Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bush Threatens to Confront Iran Over Alleged Support for Iraqi insurgents
NEW YORK - George Bush yesterday ramped up the war of words between the US and Iran, accusing Tehran of threatening to place the Middle East under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust and revealing that he had authorised US military commanders in Iraq to "confront Tehran's murderous activities".
In a speech designed to shore up US public opinion behind his unpopular strategy in Iraq, the president reserved his strongest words for the regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which he accused of openly supporting violent forces within Iraq. Iran, he said, was responsible for training extremist Shia factions in Iraq, supplying them with weapons, including sophisticated roadside bombs. Iran has denied all these accusations.
Mr Bush referred specifically to 240mm rockets which he said were made in Iran this year and smuggled into Iraq.
"Iran has long been a source of trouble in the region," he said." Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust."
The blunt terms in which Mr Bush portrayed the Iranian threat, and his threat of military confrontation with Tehran involving US troops based in Iraq, elevated the tense standoff between Washington and Tehran to a new level.
The speech also contained the implicit desire on Mr Bush's part for regime change, calling for "an Iran whose government is accountable to its people, instead of to leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons".
Equally menacing words emanated from Tehran yesterday, where Mr Ahmadinejad said US influence in the region was collapsing so fast that a power vacuum would soon be created. "Of course, we are prepared to fill the gap," he said.
Though the Iranian president said he backed the leadership of the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, and welcomed the involvement of Saudi Arabia, his offer to occupy the space the Americans might leave behind is unlikely to cool emotions in Washington.
He went on to deride the possibility of the US pursuing military action in Iran, saying it was in no position to do so and claimed that Iran had already acquired enriched nuclear fuels, though they would only be used for peaceful purposes.
In a further cause of tension, Mr Bush accused the Quds force within Iran's revolutionary guards of leading the supply chain to Iraqi extremist groups. As the Guardian revealed earlier this month, the Bush administration is preparing to declare the 125,000-strong Revolutionary Guard Corps a "global terrorist organisation" - a move that would be seen as provocative within Tehran.
According to reports from Baghdad last night, a group of Iranians were detained last night in a raid by US troops on a hotel in the city. Of 10 people arrested, seven were said to be Iranian, including an employee of the Iranian embassy and six members of Iran's electricity ministry in Iraq to discuss contracts for electric power stations. It was not immediately clear why the men had been arrested, or where they had been taken. The US military would only say the action was part of an on-going operation.
Mr Bush's bullish talk of his determination to "take the fight to the enemy" in the carefully choreographed setting of a veterans' convention in Reno, Nevada, was the second of a two-part appeal by him to shore up public support for his flagging strategy on Iraq. In the first speech, made last week, he invoked Vietnam to argue that quitting Iraq now could put the lives of millions of innocent civilians at risk.
Mr Bush yesterday vowed to persevere with his controversial military policy in Iraq, insisting that political and security progress was being made, despite a rising tide of dissent even from high up within his Republican party.
"Our strategy is this: every day we work to protect the American people. We will fight them over there so that we don't have to fight them in the United States of America," he said.
The twin speeches were intended as preparation for a crucial series of debates on Iraq that will dominate Washington for the next few weeks.
In a fortnight the senior general in Iraq, General David Petraeus, and American ambassador in Iraq, Ryan Crocker, will give two days of testimony in which they are likely to argue that the troop "surge" is having some beneficial impact on security levels, though political progress lags behind.
Under the current policy, US troop numbers in Iraq have risen by 30,000 to about 165,000.
As the climax of these intense hearings, Mr Bush himself will present his latest assessment.
Yesterday's speech was the latest clear indication that he will resist any attempt to change course in the prosecution of the war.
Mr Bush's latest attempt to reassure the American people that the war is moving in the right direction came on another tumultuous day in Iraq.
Hundreds of thousands of pilgrims attending a Shia festival in Kerbala, 68 miles south-west of Baghdad, were ordered to leave the city after intense fighting broke out, reportedly between warring Shia factions. At least 52 people have been killed since Monday, mostly police officers engaging in the battle.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
Comments
The Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines.

