Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Was Campaigning Against Voter Fraud a Republican Ploy?
WASHINGTON - A New Mexico lawyer who pressed to oust U.S. Attorney David Iglesias was an officer of a nonprofit group that aided Republican candidates in 2006 by pressing for tougher voter identification laws.
Iglesias, who was one of nine U.S. attorneys the administration fired last year, said that Albuquerque lawyer Patrick Rogers pressured him several times to bring voter fraud prosecutions where little evidence existed. Iglesias believes that he was fired in part because he failed to pursue such cases.
He described Rogers, who declined to discuss the exchanges, as "obsessed . . . convinced there was massive voter fraud going on in this state, and I needed to do something to stop it."
Iglesias said he only recently learned of Rogers' involvement as secretary of the non-profit American Center for Voting Rights Legislative Fund - an activist group that defended tighter voter identification requirements in court against charges that they were designed to hamper voting by poor minorities.
Rogers, a former general counsel to the New Mexico Republican Party and a candidate to replace Iglesias, is among a number of well-connected GOP partisans whose work with the legislative fund and a sister group played a significant role in the party's effort to retain control of Congress in the 2006 election.
That strategy, which presidential adviser Karl Rove alluded to in an April 2006 speech to the Republican National Lawyers Association, sought to scrutinize voter registration records, win passage of tougher ID laws and challenge the legitimacy of voters considered likely to vote Democratic.
McClatchy Newspapers has found that this election strategy was active on at least three fronts:
- Tax-exempt groups such as the American Center and the Lawyers Association were deployed in battleground states to press for restrictive ID laws and oversee balloting.
- The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division turned traditional voting rights enforcement upside down with legal policies that narrowed rather than protected the rights of minorities.
- The White House and the Justice Department encouraged selected U.S. attorneys to bring voter fraud prosecutions, despite studies showing that election fraud isn't a widespread problem.
Nowhere was the breadth of these actions more obvious than at the American Center for Voting Rights and its legislative fund.
Public records show that the two nonprofits were active in at least nine states. They hired high-priced lawyers to write court briefs, issued news releases declaring key cities "hot spots" for voter fraud and hired lobbyists in Missouri and Pennsylvania to win support for photo ID laws. In each of those states, the center released polls that it claimed found that minorities prefer tougher ID laws.
Armed with $1.5 million in combined funding, the two nonprofits attracted some powerful volunteers and a cadre of high-priced lawyers.
Of the 15 individuals affiliated with the two groups, at least seven are members of the Republican National Lawyers Association, and half a dozen have worked for either one Bush election campaign or for the Republican National Committee.
Alex Vogel, a former RNC lawyer whose consulting firm was paid $75,000 for several months' service as the center's executive director, said the funding came from private donors, not from the Republican Party.
One target of the American Center was the liberal-leaning voter registration group called Project Vote, a GOP nemesis that registered 1.5 million voters in 2004 and 2006. The center trumpeted allegations that Project Vote's main contractor, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), submitted phony registration forms to boost Democratic voting.
In a controversial move, the interim U.S. attorney in Kansas City announced indictments against four ACORN workers five days before the 2006 election, despite the fact that Justice Department policy discourages such action close to an election. Acorn officials had notified the federal officials when they noticed the doctored forms.
"Their job was to confuse the public about voter fraud and offer bogus solutions to the problem," said Michael Slater, the deputy director of Project Vote, "And like the Tobacco Institute, they relied on deception and faulty research to advance the interests of their clients."
Mark "Thor" Hearne, a St. Louis lawyer and former national counsel for President Bush's 2004 reelection campaign, is widely considered the driving force behind the organizations. Vogel described him as "clearly the one in charge."
Hearne, who also was a vice president and director of election operations for the Republican Lawyers Association, said he couldn't discuss the organizations because they're former clients.
But in an e-mail exchange, he defended the need for photo IDs.
"Requiring a government-issued photo ID in order to vote as a safeguard against vote fraud and as a measure to increase public confidence in the fairness and honesty of our elections is not some Republican voter suppression effort," Hearne said.
Hearne called photo IDs "an important voice in election reform."
Hearne and Rogers appeared at separate hearings before the House Administration Committee last year in Ohio and New Mexico. They cited reports of thousands of dead people on voter registration rolls, fraudulent registrations and other election fraud schemes.
