Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Michael Moore's 'Sicko' Leaves Top Democrats Ill at Ease
WASHINGTON - With the release of Michael Moore's "Sicko," a movie once again is adding sizzle to an issue that's a high priority for liberal politicians - this time comprehensive health insurance for all. But unlike Al Gore's film on global warming, which helped rally support on an equally controversial problem, "Sicko" is creating an awkward situation for the leading Democratic presidential candidates.
Rejecting Moore's prescription on healthcare could alienate liberal activists, who will play a big role in choosing the party's next standard-bearer. However, his proposal - wiping out private health insurance and replacing it with a massive federal program - could be political poison with the larger electorate.
At a special screening in Washington this week, politicians, lobbyists, media pooh-bahs and policy junkies flocked to see Moore's film. And its slashing demand for action on an issue that voters care deeply about, and Democrats hope to capitalize on, generated plenty of buzz. Moore hopes that, after its general release June 29, "Sicko" will exert significant influence on the presidential campaign.
Instead of greeting the film with hosannas or challenging it head-on, however, the leading Democratic presidential candidates have sidestepped direct comment on Moore's proposals.
Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of South Carolina all have staked out positions sharply at odds with Moore's approach. But none of them is eager to have that fact dragged into the spotlight.
If Moore's fire-breathing proposal catches on among party activists, who tend to be suspicious of the private sector and supportive of direct government action, the candidates' pragmatic, consensus-seeking ideas could look like weak-kneed temporizing - much the way their rejection of an immediate pullout from Iraq has drawn heated criticism from antiwar activists.
In "Sicko," the filmmaker calls for abolishing the insurance industry, putting a tight regulatory collar on pharmaceutical companies and embracing a Canadian-style government-run system.
Advocacy groups are already planning to use the film to pressure the Democratic hopefuls.
"The candidates haven't sensed the political fever in this country that fundamental change is called for in the healthcare system," said Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Assn. "What we are going to do is call on the candidates to reconsider their positions."
Stoking the passions of rank-and-file Democrats for a government takeover of the healthcare system amounts to political folly, respond some liberal veterans of Washington's healthcare battles.
"To presume that the private sector is going to sit idly by to see the destruction of private coverage I think is a misreading of reality," said Ron Pollack of the advocacy group Families USA. "I think the presidential candidates understand that if healthcare reform is going to have a chance of success, it will require bipartisanship and a balance of public and private coverage. It cannot be the triumph of one ideology over the other."
Such a blending increasingly seems to be taking place in major federal and state programs, including Medicaid, the State Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicare. As employer-sponsored health insurance shrinks, insurance companies have reinvented themselves as managers and middlemen for government programs, said UC Berkeley health economist James Robinson.
For example, more than 60% of Americans enrolled in Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor, are now in some form of managed care, compared with fewer than 25% in the mid-1990s. In California, Medicaid is known as Medi-Cal.
"Whatever mix of private and public sources will increase the number of people with coverage, the insurance companies would like it to be managed by them," Robinson said in a recent interview. "They can work with Medicare, they can work with Medicaid, they can work with employers, they can work with whomever."
There's little room for such nuanced partnerships in "Sicko." If there's a villain in the movie, "the villain is called the health insurance industry of America," Moore told a Capitol Hill rally Wednesday. To laughter and applause, Moore said he hoped the film would turn into a "going-away present" for industry lobbyists.
"Sicko" uses the wrenching stories of individual Americans to compare some of the worst failings of this country's system with a rosy perspective on healthcare in Canada, Britain, France and even Cuba - a country that offers healthcare for all but also imprisoned a doctor in the late 1990s for speaking out against government failure to respond to an epidemic of a mosquito-borne virus.
Moore investigates the dumping of hospital patients on skid row in Los Angeles. He tells the story of a middle-class couple from Colorado who lost their home and had to move in with their adult children because of medical bills, even though they had insurance. A particularly sobering episode involves a Missouri family in which the father is denied a medical procedure that might have saved him from cancer.
