Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
With Iraq on Fire, Rest of World on Hold
WASHINGTON - Two months ago, President Bush enthusiastically accepted an invitation to visit Singapore in September. But he abruptly changed plans, and his summit with Southeast Asian leaders is off. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is skipping an Asian meeting, too, and tossed out plans to visit Africa this week. Defense Secretary Robert Gates' mission to Latin America? Postponed.
The reason is Iraq.
As the White House struggles to show progress in the 52-month-old war, other important global issues increasingly are getting pushed to the side, according to U.S. officials, diplomats and analysts.
"The United States is very focused on Iraq and the Middle East. We know we are not a white-heat zone . . . which is good for us. But it means we are not on top of the list," said Heng Chee Chan, Singapore's ambassador to the United States.
Bush had promised to attend a summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations - which includes several longtime U.S. allies - in Singapore in September. Chen said the summit had been postponed, not canceled.
Few doubt Iraq's centrality in U.S. foreign policy. Failure there could damage America's prestige for years, if not decades, and suck Iraq's neighbors into the vortex of violence.
But the high-level U.S. attention and energy drawn away from all but a handful of other world problems is yet another cost of the Iraq war.
"Canceling a meeting here or there may not seem like a big deal, but the slights are piling up," Asia expert Walter Lohman of the conservative Heritage Foundation wrote recently. "Unless the Bush administration can quickly get back on track, the game is over; it will fall to the next president to revitalize the U.S. commitment" to Asia.
Bush and his aides have torn up their schedules before a crucial report on progress in Iraq due Sept. 15 from Iraq top U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker.
Gates earlier this month postponed a visit to some of the closest U.S. allies in the Western Hemisphere - El Salvador, Colombia, Peru and Chile - to be on hand for the release of an interim Iraq report to Congress.
Rice was supposed to be en route to Ghana this week for a meeting on expanding trade and curbing poverty in Africa.
Instead, she found herself Wednesday on Capitol Hill lobbying lawmakers not to set a deadline to bring American troops back from Iraq. She addressed the Africa group by video link Thursday.
Staffing has taken a hit, too. Embassies and offices in the State Department have come to expect a cut in resources for projects other than Iraq, a senior State Department official said.
"Everybody is subject to an Iraq tax. They basically know they will give up resources for Iraq," said the official, who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.
When Crocker complained in late May that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad didn't have enough highly qualified staff, the State Department's response included sending one of its top experts on the Arab world, Robert Ford, back to Baghdad. He was pulled from Algeria, where he'd been ambassador less than a year.
With just 18 months left in office, Bush appears to have settled on a few top-flight issues - Iraq, the "war on terrorism," North Korea and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - to shape his legacy.
Rice recently held an unpublicized, two-day retreat with her senior staff to discuss policy priorities and State Department management in the remainder of Bush's term.
But other regions of the world also hold important potential for U.S. security and prosperity.
In Latin America, many leaders are struggling to maintain close ties with Washington despite the increasingly anti-American mood there spurred by popular anger over the war in Iraq. China has expanded its influence and trade there.
Sub-Saharan Africa, where Rice has stopped only briefly in her two and a half years as secretary of state, is by far the most pro-American region in the world, according to a recent poll by the Pew Research Center, but it isn't on anyone's priority list.
Nowhere is the lack of U.S. leadership felt more keenly than in East Asia, where China's growing economic and political power has left midsize nations traditionally sympathetic to the United States nervous about the future, critics said.
While the State Department hasn't formally announced that Rice will skip an Association of Southeast Asian Nations meeting in the Philippines later this month, officials said she planned to travel to the Middle East instead.
"Our commitment to the (East Asian) region is not in question," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said. Rice, he said, "is secretary of state for the entire globe."
But news media in Southeast Asia reflect a mix of disappointment and bitterness over Rice's no-show in Manila, after her absence from the annual meeting two years ago.
"ASEAN on the back burner as Iraq, Middle East take center stage in final months of Bush presidency," read a headline this week in Singapore's Straits Times.
"We are disappointed that Secretary Rice will not participate in the ASEAN regional forum meetings this year," said Matthew Daley, a former State Department official who's the president of the U.S.-ASEAN Business Council.
Rice's deputy, John Negroponte, will take her place, Daley noted.
The United States exports more to the countries of Southeast Asia than it does to China.
Charles Kupchan, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a research center, said the administration was probably less Iraq-focused than it was in Bush's first term, when the buildup to the invasion trumped all other issues. The president deserves credit for engaging with Europe and upgrading relations with India, Kupchan said.
"Things don't look as good when you come to other regions," particularly Southeast Asia and the far-reaching changes stemming from China's rise, he said. "There doesn't seem to be anybody who's minding the store at the top level."
