EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
Popular content
Today's Top News
Clean Up the Cruise Industry
The multi-billion dollar cruise line business, plying international waters alongside different national jurisdictions, has been playing a hide and seek game for years. Hiding the dumping of harmful wastes and chemicals into marine environments and seeking all kinds of concessions and non-regulation by lobbying and federal regulators.
The media takes them over the coals from time to time when they are caught illegally dumping or in the rare instances when they are prosecuted for felonious behavior. Public exposés, viral or bacterial epidemics causing these companies severe embarrassment and lawsuits, and occasional harrowing stories from mistreated crew members mostly from Third World countries, have pressed the industry to adopt improved waste treatment technologies and voluntary industry codes of more acceptable practices.
The rule of American law has still not caught up with them. Until, that is, the companies lost a fierce battle in Alaska last year over a Cruise Ship Ballot Initiative (CSBI) which Alaskans passed in August 2006.
No other state has embraced the cruise companies with an enforceable regime of accountability. Florida and Washington State, for example, have Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) which have no enforcement mechanism, despite recent findings by Washington state that the discharge point impact on shrimp and other marine life left zero survivors instead of the expected 80% (the so-called "wet tests").
So, Alaska is leading the way. Gershon Cohen, who with labor union lawyer, Joseph Geldhof, led the victorious mobilization of voters, described the rationale this way: "We want waste discharges from the cruise industry to meet all Alaska Water Quality Standards as required of every other discharger into Alaskan waters.
"We believe the cruise industry should pay corporate income taxes, from which they were exempted by the Legislature in 1998. We think the cruise industry should pay a percentage of their gambling profits to Alaska like every other gaming operator in the State.
"We need to have an independent marine engineer [the Ocean Ranger Program] aboard every ship to make sure they don't dump untreated wastes into our waters or falsify logbooks-actions that have repeatedly brought them felony convictions in the last decade."
The taxes are now being collected. And the Alaskan Department of Environmental Conservations, together with other agencies, are in the process of issuing the rules to implement the initiative after a public notice and comment period.
The Ocean Ranger Program is about to start to generate the deterrence and inspection programs that will be very useful to other lagging states considering similar legislation to "protect passengers, crew and residents at ports from improper sanitation, health and safety practices," to quote the words from the CSBI.
Given the many thousands of passengers who have gotten sick from contaminated food or from noroviruses, other states need to end their endless indulgence of the cruise industry lobbyists. As for workers, some of the crew are unionized. But most of the laborers have few or no rights and have no organized representatives. Being offshore, U.S. labor laws do not apply to protect them.
With Alaska and Alaskan Native Organizations leading the way, can the other states and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) be that far behind? That depends on the passengers, the more outspoken workers especially when they have quit, the detailed ship and cruise line-specific information coming from Alaska and a more inquiring media.
On March 17, 2000, Clinton's EPA Administrator, Carol Browner, received a petition with detailed recommendations for regulatory action signed by leading Democratic members of the House and Senate, environmental groups, officials from the EPA itself, the Department of Justice and the U.S. Coast Guard.
Result: Nothing has been done under Clinton or under the Bush Government to address this remarkably detailed and documented petition.
The major interaction with the Bush government has been a huge rip-off by Carnival Cruise Lines which received, under a no-bid contract with FEMA, a $236 million contract for three of its ships to house homeless people, post-Katrina. For details see the website for Cong. Henry Waxman (D-CA) (http://www.house.gov/waxman/) for letters and testimony regarding this debacle.
When reminded of its felony convictions for deliberate dumping, installing 'magic pipes' to facilitate a total bypass of treatment, bypassing the oil bilgewater separators, giving false information to the Coast Guard, the industry's standard reply is 'that was then and now conditions are better.'
Enforcement of the Alaskan law covering a million passengers plus crew every summer, together with a citizen's lawsuit provision awarding portions of penalties to whistleblowers who provide information leading to convictions, will test that claim.
