Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Showdown Looming Over Executive Privilege
George W. Bush's presidential tenure has been marked by one cover-up after another. But the masterful spinning of Karl Rove and a compliant media enabled Bush to get away with it. Now that the Democrat-controlled Congress is investigating administration malfeasance, Bush's cover-ups have come cloaked in the guise of "executive privilege."
Bush has claimed executive privilege in resisting congressional subpoenas in the investigation of the U.S. Attorney firing scandal. U.S. Attorneys who weren't "loyal Bushies" were ousted in a mass purge. Bush instructed former White House political director Sara Taylor and former White House counsel Harriet Miers to refuse to testify about any "White House consideration, deliberations or communications" regarding the firings. He also instructed his chief of staff Joshua Bolten to withhold documents demanded by the House Judiciary Committee. Defying a congressional subpoena is a crime.
Taylor testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, invoking the privilege selectively. Miers's and Bolten's situation is even more problematic. They refused to show-up at the House committee altogether. A witness must appear, be sworn, and then invoke the privilege. Miers and Bolten committed a crime when they failed to appear. They could be locked up for ignoring the subpoenas. Bush will claim the Executive is supreme and that his order to Miers and Bolten nullifies the subpoenas.
There are already signs that Bush will refuse to allow his Justice Department to enforce congressional contempt charges. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy responded angrily, saying, "By acting above the law, this President and Vice President seek to override the independence of law enforcement and manipulate our valued system of checks and balances," adding, "an independent review is probably in order." It remains to be seen whether Congress will match its rhetoric with its votes.
As it did after the Haditha massacre, the U.S. military covered up the real cause of Pat Tillman's death. After claiming he died in a heroic gun battle with the enemy, the administration was later compelled to admit Tillman died from "friendly-fire." When the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subpoenaed "all documents received or generated by any official in the Executive Office of the President" relating to Tillman's death, Bush refused, claiming executive privilege. Again, a showdown is looming, this time over documents.
Chairman Henry Waxman and ranking Committee Republican Tom Davis wrote a letter to White House Counsel Fred Fielding, which said: "The Committee hearing [on Tillman's death]. . . raised questions about whether the administration has been providing accurate information to Congress and the American people about the ongoing war in Iraq and Afghanistan."
Congress has three options. First, if a majority of the judiciary committee and the full chamber agree, they can issue contempt citations and then certify them to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," according to a federal statute. But in spite of that statute, the White House will reportedly forbid the Justice Department from pursuing contempt charges.
Second, Congress could invoke its own "inherent contempt" power, direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest the recalcitrant witness, and imprison her in the Capitol basement. This power was last used in 1934.
Finally, Congress can hire counsel to enforce the subpoenas in civil court.
In the past, when the White House and Congress have clashed over claims of executive privilege, the President generally capitulated before criminal proceedings began. But Bush has consistently defied Congress and the courts with his secret spying program and his signing statements. He will likely hold firm, banking on favorable rulings in the increasingly conservative Supreme Court.
Perhaps Congress should subpoena Dick Cheney to shed light on these matters. Since Cheney denies belonging to the executive branch, he'd be hard pressed to assert executive privilege.
Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and President of the National Lawyers Guild. Her new book, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law, was just published. Her articles are archived at http://www.marjoriecohn.com.



41 Comments so far
Show AllI don't believe a true showdown is looming. Note that Leahy says an independent review is "probably" in order. "Probably" is the operative word here. When push comes to shove, the Dims will cave in as they always do. First they posture, then they argue a while, and then they let the Repugs have it their way. I hope I'm wrong, but if the past is prologue, this is just another Repug triumph in the making.
This is another diversion!
"Again, a showdown is looming, this time over documents."