114 Comments so far
Show AllDemocrats were so wise to give Bush war powers to attack Iran, since he has proven his case in Iraq (WMD were found) and Afghanistan (Bin Laden was caught). What a wonderful set of politicians we have representing us in DC!
Democrats were so wise to give Bush war powers to attack Iran, since he has proven his case in Iraq (WMD were found) and Afghanistan (Bin Laden was caught). What a wonderful set of politicians we have representing us in DC, I'm a proud American!
Not.
One life being equal to another as far as I am concerned, I hope for the citizens of America that this evil cabal at least avoids staging another false flag event like that which occurred on Sept. 11 2001.
I would much rather have seen this whole sordid progression stopped by impeachment immediately following the openly stolen elections of 2004.
Too late now. It's World War 3 and it's only days away.
I only hope one day history will record the truth. Otherwise we'll never learn.
The risks that Bush and gang are running by inviting a fight with Iran are so incredibly high for the US economy and for world oil supplies (for starters) that these men must be fuelled by some messianic madness. What other explanation is there? It is unbelievable. Citizens of the USA --- fight to take your country back from these crazed zealots!!!
The war making branch of the US gov't is the world champion of horror.
If the pentagon, white house and capital hill were all reduced to ashes in the middle of some night, billions of good people (especially those who are not victims of American propaganda) would rejoice.
Bush and his masters are out of their minds.
It is ironic that Bush will not speak to some national leaders because it may give them a status that they do not deserve, but he will respond in speeches where it gives those same leaders the opportunity to reply and keep the back and forth going. This is not any way to run foreign relations. It is talking past one another using speeches as vehicles. This is childish and unfitting for someone in the office of the president to conduct themselves this way.
We do not learn from history. We carve monuments to the dead of past wars and claim that their sacrifice was not in vain; lest we forget. But the bush administration launched a war against Iraq for the same reasons that Hitler launched a war against Poland; greed and to 'make up' for an earlier lost war. It's a damn good thing that the Soviets never allowed a foolish idiot like bush to become their leader, had they done so the west would have been nuked for supporting the Afghani's during the Soviet occupation. Just when you think the yankee arse can't be more stupid...
Hope the edit works this time,
I know that bush wants to think of himself as a modern day W.S. Churchill (hah!), too bad that bush seems not to have heard one of my favourite quotes from the man "to jaw jaw, is better than to war war."
If Americans believe the rest of the world is made very,very nervous by the Bush Administration and their sabre rattling foreign policy they are correct but are underestimating the depth and solidarity of this feeling. With whom is the rest of the world going to align its support if the US follows through on this "attack Iran" policy. I can only speak for myself but I see the US going it totally alone . Who else is going to "sign up"? They are appearing more and more unbalanced by the day. It seems that because Americans don't pay attention to what is going on in the rest of the world (let alone in their own country) they believe that the rest of the world is also not paying attention. Not True! We are and we are not happy!
According to the reasons the President cites for war with Iran, we might have to attack ourselves.
We are supporting militias throughout the Middle East in our attempt to control the region. We helped bring Saddam Hussein to power and we supported him during his war with Iran. We supported Osama bin Laden and other islamist radicals in Afghanistan. We continue to support the repressive Saudi Arabian and Egyptian governments Al Qaeda is fighting against.
The President says Iran is supporting Shiites in Iraq, but so are we. We are supporting the government in Baghdad that is made up of people who were exiled to Iran while we supported Saddam Hussein. Did we expect Iran not to play a role in a post Saddam Iraq even though we took military action to allow democracy to elect the religious rulers backed by Iran?
Why is it OK for the United States to travel thousands of miles to take an active role in determining the future of the Middle East, but it is not OK for Iran to be involved in Middle Eastern affairs? Would we feel threatened and a need to intervene if a foreign power was threatening the United States while invading and occupying Mexico and Canada?
I want democracy and open markets in the Middle East, but I don't support using war to achieve the goal. I especially don't support misleading the American public into war in order to make the desired political changes.
