Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- This Is What Happens When You Rip a Hole in the Safety Net
- New Sanders Bill Would Break Up Big Banks
- So Your Groundwater's Poison and Your Tap Water's On Fire. Not to Worry: Fracking Chemicals Are Trade Secrets You Don't Need To Know About
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize
Popular content
Today's Top News
Palestinians Poorer Than Ever
BRUSSELS - Poverty in the Palestinian territories has reached "unprecedented levels" because they have been held under an "economic siege" for almost seven years, a United Nations body has found.
During 2006 the number of Palestinians living in 'deep poverty' almost doubled to more than 1 million. Some 46 percent of public sector employees do not have enough food to meet their basic needs, with 53 percent of households in the Gaza reporting that their incomes declined in the last year by more than half.This data is contained in a report, released Aug. 30, by the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
It stated that an ostensible Israeli policy of 'separating' the Palestinian authorities from Arab and world markets by restricting the movement of people and goods has "squeezed the economy to a size smaller than a decade ago."
The Palestinians' reliance on imports as a proportion of their gross domestic product rose to 86 percent last year -- up from 75 percent in 2005, equating to the loss of 500 million dollars to the economy.
UNCTAD also complained that Israel declined to hand over more than 800 million dollars in tax revenues it had purportedly collected for the Palestinian Authority during 2006. Because of this refusal -- the second since 2002 -- the authorities' revenues shrank to under 600 million dollars, half what they were in 2005.
The report's publication coincided with a UN-sponsored conference on resolving the Middle East conflict in Brussels.
Controversially, the conference, which featured campaigners from the international Palestinian solidarity movement, was described as anti-Israel in some press reports.
Yet this allegation was dismissed by Paul Badji, a Senegalese diplomat who chairs the UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. "It is not anti-Israel to defend the rights of Palestinians," he said.
Leila Shahid, delegate general of Palestine to the European Union, reminded the conference that it is 40 years since Israel began "the longest occupation in contemporary history."
Delivering a statement on behalf of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, she said that by setting up 550 permanent and mobile checkpoints, Israel has turned the West Bank into "a group of isolated cantons, while over 11,000 Palestinians, including elected representatives and municipal council members, languish in prison, and targeted assassinations continue."
Pierre Galand from the European Coordination of Committees and Associations for Palestine said he did not believe that the U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration could "do peace a favour by granting 30 billion dollars of military aid to Israel, an increase of about a quarter of the American military aid to the Israeli state for the next ten years.
"We do not believe either that Germany aided peace in the Middle East when delivering in August 2006, during the war against Lebanon, two submarines with nuclear capacity and a 4,500 km radius of action," he added.
But Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian envoy to the UN, welcomed efforts by Washington to convene a Middle East peace conference.
"There is no question that the U.S. is a very powerful country and very influential in our region," he told IPS. "Therefore, its participation in brokering a conference for the autumn could possibly be very constructive. It could help to get all the parties to the conflict to move in the right direction."
Jamal Juma, coordinator of the Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign in Jerusalem, strongly denounced the 760 km 'security fence' that Israel has been constructing in the West Bank. This barrier is being constructed in defiance of the International Court of Justice. In 2004, the Hague-based court declared that the wall flouted international law by infringing on the rights of the Palestinians.
"What Israel is creating on the ground is a ghetto system worse than the apartheid system in South Africa," Juma said.
Angela Godfrey-Goldstein from the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions pointed out that both South Africa's former president Nelson Mandela and Archbishop Desmond Tutu have drawn parallels between the plight of the Palestinians and that of their country's black majority under apartheid.
She urged an international boycott of Israel similar to that which led many governments to impose economic sanctions against South Africa during the 1980s.
Clare Short, the former secretary for international development in the British government, said that Israel has razed 18,000 Palestinian homes since 1967 and that "each demolition is a war crime."
Short noted that a free trade agreement between Israel and the European Union contains clauses relating to respect for human rights. She asked why these provisions have not been invoked "to insist on Israeli compliance with international law."
New York-based Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, a spokesman for Jews United Against Zionism, said that the conduct of Israeli forces in the Palestinian territories is helping foment anti-Semitism. He also took issue with Israeli politicians who cite the Holocaust to defend attacks on Palestinians, which they claim are necessary to protect Israel's security.
"The state of Israel is not doing Jews a favour," he told IPS. "My grandparents died in Auschwitz and it is wrong to dig them up and use them to oppress the Palestinian people. They should not be used as a pawn."
Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


15 Comments so far
Show AllI hope for the sake of these victims of greed that there really is a hell, so that all of us who are responsible for this travesty can burn in it.
"Jamal Juma, coordinator of the Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign in Jerusalem, strongly denounced the 760 km 'security fence' that Israel has been constructing in the West Bank. This barrier is being constructed in defiance of the International Court of Justice. In 2004, the Hague-based court declared that the wall flouted international law by infringing on the rights of the Palestinians."
After violating International Law Israel is then rewarded with $30 Billion in Military Hardware over 10 years by Bushco....
This is like having a dysfunctional relative who burns their next door neighbors house down.... To keep the relative in line; you give them a carton of matches and 200 gallons of petrol as a Xmas present....I'm sure the hottest place in hell will be reserved for "Bush the Inferior"....
We have our own poor in America, keep focused.
One motive of Israel is to drive the Palestinians into such a state of despair they will leave.