No, it's not. The simpering, spineless Democratic-led Congress will do nothing as Bush and Cheney continue to bitch-slap them into submission. Pelosi keeps impeachment "off the table." Conyers (and others) ignores his constituents' demands for impeachment. Obama says Bush hasn't committed any impeachable offenses. Nobody's investigating the torture and illegal wiretapping that continues. Oil industry's windfall profits and subsidies: who cares! Leahy has done (and will do) nothing to enforce his ignored subpoenas. When Congress gave Bush more money for the Iraq/Afghanistan wars than he requested, we knew what was going to happen: nothing.
Around our house we've started referring to the federal government as "The Party." There is no showdown because there is no opposition. The pretense exists only to distract the rest of us while unified plans to expand the empire - at home and abroad - proceed as ordered by their corporate masters.
Time to stop being fooled.
The Bush Gang has done an outstanding job of closing off any and all means through which accountability might be applied to them. Incompetent though they may be in all other areas, they are expert at using any and all means to keep themselves from being busted by anybody for what they do. Bush's approval rating could go down to below .1 percent and they would continue to do what they do and censures, impeachments, lawsuits, et. al. would continue to go their way.
Watching Alberto Gonzales's testimony, all I could think is what a mealy-mouthed little weasel and I wondered how anybody, even fervent supporters of President Junior, couldn't see it. But they don't want to stop being fooled because being fooled keeps them in the game, ahead on points.
I wish I knew what to do about it, but I don't.
More like a circus than a party. We have a kangaroo Congress with kangaroo courts holding three rings circus'. Listening to Gonzale's comments is too silly for words. I think this is what Orwell referred to as Doublespeak About the only things left in Orwell's picture are gray jumpsuits for all of us and being monitored by the Thought Police.
The GOP should be outlawed in the USA! The are anti-progressive and are the last to face reality, and do nothing but cause grief both in their nation and throughout the world. They believe that Christianity is more truthful than Science, are pathological liars, and claim to be the judge of other Americans as to who is the most worthwhile American. Let's face it, in the USA, a Christian has more worth than a gay person.
If Republicans can throw Communists in jail in the 1950s, so too can Democrats, Socialists, Green etc. can throw Republicans in jail once these parties gain control of the US Government. Only they should go a step further...establish a law that states that any affiliate of the GOP can be arrested for treason. No "fair and speedy trial" is needed for these GOP scum. After all, it was Republicans who believe that any American can be locked up without a trial for violating their concept of "enemy combatant." Plus GOP members are too stupid to clarify what they mean by their invented concept, probably because these people live in the southern part of the USA. The Americans can even make it a spectacle to try these Republican vermin. Now that would be real reality TV!
The American people should forget about electing either the Republican or Republican-lite (Democrat) parties...
The Dems have made a deal with the devil. As much as they protest against Bush's abuse of powers, they fail to impeach because they want these unconstitionally expanded powers preserved for themselves when they THINK they will win the next election.
they dont mind going after the underlings through contempt charges and "investigations" because this will not affect the underlying expanded Presidental powers that are the root cause of the problem.
However, the joke is on them...they will lose on the contempt and executive privelege question, as the fix is already in. Contept of Congress goes to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia..another appointed loyal Bushie, to be tried by another Loyal Bushie judge...who will either not proceed per Bush's instructions, or fix the Grand Jury
If they go the civil route, it goes to the Appointed Loyal Bushie Supremes.
you dont have a chance in hell of bringing the Justice Department to justice, when it judges itself.
why nor just vote for the Mafia or Medellin drug cartel...either are probably more honest and patriotic
sometimes I imagine everyone, conservative, progressive, religious, scientific, none of the above, all going to the polls and voting for ANYONE, whoever it is, as long as they are not of the spoiled "ruling class" we're up to our freakin necks in right now, or interested in joining them (Obama).
ummm, how long has this been going on?
When is Congress going to take action?
We impeached a president for a cat-burglary of documents - nobody died.
We brought impeachment proceedings against a president for lying about philandering, abusing a cigar and staining a dress- again, nobody died.
Now we have a war based on lies, an attorney general who can't keep the facts straight, a CIA agent outed, defense contracts given out like candy, a president invoking executive privilege for every tom, dick, and harriet, and what has happened?