From Public Opinion by Walter Lippman.
"Abnormality in these instances is only a matter of degree. When an Attorney-General, who has been frightened by a bomb exploded on his doorstep, convinces himself by the reading of revolutionary literature that a revolution is to happen on the first of May 1920, we recognize that much the same mechanism is at work. The war, of course, furnished many examples of this pattern: the casual fact, the creative imagination, the will to believe, and out of these three elements, a counterfeit of reality to which there was a violent instinctive response. For it is clear enough that under certain conditions men respond as powerfully to fictions as they do to realities, and that in many cases they help to create the very fictions to which they respond. Let him cast the first stone who did not believe in the Russian army that passed through England in August, 1914, did not accept any tale of atrocities without direct proof, and never saw a plot, a traitor, or a spy where there was none. Let him cast a stone who never passed on as the real inside truth what he had heard someone say who knew no more than he did."
Have we learned nothing about the reality of war since Lippman wrote this in 1920's?
The reality that this cabal MUST be REMOVED FROM POWER is staring us in the face. We have to really turn up the heat on the opportunistic and spineless Dims if we have to shut the country down to do it.
The speech also contained the implicit desire on Mr Bush's part for regime change, calling for "an Iran whose government is accountable to its people, instead of to leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons".
Oh my, couldn't we just remove the word "Iran" and insert "Amuuurika"? The man is a lunatic and has surrounded himself with fellow lunatics. These said lunatics will not be happy until they rule the World or kill us all trying. IMPEACH TODAY! (cuz tomorrow is questionable)
Yet more proof that the USA is the biggest terrorist nation the world has ever seen.
Watch and see. Gonzalez left because he was an embarassment to the admin, but more importantly Snow and Rove left because they no longer have the energy to spin, decieve, and propogate America into another war.
Just look at the quote from White House when Snow resigned, something like "If Snow is going to step down, he ought to do it no later than Sept. 11th, 2007."
They're up too something. This is just like when Rumsfeld mysteriously "resigned" when his concious finally hit him, and he decided to go against the Neocons vision of Imperial Perpetual war.
Look for Rice to be resigning soon as she is the last obstacle in the way of war with Iran.
NATHAN ANDOVER & MANCHILD: Good, important postings. Coming from my realm of celestial expertise, it strikes me as far more than metaphor (as per the age old "As above, so below" Divine equation) that Bush would recite these obvious FICTIONS just on the year's only full moon in Pisces, an eclipse no doubt. Just as the Republican convention 3 years ago occured on the PISCES full moon. Pisces invokes the two fish opposing one another, and represents the end of an age that has lasted 2200 years. The fish teach us that we either learn to find correspondences and get along, or we OPPOSE each other. When the opposition reaches critical mass and the weapons consist of what they do today, all sane minds recognize the benefits of choosing the path to cooperation over conflict. Pisces is the sign of deception beginning with self-deception. It is a sign of subterfuge and relies on drugs, escapist behaviors and addiction. (There are many Pisces who choose "the fish less traveled by" but the sign carries the significant danger of DECEPTION.)
If the FATES genuinely observe the affairs of planet earth, and the powerful role its so-called leadership plays, then Bush making these false allegations on the full moon Pisces eclipse fulfills the portent of deception in the boldest of ways.
WE should all get to Washington for the protests scheduled for September 15... these MONSTERS must be stopped!
"POLAND HAS AMMASSED 2 MILLION TROOPS ON THE BAVARIAN BORDER" GERMANY MUST RESPOND.
You see, our American imperial wars are always a "response" to fiction drummed up by the media, and swallowed without any critical thought by the herdish public, so easily manipulated and controlled.
