Dirt Isn't So Cheap After All
Soil erosion is the "silent global crisis" that is undermining food production and water availability, as well as being responsible for 30 percent of the greenhouse gases driving climate change.
BROOKLIN, Canada - "We are overlooking soil as the foundation of all life on Earth," said Andres Arnalds, assistant director of the Icelandic Soil Conservation Service.
"Soil and vegetation is being lost at an alarming rate around the globe, which in turn has devastating effects on food production and accelerates climate change," Arnalds told IPS from Selfoss, Iceland, host city of the International Forum on Soils, Society and Climate Change which starts Friday.
Along with many other international partner institutions, Iceland is marking the centenary of its Soil Conservation Service by convening this forum of experts.
Every year, some 100,000 square kilometres of land loses its vegetation and becomes degraded or turns into desert.
"Land degradation and desertification may be regarded as the silent crisis of the world, a genuine threat to the future of humankind," Arnalds said.
Food production has kept pace with population growth by increasing 50 percent between 1980 and 2000. But it is an open question whether there will be enough food in 2050 with an estimated three billion more mouths to feed.
That means more food has to be produced within the next 50 years than during the last 10,000 years combined he noted.
"Global food production per hectare is already declining," said Zafar Adeel, director of the United Nations University's Canadian-based International Network on Water, Environment and Health.
There are a number of reasons for this decline, including the fact that soil degradation is producing growing shortages of water. Soil and vegetation act as a sponge that holds and gradually releases water, Adeel explained.
The newest challenge to food production and conserving land and water resources is the boom in vegetable-based biofuels, says Andrew Campbell, Australia's first National Landcare Facilitator.
"Soils are under greater pressure than ever before," Campbell said in an interview. "Governments around the world are subsidising crops to produce biofuels."
Hundreds of millions of square kilometers of farmland will soon be used to meet a small part of the world's rapidly growing thirst for fuel. And even if rainforests aren't being cleared to grow biofuel crops, as is the case in parts of Asia and South America, they offer little if any net environmental benefits, Campbell argues.
Another reason to rethink the stampede to biofuel: These crops use a lot of water. In future, there will simply not be enough water to grow the food we need, he says.
By most analyses, biofuels do little to help out the problem of climate change, but preventing deforestation and soil loss the quickest and easiest way to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
Paradoxically, the environmental problem of climate change may finally move the world to act on another long-term fundamental environmental issue -- the protection of soils.
Land degradation and desertification may account for as much as about 30 percent of the world's greenhouse gas releases, according to researcher Rattan Lal of Ohio State University. These changes to the land also alter the water, temperature and energy balance of the planet.
And climate change makes land degradation much worse and more extensive, mainly through changes in precipitation and increased evaporation that trigger more extreme weather.
Carbon dioxide is the main greenhouse gas and "keeping carbon molecules in the soil and in forests and grasslands is the quickest and best bang for the buck in addressing climate change," Adeel said.
There is money to be made in the new carbon markets by sequestering or storing carbon in the soil and vegetation. As much as 20 percent of anticipated net fossil fuel emissions between now and 2050 could be stored in this way, said Maryam Niamir-Fuller of the U.N. Development Programme.
However, the so-called Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) rules under the Kyoto Protocol treaty on climate change need to be changed to ensure the triple benefits from climate mitigation, climate adaptation and sustainable development for the poor are achieved, said Niamir-Fuller in a statement.
A number of other fundamental policy changes are also needed if conservation of soil and vegetation and restoration of degraded land to ensure humanity's future survival, experts say.
Ending the estimated 30 billion dollars in food subsidies in the north that contribute directly to land degradation in Africa and elsewhere, and which force poor farmers to intensify their production in order to compete, would be a good start, Adeel said.
For Andrews, a sweeping change in how land use decisions are made at all levels of government is needed. Soil, water, energy, climate, biodiversity, food production are all interconnected, which demands integrated policy-making. Decisions and policies are currently set by different governmental departments and agencies with little regard for the impacts on other sectors, he said.