For more information and ways you can become involved in challenging this industry, see www.cruisejunkie.com and Ross Klein's two books-Cruise Ship Blue and Cruise Ship Squeeze. Another useful website is www.internationalcruisevictims.org. For immediate information, you can telephone Gershon Cohen at (907) 766-3005. He answers his own phone!
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer, and author. His most recent book is The Seventeen Traditions.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllFor seven years I had a standing date for a beach vacation with an old boyfriend in Zihuatanejo, Mexico.
I live in central Mexico, and would take an overnight bus or a 50 minute flight each way to spend anywhere from 4 to 15 days--depending on my schedule of work--with my friend in a palapa above Playa la Ropa.
Our "window" looked out across the bay towards the small town. The bay itself looked so inviting the first couple of years that I was persuaded to walk down to the beach and swim for a while.
Then came the turning point spring: the Spring of the Stream of Shit. A huge hotel-sized cruise ship parked itself in the bay like a whale in a bathtub--and let loose during its entire stay a stream of shit that streamed its way into the beaches.
When it left, another hotel of shitters arrived, and the same thing happened.
And then another.
I have not put one toe in the water since 2001.
But there are thousands of folks who do--because the bay looks so beautiful and they do not have the bird's eye view of what's really happening when those cruise ships come in and park.
The folks of Zihua have been trying to clean up the bay for years now--it's their bay, after all, that those big hotels of shit are constantly contaminating.
But those big cruise lines are all First World enterprises--and they don't give a SHIT about the rights of folks in the Third World.
I think the assholes that spend their vacations defecating all over the people of other countries and cultures should stay home.
Thank you Mr. Nader for your unwavering dedication to the planet and democracy.
I just ordered your book, "The Seventeen Traditions".
You are a breath of fresh air in this stale political world in which we are all currently ensnared.
Any suggestions on how to get out of this rotten fascist hole we've dug for ourselves through our collective lack of public oversight of the U.S. government over the years?
I'd also love to hear your comments on the coup d'etat committed against FDR by heads of U.S. banks and corporations that went unpunished by FDR. In case you don't know about it, there was an article written by Alan Nasser here on Commondreams Aug. 2nd entitled, "The Threat of U.S. Fascism: An Historical Precedent". Thank you.
hmmmm... bridges dropping, global warming, levees breaking, occupation of iraq, trashing of the constitution....and now cruise ships. all sypmtons, but not the root of the problem. is the problem one thing or many things? i am not sure. i have to question nader's choice of subject.
Who beside Ralph Nader consistently holds ALL corporations accountable?
This yet another example of government failure to regulate corporations. Why should cruise ships be free to pollute the ocean, exploit its workforce, dump raw sewage, etc.
Thank you and please Run, Ralph RUN!
As a Presidential candidate, I believe Ralph Nader could be trusted to pick a running mate and cabinet of ethical and Constitutionally loyal Americans.
I would trust Ralph Nader with my life and that of my family. I would trust him to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic and to secure our civil rights.
I know he would never mind testifying UNDER OATH to any questions the American people might have and I believe he would always tell the truth.
I don't think he'd bat an eye at a new investigation of 9/11 that is fully independent with subpeona power.
If he ran for President, I would tirelessly devote myself to his campaign. Because it's better to do SOMETHING you feel is a move in the right direction to challenge the present Democratic/Republican cabal.
And I'd also work toward a National Absentee Voting Campaign and a Citizen's Count of the Ballots on Election Day in order to neuter the fraudulent computerized voting and counting.
Here's the bumpersticker: THE PEOPLE COUNT!
Obviously it has a double meaning. What do ya'll think? Ralph, are you with us?
Ralph Nader, my (our) hero...
He wrote: "... Florida and Washington State, for example, have Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs)...".
MOUs. My god, how lame. And so very, very WA, no surprise there. WA State, very lax regarding industry standards (they have laws, but refuse to implement them)- one of the most important, yet least discussed issues in WA.
