Email List
Most Popular This Week
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Bradley Manning is Off Limits at SF Gay Pride Parade, but Corporate Sleaze is Embraced
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
Popular content
Today's Top News
Hillary Clinton Aide's PR Firm is Under Attack
WASHINGTON -- As she presses for a coveted endorsement from organized labor, presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is facing a backlash over the business ties of a top campaign aide who has angered the labor movement.
Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.) and her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination are to speak today at an AFL-CIO candidate forum in Chicago. An endorsement promises brigades of union workers to knock on doors, drive people to the polls, and staff phone banks targeting potential voters.
Labor activists demand that Clinton give the aide, Mark J. Penn, a choice: sever connections to the public relations firm that he heads or leave the campaign.
Apart from working as a strategist and pollster for Clinton, Penn is worldwide president and chief executive of Burson-Marsteller, which has more than 100 offices in 59 countries. The firm's clients include Cintas Corp. of Cincinnati, which manufactures and launders corporate uniforms. With Burson-Marsteller's assistance, Cintas has staved off a push to unionize its workforce, and the public relations firm's website at one point boasted of its work in parrying union pressure.
"Companies cannot be caught unprepared by organized labor's coordinated campaigns," the section read, "whether they are in conjunction with organizing or contract negotiating.... That is why we have developed a comprehensive communications approach for clients when they face any type of labor situation."
Penn has said that his own public relations work does not involve anti-union activity, but union leaders said they were troubled that a Democratic candidate who cast herself as a labor ally had chosen him as a campaign partner.
"Learning that Mark Penn was CEO of a company that in fact conducts some of its business busting unions was very, very problematic to the AFL-CIO, as well as to many other unions, and we made that clear" to the Clinton campaign, said Karen Ackerman, AFL-CIO political director. "This is an issue that continues."
Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa said in a statement: "We have expressed our concerns to Sen. Clinton about Mark Penn and his firm's work for anti-union companies. We value Sen. Clinton's commitment to strengthen America's middle class. But as long as Mark Penn continues to profit from his company's involvement with anti-union companies, this issue will not go away."
Penn is refusing to part ways with Burson-Marsteller, and Clinton has not asked him to do so. In an interview, he said he was avoiding a role in overseeing the part of the company's practice that involved management-labor issues.
Penn said he also had invoked the company's "conscience clause," meaning that he would not work with particular clients "because of personal feelings on the issue."
"Look, I've not been anti-union in my work.... As a practical matter, this is not the kind of work that I've been doing," Penn said. "It's nothing that I've had any connection with since I started at Burson."
He was named CEO of the public relations giant in December 2005.
Penn is part of Clinton's inner circle, participating in daily 7:30 a.m. conference calls with campaign aides.
He also is president of Penn, Schoen & Berland, a market research firm that he founded in 1975 and that is now part of Burson's parent company, WPP Group. For its political consulting and polling work, Penn Schoen collected $273,000 from Clinton's campaign in the quarter that ended June 30, campaign finance records show.
"It's not unusual for political consultants to have other clients, or do other work in addition to their political work," said Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson. "There were questions raised about some of Burson-Marsteller's work, and Mark made it clear that he was going to recuse himself completely from any of the work in question, and he has done so."
The outside financial interests of political strategists can cause difficulties for a candidate. When George W. Bush ran for president in 2000, he insisted that his main advisor, Karl Rove, sell a political consulting firm Rove had founded, to ensure that Rove's loyalties were not divided.
Other candidates also rely on advisors who maintain independent careers. Gregory B. Craig, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), is a Washington lawyer who in 2000 represented the father of Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban boy at the center of a custody battle between relatives who wanted to keep him in Miami and his father, who wanted to take him back to Cuba. As a White House special counsel, Craig also represented President Clinton in the 1998 impeachment case.
With thousands of clients, Burson-Marsteller has far-flung interests. Cintas spokeswoman Pamela Lowe said it was Cintas' main public relations agency, doing "a wide range of corporate communications for us."
"I'll tell you that Cintas is pleased with the work that Burson has done," she said.
Cintas had $3.7 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2007, and it has 34,000 employees, of whom about 400 are union members. Its founder and chairman, Richard T. Farmer, has given heavily to Republican causes, including a $25,000 contribution to the Republican National Committee in March.
It is not clear whether Hillary Clinton will face forum questions today about Penn's dual roles. Questions will come from the audience, from members writing to the AFL-CIO website, and from the moderator, MSNBC talk show host Keith Olbermann. The forum is at Soldier Field; about 15,000 union members are expected.
In the days leading up to the event, union officials said they were not appeased by arguments in Penn's defense.
Candice Johnson, a spokeswoman for the Communications Workers of America, which represents about 700,000 workers, said: "CWA and other unions do have concerns about Burson-Marsteller and the anti-union campaigns they support.... We have questions about this, and we've asked for direct discussions with the Clinton campaign."