Energy ministries will happily spend billions on biofuels without worrying about where the water will come from, or how they will impact soils, biodiversity and food prices, he warned.
There is also no formal agreement on protecting the world's soils. Delegates at the weekend forum in Iceland will consider propositions for an International Year of Land Care to focus attention on soil stewardship, which affects food and water security worldwide.
"We have battled very severe land degradation in Iceland that has taken us 100 years to tackle," Arnalds said.
That degradation means one-third of Iceland's 103,000 sq km area is still desert.
Iceland has should serve as both a warning to other countries and hope that it is possible to restore degraded lands with enough resources, he says.
"It is far better to preserve than restore," the scientist noted.
© 2007 Inter Press Service
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllI live in SW Florida and did some quick calculations: If a Florida farmer converts an acre of sugar cane to ethanol, he can produce approximately 870 gallons a year or 66 million BTU's worth. On the other hand, if he "farms" an acre of PV solar collectors operating at slightly under 20% efficiency (thus yielding 1 kwh/sq.m/day) he can generate 5 trillion BTU's per acre per year. Seventy-five times (!) the energy of sugar cane ethanol with no soil depletion, no water, fertilizer, pesticide or herbicide use and no labor--either his own or illegal aliens'.
It's worth noting that sugar cane yields twice the ethanol that corn does, but it requires 4600 units of water to produce 1 unit of ethanol, and 3 BTU's of energy to raise, process and transport 4 BTU's worth of corn ethanol.
In his book, Solar Florida, John Blackburn says that only 2% of Florida land mass with PV collectors operating at 10% efficiency could supply ALL of Florida's energy needs, including transportation. Besides that, if you used animal and human waste and biomass from eutrophied (?) lakes to generate methane, you could not only produce excess energy, you'd improve water quality at the same time.
Seems to me the problems can be solved if you simply get the special interests (and politicians wedded to them) out of the way.
Malthus2 asks, "How will food be dispersed without fossil fuels to all the cities where billions live?" The challenge in imagining future scenarios is fully recognizing one's own assumptions, based on present conditions. A partial answer to your question is that much of the food will NOT be dispersed to the cities where billions live, because a good many of those people will leave those cities to return to places where food is more accessible. Yes, there is some potential for urban agriculture, but the massive cities of today are largely a product of a transitory cheap-fossil-fuel era. We can expect a major exodus once that era is past. For the most part, small towns and rural areas will be the place to be for people trying to survive and thrive. (See James Howard Kunstler's discussion of all this in his sometimes-too-pessimistic book "The Long Emergency.")
It is interesting to look at how urbanization in the United States during the first half of the 20th century sparked a lot of reservations and creative thinking among people who saw urban life as basically artificial---in part because it distanced people from their own food supply. There was, for example, the homesteading movement led by Ralph Borsodi. He recognized that many people, with the benefit of small-scale technologies, could live in the country, grow and preserve much of their own food, and bring in cash income from family members who commuted to jobs in the city. (See Borsodi's book "Flight From the City.") And Henry Ford modeled village industries---small Ford plants in rural locations where some employees realized Ford's ideal for workers: "One foot on the soil for his livelihood, and the other foot in industry for the cash he needs." (See Howard P. Segal's book "Recasting the Machine Age: Henry Ford's Village Industries.")
Malthus2,
Note that every single farm in the United States and the world can get all the power it needs from solar and wind. Powerful electric motors with good rechargeable batteries have reached a high degree of technical advancement - so there's no need for 'back breaking labor'.
Every farm should have it's own small wind farm and solar panels on all of it's buildings, as well as a small fleet of sturdy electric tractors. They can even convert some of their crop waste to biofuel and 'black earth' which allows them to a) have fuel and b) rebuild their soil.