Absolutely nothing!!!
Why don't we just order a crown or a camo-suit and be done with it?
PARANOID PESSIMIST and CANUCK CHUCK cite the major problem here: the ROUTES to real justice are either blocked off or have been co-opted by the neocon chess moves on the big political board. It's like a hurricane warning where all the cars get on the road, but the roads become overloaded so no one is able to make it to safety. The catch 22 of having an illegitimate prez stack the court with MATRIX-like Mr. Smith clones (a/k/a authoritarians, to quote John Dean) means justice as understood in the form of 3 healthy governing branches there to check-balance the potential power abuse of any other is GONE (for now, anyway).
Excuse me Sir Melvin Cleophus for critiquing your post. However, I resent the implication that gay people are not Christians. (Let's face it, in the USA, a Christian has more worth than a gay person.) That is ridiculous. Of course gay people believe in God. Also, living in the south does not make one stupid. Your covering a lot of territory there. And I might add that categorizing people is not a sign of intelligence. All of us are disgusted with the present adminstration and their cronies, however, most GOP voters were taken in by the lies, deception and probably fear. I will hasten to say that I did not ever vote for George Bush (either one) and would like to see him and his on trial. I know some GOPers that would like the same thing.
GOOD POINT ChartreuseMuse!!
What is disheartening is that most Americans truly believe that we have true democracy in this country. Do we really?
Do we really have many choices in the next presidential election? The corporate media, Washington, and corporations have given us 3-4 candidates to choose from. Unfortunately, all bend over to their masters.
The only viable candidate is Kucinich, but the media marginalizes and ridicules him. If 55% of Americans favor impeachment of Tricky Dick and 45% favor impeachment of King George, and if Congress has such a low approval ratings and Americans see no discernable difference between Democrats and Republicans, why does Kucinich only have 2-3% in the polls?
If Americans are so pissed-off at Washington, why don't they take to time to find out what each candidate is saying and discover the glaring deference between Kucinich and the other candidates and support Kucinich?
I am aware that there are some gay people who are Christians, octotroph. Why are there gay Christians? I have no idea, since Christianity is used as a tool of oppression against them in the USA, so is Islam, and Republicans love insulting gay people over there every chance they have; but it never made sense to me to affiliate with a group who is against your personhood. Sure some gay people believe in God as well, but not in the true God and have a hard time doing what this God expects. The Judeo-Christian God, as interpreted by Evangelical Christians, demands of gay people the renunciation of themselves. They are the REAL Christians in the USA as they have said so. Evangelist holy-rolling Christians are on the rise in the USA also.
You say people who live in southern USA are not stupid? They are if they are unable to anunciate proper English correctly, while prohibiting Spanish being taught in schools. Most in that part of the USA are Republican racist Christians too, if YOU know the history of the people you are sticking up for. Defending them only portrays you to be just them in my mind despite your claim not to have voted for Bush Sr. or Jr. Guess what? I don't care if this assumption may or may not be true.
Categorizing people is not a sign of intelligence? Tell that to Evangelical Christians, Catholics, and as many Americans as possible before you let me in on that secret. Let me guess, people from Southwest Asia who live in the USA are automatically suspected terrorists? They are more watched than any demographic over there are they not? Yeah...I thought so!
It's like after that last election. I said I'll wait to celebrate until something good happens. I'm stilling waiting.
Throw those Dem's some pork and they will go back to sleep like they do with every other crisis. We truly are on the 'eve of destruction'.
"Enunciate", Sir M. Cleo. And I'm from the South--Texas, no less--but my English skills are on a par with anyone in the world. (I write formal legal documents for a living.)
Siouxrose: You are right on, for the most part. One addition, though: Remember that IF we had a real opposition party, we could impeach the Fascist Five as well. But "aye, there's the rub": no serious opposition...
"[. . .]Congress could invoke its own "inherent contempt" power, direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest the recalcitrant witness, and imprison her in the Capitol basement."
