Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Media Blitz for War: The Big Guns of August
This week the U.S. media establishment is mainlining another fix for the Iraq war: It isn't so bad after all, American military power could turn wrong into right, chronic misleaders now serve as truth-tellers. The hit is that the war must go on.When the White House chief of staff Andrew Card said five years ago that "you don't introduce new products in August," he was explaining the need to defer an all-out PR campaign for invading Iraq until early fall. But this year, August isn't a bad month to launch a sales pitch for a new and improved Iraq war. Bad products must be re-marketed to counteract buyers' remorse.
"War critics" who have concentrated on decrying the lack of U.S. military progress in Iraq are now feeling the hoist from their own petards. But that's to be expected. Those who complain that the war machine is ineffective are asking for more effective warfare even when they think they're demanding peace.
If Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack didn't exist, they'd have to be invented. The duo's op-ed piece Monday in the New York Times, under the headline "A War We Just Might Win," was boilerplate work from elite foreign-policy technicians packaging themselves as "two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration's miserable handling of Iraq." A recent eight-day officially guided tour led them to conclude that "we are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms."
Both men have always been basic supporters of the Iraq war. O'Hanlon is a prolific writer at the Brookings Institution. Pollack's credits include working at the CIA and authoring the 2002 bestseller "The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq." In the years since the candy and flowers failed to materialize, their critiques of the Iraq war have been merely tactical.
The media maneuvers of recent days are eerily similar to scams that worked so well for the Bush administration during the agenda-setting for the invasion. Vice President Cheney and his top underlings kept leaking disinformation about purported Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda -- while the New York Times and other key media outlets breathlessly reported the falsehoods as virtual facts. Then Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice and other practitioners of warcraft quickly went in front of TV cameras and microphones to cite the "reporting" in the Times and elsewhere that they had rigged in the first place.
Last Monday, the ink was scarcely dry on the piece by O'Hanlon and Pollack before the savants were making the rounds of TV studios and other media outlets -- doing their best to perpetuate a war that they'd helped to deceive the country into in the first place.
The next day, Cheney picked up the tag-team baton. Tuesday night, on CNN's "Larry King Live," he declared that the U.S. military "made significant progress now into the course of the summer. ... Don't take it from me. Look at the piece that appeared yesterday in the New York Times, not exactly a friendly publication -- but a piece by Mr. O'Hanlon and Mr. Pollack on the situation in Iraq. They're just back from visiting over there. They both have been strong critics of the war."
On Wednesday, the U.S. News & World Report website noted: "The news that the U.S. death toll in Iraq for July, at 73, is the lowest in eight months spurred several news organizations to present a somewhat optimistic view of the situation in Iraq. The consensus in the coverage appears to be that things are improving militarily, even as the political side of the equation remains troubling."
Such media coverage is a foreshadowing of what's in store big-time this fall when the propaganda machinery of the warfare state goes into high gear. The media echo chamber will reverberate with endless claims that the military situation is improving, American casualties will be dropping and Iraqi forces will be shouldering more of the burden.
Arguments over whether U.S. forces can prevail in Iraq bypass a truth that no amount of media spin can change: The U.S. war effort in Iraq has always been illegitimate and fundamentally wrong. Whatever the prospects for America's war there, it shouldn't be fought.
During the Vietnam War, the U.S. news media were fond of disputes about whether light really existed at the end of the tunnel. Framed that way, the debate could -- and did -- go on for many years. The most important point to be made was that the United States had no right to be in the tunnel in the first place.
For years now, many opponents of the Iraq war have assumed that the tides of history were shifting and would soon carry American troops home. "President Bush may be the last person in the country to learn that for Americans, if not Iraqis, the war in Iraq is over," New York Times columnist Frank Rich wrote in August 2005. He concluded that the United States as a country "has already made the decision for Mr. Bush. We're outta there."
As I wrote at the time, Rich's storyline was "a complacent message that stands in sharp contrast to the real situation we now face: a U.S. war on Iraq that may persist for a terribly long time. For the Americans still in Iraq, and for the Iraqis still caught in the crossfire of the occupation, the experiences ahead will hardly be compatible with reassuring forecasts made by pundits in the summer of 2005."