Ya know this photo of Bush, and the Chertoff photo on the data mining article, I don't know where commondreams keeps picking up the blatently propogandistic photos of the government officials, and I don't know why they continue to use them. They only serve to help the very same government officials who are corrupt and criminal.
insanity
Main Entry: in·san·i·ty
Pronunciation: in-'sa-n&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia)
2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility
3 a : extreme folly or unreasonableness b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
oligarchy
Main Entry: ol·i·gar·chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control
plutocracy
Main Entry: plu·toc·ra·cy
Pronunciation: plü-'tä-kr&-sE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -cies
Etymology: Greek ploutokratia, from ploutos wealth; akin to Greek plein to sail, float -- more at FLOW
1 : government by the wealthy
2 : a controlling class of the wealthy
- plu·to·crat /'plü-t&-"krat/ noun
- plu·to·crat·ic /"plü-t&-'kra-tik/ adjective
- plu·to·crat·i·cal·ly /-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb
mperialism
Main Entry: im·pe·ri·al·ism
Pronunciation: im-'pir-E-&-"li-z&m
Function: noun
1 : imperial government, authority, or system
2 : the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas; broadly : the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence
- im·pe·ri·al·ist /-list/ noun or adjective
- im·pe·ri·al·is·tic /-"pir-E-&-'lis-tik/ adjective
- im·pe·ri·al·is·ti·cal·ly /-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb
fascism
Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
- fas·cist /-shist also -sist/ noun or adjective, often capitalized
- fas·cis·tic /fa-'shis-tik also -'sis-/ adjective, often capitalized
- fas·cis·ti·cal·ly /-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb, often capitalized
corporatism
Main Entry: cor·po·rat·ism
Pronunciation: 'kor-p(&-)r&-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
: the organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction
- cor·po·rat·ist /-p(&-)r&-tist/ adjective
I wonder what stability Bush has brought into the ME and Afghanistan....Pot calling the kettle black here.
reactionary
Main Entry: re·ac·tion·ary
Pronunciation: rE-'ak-sh&-"ner-E
Function: adjective
: relating to, marked by, or favoring reaction; especially : ultraconservative in politics
- reactionary noun
- re·ac·tion·ary·ism /-"i-z&m/ noun
It's bad enough we let Bush lie us into one war and occupation, so why not let him do it again, eh? You bet we will let him do it. I no longer have any faith in the American people which is why I am planning on moving to another country. I'm very young so I can start fresh. Yes, congress and America will let Bush attack Iran, and maybe even Pakistan or Syria after. The American left will do absolutely nothing as always, except give their blessing by "protesting" and "calling their congressmen". Compared to the left in other countries, the American left is the most inept bunch of effete p*ssies in any industrialized country. Not that I'm any better.
I will only return to America when Bush and Cheney are behind bars, and all the criminals in the Congress voted out and their careers destroyed for their complicity.
reactionary
adjective
1. Vehemently, often fanatically opposing progress or reform: die-hard, mossbacked, ultraconservative. See politics
2. Clinging to obsolete ideas: backward, conservative, unprogressive. See politics
noun
A person who vehemently, often fanatically opposes progress and favors return to a previous condition: die-hard, mossback, ultraconservative. See politics
The strangest thing happened yesterday. I had C-SPAN on listening to Washington Journal and suddenly the TV made a high-pitched noise, the program was interrupted and a big statement went across the screen, "THIS IS THE WEEKLY EMERGENCY TESTING SYSTEM".......
I haven't seen that since 1960!
And Aug. 31st the Board of Governors of The Federal Reserve are having their yearly pow-wow, guess where? In Wyoming in the underground bunker at the Continuity of Government headquarters! Why not Tavern on the Green or Kennebunkport?
I know the economy and the stock market and the hedge funds and real estate are all tanking, but C.O.G. headquarters? And I thought I was paranoid.
I wish I knew what was really going on and what on Earth I could do to stop it. I feel like we're all on flight 93 and can't get into the cockpit.
Any suggestions? I'm getting tired of sitting here in my pajamas typing.
Nam - Myoho - Renge - Kyo (World Peace Begins With You) may be all we have left.
the·oc·ra·cy audio (th-kr-s) KEY
NOUN:
pl. the·oc·ra·cies
1. A government ruled by or subject to religious authority.
2. A state so governed.
Dr. Suess [very short] Commencement Address at Lake Forest
Lake Forest, IL 4 June 1977
On Healthy Skepticism
MY UNCLE TERWILLIGER ON THE ART OF EATING POPOVERS
My uncle ordered popovers
From the restaurant's bill of fare
And, when they were served, he regarded them
With a penetrating stare ...
