EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
People in 41 Nations Are Living Longer Than Americans
WASHINGTON -- Americans are living longer than ever, but not as long as people in 41 other countries.
For decades, the United States has been slipping in rankings of life expectancy, as other countries improve healthcare, nutrition and lifestyles.
Countries that surpass the United States include Japan and most of Europe, as well as Jordan, Guam and the Cayman Islands.
"Something's wrong here when one of the richest countries in the world, the one that spends the most on healthcare, is not able to keep up with other countries," said Christopher Murray, head of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
A baby born in the United States in 2004 is expected to live an average of 77.9 years. That ranks 42nd, down from 11th two decades earlier, according to international numbers provided by the Census Bureau and domestic numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics.
Andorra, a tiny country between France and Spain, had the longest life expectancy, at 83.5 years, according to the Census Bureau.
It was followed by Japan, Macao, San Marino and Singapore.
The shortest life expectancies were clustered in sub-Saharan Africa, a region that has been hit hard by HIV and AIDS, famine and civil strife. Swaziland has the shortest, at 34.1 years, followed by Zambia, Angola, Liberia and Zimbabwe.
Researchers say several factors have contributed to the United States falling behind other industrialized nations. A major one, they say, is that 47 million people in the United States lack health insurance, whereas Canada and many European countries have universal healthcare.
But "it's not as simple as saying, 'We don't have national health insurance,' " said Samuel B. Harper, an epidemiologist at McGill University in Montreal. "It's not that easy."
Among the other factors researchers cite:
* Adults in the United States have one of the world's highest obesity rates. Nearly a third of those 20 or older are obese, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. "The U.S. has the resources that allow people to get fat and lazy," said Paul D. Terry, an assistant professor of epidemiology at Emory University in Atlanta. "We have the luxury of choosing a bad lifestyle as opposed to having one imposed on us by hard times."
* Racial disparities. Black Americans' average life expectancy is 73.3 years, five years less than white Americans'. Black American males have a life expectancy of 69.8 years, slightly shorter than in Nicaragua and Morocco.
* A relatively high percentage of babies born in the United States die before their first birthday, compared with other industrialized nations: 6.8 deaths for every 1,000 live births. Forty countries, including Cuba, Taiwan and most of Europe, had lower infant mortality rates in 2004. The rate for black Americans was 13.7, the same as Saudi Arabia.
"It really reflects the social conditions in which African American women grow up and have children," said Dr. Marie C. McCormick, professor of maternal and child health at the Harvard School of Public Health. "We haven't done anything to eliminate those disparities."
Another reason for the U.S. drop in the rankings is that the Census Bureau now tracks life expectancy for many more countries -- 222 in 2004 -- than it did in the 1980s.
Murray said improved access to health insurance could increase life expectancy. But he said he doubted that the United States would move up in the rankings as long as the healthcare debate was limited to insurance. He said policymakers also should focus on reducing cancer, heart disease and lung disease. He advocates stepped up efforts to reduce tobacco use, control blood pressure, reduce cholesterol and regulate blood sugar.
"Even if we focused only on those four things, we would go along way toward improving healthcare in the United States," Murray said.
© 2007 The Los Angeles Times
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

19 Comments so far
Show AllThe best country in the world. Yes the lies are reveled. Turn off the TV, throw away the paper. And start living life. We are number one in exporting guns, and death. Think local. Work for your community. The government is not here to help you anymore. It just wants your money.
Ok.... nearly everytime you see the life expectancy statistic, more likely than not, it includes incedences of infant mortality. So that means that since the US generally has a higher birth rate, it also has higher INCEDENCES of infant mortality thus lowering average life expectency accross all groups. Keep that in mind when you read these types of articles, which are a little decieving.
Health Care access, and health insurance in the country is a clusterfuck yes. There are so many flaws in the current profit driven health insurance system, but there's little need to focus on life-expectancy as a greivance, since it really isn't one.
Mastershake said: "that means that since the US generally has a higher birth rate, it also has higher INCEDENCES of infant mortality thus lowering average life expectency accross all groups. Keep that in mind when you read these types of articles, which are a little decieving."
They're talking about percentages though. If 100 babies are born in country A and 10 die and country B 50 are born and 6 die, country B still has a worse stat because projected it means that if the population was doubled 12 die. Country A still has the higher incident rate though.
I think the comments about obesity are so bang on - having the luxury to get fat and immobile leads to a lower life expectancy while as an irony may reflect a richer society!
Mastershake, "more likely than not" is inaccurate. Reread the stats: 6.8 deaths for every 1000 live births of white babies and 13.7 deaths for every 1000 live births of black babies born in the US. No "incidence" involved. Stop trying to spin the facts, life expectancy IS an issue.