As proof, Hearne, offered a 28-page "investigative report" on Ohio events in the 2004 election, and then publicly sent a copy to the Justice Department, citing "substantial evidence to suggest potential criminal wrongdoing."
So far, no charges have been filed.
Earlier, in August 2005, the Legislative Fund issued a string of press releases naming five cities as the nation's top "hot spots" for voter fraud. Philadelphia was tagged as No. 1, followed by Milwaukee, Seattle, St. Louis and Cleveland.
With a push from the center's lobbyists, legislatures in Missouri and Pennsylvania passed photo ID laws last year. Missouri's law was thrown out by the state Supreme Court, and Democratic Gov. Edward Rendell vetoed the Pennsylvania bill.
In an interview with the federal Election Assistance Commission last year, two Pennsylvania officials said they knew of no instances of voter identity fraud or voter registration fraud in the state.
Amid the controversy, the American Center for Voting Rights shuttered its Internet site on St. Patrick's Day, and the two nonprofits appear to have vanished.
But their influence could linger.
One of the directors of the American Center, Cameron Quinn, who lists her membership in the Republican National Lawyers Association on her resume, was appointed last year as the voting counsel for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
The division is charged with policing elections and guarding against discrimination against minorities.
Researcher Tish Wells contributed to this article.
2007 McClatchy Newspapers
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


30 Comments so far
Show AllExcellent blog sabresong.
bravo to McClatchy for investigating this! let's see if any of the MSM picks this up. as bad as firing attorneys for investigating republican corruption is, this is the real issue, an attempt to institutionalize the disenfranchisement of voters, which happened illegally in 00 & 04.
if the dems wanted to maintain their hold on power for the next 25 or 50 years, all they'd have to is run run run w/this story.
something tells me they won't.
There is no logic in retail voter fraud. The number of votes you can affect is insignificant.
Voter fraud has to be a wholesale operation. One crime many votes.
Half of the potential voters don't bother to vote once - Why would anyone believe the same person is voting twice at risk of major legal penalty?
The ability to create a diversion sending lots of reporters, prosecutors and law enforcement on a hopeless investigation is the perfect cover for a really nice wholesale election ripoff.
Rove is not a genius, he just has stupid opponents and no morals. He pulls the same cheap tricks in every election.
Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman were real pit bulls. They had the morals of alley cats but everybody knew better than to ---- with them. What happened to the Democrats?
Damn, that picture of Rove looks like me.
shakker has it right. There's little evidence of voter fraud anywhere in this country. What we should be guarding against is election fraud.
The Democrats learned it from the Republicans.
It's called survival of the fittest. The ones with the best computer hackers will win the next election. If it's real close the ones with the best friends sitting on the bench will win. What's the name of that tune? ___ Oh year, I'm Sorry.
Missed the bigger conspiracy - shift all attention away from well documented electronic vote stealing and rigging by GOP-friendly corporations, and create the sense that "voter fraud" is a two party party.
And, by golly, once again, it worked like a charm. Has anyone been prosecuted for electronic vote stealing yet? No? Gee, what a surprise...
If you're the bank guard and you want to rob the bank, how hard would it be? You'd yell, "FIRE!", usher everyone out of the bank and za-zam!
rove and his minions are the bank guards, and the bank tellers, and the bank examiners, and the banks most senior partners and includes other people from other agencies.
I think the hardest thing that people can come to grips with is just how corrupt our system has become. To throw an election takes more than a few dozen people. It involves thousands. And it costs hundreds of millions of dollars. This is nothing little and they have committed it with such arrogance as to not have cared if they covered their crimes.
But, than again, why should they? They're still in power telling us to "fuck off".
Voter fraud (as a republican would define it) is a release-valve issue, it is less about voter suppression than it is about hijacking the election system discussion. Really now, it becomes much less important to stop someone from voting when you're counting all the votes behind closed doors (or in a closed-source black box). They need to take pressure off of election system reform, so they decided to offer election system reform. Hijacking minority votes is just a side effect, a horribly obnoxious side effect... Maybe not, maybe it's a smoke screen to keep you from screaming as loudly about ALL OF OUR votes going unheeded, the counting just so much pageantry.
Do you ever worry that boards like this where we can express our outrage are really just release valves for our anger? That they keep us from meaningful activity that MIGHT have some effect on these attacks on our constitution and our rights?