Then he spoke great words of wisdom
As he sat there on that chair
"To eat these things," said my uncle
You must exercise great care.
You may swallow down what's solid ...
But ... you MUST spit out the air!"
And as you partake of the world's bill of fare
That's darned good advice to follow
Do a lot of spitting out the hot air
And be careful what you swallow.
"The speech also contained the implicit desire on Mr Bush's part for regime change, calling for "an Iran whose government is accountable to its people, instead of to leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons"." ---did he really say nuclear and not nucular?
now think of this in terms of the American Republic, or what's left of it. An American Republic whose government is accountable to ts people, instead of to leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons.
it's plain to me that any sane and logical person can see that g.w. bush is a nutjob. he can't be taken seriously.
abbybwood August 29th, 2007 1:30 pm
Do you have a link or source about them meeting at that location abby?
"Never forget that it was Iran...er...Iraq...er...Afganistan...er...Taliban....er Pakistan..( that attacked the USA on 9/11...they have WMD ...they hate us for our freedoms, and they tried to kill ma Daddy!!
(and please forget that it was actually Saudi Arabian under my business partner Osamma Bin Laden and Bandir Bush)"
As i predicted after our invasion of Iraq that Bush and his insane thugs would start a war with Iran. The time is near. Any psychologist can see that Bush is not in his right mind. Power has gone to his head. The American people or the military better get rid of him, Cheney and their thugs before he starts WWIII. But the Pentagon wants to invade Iran. There job is to kill people, innocent especially cause they can't fight back. But the American military only fights those countries that can't fight back, like Iraq that had no weapons to fight with, except AK-47's and homemade bombs. Everyone knows Bush is a lunatic along with his gay buddy, Cheney. Greed and Power is what got us into the situation we are in now. The only ones who side with them are the Republican cultists. There is no Republican Party. It is a cult, has been for over fifteen yrs. now. The stable military men in the Pentagon better do to Bush and Cheney what the Pentagon leaders did to KEnnedy. Assination is the only way out of this predicament. America is in a sorry state. You notice Bush can only hold his speeches in front of ex military men that fought for freedom, which we are losing by the day. God help us. And God save us by getting rid of Bush and his thugs. But even if that happens, it's too late to change things like they were before 9-11. Those days are gone forever. If it were up to me i'd hang every politician in WAshington DC from the Capital building. If the American people don't wake up and get involved to get rid of these insane people leading the country we are all doomed. In my opinion, everyone that voted for Bush are traitors to our founding fathers and the constitution. God help us. Amen.
UNDER THE NUCLEAR NON PROLIFERATION TREATY, IRAN IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A CIVILIAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM, AND THE USA IS SUPPOSED TO BE REDUCING ITS NUKE ARSENAL.
SO WHO IS THE CRIMINAL HERE?
ALSO REMEMBER THAT THE USA IS CURRENTLY ARMING ALL SIDES OF THE IRAQ CIVIL WAR, EVEN THE "INSURGENTS"
"Something wicked this way comes."
Russia and China need the oil just as much as America does. I suspect one of them to be supporting the insurgency to make a stupid American president start a war in Iran and watch the American super power fall apart from within. Remember the Russian war in Afghanistan? We were supporting Bin Laden's efforts against Russia.
China holds in excess of 800 billion in US currency. A weak American economy and an even weaker American dollar caused by a war in Iraq and a possible war with Iran, China can dump it all on the market and the dollar will fail.
Has anyone taken a look at the price of gold lately? From 97 to 02 gold moved between $250 and $350, it has since moved to a high of $700 currently at $660. It looks like someone is preparing for some sort of crash.
Not all wars are fought with guns and tanks. The American Achilles' heel is its vulnerable federal reserve fractionalized debt based economy. You can't fight a war without when you have no money. To quote a popular Hip Hop phase, "If you aint got no money, take your broke ass home".