The real problem is rebuilding soil fertility, especially when were are dealing with heavily damaged industrial soils that are little more than hydroponic growth media. Anyone who is interested must read these articles about 'terra preta' - a method for rebuilding devastated industrial soils that relies on crop waste conversion to charcoal soil supplements and biooil:
http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/terra_preta/TerraPretahome.htm
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/company
The other main use of fossil fuel on farms is in the production of nitrogen fertilizer. However, most of the nitrogen applied as ammonium nitrate to farm fields runs off into local watersheds and isn't used by the plants. This is good for the natural gas powered nitrogen fertilizer industry, but very bad for our streams, lakes and now even oceans.
Major research efforts should go into solving the nitrogen problem - but organic farming (read that link above) has ALREADY demonstrated that good yields are possible w/o natural gas -based NH4NO3 fertilizers.
Anyone who looks honestly at the effects of industrial agriculture on communities (pollution with herbicides, pesticides, cancer and Parkinsons, diesel residues, hog farm waste, etc. etc.) would agree that it has been a huge disaster for years now.
Badgersouth hits the nail on the head with his comment - things are set to get worse for farmers all over the world due to the onset of global warming. Already, farmers are seeing severe crop losses due to freak storms, heat waves and flooding brought on by our fossil fuel-destabilized climate. Sea level rise and saltwater intrusion will only make things worse. As badgersouth says, the time for serious, fundamental change is RIGHT NOW!
Here's just but one example of how climate change could literally change the face of the Earth and human civilization. There simply is no Planet B for the human race. The time for debate is over. The time for action is now!
Global warming threatens Nile Delta
The Associated Press, August 24, 2007. "Millions of Egyptians could be forced permanently from their homes; the country's ability to feed itself devastated. That's what likely awaits this already impoverished and overpopulated nation by the end of the century, if predictions about climate change hold true. The World Bank describes Egypt as particularly vulnerable to the effects of global warming, saying it faces potentially 'catastrophic' consequences. 'The situation is serious and requires immediate attention. Any delay would mean extra losses,' said Mohamed el-Raey, an environmental scientist at Alexandria University. A big reason is the vulnerability of Egypt's breadbasket the Nile Delta, a fan-shaped area of rich, arable land where the Nile River spreads out and drains into the Mediterranean Sea. Although the Delta makes up only 2.5 per cent of Egypt's land mass, it is home to more than a third of this largely desert country's 80 million people. The Delta was already in danger, threatened by the side effects of southern Egypt's Aswan Dam. Though the dam, completed in 1970, generates much-needed electricity and controls Nile River flooding, it also keeps nutrient sediment from replenishing the eroding Delta."
DOUGLAS BARNES
thankyou for that link. it is very informative. and being vegan i am concerned about this.
MALTHUS2
couldn't agree with you more.........
As per Ike above:
--"Industrial agriculture has been a disastrous experiment - and organic fossil fuel free agriculture can provide just as much food."
This grand experiment of industrial ag has not yet become a disaster. It depends on when the fossil fuel becomes scarce that we will find out if humans can really provide just as much food with back-straining, double-digging, organic agriculture. How will food be dispersed without fossil fuels to all the cities where billions live? I suspect that some will survive, but billions will not when civilization as we have known it comes crashing down as energy resources decline and prices sky rocket. It is true the industrialization was but a moment in the sun and so was civilization. We are doomed by our own cleverness and hubris.
http://www.growbiointensive.org/partners_main.html
..."Ecology Action has catalyzed projects worldwide. The projects below had their beginnings through connections with Ecology Action or through people who had connections with us. All of the projects have since put down strong roots and have been the means by which hundreds of thousands of people have learned how to successfully grow their own food" and enhance the soil.
Soil Enhancement, Carbon Sequestration, and Bio-fuel
It is not necessary to use food crops, or destroy natural habitat to supplement our addiction to oil.