AND, does it cross your minds that some psy ops are sitting in some office in DC collecting our comments getting ready for the day it's 'necessary' to round up the 'usual suspects?'
No suggestions here....just thoughts and comments.
Me
Yep, I've thought about that cokids.
So if you all stop seeing me here, I'm either dead or have been carried off. I have learned more about American here in 45 days than I have in 71 years. Make that 68 years, I didn't care until I was four years old. So, I believe this sounding board is pretty darn good, and I fnd time to write to my congressman and others now. Never bothered before joining Common Dreams.
On second look, I don't look like Rove, I look more like a bald GWB, no double chin.
Cokids: I think about that, too. The hope is that there are SO MANY of us that even with 2 million prison beds, it would be hard to keep track. Then again, nature, the US economy, a real attack that perhaps is not an inside job could change the M.O of those drunk on their sense of absolute power, utterly convinced they have managed to break all laws with impunity. Isn't it when hubris gets as thick as a snowstorm that the karmic boomerang heads back with a blinding quickness? I'm waiting for THAT part of the big movie. If that's delusional, it can't be more so than living in a nation, THE quintessential shining light nation of the "free world" that endorses torture, ups the ante on global warming when it's now resembling a mass suicide mission to do so, and treating our Constitution, Bill or Rights and Geneva Conventions like toilet paper. Yeah, something's rotten in Denmark, and when it's this dark you have to go to unconventional lengths to seize (or summon) the light.
cokids, I worry more about crazy conspiracy nuts. Do you see black helicopters at night, too?
I was trying to decide whether to catch Michael Moore's Sicko or the Rat that wants to be Chef for tonight's last movie (airconditioned). After that article, I think I may go for the rat, don't have the stomach for more fascism.
powerslave1. As a matter of fact, a black helicopter did circle our home three days ago. Never saw one like that in New Mexico, where we live up in the mountains. It was a black two seater, Hughes with a white top bubble canopy. If flew so low we could easily see the two men in the cockpit. Made me wonder. taht's not paranoia, it was here.
Voter fraud does not necessarily have to be wholesale. By targetting key swing states, they can throw the system completely out of whack. All they really have to do is be smart with their demographics and I guarantee that they are.
Hi siouxrose, Liked your comments, but I wonder if it would be difficult to take out the most troublesome, shut them up.
In the archives I notice there are not that many who have written over thirty comments, in comparison with the rest. I also noticed that some only blog a few times and they are often disruptive and criticize the majority of the opiions of others, or start arguments with words like stupid, morons, etc. There may be one of those blogging on this article; I'm not sure. Two million beds may be quite adequate, if a lot of the first scheduled detainees passed away. You know, Like in Hitlers concetration camps. Of course that type of thinking is silly, this is America. It could sound like conspiricy nuts. Also, Karma sometimes takes awhile to show up. Am I wrong? Often am.
Evelyn
Progressives have had at least two elections stolen from them. Have they ever heard of UN election monitors? Time to call them.
I recall hearing that UN election monitors must be invited. Who does the inviting isn't clear. Is it Congress, a political party, a candidate, the president? The Democratic Party would be well advised to start now calling for inspectors. Coupleing that with serious hearings would get this issue on the front burner and in the public mind. The public needs to know that the Dems aren't afraid of transparency in elections and that the Republics are and why. The time is now to trow open the door to the back room.
powerslave1,
Last October, I saw a news clip where 14-year old Julia Wilson got in trouble for putting a decidely anti-Bush post in her MySpace space.
It was a picture of Bush with a red circle/slash verboten symbol over him and a cartoonish knife stabbing his hand - his hand - with cartoonish blood drops spewing out, and "Kill Bush" written very girly-girl over the top of the image. They showed the photo in the news clip. It was laughably bland.
So what happened? Her mother was paid a "visit" by the Secret Service at their home in Sacramento. They immediately made another "visit" to the girl while she was at school. They pulled her from class and berated her in front of students and teachers.
Yeah, the "Kill Bush" part was a little over the top, but most hormonally-raging 14-year olds (regardless of gender) are over the top on just about everything. She did not explicitly say, "I'm going to kill Bush," or "I want to kill Bush," or "We need to kill Bush," or even "Somebody needs to kill Bush."
In fact she said, "I don't actually hate him. Hate is a very strong word. I really dislike him. I should say that I hate his policies."
Now had the SS taken her entire MySpace space in context, perhaps they may not have been such bullies about it.
