Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bush Threatens to Confront Iran Over Alleged Support for Iraqi insurgents
NEW YORK - George Bush yesterday ramped up the war of words between the US and Iran, accusing Tehran of threatening to place the Middle East under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust and revealing that he had authorised US military commanders in Iraq to "confront Tehran's murderous activities".
In a speech designed to shore up US public opinion behind his unpopular strategy in Iraq, the president reserved his strongest words for the regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which he accused of openly supporting violent forces within Iraq. Iran, he said, was responsible for training extremist Shia factions in Iraq, supplying them with weapons, including sophisticated roadside bombs. Iran has denied all these accusations.
Mr Bush referred specifically to 240mm rockets which he said were made in Iran this year and smuggled into Iraq.
"Iran has long been a source of trouble in the region," he said." Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust."
The blunt terms in which Mr Bush portrayed the Iranian threat, and his threat of military confrontation with Tehran involving US troops based in Iraq, elevated the tense standoff between Washington and Tehran to a new level.
The speech also contained the implicit desire on Mr Bush's part for regime change, calling for "an Iran whose government is accountable to its people, instead of to leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons".
Equally menacing words emanated from Tehran yesterday, where Mr Ahmadinejad said US influence in the region was collapsing so fast that a power vacuum would soon be created. "Of course, we are prepared to fill the gap," he said.
Though the Iranian president said he backed the leadership of the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, and welcomed the involvement of Saudi Arabia, his offer to occupy the space the Americans might leave behind is unlikely to cool emotions in Washington.
He went on to deride the possibility of the US pursuing military action in Iran, saying it was in no position to do so and claimed that Iran had already acquired enriched nuclear fuels, though they would only be used for peaceful purposes.
In a further cause of tension, Mr Bush accused the Quds force within Iran's revolutionary guards of leading the supply chain to Iraqi extremist groups. As the Guardian revealed earlier this month, the Bush administration is preparing to declare the 125,000-strong Revolutionary Guard Corps a "global terrorist organisation" - a move that would be seen as provocative within Tehran.
According to reports from Baghdad last night, a group of Iranians were detained last night in a raid by US troops on a hotel in the city. Of 10 people arrested, seven were said to be Iranian, including an employee of the Iranian embassy and six members of Iran's electricity ministry in Iraq to discuss contracts for electric power stations. It was not immediately clear why the men had been arrested, or where they had been taken. The US military would only say the action was part of an on-going operation.
Mr Bush's bullish talk of his determination to "take the fight to the enemy" in the carefully choreographed setting of a veterans' convention in Reno, Nevada, was the second of a two-part appeal by him to shore up public support for his flagging strategy on Iraq. In the first speech, made last week, he invoked Vietnam to argue that quitting Iraq now could put the lives of millions of innocent civilians at risk.
Mr Bush yesterday vowed to persevere with his controversial military policy in Iraq, insisting that political and security progress was being made, despite a rising tide of dissent even from high up within his Republican party.
"Our strategy is this: every day we work to protect the American people. We will fight them over there so that we don't have to fight them in the United States of America," he said.
The twin speeches were intended as preparation for a crucial series of debates on Iraq that will dominate Washington for the next few weeks.
In a fortnight the senior general in Iraq, General David Petraeus, and American ambassador in Iraq, Ryan Crocker, will give two days of testimony in which they are likely to argue that the troop "surge" is having some beneficial impact on security levels, though political progress lags behind.
Under the current policy, US troop numbers in Iraq have risen by 30,000 to about 165,000.
As the climax of these intense hearings, Mr Bush himself will present his latest assessment.
Yesterday's speech was the latest clear indication that he will resist any attempt to change course in the prosecution of the war.
Mr Bush's latest attempt to reassure the American people that the war is moving in the right direction came on another tumultuous day in Iraq.
Hundreds of thousands of pilgrims attending a Shia festival in Kerbala, 68 miles south-west of Baghdad, were ordered to leave the city after intense fighting broke out, reportedly between warring Shia factions. At least 52 people have been killed since Monday, mostly police officers engaging in the battle.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
Comments
Due to trouble with browser compatibility, Common Dreams has reverted to the older version of Disqus for comments while they fix these problems.

114 Comments so far
Show AllWhat you say your name was - salvation ???? what a joke.
I'm doing more than talking, I'm WALKING. That name "walker" needs to reclaim a bit of honor anyhow.
Peace,
Ken Hausle
"To initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime,differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
Nuremberg Tribunal
"Any excuse will serve the tyrant"...Aesop, from 'The Wolf and the Lamb'
"Liberty is not for these slaves; I do not advocate inflicting it against their conscience. On the contrary, I am strongly in favor of letting them crawl and grovel all they please before whatever fraud or contributors of frauds they choose to venerate...Our whole practical government is grounded in mob psychology and...the Boobus Americanus will follow any command that promotes to make him safer."