I strongly suspect another motive, although not necessarily that of a majority of Israelis, is to drive up infant/child mortality rates higher in order to delay the time at which Muslim Arabs outnumber Jews in the combined Israeli/Palestinian territories. The key driver is the fear of a fair solution to this crisis. The Israelis have caused so much more harm to the Palestinians than vice versa, they could not come close to fairly compensating the Palestinians in a two state solution, without ceding large amounts of Israeli territory to the Palestinians. This will not happen. The only fair solution possible is a one-state solution.
saywhat-You make a good point, but you also have to realize that the U.S. supports Israel.
saywhat ... the fact that we have our own poor in america does not give us the right to condemn other people to poverty. This is sick and twisted. We willingly and knowingly condemned the Palestinians to this state so as to satisfy Israel, our local watchdog in the middle-east. This is a crime against humanity.
Your blithe statement is a reflection of the true american head-in-my-ass mindset.
Genocide by any other name
This article, and the people who post comment above me are one sided and biased.
A coin has more than one side.
The article say that the Palestinians are poorer than ever, and suffer from restrictions of movement (true). But it fails to say the reason why.
Until 2000, Palestinians could travel freely the roads of the Occupied territories and freely enter Israel (for work and business). The standards of living within the Palestinian Authority (Income per capita) was higher than in all the countries around (Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria)
Someone who read this article might get the impression that at the end of 2000, suddenly, our of the blue, for no apparent reason, Israel decided to put restriction on the Palestinians that killed their economy. This is not true. The Palestinians have initiated a war against Israel.
http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties.asp
All the restrictions of movement were placed by the Israeli government for one reason, and one reason only. To save the lives of Israeli citizens from wave after wave of road shooting, suicide bombing against civilian targets and rocket launch. A campaign of terror described by human right organization such as Amnesty international and Btselem as crime against humanity.
simonhhh - The Barrier have stopped between 80% and 100% of suicide bombers. It saved the lives of hundreds of Israelis and Palestinians every year.
Also - the International Court of Justice 2004 unbinding advise on the barrier, which was based on a request of the UN General assembly is NOT binding international law. You are misleading the readers.
evanj September 2nd, 2007 3:25 am
"Genocide by any other name"
You are abusing the word Genocide. The Palestinians Fatalities in the conflict is less than 0.2% of the Palestinian population.
To learn what is the meaning of the word Genocide - we have a book called dictionary
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Genocide
Good fences make good neighbors. Some remain better than others. But the security wall works and can be taken down at such time as Palestinians take responsibility for the actions of their own and interdict those attacking Israel so Israel doesn't have to do it for them. At this time, restrictions on travel in and out of Israel and between security stations in the necessary territories should remain.
At such time some Pals decide they love their kids and free movement and trade more than they love killing Jews, this can all change.
Vets -
Of course the article is one-sided, it is told from the Palestinian viewpoint. Many more articles appear from the Israeli viewpoint than vice versa, and they are similarly one-sided. More importantly, virtually all articles in the MSM are one-sided in favor of Israel, in that the use of adjectives, nouns, etc. are not neutral, they follow the Israeli party line. In descriptions of events, each Israeli victim is given far more press than each Palestinian victim, and the indirect victims (deaths due to poverty) are ignored because they are Palestinian and difficult to document.
You explain the Israeli restrictions on Palestinian movement as a result of Palestinian violence against Israelis, but totally ignore that that violence is a reaction to much greater Israeli violence against Palestinians. The 2nd intifada initially was a protest campaign; it became lethally violent when Israel decided to kill teenage protesters, not just once but repeatedly. When hell broke out loose in Gaza, the Israeli story that it was a reaction to a fatal raid by Gazans against an Israeli military post. This fails to point out that Gaza observed a cease-far for over 6 months with no fatal attacks against Israelis. During that time, did Israel do the same? No, they killed, not just 3 or 4, or 30 or 40, but over 140 Palestinians.
gde - I don't agree with your view that the second intifada started as a peacefull protest. The second intifada was a campaign of violence initiated by Arafat after the peace talk in Camp David failed. (It is true that initially some of the protesters were not armed with military issued weapons, but a few Israeli drivers were killed by bricks hitting their cars by these so called "peaceful" demonstrations)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Aqsa_Intifada
You claim that there was 6 month of cease-fire in Gaza is not an accurate description of what happened in and around Gaza. There was an official cease fire by the Hamas. However, other militant groups, such as the Islamic Jihad, NEVER took part in the cease fire. Rocket hit Israeli civilian towns was a daily event. (Therefore these groups, and these rocket launchers were legit targets). In addition, also the Hamas broke the cease -fire on number of occasions. (For example, where they parading a track filled with Qassam rocket, and that track exploded due to poor safety regulation. They blamed Israel and broke the cease-fire)
One thing I would agree with the article. The Palestinians are poor now.
gde - Another example of your so called "cease-fire". Fresh news from today.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/900315.html
Islamic Jihad militant group claimed responsibility for the rocket attacks, calling them "a gift for the opening of the school year."
I think there are many explanations to Palestinian poverty.
I think that all sides need to recognize that a war is going on and in any war torn area economies suffer. The wall is a destructive force for many villages; whether that wall would exist without suicide bombers can be argued. Perhaps it is a land grab for an arrogant Israel that wants to dictate terms to the Palestinians. But there is no question that so long as the Palestinians blow up Israeli cafes, wedding ceremonies and birthday parties there will be closures that impact the palestinian economy. So long as there is corruption and in fighting there will be no investment in Palestine.
People can blame the occupation, which is the root of the poverty; but until they also hold all sides responsible for choosing self-defeating strategies we will continue to have these exchanges.