But I doubt it.
Eric Zahren of the SS justified their actions by issuing this statement: "We have to run out every threat. We don't have the liberty to do otherwise." ('Liberty' being a rather ironic word to use...)
And let's not forget that the technology currently used by the Chinese government to 'monitor' the web activities of its people is courtesy of major U.S. tech corporations.
So in light of all this, it's not at all a stretch to consider that some 'loyal' government minion is monitoring this site and others like it for other potential "threats."
I think shakker made a very good comment at 6:38 pm. Few people would risk voting illegally. Each time they did so they would risk being arrested. They would be very much out in the open and vulnerable. It is much more likely that manipulating the results of an election would involve 10,000 or a 100,000 votes at a time and be either be subtle so that it would be hard to prove or well hidden.
cokids wrote:
AND, does it cross your minds that some psy ops are sitting in some office in DC collecting our comments getting ready for the day it's 'necessary' to round up the 'usual suspects?'
and Evelyn Smith wrote:
Yep, I've thought about that cokids.
So if you all stop seeing me here, I'm either dead or have been carried off. I have learned more about American here in 45 days than I have in 71 years.
__________________________________________________________
The way to make an impact is to reveal your true identity without fear. Because any anonymous person can say anything without impunity, this sends the message that "I'm willing to put a face behind my statements and become a target". Of course, it helps to measure your opponenet and know their capabilities, have the kind of legal experience in CIVIL RICO where you can bring them to their knees in front of a Federal Judge.
We submitted this news item to CD but have not heard from them?
____________________________________________________________
In case anyone is in the area, we have a planetary science (meteorite exhibit) opening up on July 5th at: MSAM, 2601 Montgomery Street. Fort Worth, TX 76110. Some of you may or may not know, this private exhibit represents the extraterrestrial samples which exposed scientific misconduct, falsfication, fabrication, and discrimination in the academic arena: Government funded scientific misconduct through among others, NASA and the NSF. Not to be missed.
Cordially,
S. Ray DeRusse
www.bccmeteorites.com
To the people who warn us that our submissions to this forum are being cataloged by the government; they probably are.
An old comedy bit by George Carlin comes to mind. A guy who knew that the Hoover FBI had tapped his phone used to answer his phone, "FUCK HOOVER".
The government can kill or torture you but they can't make you work for them. Lets hope enough of us can feel that way when they merely monitor and harass us.
The most important thing in voter protection is a paper ballot with a receipt. If you can go into a convenience store and get a receipt for your lottery picks, then it should be just as easy for a voter receipt to be generated.
Shame. That's what our elections are.
We don't have a government anymore. We have international mega-corporations that give us the illusion that the people actually have a say in how and who runs our country. When only millionaires can run for office only millionaires will be represented.
We won't see any meaningful election reform in this country. It's the last thing the corporations want. There is nothing democratic about the way a corporation is run. And there is no way they are going to allow their grip on power to be taken away by the rabble that they view the people to be.
I don't know why none of the progressive sights don't initiate a General Strike? Unlike street protests that are ignored by the MSM, hereby negating their effect, General Strikes are easy and very effective. Boycott GE or Exxon/Mobile products and watch what happens. Have a couple of million people to stay home for work for a day. I don't have much hope but I would like to see this happen.
First, Powerslave, why do you feel it necessary to degrade and insult people who are trying to carry on an intelligent conversation? In a nation where extraordinary rendition and random "enemy combatants" are far more common than any right-thinking American should tolerate, are such concerns so easily written off?
Yes, we are being monitored. But nobody is claiming a wild conspiracy. The fact is, we KNOW we're being monitored. It's been all over the news for a few years now. So why degrade those who say what we all have seen on CNN?
Now, on to the issue of the article ... voter fraud. I don't believe it exists, not to the degree that Bush and his cronies would have us believe. On a small, individual scale, yes, but the REAL issue is ELECTION fraud. Big difference there. So thank you, Greg, for this article. Now, can we, the voters, take this issue outside the blogs and comments and into the mainstream? Because these blogs are vital, but they are only a first step. We MUST take back control of our government, and that can only be done by bringing election fraud and its root causes and perpetrators to the attention of ALL Americans, not just those few who read blogs.
Powerslave1: Good nickname, it fits you. It's time to pick another to hide behind, we know you by your deeds.___ Kem Patrick