EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Walking the Talk of Peacemaking
Peacemaking is a passive activity, right? Or at least it's an absence of war. Yes?After spending 18 months of observing and talking with local peace activists since the start of this war with Iraq, I learned that peacemaking is really an action-oriented endeavor that takes much time, integrity, ingenuity, commitment, determination, discipline, restraint and sacrifice.
First of all, to adopt a vision of peace and enact it in one's daily life requires an intense and unwavering conviction that you can make a difference in the world, or as Gandhi reportedly put it: "Be the change you wish to see." Such peaceful, nonviolent aspirations are radical departures from war and violence, which assume that forcefulness can effectively control people or situations-and should.
What I also discovered about peace activists is that while people may want to be peacemakers, they may find it difficult to pursue this noble cause in isolation. They must be part of a group that consistently challenges its members to be true to the virtues of peacemaking. For example, while demonstrating for peace on the street, it is easy to get caught up in a moment of passion when war supporters in passing cars shout nasty remarks or make obscene gestures. Activists need each other to remind them of their purpose.
"If someone makes a bad remark, avoid arguing or fighting back," advised Tom Small, a Quaker and one of the founders of the Kalamazoo Nonviolent Opponents of War (KNOW) who organized weekly peace demonstrations in my town nearly five years ago. "As people for peace, we have to be peaceful. Just smile or wave or give a peace sign, but don't respond with hostilities." Interesting enough, the demonstrations became a place of refuge, mutual support and friendship. This was especially important when the peace activists were called "traitors" by those who backed Bush.
The peace demonstrations in my town also became a place for people to express their deep feelings of sorrow and distress over this war. On the evening of Thursday, March 20, twenty-four hours after the war had started, the peace activists held a silent candlelight vigil. Seven hundred people lined both sides of the downtown's main street on that cold, misty night! During the early months of the war 400 to 500 people came out to stand for peace at the weekly vigils. Today 30 to 40 people still come each Sunday at noon to stand for peace for an hour. These kinds of actions by peace activists are taking place all over the country!
Of course, the peace demonstrations became the place for citizens to declare their opposition to the war and their anger at the Bush administration in a public way. Unfortunately, we Americans don't value the public realm as much as we used to do. "The street" has negative connotations. There is a pervading fear that violence will erupt when groups with political agendas gather to demonstrate. However, by reducing the public realm people not only sequester themselves from those unlike themselves (like immigrants, poor people, African Americans, workers, women, etc.), they cut themselves off from some important realities about the injustices of their society, like opposition to this illegal, immoral, unnecessary war.
Actually, the whole idea of demonstrating in public is essential to peacemaking because it provokes a response. Onlookers see overt activity. They see protest. They see that something is amiss. They wonder what is happening. To find out, citizens have typically depended on the media for information, however, as we all know, the mainstream media shamefully dropped the ball before the war began and yielded to the White House. The New York Times admitted as much. Books like Eric Boehlert's Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush illustrate how the media were more concerned about pleasing their advertisers and protecting their access to the administration than they were about reporting the dissent over the war-or the truth about why Bush wanted to wage it. Books like Joshua Rushing's Mission Al Jezeera show how the administration's tight control over the media prevented essential information from coming out, not only to the detriment of American citizens' view of the war but in our relationships with the Arab peoples and their perceptions of our country.
Demonstrating in public is indispensable to democracy. It is a "right of the people peaceably to assemble", according to the First Amendment. Such demonstrations point to some injustice being committed and it is the duty of citizens to "petition the government for a redress of grievances." Public demonstrations are about putting yourself on the line as to where you stand on an important issue. It is one of the most patriotic things a citizen can do! However, when government curtails peaceful protest, as the Bush administration has consistently done, or if the media fail to report what is happening in the country, then citizens cannot obtain a clear or accurate view in which to judge the situation rationally.
Peacemaking is a coalition-building process that attempts to make a point using the apparatus of the system. Of late, peace groups all over the country have been lobbying their representatives in Congress to vote against continued funding for the Iraq war. The 2006 elections brought out people to support candidates who vowed to bring an end to the war. While we have yet to see the results of these efforts, polls show that 70 percent of Americans do want the war to end and Congress is now under tremendous pressure to deliver.