To quote Tom Servo, "OHPLEASEOHPLEASEOHPLEASE!"
:)
While reading these insightful posts, a horrible thought came to mind...
The "state of emergency clause" where the elections could be pre-empted indefinitely; our terrorist czar's "gut feeling" about another 911; and the fact that W is so damned dumb...
What if they all collide in one ugly-demon-nightmare-terrorist-attack-from-hell?
Like some bad thing happens that kills thousands of--Americans, of course--and W... or maybe just W. Cheney would be the "el supremo" and that would be that. No honeymoon, no mercy, hello serfdom for most of the population of the planet, including the U S of A.
It was just a thought...
that gave me an awful chill.
The two headed hydra called our political establishment plays the game well, and we fall for it every time. Nothing ever changes. Ever. Rotten noises and smells can be felt over the horizon, as per gut feelings, imminent threats and constant terra terra booga booga. Something is coming, courtesy of the criminals in office, a Pearl Harbor like event redux.
The aftereffects will be chilling. For a sobering and excellent vision into what awaits us, I recommend reading "America's Tomorrow", a chilling look at life in America in the not too distant future. Is it inevitable? I hold no illusions that it is not. Link below.
Great question usrcjp!!
Why does Kucinich truly believe in his positions?
I'm going to sleep on this....right...now.......(I'm an Eastcoaster....please forgive me).
Why be afraid of ghosts, demons, fear itself? Indeed, if push ever came to shove a true patriot would need to muster a hell of a lot more courage than cowering from hypothetical problems.
A scenario like that would present more of an opportunity than a dictatorship. It would serve only to galvanize Americans of all walks of life.
Bush simply doesn't have the popular support or trust that Hitler enjoyed, nor does he have a relatively disarmed populace that other unitaries have enjoyed.
I think you're right about another event though.
If only there were a pair of cajones left in Congress, we could cut through all this crap and simply arrest the Loonitary Executive for confessing to illegally spying on American citizens, a violation of FISA, which states that even a sitting President can be indicted for said illegalities.
Oh, sorry, I forgot - executive privilege. Got it. Please don't freeze my assets for daring to suggest... wait a sec - I don't have any assets...
What Bush is the Greatest Republican President of All-time…. Right??
Bush is a tough act to follow and will go down as the "Greatest Republican President of all-time. Think for a moment, what Republican President do all the Republican candidates at least once a debate refer to, "Ronald The Great Reagan". By all republican standards George has far surpassed Ronny and should be considered the greatest republican president to date. Let's review the facts.
The real standards republicans use to measure their Presidents are the following:
(Please remember we only have space for a few highlights, these lists and there support would fill volumes.)
1) The amount of worldwide destruction and terror their administration caused; Reagan Iran-Contra, Bush Iraq war, Afghanistan War, worldwide terror squads. Winner Bush hands down, ps…in his day Reagan/ Old Bushes admin was number 1.
2) The amount of despair and hopelessness caused to the greatest majority of free Americans by; not raising minimum wage, shifting the tax burden to the middle class, cutting social programs; OK I'll concede this one is a tie, they are both number 1..
3) Allowing the most corporate fraud; (critical category to major party donors) Winner Bush hands down, ps…in his day Reagan/(Old Bushes admin was number 1.
4) Spreading propaganda and destroying Americans freedom and liberty; once again Winner Bush hands down, ps…in his day Reagan/ Old Bushes admin was number 1.
5) Finally who maintained the largest most wasteful military budgets while cutting the most social programs and created the greatest amount of deficit spending, yes boys and girl this is the corner stone of any successful modern republican president; Well by now this must sound like a broken record; Winner Bush hands down, Bushes old man number 2, Bushes old mans first term/Reagan's term) number 3 .
As we all know, only Freedom hating, war loving, Liberty hating, brown-nosing, greedy sycophants would ever follow the orders of this dung-beetle we call Mr. President.
At one time I would see a general and I would think of courage and wisdom. Now All I think about is how much of my hard earned tax dollars are spent feeding and clothing this despicably gutless ass-kisser.