Moonraven:
I totally agree with you. Shame on anyone who takes a cruise realizing the damage they are inflicting on the planet. It's disgusting and if it's not a crime, it should be.
Mr. Nader RUN!
I live in Juneau AK, and was disappointed to miss Ralph Nader when he was making his way through our town a short while ago. I am very glad to see a prominent name addressing the wanton disregard for our amazing environment.
Juneau is a town of 30,000, and this year, on Sunday and Monday, we have nearly 15,000 tourists and crew on our shore. Until last year, the only money that was guaranteed to go to our town was a $5 head tax, which has since been raised to $50.
Large corporations own large percentages of the shops that line the streets along the docking area, and are only open during the time the boats dock, taking the money that they didn't get at the gambling tables and bars on the boat, and packing that all up when the season is over. They also skirt taxes and misrepresent availability of tours by advertising rates on the boat for tours as "discounted" if they purchase them on the boat, when in fact there are many other options available once they get onto shore.
I am in full agreement that more taxes should be enacted upon the industry, even though the business I work for relies on the income generated during this busy time. If we allow our environment to be ruined, why would any one come here?
On another note, its not just the cruise ships that do the polluting. All of the people who come here want to go and see the Mendenhall Glacier, because of its ease of access. Its 20 Miles from the cruise ship docking ports, and so the only option is for them to load onto large busses, and make their way out there. This year it appears that our lax emissions control on vehicles are being severely abused, as all the buses are pouring black smoke in amounts I have never seen in the 20 years I have lived here.
And if their not driving to it, they are flying over it in helicopters and float planes, all burning vast quantities of fossil fuels
It saddens me to think that as more people come to see the glaciers before they melt, they are contributing to its demise at an ever increasing rate due to the carbon emissions resulting from their transportation.
I think that we all need to rethink the way that we "vacation" and find ways to enjoy the surroundings in which we live before we ruin it all.
diver.travis@gmail.com
S.O.S. Bahia started in 1999 as a grassroots movement of ordinary citizens dedicated to the rescue and preservation of the Bay of Zihuatanejo. Our main concern then was a disastrous tourism project planned by private investors (Puerto Mio, also operating under Inmobiliaria Punta del Mar) and supported by the federal tourism development agency FONATUR. The project envisioned the construction of a solid rock jetty that was to act as a cruise ship pier in the middle of our small bay, thereby practically privatizing Zihuatanejo's most important natural asset and common resource.Â
S.O.S. Bahia's "Movement for the Rescue and Preservation of the Bay of Zihuatanejo" organized two public forums, a number of massive protest marches, and spent countless hours in meetings with various municipal, state and federal government officials, the project's developers and their lawyers, and managed to stop construction of the jetty twice. After various unsuccessful attempts to build the jetty without complying with the legal obligation of conducting and presenting the necessary environmental impact studies, the project's developers and investors abandoned the jetty which, in its stumped form, today acts as an obstacle to the natural flushing and cleansing currents of the bay.
The cruise ship pier proposal, however, has once again been resurrected, this time in complicity with the federal Department of Transportation and Communication which already gave the construction contract for the pier to an outside marine construction company, PROCOMAR, S.A. de C.V.
The plan now is to build a huge piled cruise ship pier in the very center of the bay. Once constructed, the cruise ship pier would be large enough to allow three cruise ships to dock and disembark passengers simultaneously, which doubtlessly would spell the end of Zihuatanejo as a beach resort destination and could cause the collapse of its upscale tourism and real estate markets, not to mention the traditional local fishing industry.
SOS Bahia has launched an online petition against the planned construction of the cruise ship pier in the center of the bay of Zihuatanejo.
You can sign the English version of the petition here:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/sosbahiaespanol/
After you have signed, please send an email to your friends and tell them about this petition. The more signatures we can collect, the better the chance we can stop this disastrous project before it is too late.
If you would prefer to sign the Spanish version of this petition, you can do so at
http://www.petitiononline.com/sosbahia/petition.html