Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bill Would Ease US Vets' Return to School
SAN FRANCISCO - Marine Corps reservist Todd Bowers was half-way through his degree in Middle Eastern Studies at George Washington University when the Pentagon pulled him out of school and sent him on two combat tours to Iraq.
When he returned, he found his student loans had been sent to collection.
"I had notified my lenders that I was leaving on a combat deployment," he told OneWorld. "Something went awry while I was gone and [when I returned] I had tremendous amounts of letters saying: 'You owe this money.'"
Eventually, Bowers said he was able to get the difficulty "squared away, but the damage had already been done and my credit history was ruined."
That wasn't Bowers' only problem.
"When I returned from a twelve-month deployment on my second tour, I was given just two weeks to complete my finals," he said. "I hadn't seen the course work in nearly twelve months."
So Bowers dropped out of school. He now works as government affairs director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) -- the first and largest member-organization for veterans of the United States' recent wars.
On Thursday, the group put forward a new bill in Washington, which is sponsored by Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Congresswoman Susan Davis of Southern California. The Veterans Education Tuition Support (VETS) Act wouldn't increase the amount of money veterans get for college, but it would close loopholes in the GI bill that make finishing a degree more difficult.
The VETS Act would require colleges to refund tuition for service members sent overseas, cap student loan interest payments at 6 percent while the student is deployed, and extend the period of time during which a student-soldier may re-enroll after returning from abroad.
The bill was written by Patrick Campbell, a former student body president at the University of California-Berkeley, who was sucked into a maelstrom of bureaucracy after serving as a combat medic in Iraq with the Louisiana National Guard in 2005.
"I spent my first semester back at law school exchanging over 40 letters with my student loan lender trying to stop their harassing phone calls saying that I was defaulting on my student loan payments," he said in comments posted on IAVA's Web site. "According to my lender, due to my deployment, I had used up all of my permissible grace period."
"Unlike my non-veteran classmates, I will be required to start repaying my loans the day after I graduate," Campbell added. "I was told the only way I could be restored to my pre-deployment status was to rewrite the laws. So I spent my last year of law school finding ways to change the law to help returning student-soldiers."
According to the U.S. Department of Education, veterans are less likely to graduate from college than students who have never served in the military. The Department's most recent data shows just 3 percent of veterans who entered a four-year college program in 1995 graduated by 2001, compared to a 30 percent overall graduation rate.
Currently there are about 90,000 U.S. military reservists who are enrolled in college and about 25,000 of them have been deployed at least once to either Iraq or Afghanistan.
The bill is likely to receive a positive response from university administrators.
"Anything that would help the students be able to pick up their studies if they're interrupted, or to begin their studies if they hadn't done it before -- sounds like those are all good things," said Jo Volkert, assistant vice president for enrollment management at San Francisco State University.
Volkert said veterans may believe university administrators are hostile when they return from a deployment. In fact, she says, they legally have very little wiggle room in how they treat their students.
"Basically the rules are dictated by the education code we have to follow," she said. "So if this is something that would cause the education code to be more lenient to students who are deployed, that's positive."
Veterans groups are likewise optimistic about the bill's chances for passage. They believe that a bill that costs tax payers very little money while helping veterans finish their degrees should have a relatively easy time clearing both houses of Congress before being sent to the president.
Copyright © 2007 OneWorld.net.



5 Comments so far
Show AllThe VERY least we should do is suspend ALL interest while these people are serving the country. My guess is that Congress will continue to serve itself though. As Knesal said, why are they having to pay for college anyway? These criminals who call themselves our government all use WWII as their favorite comparison for this war yet the soldiers who served in WWII all had the option to go to school on the taxpayers dime. The result was the boom in technology we are experiencing today. Those folks all built the current hi-tech industries that we have all benefitted from over the past 50-60 years. A good case for educating the masses I would say. Certainly a good case for educating our soldiers for free. Meanwhile the same criminals in Congress and the White House all bellow about "support the troops" while continuing to vote for their own raises year in and year out. DO yourself a favor and go to the next Town Hall meeting your Congressperson holds in your district and ask them 2 questions; Why do you refuse to support Bills that would take care of our soldiers and their families? Followed by; Why did you vote for your own raise last year? I'd love to hear the answers from each of them. Peace.
Join the Army - get kicked in the teeth twice! Congress better get on board this train or "support our troops" will become the most meaningless phrase in the country, even outrunning "accountability in government".
And I consider this a most tepid GI bill. We owe them a lot more than capping their loan interest at 6% WHILE they are over there risking and losing their lives for us. It doesn't matter that they went because of lies. They believed those lies. Thanks to our intrepid media. Oops, wrong word. What's the past tense for intrepid? Oh, that's right, there isn't one. How about insipid?
"According to the U.S. Department of Education, veterans are less likely to graduate from college than students who have never served in the military."
The article could misrepresent the above quote. The success rate doesn't have to do with the deployment/defaulted loan problems expressed in the article. What it indicates is the veteran, by and large, does not graduate college.
The summary at the end with the enrollment manager could also be potentially be misleading. The institution is in the business of securing students who will be able to pay for school, and thus keep the school in business. It is not in the interest of the financial or the collegiate institution to have students defaulting on loans. The defaulted loans impact the schools. The federal government can and does pull financial loans when an institution reaches a high default rate. Loss of federal loans typically happens to community colleges and not prestigious schools such as George Washington University or UC Berkeley.
The average civilian lured by GI BILL and education packages could look at the stats and determine, if they joined the military, they have less than a 4% chance of actually graduating from a four year college. How depressing for the prospective student-soldiers... ie "soldier-scholar". Arguably, the "soldier-scholar" statistically doesn't exist. Perhaps one could say the soldier-scholar fits right in there with rags-to-riches: total fallacy.
While commendable, the bill should suspend 'Interest' while deployed. Six percent adds up quickly!
Why are Combat Vets Paying for schooling anyway?
A Knesal ..... Liberal Warrior! ....... From 'Little Beirut'
That this type of protection wasn't in place decades ago shows the real level of the 'support the troops' crowd in politics.
Maybe Bu$h the inferior could commute a credit rating. Oh thats right he only protects co-conspirators.