H.L. Menchen---1956
The scary thing about Bush is his
decider' attitude while his finger is on the red button. He could easily push the red button just to prove to the world that he is indeed 'the decider.' More spoiled child than adult, more reacionary than realist, more self-centered than visionary. Poor traits for a leader in the modern world. Poor traits for anyone.
Salvation has a point.
It seems we are doomed to follow the dinosaur. Eventually, the Sun will grow cold and Salvation will be proved correct. Kudos, Salvation.
However, there is no need to go into that cold night quietly, right Salvation?
We can attempt to have the human race present at the Sun's last day, can't we?
There is no doubt that the deck is STACKED against us and that our attempts will be in vain, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be undertaken. If for no other reason than to entertain the entity that created this mess, we should rail against the evil that threatens to consume us.
And America is without a doubt EVIL. Like a petulant child, our diaper is full and Mommy has taken an Ambien. We've broken the windows on the neighbors house, stolen all the mail and all that's left to eat is our own snot. Tuck in. Fortunately, there's plenty.
May the revolution be as swift as it is peaceful.
RESTORE DEMOCRACY & DICTENFREUND: Interesting points and analysis.
PEACEMAN: I'm "on" end of the month deadlines AND have a houseguest, so I am a little behind with commentary, but I will check out what you wrote. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't do something right, don't do it at all. With that in mind, I say we dissolve our government and start fresh.
Come on Americans! Who's with me?
If you think the Democrats are going to get us out of Iraq...
"With the president continuing to stay the course in Iraq, Republicans will have to decide whether they will continue to vote with him or join Democrats and the vast majority of Americans who are demanding a new direction in Iraq and refocusing America's efforts on fighting the real threats of terrorism around the world," -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Note how she carefully selected wording in "...Democrats and the vast majority of Americans who are demanding a new direction in Iraq...". Note that nothing is mentioned that most Americans want us out of Iraq and not continuing the occupation. Withdrawing from our little oil state is not part of the Democratic (elite) plan.
Nuclear powers:
Britain, China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, Israel, North Korea.
At least six of the above don't want more US led invasions and occupation of Iran, Venezuela and other countries. Unlike our prez, they're probably not dumb enough to start a nucular war over another invasion. Cheney knows that and is using his protege's craziness to keep them guessing. But these six nuclear powers know that if they were to supply US and Israeli targets with nukes, the US will probably stop targetting them. See how we made nice with N. Korea after they acquired nukes? Will we invade Iran before the inevitable nukes are supplied?
And also:
1. The oligarchy has put our economy into the toilet so they can privatize everything, get richer at everyone's expense, and rule the world.
2. Banks and multinationals own our 65 trillion debt (see recent CD article) and have not stopped lending and foreclosing on all our homes as long as warfare is giving them a positive cash flow.
3. The Democrat Congress is timid because they know that if they stop the war profiteers, these will stop lending, foreclose on our homes and we'll be the biggest third world country in the world.
4. The oligarchy believes they are superior to the unwashed masses in every way and know how to run the world better. That people have to be kept oppressed and poor otherwise they'll make a mess of things.
He really does look like a chimp, doesn't he? LOL
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushchimpanzee.htm
We have a mad emperor leading us to destruction and an "opposition" party that only knows how to roll over and play dead. What will it take?
Declare the CIA a "terrorist" organization. Fair is fair.
ezeflyer: I admire many of your one-liners, but the 2;20pm post is tops. The 4 Items mentioned seem correct with one exception. The Democrats are not timid by any means. Most of them are willing enablers of the Bush Crime Family, including my 'Democratic Senators', Feinstein and Boxer. (especially the former) When confronted at her $16,000,000 mansion in San Francisco last week, Diane told the protestors that as long as troops remain in Iraq, she'll fund them. Who's kidding who?
What is sad is that nobody wants to help the Iraqi people. Perhaps if 500,000 'Chinese volunteers' were deployed to Iraq to repel the invader and occupier, then the cannon fodder, also know as the 'troops' would return to U.S. soil
The United States has a very heavy karma to pay. What a shame!
i thought if ya had some rabelrousers, that crossed borders to play havoc..that ya had to catch em B4 they flee the region. isn't there some type of sovernty or protection by crossing certain borders? and all the army need do is chase em into iran (some real desperados ya)..and presto you got your next engagement, nice and legal. i wonder if your afgani, or pakistan you get this sort of thing already?
Good point peaceman. A 16 million mansion may not make an oligarch. Just one of their well paid employees.