© Copyright 2007, The McClatchy Washington Bureau
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


34 Comments so far
Show AllHere's another possible reason: Iran. With Iran soon on fire, the rest of the world will be on fire, too.
This is interesting. I think the erosion of US global dominance has been one of the few positive outcomes of the catastrophe in Iraq. However, a major outstanding question is who, if anyone, will fill the power vacuum that is being created. Ideally, we would end up with a more egalitarian playing field, where no one nation demonstrates absolute "leadership" (meaning dictatorship) over the others.
The world should consider themselves lucky that our "Fearless Leader"and his underlings have other,more pressing problems to attend to.
Sub-Saharan Africa is probably still pro-American because they're not on our priority list and Rice has only visited twice.
It is often the little comments stuck in the middle of a text that grabs me. This one is a beaut.__ ("Nowhere is the lack of U.S. leaership felt more keenly than in East Asia".)
The U.S. leadership??? ____ It's time to vomit.
We sink further into the quicksand, still striving for the mirage of victory in Iraq. It sucks up more and more of our resources of men, women, money, time. We are increasingly unable to spare any for the rest of the world.
We miss out on opportunities to do good. Zimbabwe is a prime example. The outgoing ambassador did his best (Christopher Dell-I applaud his efforts).
This country is imploding (due to its vampire one-party government) and is already starting to destabilize the Republic of South Africa, the key to southern Africa and a place where whites and blacks are trying to live in racial harmony.
Iraq is a black hole, sucking in the energy that we could have used to illuminate the world (of course, we would need moral leaders instead of the Prince of Darkness and Chimpy McFlightSuit and our Congress full of nothing).
If I am a struggling government in SE Asia, Latin america, and Africa, I should be cheering on the Iraqi insurgency and Afghan Taliban.
Every dollar and life spent by the US in Iraqi and Afghani meddling is that much less available to do the same in other regions in the world. Maybe when this mess in Iraq reaches its 5th anniversary (3/18/08) the Nobel committee could announce the "Peace" prize being awarded to the Iraqi people.
The proclamation could read in part, "for conspicuous sacrifice on behalf of the rest of the human race by keeping the United States occupied in Iraq thereby reducing its capacity to make mischief throughout the rest of the world."
"With just 18 months left in office, Bush appears to have settled on a few top-flight issues - Iraq, the "war on terrorism," North Korea and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - to shape his legacy."
Really? That will be interesting since his legacy so far will be that of an impotent and ignorant tyrant. Texas Rangers, Harken Energy, Texas Air National Guard, Governor of Texas, and as President of the US, this guy has F'd up everything he ever did. Everything. Can anyone name anything he has done that has worked as advertised or even come close to being something other than a complete failure?
Let's just examine the Gobal War On Terror... GWOT... one of the things Shrubby wants to have a "legacy" for...
First off, terrorism is a method not a place or nation or even a tribe of people. How did we declare war on a method and how did over 300 million Americans fail to recognize this? It was easy once the corporate media conflated terrorists with radical fundamentalist Muslims. The truth is that only a very small minority of Muslims are not radicals, and many fundamentalist Muslims do not believe in violence. Sort of like how here in the US many fundamentalist Christians do not believe in violence or blowing up abortion clinics either. GWB...
2nd - Osama bin Laden is still free and unnacounted for... At Tora Bora no one seems to know where the order came from or high up the chain of command it came from, but someone told the 10th Mtn Div. US Marines to stand down while Osama's friend (the new Afghan Army - which did not really exist yet) was allowed to escort him to Pakistan. Embedded corporate reporters were told it was to allow Afghanistan to show its support for the... GWOT that's right you guessed it!!
3rd - Conflating Iraq with Al-Qaeda seems to have really made things much worse. It was a grab for what has long been thought of as unclaimed oil since it belonged to an American lackey, Saddam Hussein. Who had never shown any support for any terrorist group, ever. Sure, he was a terror to his own people, but he posed no threat to the US ever, even in 1991. this action also ignored the fact that Iran assisted the 9-11 hijackers with a free pass through their country for many of the hijackers to allow them to appear to have come from somewhere other than Afghanistan. It also left open in Afghanistan a power vaccuum for the Taliban to fill. So now, 4 years out we have created a new breeding and training ground for wanna be terrorists in Iraq, while completely failing to give Afghanistan back to the Afghan's and ignoring Iran's role in 9-11. One can only hope that the mission was to create anarchy and chaos in the Middle East, since this will no doubt be his only legacy... failure.
Personally, I don't give a damn what happens to the prestige of the United States overseas. It no longer deserves prestige. If both parties insist on continuing and widening a conflagration in the Middle East that no one asked for, they have forfeited their right to govern.
