angry and many are scared. Exciting stuff!! Sort of like you are running a crack house and the swat team is breaking down your door. You know its not going to turn out well but what a rush!!!
It's about time for an American Resistance. Our country has been invaded and occupied by a fascist regime. I'm afraid there's only one way to stop them. The same way as our Iraqi counterparts.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6577
"The Iraqi Resistance is by definition democratic as it is the spontaneous expression of a people who took its destiny into its hands, and is by definition progressive as it defends the interests of the people."
The Iraqi Resistance and the other resistance movements of the Middle East are movements of the peoples and by nature egalitarian.
It's about time for an American Resistance? How pray tell?
Throw some eggs at the White house? What kind of resistance? Wear some Bush Lied T-shirts? Blog till were bleary eyed? I know I sound demeaning . But resist How?
Protest, sing hippy songs, put flowers in your hair, listen to Dylan?
"One name that's been floated for Bush's third attorney general is Joe Lieberman, the "independent" senator from Connecticut. Lieberman, who advocates the use of military force against Iran, was the only person Bush quoted in his August 28 speech to the American Legion. Bush called Iran "the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism" and pledged to "confront Tehran's murderous activities."
"Similarly, Lieberman would ensure the Justice Department mounts a vigorous defense of a war of aggression against Iran. And Bush would get a two-fer: Connecticut's Republican governor would appoint a Republican to fill Lieberman's seat, returning control of the Senate to the GOP. A Republican-controlled Senate would direct the agenda, thereby furthering the Bush/Cheney plan."
No!
lo Q. Lieberman as Attorney General? Scary indeed. Its bad enough we have Chertoff as head of Homeland Security and Cheney at the healm of the neocon ship.
All I can say OMG where the hell is my passport. Time to flee the Titanic before they start rounding up political dissidents! We are sooooo F%@#+%!
"People often debate who wrote the better dystopian novel. Orwell or Huxley? Well, at this point I would say neither.
Sinclair Lewis was the closest to the Hole; a Black Hole that is. "It Can't Happen Here", published in 1935, portrays the same socio-political threats and degradations of a well-coordinated Fascist takeover not unlike the one we face today"
Between autumn 2001 and autumn 2004, the book disappeared from American shelves; the publisher refused to issue a new edition. It's far too close to the reality -- the dimwit businessman fronting for the party, the chief advisor enjoying same-sex orgies & the repressed homoerotic nature of fascism ("Sen. Craig, fancy meeting you in this stall!"), the theocratic broadcaster (a reactionary bishop in "It Can't Happen Here"), and of course the common sensical liberal newspaperman who can't believe that things are actually heading down the fascist road.
Dichterfreund
Yeah, it doesn't surprise me a bit the book disappeared, kinda like Clear Channel not allowing thousands of radio stations to play Lennon's "Give Peace a Chance" directly following the 9-11 debacle.
A new paperback version of the book came out in 2005 published by Signet Classics (Penguin Group) with a new introduction by a PhD by the name of Micheal Meyer. 2005 is about the time that it became OK to criticize BushCo in the MSM. So, even the fortunate re-issue of the book is governed buy a proverbial nod from the Establishment. Whoa! Maybe we are all just characters in a Sinclair Lewis novel. It is sickeningly shocking how well Lewis pegged the future of US politics.
dougrambo:
such fun!!
probably is not gonna happen,
but i wish
my great-grand daughters
are not
toast
ken
Jack37,
"There can be no real revolution for human peace until we throw that f-ing book out of our souls"
Amen to that!
The biggest and most successful scam ever perpetrated in the history of Mankind!"
i agree with both of you. i really hate the bible. it's a detestable, loathsome creation.
it's not a book of peace, a good book or a book of love. give the old testament a good test drive. the most mindless murder and violence. the entire world pretty much destroyed wit a flood? the murder of 50k+ people for looking into a box "The ark". so on and so forth.
is it any surprise that the violent mindset still exist?