Or in the summer of 2007.
Unfortunately, what I wrote two Augusts ago is still true: "We're not 'outta there' -- until an antiwar movement in the United States can grow strong enough to make the demand stick."
The American media establishment continues to behave like a leviathan with a monkey on its back -- hooked on militarism and largely hostile to the creative intervention that democracy requires.
The new documentary film "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death" is based on Norman Solomon's book of the same title. For information about the full-length movie, narrated by SeanPenn and produced by the Media Education Foundation, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org

22 Comments so far
Show AllNotice who is being pre blamed for more Mossad "False Flag"
terror......
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover080207.htm
From a psychological perspective, for five years the Bush administration has promoted the misguided and destructive war in Iraq by targeting five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq--or an attack on Iran--will likely be sold to us in much the same way. I examine these warmongering appeals--and how to counter them--in a 10-minute video entitled "Resisting the Drums of War" available for viewing HERE.
I purchased the DVD and it arrived yesterday. I watched it last night and it will be in the mail headed for the West coast this afternoon to be viewed by many others.
I believe if everyone in the U.S. watched this DVD our current Constitutional crisis would be addressed with a greater sense of haste and urgency.
Perhaps placing the DVD online to be watched would be a more effective way to get the word out? This way it could be watched and shared quickly.
Time is of the essence.
You set this piece up so well, but then, when you should be going in for the metaphorical kill, you opt for moralism:
Arguments over whether U.S. forces can prevail in Iraq bypass a truth that no amount of media spin can change: The U.S. war effort in Iraq has always been illegitimate and fundamentally wrong. Whatever the prospects for America's war there, it shouldn't be fought.
Well, yes, but this argument isn't all that relevant to foreign policy elites, or most of the American public.
I think some of the letters published in today's Times offer more pointed critiques of this piece than Solomon's:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/opinion/l02iraq.html
Hopefully some of these writers will be making the rounds of talk shows, NPR, etc. But I wouldn't count on it.
War Made Easy is absolutely a must-see. There are currently 95 "official" showings currently scheduled at http://www.bravenewtheaters.com, and many more unofficial showings. The only way we can stop the deployment of 20,000 MORE troops as planned by the end of this year, the invasion of Pakistan as threatened by Obama, the clearly-intended invasion of Iran, or any other foolish and insane military action not even on the radar screen yet, is to make everyone in this country aware of how the media is manipulated by the government to "manufacture" the consent of the governed (that be us, folks!) to lie down quietly and let these military actions happen. See the movie. Get the DVD and show it to your friends! Be a pest and talk about this all the time! Support impeachment of these guys wherever you go!
Until the US populace gets the courage to take to the streets and follow the example of Gandhi's non-violent marches and demonstrations nothing will change. The people have got to WANT the Constitution restored enough to ACT accordingly. If there is no such desire, there will will be no more US Constitution (except in name only).
What a shame to let cowardice bring down such a noble experiment of human governance!!
Things will change only when the populace is alienated and hopeless.
Then they may :
STAND UP - for what they beleive to be right.
SIT DOWN - in the nearest street to bring transportaion, retail, everything to a standstill.
FIGHT - I hope like Gandhi's Pathan friend Badshar Khan(Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan) (check him out)a Pashtun nonviolent Muslim
FIGHT - Even if it means sacrifice to themselves to totally repudiate the oligarchy
FIGHT - As if their lives depend on active resistance - which they do
When people realize that they cannot ignore the actions of the government and relaize they themselves are the governmet, only then is change possible..
Allow me to quote another blogger of my vintage - estebandito:
(I hope he does not mind)
'As an old hippy draft-dodger,who has been out in the streets se'veral hours a week behind my Iraq anti-war signs demanding an end to the madness since this insanity began (how many years now?), I gotta report: very few people of any age give a good goddam. Oh yeah, we "protestors" get a free coffee now an then and lots of happy honking as the cars go by, but the truth is very sad. Old radicals tell me they are afraid of losing their subsidized rents!! " FBI lists! Got no time for it…"
Practically no one can remember that the way a people get new governments and new directions is ancient and simple: you stop up the streets and you go to jail for misdemeanors and then you go back and do it again. respectfully and peacefully. The fact that this is so self evident yet almost completely ignored tells me that our population of united statesians has largely ceased to function as truly caring, conscience-filled people. Reasons are many……but we are losing hope, and we deserve whatever happens to us now. This is not nice talk in front of the children, or at parties.