Filmgoers also meet an uninsured American who accidentally sawed off two of his fingertips and had to choose which one to have reattached, because he couldn't afford to do both. Moore juxtaposes that story with that of a young man in Canada who lost five fingers in an accident and had them all reattached - without having to pay.
"It's quite effective, [but] it's not a documentary," Robert D. Reischauer, one of Washington's leading health policy experts and a supporter of coverage for all, said after viewing the movie.
"Policy propaganda," he called it.
For most Democratic presidential candidates (Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio advocates a government single-payer program), it's more like a headache.
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times



101 Comments so far
Show AllOnce a politician "stakes out" a position on this issue, without admitting first and foremost that health care is a universal right, something that is part of the essential bargain a citizenry has with its representatives --that they will look out for our best interests and do as much as possible for us -- they cannot have my support, as I will only support a candidate I can trust to seek out and advance my best interests. Other countries provide health care to all of their citizens, and none of the ones that do so have perilous economies as a result. I fail to see how it could harm us and only how it could help us. And that brings us right back around to who universal health care would actually hurt, and who are the "us" that it would actually help. It's never the same people. It's never you, is it?
under the heading of "there just comes a time",i am reminded of the depression era classic "the folklore of capitalism" by trust busting asst atty gen thurman arnold.he related that in order to repair a cratered economy,somethings just had to be done whether the natl association of manufacturers liked it or not.for instance there had to be a broader construction of the commerce clause,or there would be no markets for wingnuts to bitch about.we are in a similar situation regarding health care in this country.our system eats up an intolerable 14.5% of gdp,and does a nakedly unsatisfactory job.private insurance companies have failed because health care is not a commodity,its more properly a human right.the social consequences of continuing to ignore a reality that every other industrial country has long since accepted,are obvious.judge arnold understood that depression era americans were ill served by an 18th century ideological reading of the us constitution.today,we are ideologically straightjacketed by an ideological misunderstanding of the role of the federal gov in providing healthcare.ironically,by continuing on the current calamitous path,we hamstring the very market system NAM,and other wingnut groups are always bragging about.just as during depression times,progressives will have to save the system from its own excesses.
Vey true Mr. Langley, but this is the LA Times publishing this story. The idea that democracy is limited to corporate boardrooms is far, far, "outside the range of allowable discourse" as Chomsky would say. So they have to say the people would be against it. And, to the extent that they will be, once the corporatons are done with their billions of dollars worth of brainwashing, they are right.
I can't wait to see the film. Policy Propaganda is what is being fed to us on a daily basis. Solutions that sound good on the surface and with deeper study reveal they are most beneficial to corporate greed that the majority of all politicians are benefiting from either by private investments or political contributions.
For more of my Modern Musings www.taureandevi.blogspot.com
Please go see SICKO opening weekend - June 29th. We need movies like this to do well so people will continue to make and invest in films that talk about real issues and can really make a difference.
"Top Dems' are committed to blocking real health care reform. All of their reform plans have as the key part of their design the protecting of the insurance companies, HMO's and big pharma.
Mike Moore is worried about what's happening to Americans. "Top Dems" couldn't care less and only worry about the big companies that feed them big bucks.
All documentaries are propaganda. They all have their own perspective. Ask yourself why "The March of the Penguins" makes absolutely no mention of global warming or fishing and it's effect on the penguin population. The answer is not because this is not a significant factually based problem, but because it would offend the conservatives who got behind that documentary in a big way. Michael Moore's movies have a particular worldview and should be viewed with a hermeneutic of suspicion to that worldview, but so should all other so called documentaries.
Of course, the healthcare/insurance industry will fight back with its usual tactics. What the politicians miss is that people are not asking for universal health insurance, they are clamoring for universal healthcare. What single payer does is pool the resources of the commons to provide universal healthcare rather than pool the resources and give them to private companies in order to have a substantial percentage siphoned off for profits, shareholder dividends and CEO salaries, not healthcare.