In view of the absurdity the hair brain schemes to bomb Iran and provid arms to this volatile region, and the history of other ill conceived policies of this administration, one can only conclude that the arms merchants are instrumental in its conception.
After tolerating this theocratic administration, guided by special interests for over six years, Americans must assume blame for the destruction that they have caused.
Didn't the Nazis burn Bibles though?
Two years ago I finished an updated novel somewhat similar to 'A Black Hole' and no literary agent or publisher would touch it. They tell me the far right 'Christians' would have me and them burned at the stake.
Lee H. Oswald did not fire the third shot, but JFKs replacement was a Texan.
Would Congress confirm Lie-Burrrr-man for Attorney General? I can't see that happening. Of course a lot of happenings I didn't see until they were seeable, I'm not the brightest political hack around. I do know quite a bit about cooking rodents, read and studied the book, 'Opossum Living'.
abbybwood September 2nd, 2007 7:06 pm
This will be the irony of it all.
After the bombing has stopped and the tears are still being shed all over the world, the Temple in Israel will NOT rise, the clouds will NOT move away and there will be NO "Second Coming" of Jesus.
IMO, an alien visitation is more likely when the time comes. According to David M. Jacobs, Ph.D., even a 51 year old lady is being abducted and trained for a future rescue mission. How many more years will she live? Why an old lady? (Sorry.) Therefore David M. Jacobs, Ph.D., arrived to the following conservative estimate: The time will come within the next 40 years. I think it will be much sooner, and more than likely, in 2012 (see Mayan calendar).
to KEM PATRICK, You write 'thats ten thousand, times seven', but ten thousand times seven is 70,000. 700,000 would be expressed as 'hundreds of thousands', not 'tens of thousands' as the author Marjorie Cohn initially wrote in the above article. She has since changed it to now read 'hundreds of thousands' in the same article that now appears on her blog.
But resist How? asks Dougrambo.
Like put your backpack on then get out of your house or condo, begin marching towards Washington. Carry a big sign saying WHEREVER YOU ARE, JOIN ME TO SAVE AMERICA. The media will pick up on it straight away and others will join you. Soon there may be twenty or thirty then fifty marching with you.
Others, seeing your bravery and sincerity will begin from other locations. Soon there will be an army marching across the States of America towards Washington to rid it of the cancer that bedevils it.
What are you waiting for?
If you intend to initiate a military action against a nation that declares it will fight back , then doesn't it make sense to put out of action (i.e.destroy) its means to fight back (i.e. its military).
The U.S. military machine, U.S. nationalists (most Americans are "nationalists") and U.S. capitalists (most Americans are "capitalists") are on the road to total world domination. The chorus of religious fundamentalists supporting U.S. world domination is merely the support act although a huge one. How much do Militarism, Nationalism and Capitalism depend on ANY religion or its book to do their evil deeds?
Militarism, Nationalism and Capitalism have considerable opposition from amongst religious people, just as they have support from many religious people.
Many commentators above here scare the hell out of me with their hatred for all religion as such. They need to refine their thinking a bit to be more successful. When you read about something bad like in the above article, if you want to overcome it you need to discern its fundamental causes from that which is largely just disagreeable noise.
The line between religion and nationalism has long been blurred by the Jews and Christians for Israel. Their opponents should realise that Zionism is just another modern day nationalism that emerged with the rise of European nationalism just over a hundred years ago. In my book all nationalisms are bad. But currently the most dangerous nationalisms by far are those from America and Israel. Iranian fundamentalism is nothing compared with those two nationalisms. Also the relatively defensive nationalism of Iranians is nothing compared with what it will be after they get attacked. Certainly any chance of greater democratisation will be finished for ages to come as "democracy" will be seen for what it is; largely Western Propaganda. The winning of hearts and minds has clearly been overtaken by the resort to brute force. The long term chickens will come home to roost.
.
.
Daniel Smythe,
People have tried that already; two young people have been reported as marching across the nation against the war; no one has joined them, in fact, there was one other person with them to begin with and they dropped out. Cindy Sheehan also had a similar march, and I can't say what it has done.