I read a study by an MD and another by a medical group stating that they saw a relationship between the income disparity and health outcomes in different countries. The wider the disparity, the poorer the health outcomes, and that went for the rich as well as the poor (of course, the poor fared worse). Their conclusion was that humans are hardwired to be egalitarian and health suffers for all when the income gap gets too large.
Our huge health bill, a lot of it comes from the crap we eat. We're pretty much the fattest country on earth. We don't really value health, diet or exercise. Keep us complacent, fat, lazy and stupid, and that would be detrimental to both our health and to our awareness of what's all going on.
Many portions of this country totally QUALIFY AS THIRD WORLD. The poor, especially blacks, suffer from deteriorating conditions not unlike those found in the third world or even Africa. Life expectancy, infant mortality rate, you name it.
And yes, national and universal healthcare DOES play a huge role. Bush's policies are in fact excelerating the third-worldization of America. America #1? I beg to differ. Like Bill Maher said, it's not hating on America, it's challenging it.
" whereas Canada and many European countries have universal healthcare."
Get your terminology straight : Canada and many European countries have single-payer(ie) completely federal/provincial/municipality taxes-funded and now-you-can-add the modifier "universal" healthcare. To most congresspeople "universal" means everyone ( no one left behind )but still in the greedy,grubbing hands of the Kaiser Permanantes and Aetnas. To many Americans who have lost life savings , "universal" means a variation on a French,British,Cuban,Canadian... theme which includes , sine non quo , health-care funded by taxes with no brokers .
I come from Saskatchewan,Canada where it all started in Canada . If you want to know then ask . Otherwise , sell the house to save a finger.
cobrafifty said: "Many portions of this country totally QUALIFY AS THIRD WORLD. The poor, especially blacks, suffer from deteriorating conditions not unlike those found in the third world or even Africa. Life expectancy, infant mortality rate, you name it."
I think this is going a bit far. America has wealth disparity problems and urban ghettos beset by violence and crime, but its not third world be any stretch. The poorest Americans still live better than the vast majority of people in the world. 85% of Indians live on less than 50 cents a day.
"So that means that since the US generally has a higher birth rate, it also has higher INCEDENCES of infant mortality thus lowering average life expectency accross all groups."
That isn't correct. We are talking about an infant mortality RATE, not the NUMBER of infants that die per se. In other words, the rate is based on the PERCENTAGE of infants that die compared to the total number of children born. So it doesn't matter if a nation has 1 million children born per annum or 1,000 because the way the infant mortality rate is calculated is the same.
"...U.S. drop in the rankings is that the Census Bureau now tracks life expectancy for many more countries — 222 in 2004 — ....."
OK, folks. When did we get 222 countries in the world? I thought it was maybe 191 countries. I know there are many island nations of only a few thousands of people, but still. This seems wrong. If this is wrong, how much else is wrong in the article?
We are given statistics about how we compare to other nations, and we don't even know where those "other" nations are. Isn't there a list somewhere of all the nations of the world? I know that East Timor is the newest nation. Well, that's a start.
I know that this seems to be off the thread here, but it is not. If we do not know who we are being compared to, what good are the statistics? And who did the statistics? There is no footnote to the source.
I suspect that the article is largely correct. But they do need to back up what they are saying with verifiable facts. We really can't give a wave to folks who agree with us and only scrutinize people who disagree with us.
Oh, and BTW, how many countries are there in the world? Anyone know?
There are currently 193 states recognized by the United Nations — its 192 members and Vatican City. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is the only sovereign state that is no longer a member of the United Nations. [4]
In addition to these, there are other non-sovereign territories such as Bermuda, Guam, Solomon Island and Puerto Rico.which, under the philosophy of self-determination, wish to be considered countries in this sense.
There are also constituant countries ie UK is made up of Scotland, England, Wales.
This likely makes the study return 122 as its likely practical to do the study as measuring some of these societies as opposed to merely political legalities.
On the UN Nations and Defacto Territories list are 244 entities. This corresponds to:
193 states with general international recognition:
192 member states of the United Nations (UN).
1 state with general international recognition but not UN membership, governed by the Holy See (a UN permanent observer), the Vatican City.
9 states lacking general international recognition, none of which are UN members, that are nonetheless defined as states in the body of customary international law, drawing on the precedent of the Montevideo Convention:
1 state, no longer a UN member since late 1971, recognized by 23 UN member states and the Holy See (Vatican City), and currently with de facto international relations with many others, the Republic of China (commonly referred to as Taiwan).
1 state, member of the African Union and the Asian-African Strategic Partnership formed at the 2005 Asian-African Conference, recognized by 46 UN member states but never admitted to the UN itself, with most of its claimed territory under Moroccan de facto administration, the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Western Sahara.
1 proposed state, member of the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference, recognized by more than 100 UN member states though never itself a UN member, with no sovereignty over its claimed territories, the State of Palestine.[1]
1 de facto independent state, diplomatically recognized by no UN member states except Turkey, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.[2]
5 de facto independent states, namely Abkhazia (Georgia),[3] Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaijan),[4] Transnistria (Moldova),[5] Somaliland (Somalia),[6] and South Ossetia (Georgia),[7] none recognized by any UN member states.