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



29 Comments so far
Show AllIf unions endorse Clinton, they deserve every bit of bad luck they'll have for the next 4-8 years. Clinton will be against single-payer healthcare; will prolong the Iraq war; will push more NAFTA-like trade agreements; and will give the unions just what they would deserve (if they vote for her)--the back of her hand. I hope they are smarter than that.
though unions are supposed to support the worker and did so at one time, i suspect that unions have gone corporate.
not the SEIU, see what they are doing.
"Other candidates also rely on advisors who maintain independent careers. Gregory B. Craig, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), is a Washington lawyer who in 2000 represented the father of Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban boy at the center of a custody battle between relatives who wanted to keep him in Miami and his father, who wanted to take him back to Cuba. As a White House special counsel, Craig also represented President Clinton in the 1998 impeachment case."
Yet another reason to vote for Obama.
Re: Hillary -- who knows a little about right-wing conspiracies -- She is a pawn who is selling her soul to reach her personal goal of becoming the first woman president; hang the country and its people. This PR high flying flack Penn works for a PR firm of record for the corporate world and is entrenched in the frontlines of taking away our rights; that's the real war going on. If he gives up his associaton with the Burson-Marsteller firm, it doesn't mean a thing. If she loses, he goes back; if she wins . . .
If you think you're getting a slick spin and snow job from this prez . . .
Hillary should be looking for a job on the corner of state and division in Chicago.
He who pays the piper calls the tunes...
If Hilvita wants the endorsement of the labor unions, she has to dance to their tune
Fedupwithpolitics nails it one. Anyone who votes Hilary thinking she will be a progressive and better because she is female gets exactly what they deserve. Unfortunately the third world countries she will no doubt bomb, and the trade agreements she will know doubt sign, will only hurt innocents, sigh.
Gore/Nader/Gravel/Kucinich/the Greens? How long must we wait?
isn't burson-marsteller the same outfit that served up "nayirah" to the u.s. congress as an eyewitness to atrocities (remember? 15-yr-old candy-striper whose tearful tale of 500 kuwaiti babies dumped out of their incubators by saddam's troops moved congress to authorize gulf war 1). much too late we found she was a pampered daughter of the kuwaiti "royal" family, and no such incident ever happened.
anyone having a better grip on the details please refresh us. it's getting tough to keep it all straight.
And remember her comparable personal conflict of interest in Whitewater BILLARY records machinations.
jbs: Please refrain from vast generalizations. My union works tirelessly against corporate interests. It is peace of mind during these turbulent times when profits are favored over people.
Hillary seems to be taking advice from her husband Bill who has done more for big business/corps during his presidency than most Republicans have.
Thanks, Commondreams! Even MORE face time for Clinton!
Behind the scenes (and out of the public eye, of course!) Dennis Kucinich CONTINUES to work for the American people and changes for a better way of life. Where's the coverage there?
By the way, D.K. is the ONLY card-carrying union member of the Dem candidates who is CONSTANTLY fighting for us American workers! Where's THAT coverage, CommonNightmare?!
The more time you give to Obummer and Hellary, the more recognition hits the public awareness--good OR bad.
If this is a PROGRESSIVE website, then FOLLOW THE PROGRESSIVES and NOT the regressives!!!
who is her anti-war aide? Gengis Khan?
QUOTE:
fedupwithpolitics August 7th, 2007 12:33 pm
If unions endorse Clinton, they deserve every bit of bad luck they'll have for the next 4-8 years. Clinton will be against single-payer healthcare; will prolong the Iraq war; will push more NAFTA-like trade agreements; and will give the unions just what they would deserve (if they vote for her)–the back of her hand. I hope they are smarter than that.
END QUOTE
Well, if they are like many (most?) people, just because the woman still has the gall to have a D behind her name, that's sufficient. That's all that counts.
Locally, we have a talk show host who is a Dem koolaid drinker. The other night I listened to him for a few minutes (that's all I can take of him) to see if he had put down his koolaid. No, not a chance of that. Awhile back I had heard him say on his show, "oh Hillary will make a wonderful president of the United States of America." All that. Sounds like some one is ignorant about this candidate, eh? Then the other night he rattled off this litany of things he didn't like about Hillary including he doesn't like jellyfish unprincipled people like Hillary. But then out of the other side of his mouth he said that if she's the nominee he will vote for her.
I thought: you haven't learned a damn thing have you from you and others being stuck/locked into this "lesser of two evils" rut. As long as you keep voting for "lesser of two evils" the longer we will stay right where we are because that is, in part, how we got to where we are. DUH.
I don't call this talk show host but I wish someone would ask him:
If Hillary had a R behind her name and happened to be the Repug's nominee would you STILL be voting for her? Or is it that D behind her name that gets your vote?
I suspect he would be at a loss for words to explain himself out of that. Of course it's the D that gets his vote.
I think most people are like that because they were programmed early in life by their parents/guardians with that party-line crap.
Party line, party line, party line. Gotta tow that dead Dem party line.
Yes indeed it's the season for those spit shined smiles while the horseshit fills the air like so much DU dust blowing in the wind.
SEIU is clearly corporate. All you need do is see how they treat the folk that do the leg work for them. Viz., the organizers. SEIU management treats these folk like dirt. There is nepotism and racism all over SEIU. The management regularly fires Latino and Black organizers that speak up about working conditions. Just look and you will see.