Thank you Charles. Math and speling brought my grade average down.
Being Spied. OLD lady, (51) years OLD! Damn, I must be ancient. Guess I'd better go cimb the mounain and meditate till I fall over dead. I'm 71, a uselss waste, using valuable energy from the Earth and polluting the atmosphere with my big mouth and C-02 farts.
Hey Paul, I don't have any hair and would Yanni be Ok instead of Dylan? Yannis' concert at the Accorppolis.
Where then are the 70% of folk who oppose Bush and everything he stands for, lo Q?
How is it that we in Australia continuously hear lots about all the ill-feeling towards Bush in America yet there's so little action to get rid of him? He's only a bloody politician after all, not God!
Two and two don't add up to four!
Jan September 3rd, 2007 1:57 am
The long term chickens will come home to roost.
It has already happened.
Not long ago, in a small third-world agriculture country, farmers (including women and children) were being sprayed with Agent Orange. This small third-world agriculture country was then bombed back into the stone age (as if being third-world was not bad enough). Any harm or fatality to the innocent was considered 'colateral damage.' Since then, little did Americans know the same evil doers would perform a cruel act, not in Vietnam this time, but in America itself on 9/11.
A few thoughts:
Lieberman, if nominated, WILL be okayed by the Senate. There is NO way they would refuse one of their own, regardless. I susupect they would put Larry Craig in there is he wasn't resigning. NO member of the Senate would ever be refused a higher post, because they ALL want those higher posts, and don't want to jeopardize their own chances. You or I wouldn't put him in the position of Dog catcher, but W isn't us, now is he, and neither are WE in congress.
W says he wants an Iranian gov't that is accountable to the people. Funny, I would like an America that has such a leadership. We haven't had one for pretty much my entire life, and I just turned 49.
I've been saying for three years, now, that W and Cheney want to get us into Iran. I said so after his first post Iraq invasion speech where he mentioned Iran. I heard the war cry at that point, and I had that sick feeling in my gut that he was going to try to pull this off, too. Two countries invaded, Osama still on the loose, and W "doesn't pay much attention to him". Of course not, he is a convenient bogey man. More fodder for the war on courage.
Pelosi needs desperately to be defeated in the next election. We as a country cannot afford a speaker of the house that doesn't know what their duties are in accordance with the constitution. I suspect she does know, but just doesn't give a flying rat's ass. Are you listening, San Francisco? Do your duty as citizens and send this woman packing. She has failed at this job, and it's far too important to allow her to continue in it. If she were doing her job, W would already be gone. She is an impediment to the constitution, and needs to be removed.
W will not be satisfied until he has started WWIII. He cannot be allowed to do so. Under ANY circumstances. We MUST stand up and tell EVERY congress critter that this will NOT be acceptable. We have NO business attacking yet another country that poses NO THREAT to us whatsoever.
Ahmadinejad has no real power to compel Iran to attack anyone. He is a figurehead, much like if the Queen of England said that they would attack someone else. She has NO power to initiate such a move. Neither does he. The real power rests in the hands of the religious leaders, and they are in no hurry to go to Allah before their time, and have no interest in destroying their country.
Iran is also one of the most westernized countries in the area. Thanks to our supplying Iraq AND Iran with weapons during their ten year war, the Iranians are missing an entire generation of citizens. They have old people and young people, but very few middle aged people. The young LIKE us, the old are distrustful and with good reason. But the young want to be like us in many ways. And so, apparently, we have to go and kill them all, destroy their country and turn most of them into refugees as soon as possible. This also cannot be allowed.
The only way out of this is to start impeachment procedings immediately. If there was EVER an administration that deserved it, and in fact, NEEDED it, this is it. And remember, the constitution says that impeachment WILL be used, not MAY be used. WILL be used. The founding fathers didn't see this as something to tear the country apart, regardless of what the press keeps telling us. This was supposed to be used ANY time that the president was unacountable and was committing crimes. That is exactly what we have now.