Nevertheless, I will continue to sally out and attempt to show folks the facts as well as try and get them to laugh at our predicament ( i usually dress as a clown 'cause clowns have more fun…..it seems like the compassionaste thing to do.'
Additional thoughts:
"To me nonviolence has come to represent a panacea for all the evils that surround my people. Therefore I am devoting all my energies toward the establishment of a society that would be based on its principles of truth and peace." – Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
"Today's world is traveling in some strange direction. You see that the world is going toward destruction and violence. And the specialty of violence is to create hatred among people and to create fear. I am a believer in nonviolence and I say that no peace or tranquility will descend upon the people of the world until nonviolence is practiced, because nonviolence is love and it stirs courage in people." – Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan to an interviewer in 1985
Dear Mr. O'Hanlon
Yesterday I was watching your recommended partitioning of Iraq presentation on C-SPAN, as a born middle easterner from a neighboring country of Iraq I thought there is an easier and less expensive way to achieve all your recommended objectives to ultimately save Israel and US from previously proposed disastrous idea of invading Iraq by this country that you had also proposed.
Simply Instead of moving millions of Shies and Sunni Iraqis to "SHIESTAN" and "SUNISATAN" as it was in your plan yesterday a" Better Way Forward" will be to just move all the Iraqis to the current location of state of Israel and move all the Israelis including the Likud party members to Iraq and rename the newly formed country "Likudstan" and the adjacent body of water will be called The Likud Golf with its own Brookings Institution. To assure that this names will be accepted we can ask the National Geographic to immediately print the new names on all published atlases and even pass a new UN resolution with chapter seven penalties for countries that do not recognize this newly formed young countries and renamed waters.
With this proposal Israelis will ultimately get both the OIL and the Water that they need to continue and still have access to open sea via the Likud Golf and we will have the control of the oil with much less military interventions and invasions of other countries and killing terrorist insurgents.
Now since Iraqis are moved to Palestine, Muslim Arab brothers from Palestine will not fight and kill Muslim Arab brothers from Iraq although we have moved them there so we will finally bring peace and calm and prosperity to the eastern Mediterranean shores this brings the end to the sixty year war we had created in 1946 or rather the end of world war one. This may sounds a little like the birth pang speech of last year.
The icing on the cake or the big bonus for us is that Likudstan (formerly Israel) will be Iran's next door neighbor it will be much easier to ask the Likudies to drop Nukes on Iran and save the Arabs from being embarrassed like the war of the 1980's we don't even have to send brother Rumsfield to supply them with WMD since the Likudies are self sufficient.
The only difficulty with this proposal which I am sure that a scholar like you will be able to easily solve is the logistics of renting so many U-Hall's in short notice but we can contract the moving to KBR and install the Marines as the traffic cup to clear the jam that can be created in the Jordan desert highway which I am sure the scholars of the Brookings can figure out this rather simple details.
Hopefully we can all see the next scholarly planed recommendations in a nationwide presentation on major western media.
I for myself thank god for Mr. Blair's acceptance of being the new Middle east peace envoy we could not have a better person for this post. I am sure he is the only person can facilitate this plan and Mr. Abbas will be happy that he can be now president of a nation of twenty five million plus.
With best wishes
Kooshy
'On Wednesday, the U.S. News & World Report website noted: "The news that the U.S. death toll in Iraq for July, at 73, is the lowest in eight months spurred several news organizations to present a somewhat optimistic view of the situation in Iraq..."'
Actually, the U.S. death toll in Iraq for July was the highest it's been for any July since the invasion. It was lower than the past several months only because Iraq is so damned hot in July that even the insurgents take it (relatively) easy. See "Deadliest July Yet for US Troops" at http://www.juancole.com/ for more.