Freezing assets when most Americans "saved negatively" last year might actually do some people more good than harm. They've not owned so little equity on their homes, on average, since the Great Depression according to some estimates...
Hey, I know! Let's just blithely wait for armageddon.
Oh goody...the Democrats are coming, the Democrats are coming! It's like having the Keystone Kops on the beat.
Shit.
Nuts! Let's get Vlad to impail the whole bunch and start over.
This is nonsense. Our country desperately needs a third independent party. The 2-party system is hopeless. Look at the record of the Democrats. Aside from Gulf War 1, they have gotten our country into every war we have been involved in during the 20th century. Can we seriously expect anything different in the 21st?
Give up on the Democrats. The Greens have a great platform but many "progressives" are afraid to be associated with them. The media therefore ignores them. What the hell is the problem? I can only conclude that most "progressives" are thoroughly brainwashed into believing in our change-preventing two party system. Nader was right in 2000 and he remains right tonight. Too bad we are not honest enough with ourselves to face that fact. The greatest challenge we face today is eliminating our current political system.
I love all of you! You're the GREATEST!!
I do wish we could all meet someday! Wouldn't that be fun?
Goodnight. And good luck.
This just in!!
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Countdown-Bush-Fein.mov
I admire Marjorie Cohn and others like her who are not afraid to speak the truth about the power-abusing, parasitic criminals in DC. However, there is no way that any showdown is looming. I have held that same mistaken impression many, many times over the past nearly seven years. I have since awoken from my dream of 'liberty and justice for all' and now realize that the thugs in the White House have finally found away to create a completely fascist dictatorship and, with the help of a complicit, spineless Congress, still manage to disguise it as a democratic republic.
I think Ms. Cohn, like most Americans, is still operating under the mistaken impression that Democracy and egalitarianism actually exist in the United States. News flash: it's a myth; it's a lie. It's BS. This country is the most rabidly profit=driven, stratified country in the world and it has not operated democratically for years now--if ever. This delusion is maintained at the direction and benefit of the privileged elite, which includes the millionaires who inhabit the House and Senate. Make no mistake, there is no line of distinction between our Congressional democrats and republicans. They simply maintain the appearance of two separate ideologies when, in reality, they are two identical parts of the United States's ruling class. Republicans and democrats are not working in opposition. On the contrary, central to their self-preservation is to simply appear adversarial while assuring that their political power and wealth increase, along with that of their cronies, at the expense of WE THE PEOPLE, the truth, equity, and the PEOPLE'S civil liberties. The US is an elitist, oligarchal plutocracy. Politicians, corporations, and media conglomerates--also part of the ruling class--collude to manipulate the masses into believing the myth of democracy. While distracting the masses from their unspeakable, patholgical greed and crimes by use of fascist tactics and propaganda, these unconscionable criminals are able to convince the masses to repeatedly vote against their own economic self-interests.
Our ruling elite is not interested in social issues, equity, the process of ethics, or the rule of law. They don't "support the troops," and they know we're not in Iraq or anyplace else in the world for benevolent purposes. In fact, they are all complicit of egregious mass murder and treason. They are calculating, corrupt, spineless, lying thugs whose only real interest is to preserve their perverse status quo.
Democracy? What a crock. A prescient Justice Brandeis opined many years ago that we "can have great wealth in the hands of a few, or democracy, but we cannot have both." Our dismal state of affairs in the US today is a direct result of a consumer based, profit-driven Capitalist society that is completely antithetical to egalitarianism, and which places no value on anything except superficialities, wealth, and power.
Big Money gives Bush it's highest ratings. We are trying to cure the symptoms, not the disease. http://ni4d.us/
I agree neither the Democrats nor Republicans work for the majority of Americans. Too bad this country is no longer a democracy which is free to elect a Presidential ticket that would be concerned about the majority of the people in this great nation. If such a great number of people did not feel so disenfranchised and were free to vote for the candidates that would do the most good for the most people, a ticket of Al Sharpton/Ralph Nadar would be possible.