It is high time that the people of THIS country get sick and tired of their gov't declaring war on them every other week. The war on drugs, the war on education, the war of terror and on courage... I'm sick of being the problem when I'm NOT doing anything. Americans should NOT be treating each other this way. Tell Congress to stop seeing US as the problem and doing everything they can to screw us to death.
That's enough, if not too much, for now.
Daniel Smythe September 3rd, 2007 3:06 am
He's only a bloody politician after all, not God!
Daniel, please understand. 1. Militarily, he's the commander of the world's sole super power. 2. Financially, he's supported by the world largest capitalist corporations.
Oh, I almost forget to tell you. Most of the Americans (including me) have been exposed to fluoride on a regular basis - the same chemical utilized in Nazi concentration camps to decrease the mental acuity of the detainees.
stinger, i wish i had your certainty about how you "know" all these things. you give the establishment way too much credit & power. what do you mean by the term "establishment" anyway when you say they killed JFK? is there one "establishment"? is congress that? every member of congress? is the FBI? the CIA? is big business? is it just the oil bizness, or international finance, too? what about the entertainment industry? and military industry? were all these people in on the JFK thing?
as far as the dumbya admin goes, i can tell you w/some experience in dealing w/military & military-industrial types, CIA, DOJ, there are plenty of people in those worlds who think bush is absolutely nuts.
the point being there are many conflicting interests w/in "the establishment." the GWOT and Iraq war are partially an attempt to homogenize all these interests w/a war drive, fear mongering, etc. (and probably black flag ops, too; i don't put that shit past any of them).
For those interested in a psychological analysis of the warmongering we are witnessing, I have recently completed a 10-minute online video entitled "Resisting the Drums of War." It examines how the Bush administration has promoted the misguided and destructive war in Iraq by targeting five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq--or an attack on Iran--will likely be sold to us in much the same way. The video examines these warmongering appeals and how to counter them. It's available for viewing HERE.
If the "us", a country i no longer recognize, were to foolishly attack Iran on order of a madman, tell me why the following would not be likely:
1. Iran sends troops into Iraq (aren't the british on their way out?), and along with support from many of the Iraq People takes control of significant portions of what had been Iraq. The Kurds establish an autonomous country of their own possibly after some conflict with Turkey.
2. us troops on the ground, which are already suffering from fatigue and low morale are ultimately overwhelmed and decimated with deaths tolls and permanent life-altering injuries (physical and mental) increasing by an order of magnitude or more from what has occurred thus far.
3. Oil supplies from the middle east severely disrupted exacerbating the current worldwide fragile economic situation and likely resulting in a worldwide depression that lasts for a decade or so.
4. Radicals in Saudi Arabia recognizing an opportunity to threaten, destabilize, and overwhelm the Saudi Arabia regime (this would likely also occur for Egypt, Pakistan, and others).
5. The psuedo christian end-time crazies and associated subjugated robots in the us air force would bomb the daylights out of just about everything with "innocence" (babies, children, women, men, animals, etc) paying by far the highest price - likely a few million or more dead and several times higher injured and displaced. Eventually though all air force assets in the middle east would be captured and destroyed.
6. Likelihood of a nuclear attack in the us increases substantially with entire cities vulnerable.
7. Likelihood of us citizenry revolting against all interests in DC becomes an almost certainty.
8. Local populations in the us banding together for their own self interest and in essence seceding from all government control -- police forces and others along with local military personnel joining with the local populations to help establish local order. Local populations establishing their own governments not subject to any larger centralized control.
9. Citizens in these local populations taking over assests of wealthy individuals for the good of the entire community -- at first there would be casulities, but eventually the formerly wealthy would realize that resistance is futile.
10. A "new world order" being established with all those who caused the suffering of innocence being subjugated to justice (it could be "texas" justice or a higher-order justice that sets the tone for future Peace).