So don't get all pushed out of shape when Bush and Cheney look toward Iran to blame their troubles in Iraq. Someone is a few steps ahead of their game on a much bigger playing field. I do not think that Bush plays chess, do you?
Remember, once we're "involved" (at war) with Iran, this opens the door for the imperialists to blame any other developing problems on VENEZUELA.
Watch and see.
The madmen in washington of both parties are a threat to all life on the planet. Evidently people don't realize how serious the threat is. Rage against the heartless, soul-less American empire!
======================================================
Iranian President Ahmadinejad to the UN General Assembly:
"Some seek to rule the world relying on weapons and threats, while others live in perpetual insecurity and danger.
"Some occupy the homeland of others, thousands of kilometers away from their borders, interfere in their affairs and control their oil and other resources and strategic routes, while others are bombarded daily in their own homes; their children murdered in the streets and alleys of their own country and their homes reduced to rubble.
"Such behavior is not consistent with the status of human beings and runs counter to the Truth, to justice and to human dignity. The fundamental question is that under such conditions, where should the oppressed seek justice? Who or what organization defends the rights of the oppressed, and suppresses acts of aggression and oppression? Where is the seat of global justice?...
"Would it not be easier for global powers to ensure their longevity and win hearts and minds through the championing of real justice, compassion and peace than by continuing their production and proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons and the threat of their use?
"The experience of the threat and the use of nuclear weapons is before us. Has it achieved anything for the perpetrators other than exacerbation of tension, hatred and animosity among nations?...
"Occupation of countries, including Iraq, has continued for the last three years. Not a day goes by without hundreds of people getting killed in cold blood. The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq. Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife.
"There is no indication that the occupiers have the necessary political will to eliminate the sources of instability. Numerous terrorists were apprehended by the Government of Iraq only to be let loose under various pretexts by the occupiers.
"It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq...
"Today, the most serious challenge is that the culprits are arrogating to themselves the role of the prosecutor. Even more dangerous is that certain parties relying on their power and wealth try to impose a climate of intimidation and injustice over the world make bullying, while through their huge media resources portray themselves as defenders of freedom, democracy and human rights.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2006/iran-060920-irna02.htm
WDMAX3
You nailed it. Our over agression throughout the world is not only straining our economy to the tipping point, but its allowing other world power IE China and Russia to sit on the sidelines and watch it crumble. I feel that our republic has failed us. The "cure" to this type of executive abuse was always intended to be in the form of impeachment. Sadly, its quite obvious that the washington lobbies are more powerful than the voice of the people. Your point about the federal reserve is the most glaring truth. If people looked at the links between the central banking system, coorporate interests, and these wars its not hard to see the connections. We cant say we werent warned. The founders biggest fear was the control of goverment by bankers and coorporate interests. Americans should be ready for either some kind of provoked aggression by Iran or False Flag event to gain support for both a war with IRAN and eventually a draft. Its sad that more Americans cant see through the tinted glass of their McMansions and print outs of their 401k savings.
If anyone is a danger to the survival of the world, i.e., nuclear holocaust, and has meddled in Iraq and has been on a murderous rampage there, it is George Bush. He is such a ridiculous hypocrite. He is guilty of the things he accuses others of. It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic.
The Democrats have failed miserably to rein this mass murderer in and are complicit in the war crimes of the Bush administration. Pelosi and Reid are useless.
The American Legion is a bloodthirsty organization. I think it may have a alot to do with the fact that even though they are veterans, many of them have not seen actual combat.
I don't know if many people know this, but actually only about 20% of the troops see actual combat. The rest are largely behind the lines in support roles, desk jobs, etc.