All that matter now is a democratic resistance from below, and what few allies it may find in the mainstream. Everything else is bullshit. The time for working with the "democrats" as a political unit of opposition has come and gone. Now it's time to get serious. We should be working on breaking chunks off of both major parties, and integrating them into those pieces of a third party force that function. No other task is concrete. Any work with the mainstream parties now is a pipe dream. The very assumption that the U.S., as presently constituted, should have any say in world affairs, is dogma. It's time to move on.
@ Locust:
"...we would need moral leaders instead of the Prince of Darkness and Chimpy McFlightSuit and our Congress full of nothing."
Thankyou, -really enjoyed your creative and apt turn of phrase there m'dear!
There are times when I wished that a certain period of time would "fly by." That desire could not be any stronger for the next 18 months to do so. And there is one word to describe George Bush's legacy as President: complete failure (ok, two words).
It doesn't take a genius to figure out why Iraq has all the attention. That's where the OIL is!
The international ruling fascist oligarchy's supreme stupidity is that their "faith based market" depredations and war based economies are polarizing the world. Chaos has taken an ever growing life of its own. Latin America is heading left and the Middle East theocracy is getting stronger.
Oligopolies are destroying competition-dependent capitalism. The middle class is disappearing, the poor are getting poorer and the plutocrat fraction of 1% now owns and controls over ninety percent of all the world's resources. Thanks to our ruling elite, almost everybody hates Americans. They have been too successful in fooling some of the sheeple and radicalizing everyone.
It is a matter of time before nuclear bombs start exploding worldwide, setting any survivors back to the stone age. At least the ignorant Xtians are honest about wanting the rapture. Their oligarch masters do not because their God is Mammon, but they religiously believe that they can keep invading and oppressing the world forever without the blowback affecting them in their mansions and on their yachts.
Neoconned,
Never heard of Iran's involvement in 9/11? Don't you think that if there were even an iota of truth there, BushCo and media would have made mountains of it, in as much as Bush/Cheney love to attack Iran? Didn't you mean Israel, because I've read a lot about Israel's covert complicity in 9/11?
herb,
This all started with a stolen election during the first term. From then on it was downhill for the US. All Bush cares about is his legacy ? That confirms hubris is the measure that matters in the US executive branch of government. Bush's my way or no way policy decided upon by Cheney and company where no debate is allowed led to violations of the US Constitution on too many occasions to ennumerate. And then the weak branch of government, the Legislative Branch, did not have the balls or the intelligence to question these policies and to call those breaking the whole being of the Constitution, be it its amendments about search and siezure or the controlling of the purse string, this branch, the legislative branch, did not call any of these actions into question and persist in seeing that this overstepping of authority was stopped, controlled and ended.
The little chimp has his fist stuck in a monkey trap. Even though Iraqi oil might drain out of his hand, he is still keeping his hand in a fist.
I for one hope the Bush theftcapade fails.
I also like the way eshu (July 22nd, 2007 3:01 pm) thinks. A third party could work if enough people fled from the neoconmen and the dysfunctional Democrats to swell the ranks of an anti-fascist party.
Bush is too dumb to walk and chew gum at the same time, let alone juggle more than one world issue...badly
"With Iraq on Fire, Rest of World on Hold"
"The Iraqi civil war has left the Americas a chance to fend off the Yankee hegemony."
A little insight on who is really in control......
http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/political/jews/jews_run_world.htm
PETERW: As per filling the vacuum left by the US impotence (based on overextension of resources, military and hubris): How about rather than ONE nation, several trading blocks that work more eclectically. For instance, the EURO and Europe, a legion of South American nations congregating around Chavez, and perhaps something similar for portions of Asia. We don't need a NEW bully on the block.
POET says," Every dollar and life spent by the US in Iraqi and Afghani meddling is that much less available to do the same in other regions in the world. Maybe when this mess in Iraq reaches its 5th anniversary (3/18/08) the Nobel committee could announce the "Peace" prize being awarded to the Iraqi people." EXCELLENT insight!
NEOCONNED: Good analysis; although a lot more numerical positions could be filled with domestic policy sins and blunders of an egregious nature.
EZE: Don't forget Mother Nature gets to VOTE on "the status quo." And some of us believe higher forces hear, and eventually respond to our prayers for change! Perhaps whatever force works beneficently awaits a critical mass of enough minds and hearts locked into the VISION of what is possible for mankind, rather than the sinking, stinking "ship" of what was.