I say lets just skip 1-6 and implement steps 7, 8, 9, and 10 in a deliberate, controlled, and peaceful manner. It can be done.
In the end, we get to the same place, its just the hard way or the easy way.
Peace,
Ken Hausle
* I support Impeachment of DC
I think Jaded Prole @ 12:48 pm has the best handle on it:
"Given the IAEA report stating the Iran is not developing nuclear weapons, the state of the military, the lack of public support for such an escalation and the reality that Iran is not Iraq and bombing them with anything less than nukes (not a viably acceptable option) would not be effective at anything but inciting massive retiation, an outright attack seems unrealistic. More likely they will keep it low-intensity."
As for Lieberman at the AG post, that might not be so bad: get him out of foreign policy and out of the Senate. Even if he were replaced with a Republican, the new senator would be less pro-war than Lieberman.
I posted this 6 months ago in response to a blogger quote of T.S. Eliot and to a Pelosi post on Huffington Post. Referring to the world's end, Eliot wrote:
"It ends not with a bang, but a whimper."
I suggested that if the US invaded Iran, we (the world) would be experiencing a pretty severe bump, if not a "bang".
Pelosi's post referred to the first 100 hours (days, I can't remember).
Also, one should look to a current article on "www.truthout.org"; It posits that the US is planing on 12,000 targets in Iran.
But to Pelosi in January---
----------------------------------------
We all need to focus on this one matter of attacking Iran with nukes or attacking Iran at all.
The most urgent matter today is not Iraq, not the economy, not global warming, not the attacks by the Administration on the US Constitution, but the impending nuclear strike by the US and/or Israel against Iran. Time is too short to quibble over what parliamentary action the US Congress should take against the administration. If they (the Admin neocons) think that they are about to be deterred in any way by the legislative branch, they will act, and anything initiated from Israel will be considered by all the powers that be in the Middle East as an attack by the US.
I think if I were part of an Iranian planning operation, I would not target Israeli or Saudi cities. I would already have the Straight of Hormuz, the major US military bases in Iraq, major US military warships (i.e. carriers), and the Saudi oil fields as my missile and air weapons targets. And given that a massive "shock and awe" US and/or Israeli offensive against Iranian targets would result in an equally massive "use it or loose it" launch against those targets, we the people of this world would experience a very unpleasant day in the Middle East with many even more unpleasant years to follow.
Miss Pelosi, is anyone in Congress thinking along those lines? Is there anything you can do to stop this?
---------------------------------------------------------
(In this, I didn't even take into accout what the reactions of Russia and China would be.)
Amazing! Not a single fascist in the lot. Maybe they haven't noticed. Or perhaps the accumulating evidence of dissembling, corruption, incompetence, hypocrisy, dishonesty, bloodthirst, etc., has become so overwhelming that even the most ardent defenders of the regime are beginning to see the light...
But then there is Congress. I am afraid that the consensus that the dem/doormats will just cheer is correct. Somehow the dems have to be wakened from their torpor. Forget the talk of assassination, rebellion in the ranks/military coups (the Joint Chiefs refuse an order? Who are you kidding?), there is only one course open to us. Until these buggers are removed from office they are just going to continue down this same path. The only option is impeachment; but if they bomb Iran, they will probably suspend the legislative branch, anyway.
Daniel Smythe:
>How is it that we in Australia continuously hear lots about
>all the ill-feeling towards Bush in America yet there's so
>little action to get rid of him? He's only a bloody
>politician after all, not God!
I think you Australians should first clean up your own back yard and then criticizing others. Can you say the same thing about your beloved prime minister who is equal (if not worse) than Bush?
WmC: the key is flipping Senate control to the Republicans. That would be very bad.