Finally, peace activists represent the hope and resolve that a world without war IS possible because they understand that it is no longer possible to settle our international differences by fighting costly and genocidal wars. For all of these reasons, peace activists deserve to be recognized as heroes of a different stripe.
Olga Bonfiglio is a professor at Kalamazoo College in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and author of Heroes of a Different Stripe: How One Town Responded to the War in Iraq. She has written for several national magazines on the subjects of social justice and religion. Her website is www.OlgaBonfiglio.com. Contact her at olgabonfiglio@yahoo.com.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

19 Comments so far
Show AllA wonderful essay. Indeed, peacemakers such as yourself are the true heroes of our age. Please keep up the peace.
"True heroism is remarkably sober, very undramatic. It is not the urge to surpass all others at whatever cost, but the urge to serve others at what ever costs". (Arthur Ashe)
Bush's father was in charge of the CIA media controlled disinformation program Operation Mocking Bird when he was in control of the CIA. Bush SR. and Bush JR both used this CIA asset to help them get elected. The names of thousands of the CIA paid journalist and the press people who worked for the CIA while they spied on America for the CIA in the CIA domestic spying operations have not been released!
George Lakoff always recommended turning the other cheek in days like these. There are always going to be staunch pro-war folks out there but it's safe to leave those 30% folks in the dust and convince the swing voters and your non-war base out of war.
We have the ability to live in peace.
Aggressive behavior should be frowned upon, but first we must control our own thoughts and actions stemming from the MIND. All activity originates from thinking, so to participate in creating a peaceful planet, how about putting into practice Zarathustra's six words. It's easier said than done, but why not start now.
GOOD THOUGHTS, GOOD WORDS, GOOD DEEDS
Imagine all the natural resources we could save by dismantling "armed forces " around the world and puting those resources and material to better use, let alone the misery and suffering, death and destruction from "warfare".
Great article, thanks for publishing. We peace activists do indeed have to "Walk the Talk"
War is Peace.
Yes, we have the ability to live in peace, but we choose not to.
we have the ability to live in peace
and we can choose to do so
millions of people who once brutalized each other now live in peace
www.uspeacegovernment.org
"If the history of the past fifty years teaches us anything, it is that peace does not follow disarmament -- disarmament follows peace."
Baruch, Bernard M.
"They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [Isaiah 2:4]"
Bible
"The peace makers shall be called the children of God."
Bible
"Peace, in international affairs, is a period of cheating between two periods of fighting."
Bierce, Ambrose
"If they want peace, nations should avoid the pin-pricks that precede cannon-shots."
Bonaparte, Napoleon
"We've learned how to destroy, but not to create; how to waste, but not to build; how to kill men, but not how to save them; how to die, but seldom how to live."
Bradley, Omar Nelson
"In truth, to attain to interior peace, one must be willing to pass through the contrary to peace. Such is the teaching of the Sages."
Brahmanada, Swami
"All that a pacifist can undertake -- but it is a very great deal -- is to refuse to kill, injure or otherwise cause suffering to another human creature, and untiringly to order his life by the rule of love though others may be captured by hate."
Brittain, Vera
"'He insulted me, he cheated me, he beat me, he robbed me' -- those who are free of resentful thoughts surely find peace."
Buddha
"We used to wonder where war lived, what it was that made it so vile. And now we realize that we know where it lives, that it is inside ourselves."
Camus, Albert
"I prefer the most unfair peace to the most righteous war."
Cicero, Marcus T.
"The United States is not a nation to which peace is a necessity."
Cleveland, Grover
"If you want to make peace, you don't talk to your friends. You talk to your enemies."
Dayan, Moshe
"We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom."
Eisenhower, Dwight D.
"Peace and justice are two sides of the same coin."
Eisenhower, Dwight D.
"Though force can protect in emergency, only justice, fairness, consideration and cooperation can finally lead men to the dawn of eternal peace."
Eisenhower, Dwight D.
"Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through understanding."
Emerson, Ralph Waldo
"If someone makes a bad remark, avoid arguing or fighting back,"
I have a hard time turning the other cheek. We live in a society where not retaliating is seen as weakness, especially when you are a man. You're always made to feel as if you need to defend and stand up for yourself.
