China Pressured World Bank to Cut Deadly Pollution Figures: Report
BEIJING - Research showing that 750,000 people die prematurely in China each year from pollution was cut from a World Bank report following pressure from Beijing, the Financial Times said Tuesday.
Beijing successfully lobbied for the removal of a third of the report, entitled the "Cost of Pollution in China," arguing the contents could lead to social unrest, the London-based newspaper said.
China's State Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) and health ministry asked the World Bank to remove the figures from a draft of the report finished last year that stated about 750,000 people die prematurely each year from pollution.
China also successfully pushed for the removal of a detailed map showing which parts of the country suffered the most deaths, the newspaper said.
"The World Bank was told that it could not publish this information. It was too sensitive and could cause social unrest," the Financial Times quoted one adviser to the study as saying.
The draft was released at a conference on sustainable development in Beijing in March, and remains available on the Internet, without the sensitive data.
The World Bank, which put together the report in cooperation with Chinese government ministries over several years, acknowledged on Tuesday that some data had been withdrawn from the draft but did not go into details.
The World Bank said in a statement sent to AFP that the published version "did not include some of the issues that are still under discussion."
The statement said the final report was "still under review," while there was no comment on the allegations that Chinese pressure had led to the sensitive data being removed.
The published report on the Internet said "conservative" estimates put the cost of premature death caused by air pollution in China at 157.3 billion yuan (20.7 billion dollars) in 2003, but gave no estimates on the numbers affected.
Its foreword said that "certain physical impact estimations" had been left out of the draft of the report "due to... some uncertainties about calculation methods and its application."
Guo Xiaomin, a retired SEPA official who coordinated the Chinese research team, told the Financial Times the cuts were made partly because of concerns that the methodology was unreliable.
But he added the information on premature deaths "could cause misunderstanding," the newspaper said. Guo also expressed concerns over the size of the 148-page report.
"We did not announce these figures. We did not want to make this report too thick," he told the Financial Times.
Officials from China's environment agency or health ministry were not available for comment on Tuesday, while the foreign ministry refused to comment.
China's communist rulers have a history of suppressing information that they perceive as sensitive. However, in recent years they have pledged to be more transparent.
In 2003, the deadly SARS virus originated in China and the government was widely condemned for initially covering up the disease, enabling the virus to spread around the world more easily.
Foreign media, informed by a retired army whistle-blower doctor Jiang Yanyong, eventually exposed the cover-up, but the disease went on to kill over 800 people worldwide, including 349 in China.
Despite the pledges of transparency, the government-controlled press continues today to ignore or play down sensitive issues such as protests and environmental accidents.
Copyright © AFP 2007
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show All"China's communist rulers have a history of suppressing information that they perceive as sensitive. However, in recent years they have pledged to be more transparent."
Sounds like the rulers in this country. I'm still waiting for a simple glimpse of transparency from our current administration and politicians "Of the Corporations, by the Corporations and for the Corporations".
Be careful what you eat if it's been imported from China!
The Communist Cadres at various levels of the gov't are basically puppets for the corporate interests. If destroying a river is necessary to keep profits up, then oh well. Tough luck for those poor Chinese who aren't getting filthy rich (emphasis on filthy) and who can't move to foreign countries, or send their kids to Oxford, Cambridge, or Harvard for an undergraduate degree. If you can't jump ship then you just have to suffer the consequences. The Communist Party has long lost its legitimacy in my eyes, but this is just ludicrous. Let the world know what is going on. Pollution is a global problem, just like SARS was.
Somtimes when I try to figure out what's going on in and going to happen to China I feel like I'm watching Disney's Jungle Book where the king of the monkeys sings "I wanna walk like you, I wanna talk like you" all the while chasing around the crumbled remains of an ancient man-city.
The pollution made in China swirls all around the globe. We need to stop importing.
Every time someone buys a product made under sweatshop conditions and no environmental control in China they add to that death toll.
Every time anyone world wide blindly wastes energy they add to that death toll.
ron murry you are right we have no excuse for the environmental damage we cause by commission and omission.
China has two billion people, whats our pollution excuse?