Stinger: In response to your jab at me about mostly intelligent people being on this blog and some comment about bullshit about Lee Harvey. First off lighten up! It was only a JOKE!!! Secondly mostly intelligent people realize that there was no coverup It probably was a nut job with a $17 gun. My point was THIS As ironic as it was for a loser like Lee Harvey Oswald to take down the president. It is equally ironic that we are suffering at the hands of another LOSER that doesnt deserve to be president. Because he lacks all the necessaty qualifications like intelligence,integrity and compassion. And as Forrest Gump would say: And that's all I got to say bout that! Except one more thing? Have you been drinking the Koolaid again!
Check this out about the bush doing some traveling....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070903/ap_on_re_mi_ea/bush;_ylt=Atgb8B7_9ilt2Pw6joYpdYCs0NUE
I honestly think the fella is not well and could use a break. He ought to just WALK out of the "currently-non" white house. Decide he is tired of making decisions. He could still sort of be the president for awhile. Meantime, cheney could be impeached. It would be an awesome show. Way better then the one being forced now.....
Just an idea.....
Peace,
Ken Hausle
So, Bush only has a few months left and there's no reason to go ahead with impeachment now???? I'm not at all willing to think that he'll stand by as the lame duck he is and go to his ranch and wait for '09. This president is a serious danger to all humanity and to allow him to stay is office is the Democrats' main failing.
I am SO SICK of hearing these mealy-mouthed justifications from our electeds who HAVE THE POWER TO STOP this president from further destruction of the planet, but who waffle spinelessly in some kind of misguided allegiance to their so-called "leadership."
IMPEACHMENT is the only answer at this point...both Bush and Cheney. But, an obvious problem is Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who everyone there must realize is too weak to take over even as an interim placeholder president. Her before-election announcement that "impeachment is off the table" boxed her into a corner, and her unwillingness to revisit this ill-conceived pronouncement shows an inflexibility that does not serve the country well.
Find your local impeachment group and get involved. bcimpeach.com is a good place to start. ###
Sadly any reference to Leiberman's umbilical cord into AIPAC and Tel Aviv will be spun into anti semitism as always. The Dum's( the new right wing DLC) & Dim's (the old left wing DNC) will no doubt play their favorable votes as voting for a centrist. The truth is they will be voting for their own and a staunch advocate for Connecticut banking which will no doubt make tons of cash financing some part of this war for chaos.
If one takes a good look at what is happening in Palestine with the creation of a false state no one would recognize if not for rabid US support you can get a glimpse of the future for those who are not fundamentalist Jews or Christians. For years my own theories revolved around the holocaust victims (rabid Zionists and founders of Israel) learning their tactics for dealing with the people who already lived there from their captors the Nazi's.
But now I have come to believe that our own unquestioning support of the atrocity that is Israel is due to the fact that our own nation was founded in like manner. We too came from Europe (those who came by choice) and found others 'in the way' of our Manifest Arrogance. We simply slaughtered those capable of protesting and fighting back and rounded the rest of the helpless that remained into 'reservations' as if this were humane. We even deluded ourselves into trying to "civilize" the Native Americans.
Israel is doing the same thing to Palestine only they chose an entirely different name to dissassociate themselves from their Palestinian brothers. There are no "Native Israeli's" just subhuman (in the eyes of Israel) Palestinians. they have learned well from their teachers though, and the teachers are the U.S. and it's own creation, NOT the NAzi's as I used to think.
i don't know what pelosi is so scared of. she could beat the diapars right off cheney.
Peace,
Ken Hausle
* Nancy, even if some "unseemingly" things come out, i'll back ya if you start impeachment. Just trying to make a deal....
Last post of the day for me, but how bout this:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070903/ap_on_re_mi_ea/bush;_ylt=Apx7y4t4FIsCUGNc6dl4Lx6s0NUE
Bush, the "great chief" holds war council, and council decides: PEACE.
Now that would also be an awesome story. Course there would have to be a bunch more chapters, but still, what a start....
Peace,
Ken Hausle
I have no doubt that this is one of the many nightmare scenarios coming out of the Pentagon's war games. What I find hard to believe in this article is that fanatics within AIPAC cynically accepting the support of lunatics waiting for Jesus to arrive to pull off the Rapture can prevent Congress from acting before this holocaust begins.