About Hilary and Labor: She's corporate, Big Labor is corporate, thus, its the marriage of like minded unethical entities doing what unethical entities do: engage in corruption.
Yes, but the unions shortened our work-week to European averages, got us European-style vacations, paid maternal and paternal leave, decent health benefits, etc.
Oops, they've done nothing of the sort. Have there been any gains at all in the past few decades?
Paul Bramscher...Those things you mentioned are nice and no, we haven't got them.
In the past few decades Unions (and all working Americans) have been playing defense.
I am a recently retired union member and elected official of my local and I can tell you we had to fight like hell to hang on to the benefits we had. More weeks of vacation would be great but are meaningless to someone whose job is outsourced.
What have the Dems done during that time? Caved in to Reagan and Bush I, elected Clinton (and NAFTA) and completely caved in to Bush II. The Dems are complicit in all the ills of labor and also unorganized workers. How they could even consider another Clinton is beyond me.
Who is the only recent candidate to call for repeal of Taft-Hartley? Ralph Nader. Ralph is at the spot where the Dems should be. Instead we are looking a Hillary and O-bomb-a.
It's a shame some labor "leaders" are looking at them too.
Meanwhile, Hillary stops to blow kisses to the lobbyist wing of the political elite. Perhaps her handlers will discover a form of The Common Touch that can be injected like botox, because she does not seem to have been born with one.
I would vote for Al Gore. But if he won't run, I prefer to see Edwards as president. Nobody here has mentioned him. They should. He's polling well in Iowa. Oh, how the corporations hate John Edwards. He's brilliant. He went toe to toe with the corporate lawyers like David against Goliath and beat them, again and again. Nothing agaist Kucinich mind you. He's of the same cloth. But Edwards has a much better chance.
I thought assisted suicide was illegal in the United States. Surely, then, labor can't back Hilary Clinton!
""Look, I've not been anti-union in my work…. As a practical matter, this is not the kind of work that I've been doing," Penn said. "It's nothing that I've had any connection with since I started at Burson."
He was named CEO of the public relations giant in December 2005."
And I suppose that will work when George Bush says that HE didn't actually PERFORM the illegal wiretaps, nor did he kill ANY Iraqis, Afghanis, or sacrifice the children of the United States to the war. Nor was he one of the doctors who actually DENIED service to children because they didn't get CHIPS insurance. Nice logic. The CEO is not responsible for the clients represented and the campaigns undertaken? As long as he isn't the ACCOUNT MANAGER giving PERSONAL service to Union Busters, why, he's positively PRO labor!
Hilary is a proponent of labor outsourcing (though she once participated in bringing TEN jobs to Buffalo from India, albeit jobs filled by Indians on work visas, and, VERBALLY, she laments outsourcing as a sad, but foregone, conclusion) I will grant that it would be near to impossible for a candidate to find "clean" sources for PR, Polling, Campaign Strategy, etc., but it is irrelevant with Clinton. She is no friend of labor, nor was her more Left Wing husband.
www.unknown-arts.org/politics
Keep giving them hell Erma!!!! Neo-con Ds are the last thing we need now.
Corporations bought the government and got laws passed that made unions weak and dependent on the generosity of corporations and government to exist.
Unions represent too few people in too few industries to mean anything.
From the 1930s to the 1960s, unions in the U.S were a force to be reckoned with. Now they are a joke. What happened? The corporations just grew too powerful. The anti-communist/anti-socialist worldview of the U.S always made the country a poor breeding ground for labor unions and socialism. Labor also didn't bother thinking long-term. In the 50s, 60s and even the 70s, so many workers were very overly-satisfied with their lot in life. Labor rested on its laurels while corporate America was was only slowly relocating factories to the 3rd world, and rewriting various laws for corporate benefit. Corporate American even used the civil rights movement to its benefit, using race issues to reframe the immigration debate - if you opposed immigration and importing cheap labor to compete with union labor, you were "racist". It worked like a charm.
Of course there was no mention of this at the labor "debate", or, for that matter, her stint on the board of Walmart (the company store brought to you from Arkansas by the NAFTA Clintonistas), where she made a practice of ignoring the issue of anti-Union store policy.
As usual Clinton gets a pass because the fix is in and always has been.
Clinton, like husband Bill and this fellow, Penn, and his company, are all part of Perkin's "corporatocracy." (See Economic Hitman.) You don't raise the money to run for president without being vetted by said interests. They've all cut their deal with the devil. And union management knows it and is simply trying to choose the lesser of evils. As are we poor citizens.
" . . . a Democratic candidate who cast herself as a labor ally . . ."
Call me cynical, but I have trouble visualizing anyone who has served on Walmart's board as a labor ally.
Read more about Clinton, Mark Penn and labor on the Labor is Not a Commodity blog here: http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2007/06/what_do_shakira.html
Penn's PR firm is also representing the Colombian government as that country pushes for a free trade agreement with the US. Meanwhile, more trade union leaders are killed every year in Colombia than the rest of the world combined. Get the full story here: http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2007/06/what_do_shakira.html