What Frank Rich meant by "we're outta there" was that Americans are outta there mentally. As in, it is now okay to pretend that that whole Iraq thingy just sort of faded away, which is why there has been no "surge" in protests, sit-ins, freeway blogging, bumper sticker sales, door-to-door activism, or creative civil disobedience. There's no massive boycotting or tax withholding - hell, when was the last time you even saw a "nut" on a corner with a "No War" sign?
There has been a surge in whiny, repetitive blogs, though...
They are gradually shifting the Iraq occupation from an army/marine ground war to a navy/air force aerial bombing war. Some aircraft will be unmanned and remote controlled. Although this tactic will cause more Iraqi casualties, they believe it will reduce US Military casualties, thereby gaining more support for this and the next war(s)from the US electorate.
What more is there to say?
What additional words are there to write?
Year after year the same things go on.
At some point, the hand of nature will wipe the slate clean. Nothing lasts forever, especially that which defies life.
Abbywood states:
Perhaps placing the DVD online to be watched would be a more effective way to get the word out? This way it could be watched and shared quickly.
Time is of the essence
******************
It's called youtube.com and what you do is break the thing down ito 8-9 minute segments and do multiple entries. For a good example of how it is done enter TMWKK in their search function and be amazed to be able to watch al three segm,ents of a great and long supressed history channel special on the Kennedy assassination.
"The American media establishment continues to behave like a leviathan with a monkey on its back — hooked on militarism and largely hostile to the creative intervention that democracy requires."
Bad news makes good copy. Why would they want to give up this cash cow? A corporation's only mandate is to make as much money as it can, any way it can.
You know what gets me is that the American people are still listening to leaders and news people who have been wrong for the last 6 years on anything having to do with 9/11, Iraq, the war on terror, the patriot act, ad infinitum.
A good example is people criticizing Obama for wanting to talk to our "bush" identified adversaries. Our foreign policy of not talking has FAILED and we are still listening to these "WRONG" arses as if they knew what they were talking about. Now I don't agree with Obama either because he is just as guilty for following failed policy.
Kooshy: great post
No matter how pretty the dress, shade of lipstick and effective the wonder bra, the people don't want to date the Iraq war pig.
To give you an idea of how far the spin goes, here in Denmark, O'Hanlon and Pollock were billed as critics of the Bush war when their puff piece was reported. The thing is, the Bush Lite gov't here will have to defend itself now that the Danish battalion has been brought home from Basra -- they will have to explain what the Danes who came home in boxes died for.
Oldtimer's link above is quite interesting. I draw your attention to the "credentials" of the author of this puff piece: "Her work has appeared on Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, Glenn Beck and The Rant."
There is something coming down the tube, it won't be pretty, it will be blamed om Al Qube, the sheet will hit the fan and it will blow over every man.
This governmnet will continue to kill foreigners and US soldiers for profit until it is overthrown or collapses under it's own stupidity. Why are we suprised?
The way to peace is to kill everyone,so there!
Main Entry: dis·in·for·ma·tion
Pronunciation: (")dis-"in-f&r-'mA-sh&n
Function: noun
: false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth
I'm trying to figure out how we can be arming Sunni militias against the expressed wishes of Maliki and without getting any other sort of permission from the Iraqi government .... and why this isn't obviously a case of undermining the "rule of law", such as it is, not that it's much of an obstacle....
Is this really the sort of Iraqis "standing up" we've been complaining about not seeing? I'm sure that amnesty for the Mahdi Army and the Sadr Corps is in the mail.
These may be TeamBush's most cynical, pandering, bordering on overtly racist (by aiding and abetting genocide) moves yet ...
=========================================================
On edit: I am suspecting this is payback for a number of things -- quite possibly most important putting the kibosh on the walls and fences in Baghdad (which I think made a whole reconfiguration of "the surge" necessary), failing to "pass" the oil revenues bill as Cheney demanded, and failing to make concessions to the Sunni as Cheney and the Saudi's demanded.) The only thing holding Maliki's "coalition" together is fear of what would replace it.