I'm very glad I came upon this essay as well as these posts. Lately I have been feeling quite angry, not only at certain individuals I regularly come in contact with, but also with the world in general and her state of affairs.
All my life, I've been made to feel as if I need to prepare to fight someone. I work out on a martial arts bag daily, feeling a need to be "ready" if and when violence comes my way.
This isn't just in terms of politics. It's just life in general. Our culture is so adversarial. It makes people anxious, worrying about "watching their backs." Someone always seems to want to bully you or hurt you in some way. And often, sadly enough, in a man's world, if people don't think you're going to throttle them or leave them in a pool of their own blood, they don't feel that they have to respect you.
As much as I admire those who are of peace, I worry about them also, and their ability to survive in what is an increasingly cold, bitter, and sociopathic world.
However, Olga's piece as given me at least some hope.
I'm a reluctant "warrior" of sorts. While I will admit to often being thrilled by physical combat, and the rush of an actual workout, I more often than not don't really enjoy the idea of having to fight. I truly want all men to be my brothers, fathers, and uncles. I am as much disappointed and saddened as I am angry about the way many men in our society behave and treat others.
Last night, as I have done many a night, I pummeled that big heavy, leather bag. The weights I have anchoring it down shifted about, the chain rattled. I imagined that bag to be any number of tormentors, past and present, real and imagined. My bare fists smacked against it. Bare, in case something "happens", and it very well might. I became angry with myself, because I wasn't hitting it hard enough. My fists felt tiny. I attacked it at every angle like my father, who spent his own youth having to fight, taught me. Finally I broke down and began to hatefully strike it, wildly. It was exhilarating.
And then I stopped, and like I have every other time I've worked out on that bag, afterwards, I felt tired, and then sick, sick at my own propensity for violence. And then I felt afraid. Afraid at how much damage I could potentially cause someone. Afraid also of how I could ruin my own life, with a strike.
In some ways, I think I'm like a neocon. I see the world in "good" and "evil" also. From the dirtbag on the street, to the unscrupulous co-worker, to the CEO's and politicans that poison the planet and disenfranchise the people. I want to triumph against them. I like vindication and poetic justice. The idea of righteous rage and indignation is something that makes my blood race. It's easy to become seduced by violence. We're taught that it can solve anything, from quieting an ornery toddler with a swat on the rump to putting a bullet in an enemy soldier. We're often taught that it is the only way.
Can we win this war waged on us by the elites by merely turning the other cheek? Will those elites see us merely as weak if they don't already? Can we stop imperialism and capitalism simply by laying down on front of those beasts?
iwarrior,
I'm very touched by what you just wrote, and as a peace/labor activist I can tell you for sure, brother, that millions of us in the U.S. of A. and around the globe feel as you do. I want to share a few items with you and other readers but I'm falling asleep. First thing in the morning i"ll submit some things which I hope will be helpful Please check out this column in the morning.
iwarrior.
When the Chinese Communists invaded Tibet, in 1959, they slaughtered thousands of Buddhist monks and destroyed many temples. Some, like the Dalai Lama, fled to India and other countries for safe haven and to practice their religion. Some highly developed lamas stayed in Tibet and were tortured by the Chi-Coms, but still, in spite of the physical pain, would not wish ill on their persecutors. ( talk about the real superman ) They overcame anger and desire for revenge and continued on the spiritual path to enlightenment that Buddha, Zarathustra, and the one we call Christ taught.
The best television station in the world is FREE SPEECH TV (FSTV) on the DISH NETWORK. Channel 9415. They had a series of documentaries on non-violent or peaceful resistance against tyranny not to long ago. One segment comes to my mind. During the Nazi occupation of Denmark, (but not as bad as our occupation of Iraq), the Germans bullied the factory workers at a hugh plant in Copenhagen to work harder and longer otherwise they would suffer the wrath of the "master race". The Danes knew they couldn't defeat the Germans in battle, but to prevent that factory from manufacturing goods for the nazi war machine, they devised a plan of "passive action". At an agreed time the Danish workers walked off the job, and as they left the factory they told the Germans it was customary to leave the job and go home and water their gardens and fields. After arguments about this procedure, the Germans agreed and the Danes chalked up a mini victory without firing a shot. In spite of a few nazi sympathizers in Norway, the Norweigians peacefully resisted. That is not to say that people in Denmark or Norway were not executed by the Germans for resisting the occupation and enslavement, but when the overwhelming majority stick together, the enemy is eventually defeated.