Since the republicans have shown exactly what the party stands for over the last seven years: greed, fear, illegal war, threat of more wars, bankrupting the country, lies, obstructing justice, election fraud, gutting social programs, vulture capitalists, more greed, and more fear; therefore no sane American, who is not directing benefiting from the above mentioned policies would even consider voting republican. So clearly any Democratic or third party candidate will easily win in 2008, right?
Sadly, that is not the case. Since free press in this country is simply a whimsical myth from a by-gone era coupled with the insane dogma freely spewed in the right wing and corporate controlled news media, this will be a close race. Henceforth, we must not forget that the Democratic Party leaders though far from perfect are our ONLY hope.
With that said I will be praying Dennis Kucinich becomes one of those leaders.
I really don't think Kucinich has a chance in hell within the Democratic Party. I think he knows this as well since the Democratic leadership does not and will not support his positions. He should recognize that he is only being used to attract more voters and leave the party. Instead, he chooses to stay. If he truly believes in his positions, why does he do this?
Freedom Loving American--You have the Repugs well figured out with your list of accomplishments. Sort of unbelievable in six years time. As for our beloved decider, he was priviledged from the time he popped out until the present, so why would he not expect to use executive priviledge to the maximum also? We need a Tom Delay in the Dumocrat party to get something done besides talk .
I'm myself, you cracked me up.
RON, you were first to comment and you are probably right,__ like you,__ I hope not too. We'll see.
This article got me thinking; what if the Democrats are baiting Bush into breaking the law? As it stands, there is no way to impeach Bush, there is no proof that he commited any crimes (yet). If however, Bush were to order the Justice Department to not do their job...well, that just might be enough for an impeachment.
Leahy said, "By acting above the law, this President and Vice President seek to override the independence of law enforcement and manipulate our valued system of checks and balances,"
Lunafish, I think that thought constantly as I live near a port. John Dean and Chomsky themselves have written enough to give one pause re loose (suitcase) nukes.
Perhaps this is a thought that occurs to a lot of folks as ridiculous protocol mandates padding down grannies, leaving the southern border wide open (vehicle-wise), and eavesdropping on all kinds of people who've not even seriously questioned authority once in their lives.
Ok, perhaps a showdown will take a while. But I'm encouraged by questioning from the Senate Judiciary Committee.
I AM liberal, but am increasingly struck at how conservative my concerns re defense of the mainland seem at times when I compare them to the risks the Bush admin is willing to countenance (and at how much more my thought dwells on "the swamp" aspect than does...what both Dem & Pub wonks have to say about same). All our resources going into defending primo oil access while wide open avenues that would facilitate your "thought" go unaddressed. It's like some kind of casino mentality. Everytime I heard about the agenda of the attorneys that were let go...it seemed like the cases they had taken on were pertinent to our situation. And it seemed like the focus the admin would have preferred ='d cavalcade of side shows. In retrospect now, it seems that if the admin desired law, order, transparency, and low risk...they would have kept the serving attorneys in their positions. On the other hand, if the admin wanted the trapeze act to pile on more and more plates...same old players moving the same mobware and porkware down the silk road in anarchyland...man they sure made the moves that made'm look guilty. My way of looking at things tells me it was part to a continuing coup on law and order as I understand it...or, at the very least, meddling with the functioning of government (paid for by tax payers) to promote purist, doctrinaire, right-wing Republican ideology. IOW a costly coup and a blatant coup though perhaps not technically illegal...for the sake of theory (and/or enforcing probability/risk level preferred by the house). Yes, it seems like the laws and the "order" that that ideology seeks to guarantee are tantamount only to a climate favorable to the entities that have had all the cuts of the action all along anyway...which at the people's level by now has now spelled out a chaos that should've caused all anarchists to abandon their philosophy. My perceptions give me this slant. Of course, if they are somehow skewed...please let me know how.
GIOVANNA: Excellent points.