Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- Revealed: How the FBI Coordinated the Crackdown on Occupy
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- The Only Way Left to Beat GOP Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Fabricated "Cliff"
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- Revealed: How the FBI Coordinated the Crackdown on Occupy
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
- The Only Way Left to Beat GOP Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Fabricated "Cliff"
Popular content
Today's Top News
From the Grave, a Senator Exposes Bloody Hands on Capitol Hill
It was a chilling moment on a split-screen of history. While the Senate debated the Iraq war on Tuesday night, a long-dead senator again renounced a chronic lie about congressional options and presidential power.The Senate was in the final hours of another failure to impede the momentum of war. As the New York Times was to report, President Bush "essentially won the added time he said he needed to demonstrate that his troop buildup was succeeding."
Meanwhile, inside a movie theater on the opposite coast, the thunderous voice of Senator Wayne Morse spoke to 140 people at an event organized by the activist group Sacramento for Democracy. The extraordinary senator was speaking in May 1964 -- and in July 2007.
A typical dash of media conventional wisdom had set him off. The moderator of the CBS program "Face the Nation," journalist Peter Lisagor, told the guest: "Senator, the Constitution gives to the president of the United States the sole responsibility for the conduct of foreign policy."
"Couldn't be more wrong," Morse shot back. "You couldn't make a more unsound legal statement than the one you have just made. This is the promulgation of an old fallacy that foreign policy belongs to the president of the United States. That's nonsense."
Lisagor sounded a bit exasperated: "To whom does it belong, then, Senator?"
Again, Morse didn't hesitate. "It belongs to the American people," the senator fired back. And he added: "What I'm saying is -- under our Constitution all the president is, is the administrator of the people's foreign policy, those are his prerogatives, and I'm pleading that the American people be given the facts about foreign policy --"
"You know, Senator, that the American people cannot formulate and execute foreign policy --"
"Why do you say that? Why, you're a man of little faith in democracy if you make that kind of comment," Morse retorted. "I have complete faith in the ability of the American people to follow the facts if you'll give them. And my charge against my government is we're not giving the American people the facts."
As Wayne Morse spoke, applause pulsed through the theater. I've seen the same thing happen many times this summer -- whether in New York or D.C. or San Luis Obispo or Sacramento -- with audiences suddenly bursting into loud applause when they hear Morse near the end of the documentary film ("War Made Easy," based on my book of the same name).
Even most antiwar activists don't seem to know anything about Wayne Morse. Whited out of political memory and media history, he was long ago banished to an Orwellian vacuum tube.
Compared to Morse -- even today, more than four years into the horrendous Iraq war -- almost every "antiwar" member of the U.S. Senate is restrained and unduly deferential to presidential war-making power. If you doubt that, consider the Senate's 97-0 vote in mid-July that laid a flagstone on a path toward military confrontation with yet another country: warning Iran that it would be held accountable for an alleged role in attacks on U.S. soldiers in Iraq.
Morse's exchange with the "Face the Nation" host on May 24, 1964, occurred more than two months before the Gulf of Tonkin resolution sailed through Congress on the basis of presidential lies about a supposed unprovoked attack on U.S. ships in the Tonkin Gulf. Morse was one of only two members of the entire Congress to vote against that resolution, which served as a green light for massive escalation of the Vietnam War.
As the years of carnage went by, Senator Morse never let up. And so, when a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee neared a close on February 27, 1968, Morse said -- on the record -- that he did not "intend to put the blood of this war on my hands."
A big media lie is that members of Congress are doing all they can when they try and fail to pass measures that would impose a schedule for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. The Constitution gives Congress the power to pay for war -- and to stop a war by refusing to appropriate money for it. Every vote to pay for more war is soaked with blood.
Wayne Morse knew that truth -- and said it out loud. Today, few senators come close.
The new documentary film "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death" is based on Norman Solomon's book of the same title. Grassroots groups have begun to show the DVD around the country. For information about the full-length movie, produced by the Media Education Foundation and narrated by Sean Penn, go here.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

54 Comments so far
Show AllWhat's the alternative to proportional representative voting? Is it the mathematical sensibility of 1 person = 1 vote that worries you or the representative part? I agree that some sort of meritocracy would be nice, but who gets to judge who's best? And does everyone have equal access to the same level/quality of education/experience to make it a fair criteria?
As for IRV, I agree somewhat on that. It might merely degenerate to 3 party, as Australia has -- but at least you have some independents as well.
Still, I'm more inclined toward Range, in which a value can be attributed to all candidates, independently.
conscience, you make a good point. If Reid canceled the recess, I would think he was serious about trying to stop the occupation. But I would bet money he won't do that and I only bet on sure things. In spite of kivals' wishful thinking, the Democrats are a lost cause. Definition of insanity: to do the same thing 20 times, getting the same result, and do it again, thinking this time it will be different. Kivals, how many times do you have to be betrayed by the Democrats before you figure out they will do it every time?
@ McDee
Re. Sen. Morse, "... there aren't any like him and haven't been for some time."
Appreciate the sentiment, but what about Paul Wellstone, or Bernie Sanders, or, for that matter, Sen. Byrd in his (albeit belated] reincarnation as a gadfly upon the State?
First past the post means one person one vote and consituency one representative, which wouldn't be the case proportional rip off voting, which means voting for a faceless party list and having no representative for any constituency, thus nobody to do real constituency work for the folks, and it sucks! Please read what I said about Abraham Lincoln and what's going on the European continent as result of the PR voting.
If you like fascism, you'll love PR voting. Progressives don't have a chance with it, but without as in Canada and the UK, they're coming back, and they're going to come back big time.