38 inhabited dependent territories:
3 external territories of Australia (Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Norfolk Island).
2 overseas countries in the Kingdom of Denmark (Faroe Islands and Greenland).
7 overseas territories of France:[8]
1 sui generis (unique) community (New Caledonia).
6 overseas collectivities:
1 overseas country (French Polynesia)
1 departmental collectivity (Mayotte)
1 territorial collectivity (Saint Pierre and Miquelon)
2 collectivities (Saint-Barthélemy and Saint Martin)
1 territory (Wallis and Futuna)
2 overseas countries in the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Aruba and Netherlands Antilles).
3 dependent territories of New Zealand:
2 states in free association with New Zealand (Cook Islands and Niue).
1 overseas territory (Tokelau).
16 British dependencies:
13 overseas territories of the United Kingdom (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, Saint Helena (and its dependencies Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha), Turks and Caicos Islands, and the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia).
3 Crown dependencies (Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man).
5 unincorporated territories of the United States:
2 commonwealths (Northern Mariana Islands and Puerto Rico).
2 organized territories (Guam and U.S. Virgin Islands).
1 de facto organized territory lacking an Organic Act (American Samoa).
4 special entities recognized by international treaty or agreement (Ã…land in Finland, Svalbard in Norway, as well as the 2 special administrative regions of the People's Republic of China - Hong Kong and Macau).
But we're number one in big screen TV ownership. So F-U world!
Forget the Global War on Terror!!! With our high rates of diabetes, obesity, wretched drivers and our GOP/DEM leaders in congress, we'll do more to hurt ourselves then any entity overseas. Self extermination, mission accomplished.
Don't forget the environmental factors. We've been dumping a lot of toxic crap in our back yard, adding it to our food and water, and using it in our manufactured goods that are off-gassing all around us, at a larger scale and apparently for longer than anyone else.
Wow, thank you, scotiarae. I copied your list and sent it to myself so I won't forget. That was great.
I am new to this discussion board so let me start by giving you all my greetings. This article is facinating in of itself because it is opening up a dialogue that was due years ago. No one wants to speak about health coverage because it is a problem that can take years to solve and it exposes many problems created by the health insurance industry and our law makers. I grew up in poverty in the south bronx and must say that the hospitals and medical services are inhumane. The waiting periods could extend for 12 hours at a time and the doctors are usually new to the field or are interns. Recently I had to accompany a student that was hurt to the hospital and the conditions remain the same. I think this article along with Sicko create dialogue that is necessary for an industry that is in a state of emergency and is truly underserving many of its people.
scotiarae quoted cobrafifty, and wrote: ""Many portions of this country totally QUALIFY AS THIRD WORLD..."
I think this is going a bit far... The poorest Americans still live better than the vast majority of people in the world. 85% of Indians live on less than 50 cents a day."
You're arguing against something that wasn't written. It is certainly true that few in America have to walk miles for drinking water. (And I would argue that cash income is a poor way to measure quality of life anyway -- I'll bet some Indians live better on 50 cents a day than some US working poor do on $30/day.)
But it is certainly true that, by many measures INCLUDING life expectancy, the US ranks below some of what most people would consider "third world" nations, which is what the article asserted.
For example:
* US percentage of urban population with adequate sanitation facilities falls below Tuvalu and Jordan: http://tinyurl.com/ynlhqe
* US percentage of under-fives suffering from wasting is the same as Columbia and Swaziland: http://tinyurl.com/2feeh8
* US percentage of life lived in ill health (female): similar to Slovakia and Portugal
* US teenage pregnancy: #1 in the developed world: http://tinyurl.com/3ayu6u
* US deaths from asthma, between Egypt and Columbia: http://tinyurl.com/yvrtfv
* US inequity of family income: between Uruguay and Cameroon, worse than Kenya, Mongolia, Uganda, Jamaica, et. al.: http://tinyurl.com/tcalc
(BTW: the above come from NationMaster.com, a WONDERFUL site for stats wonks.)
Yea, you can prove anything with "sadistics," and some places cited above are perhaps not really "third world," but the point is that, by many measures, the US is not a great place to be for the poor.
Health insurance and healthcare kept being interchanged in this article, as if they are the same thing. If we did not subsidize the health insurance companies (more corp. welfare)we could all have health care. The only presidential candidate that gets this is...Dennis Kucinich. HR 676.
The only good news I can think of right now about this is (1)at least the US is not at the bottom. (2)It is a wake up call for the issues mentioned. (3) It is time to give up the BS about "the best counrty" and the over importance of being competitive. It is time to focus on human rights, enviromnent, wealth shairing, health care etc. If one country is the best than the rest are not seen as good, which is a bad idea.