For those that didn't get this there is a video that is powered by Eco Cyclists called "Robert Newman's History of Oil" he is a political comedian and has grasped the reality of the entire situation. Please watch it for yourself since it is one of the most informative videos of our times.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159&q=The+History+of+Oil&total=790&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
So please watch this as there is much to learn and it is depicted in a light humorous way.
By the way I lived in Singapore for half of 2004, and one day I was having lunch at a very hip holistic center that sold interesting books, CDS, and sponsored lecturers. Word was that the president-king was about to turn power over to his son and that there was going to be an ELECTION. I respondned nonchalantly that they hardly needed an election, if power was going to pass from father to son. People looked at me with shocked expressions, as if I had let something taboo out of the bag, and yet it was so obvious! I was told to BE QUIET and be careful of making comments like that! The citizens of Singapore impressed me. The place is clean and has the most efficient mass transit I've ever seen. The Arab community is nestled in the small metropolis and I loved having lunch there. There's also "Little India" which is easier to take than the real thing (India), at least for me. I loved the way so many ethnic communities did their thing in PEACE and community. It's a VERY enlightened place, if cast under its own authoritarian "rule." This may explain why they wanted Bush to visit. (Of course Singapore is a very prosperous port city, and they probably require US trade to sustain their fiscal plentitude, even if they are one of the chief nations loaning us money these days.)
ALL young men in Singapore (regardless of social or economic status) MUST serve 2 years in the military. The internet cafes are filled with them practicing war on video games where wounds of course remain virtual.
A one legged man in a butt kicking contest might well rent a wheel chair, that would at least protect his own butt. Sorry but dummy lacks the sense to do that. We held our breath while he was out on Sat and The Real Tricky Dicky had the bat in his hand thankfully nobody was pitching. Time is now to get rid of the R's and bad D's.
Actually Bush has accomplished alot since he has been in office. He has managed to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and our sons and daughters and to help finish off what Bill Clinton wasn''t able to finish through the cruel embargos and let's not forget the thousands Bush Sr. has killed. Daddy must be proud of Jr. He's managed to kill so much more effectively and with less compassion than any other president to date. If I ever met Bush Sr. I would ask him if he's proud of his murdering son. I'm sure he would say Yes. Like father like son what a family!!!
nothing left but a revolution........
Zinn was on C-Span Saturday. He talked about the need for people to start a new social movement in this country. To become aware of their own power. To organize and change history. The glaring solution is in front of our noses. The National Initiative is the way. Hope people wake up and realize that THE PROBLEM IS REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT! That we have to LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE!
nomorebombs
I'M WITH YOU! We MUST keep on doing what we're doing on these sites, keep talking to those WHO AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION, keep dogging our representatives until THEY HEAR US and get that they will be voted out of office next election, but even more so WE SHOULD ALL BE ON OUR WAY TO WASHINGTON TO STORM THE PEARLY GATES, LET THEM KNOW THAT WE'RE ANGRY AND NOT TAKING IT ANY MORE, AND YANK All THEIR MURDEROUS ASSES OUT AND TRY THEM ALL FOR THEIR CRIMES.
everything is about iraq and for iraq. is this the united states of iraq? maybe the news media should have nothing but news about iraq from now on.
Blogging and writing comments such as this one is, sadly, taking the heat out of the opposition to failed US policies. The Viet Nam War was stopped, albeit a bit late, not with internet chit chat but with hard core, peaceful protesting that didn't let up. In the case of Iraq, the whole world demonstrated their opposition to the invasion of Iraq, then after we were ignored, we gave up, went to out computers, and while sipping lattes, began to complain. We are great complainers and make great comments that could be helpful if anyone were to put them into use, but no one is listening and we are too comfortable to do what it takes to be heard.
The empire appears to be overstretched.
We have idiots and crooks running the country. What do you expect? Bush and co. were isolationists, as the journalists pointed out before Bush was selected as president, and now he has proved it. Everyone around the world hates America and Americans, except for of course, Isreal and - I was gonna include England, but the people there hate us to. Oh well what do you expect. Idiots voted for the idiots that are now running the country...into the ground. It's that old saying: You get what you paid for. So the people who voted for Bush have nothing to complain about. The Republican Party is nothing but a cult and the people who call themselves Republicans are nothing but cultists. They are no different than the Nazi Party of the thirties and forties. I hope they are proud of themselves for getting us into this mess that Bush and Co. has created. Se la vi.
Yo Laddy--It's "C'est la vie!"--I definately agree with you on the cultist nature of Republican party leadership.
Bush does not understand the first thing about history, science, foreign affairs or diplomacy. With his delusional arrogance, stubbornness and stupidity, his every gesture is anti-diplomacy. If he's too busy in Iraq to be interacting with other countries, that is one good thing. The only good news I've heard in a while.