Debate moderator: Senator Clinton (or insert candidate name here), this is a two part question: First, do you accept campaign contributions from the insurance and pharmaceutical industries? Second, why do you feel that it is morally justifiable for insurance companies to make huge profits off the sick and dying while providing no service in return but layer after layer of bureaucracy and interference between healthcare providers and their patients, especially in the areas of treatment options and medications?
Senator Clinton (or insert candidate name here): Well ...
Access to quality health care is a basic human right.
I can see a day when the USA privatizes access to oxygen...and those that cannot afford to pay can go suck methane
While the practical political value of this film is problematic given the power of the health care and insurance lobbies, hopefully it will give Americans pause to think of what their government actually does for the majority of its citizens compared to other countries whose governments operate according to more humane and socialistic principles.
Perhaps people will begin to question a system that is fundamentally corrupt, buoyed as it is by the big money of corporate capitalists who use a supposedly democratic system to benefit themselves at the expense of most people.
Edwards could really shine if he changed his healthcare platform to single payer. So could Clinton and Obama.
They should refund every dollar in campaign contributions from the healthcare industry and then tell us they don't support a single payer government run system. We should demand it. The time to change this system is now.
Thank you Michael Moore--all is forgiven for your sophmoric 911 film. It is time for all Democratic candidates to declare if they are for single-payer, universal GOVERNMENT RUN health care. (which means that the insurance company leeches are going to have to find more constructive ways of making extortionate bets with Americans like at casinos, race tracks, and Jai Lai frontons!)
Dennis Kucinich and John Conyers, are you listening?--speak up with clarity and conviction on this issue!!
I've always felt there's got to be a special circle of hell for people who get rich by soaking money out of people who are sick and hurting and desperate for care and help.
Uh, "political poison with the larger electorate." Are you fucking insane? The "larger electorate" would approve of a comprehensive national health care program in a heartbeat.
There has to be an insurgency within the Democratic party. It won't happen in one election cycle but progressives have to stop putting themselves behind third parties and decide to take the Democratic party away from the current interest groups that dominate American society.
Ralph Nader is correct in saying that the two parties increasingly resemble each other - this is true as far as economics (letting corporations run everything, even government) and foreign policy(maintaining a Cold War-style global defense system).
Democrats greatest strength would be economic populism, if we could manage to get the party away from people like the Democratic Losership Council, it could mean an America with truly diverse ideas and debates. Maybe people would actually start voting again.
"To presume that the private sector is going to sit idly by to see the destruction of private coverage I think is a misreading of reality," said Ron Pollack of the advocacy group Families USA.
To presume that the public sector is going to sit idly by while the private interests of a few barbaric parasites INSURE the debilitation and destruction of WE THE PEOPLE is a misreading of reality.
The American people have been at or near 70% in favor of universal health care for over 30 years now. The audacity of our presumptive Representatives in saying there is insufficient "political will" to get it done is getting old...and dangerous.
When even hard-core naval-gazers like my sister, who has no interest in anything she doesn't see in her mirror, are up in arms about this subject...you know "the times they are a-changing."
The monthly cost of inadequate insurance to cover the average family is equal to a house payment; and still going up. Even then, most claims will be denied.
People are mad as hell! If the "political analysists" don't wake up to that REALITY soon, we may just wind up with another kind of civil war. Maybe a few weeks of mowing their own lawns and scrubbing their own toilets will help them see the light.
Don't forget: It was just last week that a woman died, in the EMERGENCY ROOM, while the janitor mopped the floor around her and none of the medical staff would help her!
DEATH TO CORPORATE PERSONHOOD!
BGK
"However, his proposal - wiping out private health insurance and replacing it with a massive federal program - could be political poison with the larger electorate."