We are talking here of a gutless and helpless Congress in the face of insanity and undoubtedly the ultimate murder of millions.
the problem when they bring up all the loving quotes from the bible is, you just cannot ignore all the violence, that is perpetrated by the god they worship. all the spin in the world cannot change that. so when i hear about a loving god, personally it makes me gag. my opinion of the god in the bible? biggest mass murderer in the history of mankind.
I hope the people in Liberman's home state are tickled pink over these developments. Liberman will have clear sailing through Congress as every job in Washington is secured by the Israeli lobby. Nobody wants to loose their job. Consider that Liberman could be standing in Cheney's shoes. Makes one shudder.
test,
this is only a test
(of a new link cause the old one stopped working)
Peace,
Ken Hausle
* I support Impeachment.....
citizen1: i suppose by this time i should know better than to even hope anyone (with perhaps just a few exceptions) in congress has the intent of actually doing the "People's will". In fact, lately i'm starting to think that it could ultimately be republicans who actually demonstrate leadership in stopping this "train wreck" in a last ditch attempt to reclaim their lost principles.....because otherwise, it appears that the republican party will go down in flames....
As for the democratic party, it looks as if their fate will not be any better....in fact, it seems to me that by virtue of their collective enabling complicity (what imposters they are) they can claim responsibility for the ultimate downfall of the federal government altogether -- good riddance as far as i'm concerned because what good has the federal government done for any of us lately.....it is obviously broken in so many ways....
I won't deny that it was "peachy' to hear bush talk yesterday about reducing troop levels. Now he and his handlers just need to know the simple truism that "actions speak louder than words" and they should also know that "time is of the essence". Plus, if this is just a diversion and there is still intent in attacking any other country, then all i can say is WHOA --- because i think it should be more and more evident that there is a whole generation or two coming along with many courageous and caring individuals who have had enough of the BS, and who intend on doing something about it. Plus, pretty soon the self-absorbed, death-affirming elderly few will all be gone.....
Anyhow, once ALL of the troops are out of Iraq and reparations are established, then it becomes a simple matter of us citizens removing all of our false representatives (pelosi should be one of the first to go) and piece-by-piece forming new government entities capable of responding to the unprecedented ecological inbalances that demand REAL action and cooperation for the sake of humanity....
Peace,
Ken Hausle
BeingSpied24/7
As your name indicates "being spied on non stop" you are probably overly paranoid about many things these days. Paranoia is crippling.
When I said the "Chickens will come home to roost" I did not mean what you made of it that at 9 /11 the hidden powerful ones once again did an evil deed. Perhaps they did - perhaps they didn't. But do you really want to deny real international opponents the possibility of escalating their responses against the USA in the future?
If every act of harm against the US were inflicted by their own secret powers, then there would be no violent forms of expression left for those who have been dispossessed or invaded by the US or Israel. Would you condemn all those who are invaded or bombed to be forever incapable of striking back because US secret "elites" continually do it first? Get real, hurt peoples will often fight back albeit usually ineffectively.
In the process of fighting back the world will be caught in an ever more viscious spiral of violence as the US also believes it is "fighting back". If you reduce nearly all bad attacks on the US to being done by its own people, you are on a very dangerous path verging on paranoia. Then you run the risk of becoming incomprehensible to the very people you need to win over for peace. Truth is that the USA is increasing the numbers of people who want to hurt it by its continual aggression.
So I say again: If Iran is invaded or bombed, once again we will see, and even more so this time, that the "Chickens will come home to roost".
.
The power and wealth possessed by empires is, by its very nature, self-destructive. The American empire, left unrivaled after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, is destroying itself, pushed along by the stupidity, bloodlust and arrogance of George Wanker Bush and the I'm All Right, Jack complacency and cowardice of the other owners of said empire. This seems to be a law of nature. The problem is, it takes down the many innocent along with the few guilty.
Theories are not proven.
I am a conspiracy truthist.