EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Higher Standards of Living May Be Behind Europe's Height Advantage
Health care is reason Americans now lag, researcher believes
Pundits often opine that America's stature is declining on the global stage. It turns out that Americans - literally - are not standing as tall, compared with the rest of the world, as they used to.
U.S. adults lost their position as the tallest people on Earth to the Dutch, who average about 2 inches taller than the typical American. In fact, American men now rank ninth and women 15th in average height, having fallen short of many other European nations.
"Americans, who have been the tallest in the world for a very long time, are no longer the tallest," said John Komlos of the University of Munich, who has published a series of papers documenting the trend. "Americans have not kept up with western European populations."
The idea that many Europeans are looking down on Americans has led to a flurry of interest in trying to explain the trend, with debate focusing on whether to blame the lack of universal health care and other holes in the nation's social safety net, particularly for children.
"We conjecture that perhaps the western and northern European welfare states, with their universal socioeconomic safety nets, are able to provide a higher biological standard of living to their children and youth than the more free-market-oriented U.S. economy," Komlos wrote in one of his latest papers, published in June in the journal Social Science Quarterly.
While some researchers agree, others are more cautious, arguing that height is determined by a complicated amalgam of genetic, environmental, social and biological influences.
"It's a puzzle to which we really don't have a good answer at this point," said Robert Fogel of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. "Nobody has identified anything that can really explain it."
Nourished by a bountiful food supply and free from scourges that plagued Europe, Americans quickly became the tallest people in the world. The colonists were about 2 inches taller than the British they defeated in the Revolutionary War, and Americans towered about 3 inches above the average Dutch and other Europeans by the 1850s. That trend prevailed for two centuries through both world wars as America's wealth and influence paralleled its dominant height around the globe.
But in a series of papers, including his most comprehensive work to date - the June analysis of federal surveys conducted between 1959 and 2004 - Komlos and others have shown that growth of the average American declined beginning in the 1950s, allowing other countries to overtake the United States by the 1970s. Although Americans have resumed growing in the past few decades, the rate has not kept pace with other nations.
"Americans were still growing until the Eisenhower administration and then stopped for two decades, which is odd, given the great improvement in health, in medical technology and given the great improvements in income," Komlos said. "Despite this, Americans have been surpassed by western European populations."
Komlos' most recent analysis excluded Hispanics and Asians to try to eliminate the effect of immigration. In another paper that has not yet been submitted for publication, Komlos produced similar findings examining military records that enabled him to exclude people whose parents were born elsewhere to further account for immigration. Another paper being published soon found identical trends among children - height stagnated among children in the United States for several decades beginning in the 1950s but continued to increase among Europeans.
"That explains why the western Europeans overtook the Americans," Komlos said.
Height is considered a bellwether of a society's well-being. As wealth increases, often so does height. Wealth usually improves nutrition and medical care, enabling people to reach their maximum growth potential and live longer. The key years are early childhood - with those children receiving the best nutrition and suffering the least illness growing the best.
Komlos and others noted that the contemporary American diet, while plentiful, has become less nutritious.
"The culture of food here is different than other countries," said Richard Steckel of Ohio State University. "Children tend to watch more television and snack and eat fast food. When they do this, the fuel they are consuming is not the optimal blend."
© 2007 Hearst Communications Inc.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show All"Short people got no reason to live."
So the farm bill that resulted in raising corn-fed kids isn't such a good idea after all?
US citizens are growing OUT rather than UP.
And that's why we all need big SUVs.
"Americans were still growing until the Eisenhower administration and then stopped for two decades, which is odd, given the great improvement in health, in medical technology and given the great improvements in income," .."
Hmmmm... when Eisenhower warned us about the "military/industrial complex", people just couldn't seem to rise above their fairy tale notions of reality; this not only stunted the growth of their minds, but apparently affected their bodies as well. It simply shows us that improvements in technology and income don't hold much weight, or should I say, height?
One can only hope that reality will re-appear once again after 6 years of George Bush. In that event, growth will become possible again in this country.
I'm only 5'8. Is that short?
This article and mentality is bullshit. We're judging one another based on height? And right out in the open too? What the hell is height advantage? I guess that means us shorter folks are inferior and deserve to be treated as such. Taller people are our superiors and deserve to be treated as such. We must marginalize and stereotype shorter people. To be shorter is to be less of a human.
OH i guess race and gender, you can't touch those, but height is up for grabs. If you actually buy into this, then you are prejudiced and discriminatory.
"All animals are equal....but some are more equal than others." George Orwell
mastershake, you have missed completely the point of the article. No criticism is anywhere implied to people based on stature. Population height is used only as a measure of the quality of children as they grow up, which obviously depends largely on environmental factors, foremost of which is proper nutrition. And stature is recognized by the researchers as an established indicator of such quality, that is all. So your comments about the article being prejudicial and discriminatory are off the mark.
my dad grew up in wartime France with little meat until the age of 11. he's 5'6". my mother is 5'5". i grew up in the US and i am 6'1". i'm convinced that environmental factors play a part and had my father grown up after the war he would have been taller.
Oh Bill, I agree with the premise, yes there is a need for universal health care. But it is absurd and bigoted for the article to use divisive langauge suggesting and implying that Taller people are somehow inherantly superior, and Shorter people are inferior- or subhuman. That's a prejudicial way to view the world.
----While some researchers agree, others are more cautious, arguing that height is determined by a complicated amalgam of genetic, environmental, social and biological influences.
"It's a puzzle to which we really don't have a good answer at this point," said Robert Fogel of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. "Nobody has identified anything that can really explain it."-----
That's it, there is a lot of ambivalance and disagreement on what determines height. Health, nutrition and environment probably do affect height, but scientists actually don't know to what degree if any at all. Moreover, the article only dedicates a few sentances to the other side of the issue, yet it's bias strongly favors the first side.
We're all on the same page here in the NEED for universal health care, and single payer systems. On a substantive level, single payer systems are much better than the current for-profit system. But we do not need this divisive language, and biased propoganda articles to prove that point. I'm saying we have TONS and TONS of proof, we don't need and shouldn't include a shaky science (at best) and biased articles when approaching this issue.