Umm, which "larger electorate" are you talking about? According to a NY Times poll (3/2/07) 78% of Americans would repeal recent tax cuts to provide universal health coverage. Only 18% faced with this choice would keep the tax cuts. 90% said the US health care system needed "fundamental change or total reorganization". Where's the poison? News flash, Democrats: that 18% ain't voting for you anyway.
Republicans will label any attempt to give us universal health care as "Socialist" (dont look now pubs but socialist are about all thats left of the "coalitions of the willing)or even "communist" as Moore brought the dreaded Cuba to the discussion.
Lets hope the electorate really wants change.
Technological developments in our society have kept moving, though our infrastructure is crumbling and our "rights" are based on old piece of parchment...good job, government!
"...if healthcare reform is going to have a chance of success, it will require bipartisanship and a balance of public and private coverage."
And here's how it'll work: if you can afford it, you pay for it. If not, you're covered by the state. If you can afford it and try to rip off the state anyway, you get your ass beat. Just like unemployment insurance - most never collect, but it's there god forbid. If you're caught defrauding UI, you go to jail and lose the right to file.
Now, please, those who can afford health insurance, please whine about how unfair it is that others aren't paying their own way. We know - it's not your fault their daddies didn't leave them the keys to the vault...
If I had to choose which finger to be reattached, I would unhesitatingly choose the middle finger, as that is the one which would get the most use in our present political climate.
Well. Well. Whadd'ya know? The writer actually farted out the Kucinich name at the very end. Of course there's no coverage that he's been preesing for Single Payer FOR YEARS!
Wake up, Americans-allegedly-seeking-the-country-the way-"We The People-deserve-it-to-be! Stop fooling around arguing the "top tier" like the media wants you to and SERIOUSLY GET BEHIND KUCINICH!
As he once famously said, "I'm very much electable--if you vote for me"!!! His Kucinich/Conyers health plan is only one of MANY things this man can do for US! PLEASE, help him do it by suopporting him no matter the jokes, ignoring, or poo-poo-ing this Great Leadr is subject to.
this article is a great example of how the MSM is going to frame this debate: it'll be a tough political sell b/c the MSM will make goddam sure that it is, and we'll only get a public-private partnership (universal health insurance) b/c the privates (corporations) want their billions, and the MSM ain't gonna challenge that.
Kucinich has my vote even if I have to write his name in on my ballot.
BigNoseKate said it and I think it shoud be repeated,
"To presume that the public sector is going to sit idly by while the private interests of a few barbaric parasites INSURE the debilitation and destruction of WE THE PEOPLE is a misreading of reality."
"The American people have been at or near 70% in favor of universal health care for over 30 years now. The audacity of our presumptive Representatives in saying there is insufficient "political will" to get it done is getting old…and dangerous."
COMarc, "I've always felt there's got to be a special circle of hell for people who get rich by soaking money out of people who are sick and hurting and desperate for care and help." [and for the politicians both Republicans and Democrata who enable them]
Anyone who has read the Bible knows that Saint Peter was a communist and that Jesus was concerned about how we treat the least among us. It's going to take a whole lot of forgiveness for those "barbaric parasites" not to end up in a bad place.
Why not work on extending Medicare to all Americans. That makes it a joint effort between government and private insurance companies. Anyone who thinks private insurance companies alone are capable, or willing, to solve the problem of the uninsured, is on too much medication. The reality is that government has a major role to play in this dilemma, and we better wake up to that fact.
Turn the entire health care system over to the U.S. nuns! They run tight, efficient, caring, CLEAN and well managed hospitals and don't take any B.S. from anyone!! Make it non-profit, with the People owning the hospitals, pharmaceutical companies etc. The insurance companies can just pack it up and go home.