It seems counter intuitive, but making bio-char from crop residue creates energy, sequesters carbon, and enhances soil.
Research the links below for Terra Preta 'technology' for potential to alleviate climate change and aid sustainable development of food and fuel.
Terra Preta is Portuguese for black earth. "Rich black soil – terra preta – was created by humans up to 4000 years ago in infertile regions of the Amazon. The high nutrient content of terra preta is recreated today by low-temperature slow burning pyrolysis of biomass. The resulting product, black carbon, known as bio-char, reduces the need for fertilizers. It can also be used as a fuel." (1.)
"Inspired by the fascinating properties of Terra Preta de Indio, bio-char is a soil amendment that has the potential to revolutionize concepts of soil management. While "discovered" may not be the right word, as bio-char (also called charcoal or biomass-derived black carbon, recently in context of agricultural application also named agri-char) has been used in traditional agricultural practices as well as in modern horticulture, never before has evidence been accumulating that demonstrates so convincingly that bio-char has very specific and unique properties that make it stand out among the opportunities for sustainable soil management.
The benefits of bio-char rest on two pillars:
1- The extremely high affinity of nutrients to bio-char
2- The extremely high persistence of bio-char
These two properties (which are truly extraordinary - see details below) can be used effectively to address some of the most urgent environmental problems of our time:
1- Soil degradation and food insecurity
2- Water pollution from agro-chemicals
3- Climate change
'Soils with bio-char additions are typically more fertile, produce more and better crops for a longer period of time.'" (2.)
"Important lessons can be learned from the recalcitrance of black carbon and its effects on the biogeochemistry of soils. Given the apparent ubiquity of black Carbon established by several authors (Schmidt and Noak, 2000; Skjemstad et al., 2002), refinements of global Carbon models and sequestration estimates may be necessary. Further, the potential for enhancing sequestration by active management of black Carbon could be established with important linkages to energy production and land use." (3.)
"Eprida offers a revolutionary new energy technology for sustainable fuels and sustainable income while producing co-products which also allow us to remove greenhouse gases from the air. We mimic nature's methods for biomass conversion and build a sustainable food and energy production." (4.)
(1.) http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2006/February/20020601.asp
(2.) http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/biochar/Biochar_home.htm
(3.) http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/terra_preta/TerraPretahome.htm
(4.). http://www.eprida.com/home/index.php4
Great article. In the real world, good healthy soil free of pollutants is worth more than it's weight in gold - after all, you can't eat gold!
This is a problem for those trying to do urban farming - the soils in our cities are heavily contaminated with lead and toxic diesel fuel residues, and that ends up in the food.
Industrial agriculture has been a disastrous experiment - and organic fossil fuel free agriculture can provide just as much food.
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Organic_Farming_Can_Feed_the_World_999.html
It's legal in the US to spread toxic waste, including heavy metals, on farmland, because the EPA then recognizes it as "fertilizer", instead of waste. So what if it makes people, animals, and crops sick?
Read the book, titled "Fateful Harvest: The True Story of a Small Town, a Global Industry and a Toxic Secret". It's a pretty amazing account of what, apparently, still goes on today in this country with hazardous waste, and how companies make money feeding their unwanted poison to us.
http://www.amazon.com/Fateful-Harvest-Global-Industry-Secret/dp/0060931833/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-2778060...
I am happy to see the greatest environmental crisis finally getting some press. Soil degradation isn't sexy and most people don't make the connection between human health and soil health, but the reality is that healthy soil is the foundation of life for many species, homo sapiens included.
Our species' first attempts at agriculture lead to the first human-created desert and the first collapse of a civilisation. The trend continues today with 19% of China salinated and losing 40 tonnes of soil per hectare per year, $20 billion per year in plant nutrients lost in the U.S.A., 38% of the Canadian prairies significantly affected by salinisation, and on and on.
I fear that this problem is perceived as too boring to be addressed seriously. Let's hope this article grabs some attention.