In my small Nebraska town, the American Legion marches every year. My Dad, who passed away last year at 90, knew these guys and said that in WWII, they never were in combat. My uncle, however, was in the worst of the fighting during the allied invasion of Germany. Bayonetted and got the Purple Heart. He never talked about his experiences and never belonged to the local Legion post. The nephews and nieces hardly new about his war experiences. A quiet man, he died an alcoholic in 1969 at the age of 45. There were other men in my community who were REAL vets that saw genuine action in WWII and Korea. Many of them died alcoholics, untreated and disregarded in my small rural community, while those who bravely pushed pencils in the armed services now proudly march and loudly proclaim their support for the Iraq war.
To properly understand Weasel Boy's speech, substitute the words "United States" every time he says "Iran". The Iranians probably can hardly believe their good luck at the power we have given them. Even if we try to bomb them, they can't lose and the world knows it. It is truly "blowback time" for the good ol' US of A.
If you liked the chaos caused by our illegal invasion of Iraq, you'll love the maelstrom of madness unleashed by our pre-emptive strikes (quite possibly nuclear) on Iran.
abbybwood August 29th, 2007 1:30 pm:
"Any suggestions? I'm getting tired of sitting here in my pajamas typing.... Nam - Myoho - Renge - Kyo (World Peace Begins With You) may be all we have left."
Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo – IS EVERYTHING that we have to make change for our lives.
It moves mountains. There's no blind faith in this practice.
We all need to wake up to our Buddha nature (one who is enlightened) and pray with confidence and conviction that our collective prayers WILL change the greedy stagnant condition of our politicians... and their puppet followers.
Check out Dr. Ikeda's peace proposals & other works at:
http://www.sgi.org/about/president/works/speeches/mahayana.html
Also see: http://www.sgi-usa.org/thesgiusa/index.html
I agree... I can't sit here in my PJ's or evening gown reading, researching, writing, and send out emails that my friends don't read anymore because it's "too depressing" or "you can't do anything about it" or "nothing is going to change"...
We KNOW how HORRIBLE the state of this nation is and the evils that this government should be accountable for…
It's time for me to put Faith into action and chant – Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for world peace as if my life depends on it - because - IT DOES. And not that it is all that we have left…
It IS what we can rely on to effect change.
It moves mountains.
Nam = Devotion to
Myoho = Mystic Law
Renge = Cause and Effect
Kyo = Vibration
Devotion to the Mystic Law of Cause and Effect through Vibration.
It works, you aught to try it for 90 days… at least!
NMRK
I read an article yesterday in the NY Times about N. Sarkozy in France and a speech he made, stating "Iran will be attacked if it continues its pursuit of nuclear weapons, but not by us" and he just spent two weeks with Bush in the US. He said other things too, but it goes hand in hand with this article and Bush's speech, Sarkozy said it would be a "catastrophe" but he also implicitly supports it and is doing some more "saber rattling" for the US.
Seems like some of the other western countries will SAY things against attacking Iran, but they will support it behind the scenes/cameras/reporters.
Hey folks, its clear to anybody with a 3 digit IQ that the stock market needs to see new corporate revenue streams to keep it bouyant. The American consumer can't borrow much more money and the amount of corporate welfare that can be fanagled for the Iraq occupation is limited, so another occupation (or war as the media will label it) is just the ticket to propel the stock market!
Since Iran is much larger than Iraq, and the US Army is scraping bottom to get "boots on the ground", the Iran occupation will be more of an Air Force and Navy show than an Army and Marine show. In other words, lots of bombs and possibly nukes. The military-industrial complex, escpecially the nuclear sector will love every minute of it and those Goldman-Sachs executives will continue to get their seven figure bonuses.
NMRK: Thank you for the suggestion. It's always been hard for me to meditate as my mind doesn't want to go blank. It badgers me, "Why are you just sitting her chanting! You have books to read, your screenplay to work on, organizing things to do blah, blah, blah."
But I know you are right and I should try it. Because the Valium certainly isn't working. (Kidding)
Mastershake: I found this link when Googling The Federal Reserve:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/calendar.htm
I think that's the right one. The meeting appears to be this Friday in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Jackson Hole is actually quite nice this time of year.
BTW, on the issue of the U.S. striking Iran militarily we also need to keep in mind that China has major investments in Iran ($3.5 Billion), particularly in relation to oil:
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=6783