I was given a "Health Security Identification Card" for "Complete Care" many years ago. On the back side of the card it says: This card WILL entitle you to...Lifelong doctor and hospital care, Your choice of any doctor, hospital, HMO or clinic, Longterm nursing and home health care, Prescription medicine, Health services guaranteed to all U.S. residents....IF the Federal Government or your State enacts a universal, publicly funded Health Care Program. MAKE THIS CARD VALID!!
Too bad the card was a JOKE. Just like my "Official backseat driver's card".
The bias of this article is really important to understand because it proves just how deep immorality resides the press. Given the connection between MSM and corporate heathcare, more items using similar rhetorical styles can be expected. The polls cited clearly indicate the public understands the primary mission given the USG in the Constitution's Preamble--"to promote the general Welfare."
The L.A. Times, "Liberal" media?????
Just look at the mention they had of Cuba imprisoning a doctor. Holy crap. Why do they not mention Cuba sent the most doctors to earthquake ravaged Pakistan, and offered to send doctors in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina (which the US denied).
They mention how he paints a "rosy picture" of other systems, but fail to mention why... They are ranked ahead of us in mostly all Health Care rankings.
Others have pointed out the "electorate poison" which should be more accurately called "media poison". I believe in Chomsky's Failed States he cites a poll that 51% of Americans would approve of universal single payer EVEN IF it meant taxes went up.
This is going to be a fun, and at the same time frustrating summer.
See my earlier but very similar plan complete with funding, at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/opedne_
professo_070314_why_we_need_to_have_.htm
and
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_
professo_070201_a_comprehensive_heal.htm
Most of the democratic "leadership"??? are nothing but Republicaqn Lite. With the exception of Kucinich, who is not one of the favored Democrats, the pretty much BELONG TO THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY. Unless someone like Al Gore runs (perhaps with Kusinich as a running mate, we will get more of the same compicated mess we currently have disquised as Universal health care only even MORE of our money will go to the insurance co., big pharma etc. When will those in power, from whichever party, realize that "socialism" is not communism. The most popular government programs ever (and some of the most efficient) are "social"security and medicare. In fact, abuses in Medicare are generally greedy doctors who scam the system, and the insurance companies who try to cheat the people who pay them money. First elect Gore, Kucinich or whoever. Then let them go on National television and address the American people to FLOOD the offices of their congressmen and senators and demand a single payer, gov. run system be passed, or as one person suggested, expand Medicare to cover everyone. The best way to bypass the slime on K-Street is to go directly to the voters and let them TELL their elected officials to vote for the interests of the people, not the corporation, or replace them with someone who will.
Leading Democratic candidates upset with Moore's film? GOOD! Kucinich is the one candidate proposing what needs to be done--Medicare for all. Most Americans want this.
The Dems need to pass public financing for all elections, no exceptions for folks with private fortunes or rich friends/donors. They, and Republicans who don't like the current system either, could then be free -- FREE -- of influence from corporate lobbyists who now have more say (they say "access to present their information") in legislation than we do.
Public financing would make it easier to pass universal single payer health care BUT IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE NOW AND THEY CAN DO IT IF THEY TRY. THEY ARE JUST NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE.
Isn't it funny how the obvious solution is seen as extreme or won't sell with the electorate?
This sheep-like herd mentality keeps everyone in line because nobody wants to seem extreme -- except capitalist cheerleaders, religious nuts, hyper-jingoist nuts and the whole Republican Party which has dismantled good government by its extreme positions and actions.
Maybe people are just too stupid to be helped.
it's every man and woman for themselves. america has no social conscience. here comes them damn commies again.
Michael Moore position best represents my opinion about health care. How can we expect meaningful reform when profit making corporations are allowed to stand between us and our doctors? Insurance companies demand an ever growing amount of profit and that strips money away from the system as a whole. They've had their hands in our pockets for so long that they and they alone have bankrupted our nation's entire medical system. Private medical insurance as a national health care policy is a poorly designed scam. We need it to stop, now.
Awaken...