Real American history is not taught in schools because the "ruling class" prefers an ignorant population. If the working class, which is over 90% of the country knew the history of labor, and how everything we take for granted now was a gigantic struggle, like the 8 hour workday, for instance, they would know that by sticking together, we could end the murder, torture, rape, and plunder our corrupt politicians have inflicted on the Iraqi people by the nationwide General Strike. Everybody, union and non-union alike, staying home or away from the workplace, and that also includes the military as well. Just say no to legalized murder.
The History Channel has a program on the "CHRISTMAS TRUCE of 1914", about German and British troops celebrating and having fun. Do an internet search of it and you'll be surprised. Peace should be contagious, not violence.
Thank you for your posts peaceman. I will look into those programs you talked about.
I've been reading James Loewen's "Lies My Teacher Told Me", and how the misinformation you talked about has been used to keep working and poor people down by making them think that they deserve to be disenfranchised.
Getting people to stick together, to throw away their anger, and convincing them that non-violence to work. That's the key, and it's why the elites keep us at each other's throats.
You've given me a lot to think about. Thank you again.
I also enjoyed this essay, because the author starts out by saying that we need to find peace within ourselves first. Indeed, that is the most difficult thing for many of us as we are pummeled by violence on television, in our sports stadiums, and on our streets. I struggle with this every day, confirm my commitment to peace every day, and pray to the Mother for peace throughout our world.
iwarrior and peaceman:
Bless you guys for sharing that stuff! A couple of good books:
AT HELL'S GATE by Claude Anshin Thomas--personal story by a Vietnam Vet who grew up in a family culture of violence, killed his way thru Vietnam, and after a lot of booze and drugs and real horror, wound up becoming a Buddhist monk.
A FORCE MORE POWERFUL by Peter Ackerman and Jack Duvall--a history of non-violent action thru the 20th century, including the fall of the Soviet Union in '89-91. Some of these events get passing mention in the history books, but FORCE MORE POWERFUL is the first thing I've read that makes one story of it.
I think too many men hear "pacifist" as "passivist". T'ain't so! You might want to look for local Quakers or peace groups and talk to them. Non-violent action takes COURAGE, and control of one's own behavior, despite one's feelings. We all have an inner resistance to harming our own kind--look how hard you are working, iwarrior, to keep that anger up there. You say you've been "made to feel---" How about finding out what YOU truly feel?
I couldn't finish JOHNNY GOT HIS GUN. Too painful.
So many wonderful posts!! I am heartened by the widening universal struggle for peace and spirituality. Like the growing mass of deep public sentiment, the days of war are numbered!!
It is true, peace is more than the absence of war - it is justice, respectful and appreciative relationships across the ethnic, economic, religious and gender divides, and devoted service to human unity and well-being, which entails eliminating extremes of wealth and poverty, being educated and able to communicate with everyone, forgiving, loving, praying for growth in goodness from within and without, and confronting untruths. These are the teachings of peace given by Baha'u'llah in 1863, for which He was imprisoned, tortured and exiled.
Thank you iwarrior, Joy, lightfollower, and others for the kind compliments. I'm glad we can share our thoughts on Common Dreams.org, and together, sisters and brothers, WE WILL take back our government, our military, and restore what the fat cats in Washington, D.C. have been destroying for too many years.
Joy Goldstein; I read some of A FORCE MORE POWERFUL, and It is worth reading. Funny you mentioned JOHNNY GOT HIS GUN, written by the screenwriter Dalton Trumbo. I read it in 1971, and have been saying ever since, that JOHNNY GOT HIS GUN should be required reading for every boy and girl in high school before they decide to play macho man in the armed forces. It is tough to read.
Non-violent action does take COURAGE and control of one's thoughts. Thus Spake Zarathustra.
iwarrior: you hit the bullseye when you said, in your poignant words...getting people to stick together, to throw away their anger, and convincing them that non-violence works. Thats the key...and why the elites keep us at each other's throats.
lightfollower; Lovely comments, and oh so true.