Not only stupid but FEARFUL of the change they SAY they want--AND STUPID! Cowardice and follow the (STUPID) crowd mentality guarantees bullshit as usual. Kucinich is neither STUPID or a coward!
If all healthcare costs were paid by the government, that would remove a big financial burden from those US companies that are paying for it for their employees. GM, for instance, while not one of my favorite companies, says that $1000 of the price of every car they make is the cost of health insurance. Pit corporation against corporation, and we have a better chance to win on this issue.
That universal care SHOULD happen: Agreed
That universal care COULD happen: Never say never, but I don't think it's likely.
How many hundreds of thousands of US citizens, in addition to millions more world-wide marched to oppose the war on Iraq?
There might be hundreds of thousands, even millions of US citizens willing to march for this issue. A war was started on Iraq. Why should I think there would be a different result this time?
I still write the congress people and support Kucinich and would march if there were marches. So, I am optimistic, just not hopeful.
Here in southern New Mexico a lot of folks do an end run around big pharma/medicine by going to Mexico to fill prescriptions, etc. I've seen some damn fine dental work done there too...
There is a good single payer medical system in the US. It is called the Veterans Administration, and under Bill Clinton was put in order by Kenneth Kizer. Until Bush screwed it over by appointing a Friend of George (James Nicholson) as director, it was and still is producing results superior to the Mayo Clinic and the Massachusetts General Hospital. It has been lauded by the New England Journal of Medicine and The Annals of Internal Medicine. VA patients have a longer life expectancy than managed care Medicare patients. Until the aforementioned FoG screwed up its budget so that it couldn't meet the influx of Iraqi and Afghanistan wounded, it was doing well. The way it was working makes it a good model for what medical care should be for all Americans. But Corporate America hates it, so don't hold your breath.
I like the idea of playing the corporations against each other. Force them to pay for their employees' health care or support a single payer system. Given that choice, I bet that only medical insurance companies, for profit hospitals and pharmaceutical corporations back our present system. All the medical people I know despise the present system.
It's more than simply that the medical industrial complex has it's greedy fingers in everybody's "candidate-finger-puppet" inner workings, it's how they got the ability to get there.
One of the greatest Constitutional F*&k-ups was when the Supreme Court determined that corporations hold the same powers of citizenship and voice as each individual citizen.
Corporations can behave as a single taxpayer/person/voter/citizen, not that any of them actually PAY TAXES!! THAT little ditty has to be repealed/truncated... whatever the appropriate term is...
When that change occurs, we can then begin to start enjoying the rights afforded us. At that point we can actually get them out of our elections, our doctors' offices, hospitals, etc. and begin to demand that the candidates and (elected?) representatives actually SERVE the public by ensuring that we have appropriate health care--which we deserve. (Remember the term public servant??)
All those companies opting out of employee insurance plans are only joining the prescribed dilemma because it gives them an excuse to "screwge" us for profit and gain for stockholders.
These days it appears that the real battle is stakeholders vs stockholders. It's actually been going on for quite some time now.
Capitalism is an ugly thing, there's nothing humane about it.
[quote] "It's quite effective, [but] it's not a documentary," Robert D. Reischauer, one of Washington's leading health policy experts and a supporter of coverage for all, said after viewing the movie. "Policy propaganda," he called it. [unquote]
Takes a propagandist to know a propagandist.
This so-called "sharing" between public and private is an even bigger disaster waiting to happen. One only has to read up on the history of health care in Canada, Britain, and other countries that now have universal health care. It creates a two-tiered system, and guess which tier gets the health care.
Lunafish and big-nosed Kate--Good points about the personhood of inanimate corporations before the law. Their "personhood" needs to be terminated right now.
A personal anecdote: I'm self employed and I have a high end ($$$) health plan.Several years ago I had a minor stroke, I recovered in minutes and called my doctor. He had me come in and sent me to the hospital for tests. 5 days later I was discharged.
The bill was $33,590. My portion was $13,770. There was no logical explanation of the billing, no rhyme or reason to the insurer's policy of paying 50% of this or 25% of that. I was billed by Doctors I never saw, labs I was never in. I had specialists examined me and never answered a question I asked. (I got really pissed at one of them one morning as I was watching the Today Show and reading the paper while he was talking to his Residents like I was in a coma...he was an incredible asshole!) It was an unnerving experience.I left the hospital knowing no more than when I arrived.
After over 30k worth of modern America medicine in one of the nation's most respected hospitals, I had the same explanation of my stroke my Internist had given me an hour after it happened.
I negotiated the insurer down on the bill and saved my self 3,000 dollars. What a country!
Like so many movements, this movement toward universal single payer health care needs to be a bottom-up movement in which the grassroots take over from the established higher ups, who are running away from this issue.
Sicko should help create momentum for the Kucinich campaign. Dennis has been advocating universal single payer for years, which the author of this article conveniently and probably intentionally forgot to mention.
Fascinating. In America we do a better job of regulating and reforming car insurance companies than medical insurance companies. You can guess who has the stronger lobby...
I can't expect that Moore's film will force any changes. His films are entertaining, but but there has not been a significant change of policy from any one of his docudramas.
I can only hope that this may have a cumulative effect on the American voters. Maybe he should do a documentary on America's voting problems too, but then if Americans knew the facts on our stolen elections they probably wouldn't vote at all.
Michael should have run a bit further with this very interesting fact -- Tommy Douglas, the father of Canadian health care, baptist minister, and first socialist CCF/NDP) provincial premier of any province or state in North America, is Kiefer Sutherland's grandfather. Shirley Douglas, Kiefer's mother, is also an actor and Canada's most outspoken activist on behalf of defending the Canadian system. Kiefer has also campaigned for the NDP. Check this video: http://www.workingtv.com/mouseland.html
Maybe Kiefer's mother can prod him to use his Jack Bauer persona for some good for a change.
Rep. John Conyers H.R. 676, which has over 70 co-sponsors, is the best solution to the health care crisis hands down. The incrementalists and the hacks for the insurance lobby do not want to end their pipeline of money, and will work to keep the insurance companies in the game. The insurance companies add nothing to health care, and for-profit business should not be in the business of health care.
Don't be deceived by those who will play upon the lack of knowledge of Americans and use fear to keep their cash registers ringing.
If one takes the time to read this carefully, one can see a negative bias by looking at the loaded language: "massive" federal program, abolishing the insurance industry (false, only the part of the industry involved in health care, plus look at this extended one-sided diatribe against a government run single payer system:
"To presume that the private sector is going to sit idly by to see the destruction of private coverage I think is a misreading of reality," said Ron Pollack of the advocacy group Families USA. "I think the presidential candidates understand that if healthcare reform is going to have a chance of success, it will require bipartisanship and a balance of public and private coverage. It cannot be the triumph of one ideology over the other."
Such a blending increasingly seems to be taking place in major federal and state programs, including Medicaid, the State Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicare. As employer-sponsored health insurance shrinks, insurance companies have reinvented themselves as managers and middlemen for government programs, said UC Berkeley health economist James Robinson.
For example, more than 60% of Americans enrolled in Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor, are now in some form of managed care, compared with fewer than 25% in the mid-1990s. In California, Medicaid is known as Medi-Cal.
"Whatever mix of private and public sources will increase the number of people with coverage, the insurance companies would like it to be managed by them," Robinson said in a recent interview. "They can work with Medicare, they can work with Medicaid, they can work with employers, they can work with whomever."
This isn't a new article--its propaganda for the insurance industries.
It is dishearting to see this article recieve top billing on the Common Dreams site.I suggest a trip to Daily Kos to read -"LA Times Hit Piece on SiCKO and American People
by LithiumCola" to see that this is just another example of the typical stuff the 'liberal' CMSM puts out.