Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Hamas Declares Victory
RAMALLAH - The Palestinian quest for an independent state was on the verge of collapse last night after Hamas militants took control of the Gaza Strip, banishing and executing their Fatah rivals and declaring Islamic rule on Israel's doorstep.
Fourteen years after the Oslo accords opened up the prospect of a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, its putative territory was in danger of breaking into two warring entities as Hamas fighters routed Fatah gunmen at the end of a week of violence that has left almost 100 people, both gunmen and civilians, dead.
Last night Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president and Fatah leader, declared a state of emergency from Ramallah in the West Bank and dissolved the three-month-old "national unity" government as he grasped for a strategy to undermine the "coup d'état".
But the deposed Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas, said Mr Abbas's decision to dismiss him and his government was "hasty", pledging to stay in power. Mr Haniyeh told a late night Gaza news conference that Mr Abbas and his advisers had not considered "the consequences [of the decision] and its effects on the situation on the ground".
It was unclear how the president could impose his authority in Gaza, where the green flag of the Islamic resistance movement fluttered on many government buildings in the crowded coastal strip.
"We are telling our people that the past era has ended and will not return," Islam Shahawan, a Hamas spokesman, told the movement's radio station. "The era of justice and Islamic rule have arrived."
Qais Abu Leila, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation executive committee, said there was determination to take action to stop the "insurrection". "This is a fight to preserve everything that we have built over the last 14 years."
But in Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian Authority, leaders appeared paralysed as they discussed how to stop the revolt. Some feared the turmoil could lead to the disintegration of the authority. Ominously, Fatah rounded up dozens of Hamas militants in the West Bank, where it is more dominant.
The Bush administration described the Gaza events as "a source of profound concern", accusing Hamas of committing acts of terror. The EU suspended what few aid projects it still maintained there. The Arab League warned of a "disastrous outcome" to internecine fighting that has crackled on and off for more than six months.
The Hamas victory is widely seen as a boost for Iran and Syria, which have supported the militants, and a painful reversal for the pro-western regimes in Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which worry about Tehran's meddling in Iraq and Lebanon, as well as Palestine.
Jordan also fears intra-Palestinian fighting could spread from the West Bank and across the river into the kingdom, where at least half the population is of Palestinian origin. "Things have never been so bad," said one senior Arab diplomat.
Around 25 people were killed and 90 injured in yesterday's violence. Hospital staff said some of the dead had been shot in the head at close range.
Hamas gunmen took over the Palestinian Authority's security and military intelligence headquarters after a three-day siege. Sources close to the Palestinian president said Israel had ignored repeated requests to allow deliveries of ammunition to Palestinian Authority forces, leaving them outgunned by Hamas who have relied on smuggled munitions.
Last night, Hamas said it had executed the top Fatah militant in Gaza, Samih al-Madhoun. Witnesses said the conquest of the security headquarters was followed by many executions. One told the Associated Press he saw Hamas men carrying out executions, despite pleas from residents.
The civil war is rooted in a long-standing power struggle between Hamas, which won elections last year, and Fatah, the historic core of the PLO. Hamas, which refuses to formally recognise Israel or renounce violence, denounced Fatah officials who had negotiated with Israel as renegades and "collaborators".
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

18 Comments so far
Show AllVets said to those who support Hamas, "Don't be ignorant."
As the saying goes: The best response to an ignorant person is silence. thus, all those who support Hamas will remain silent and not respond to you.
To all those who support the Hamas, I would advise you to search the Internet on information on the: -Hamas charter-.
Learn about them, their goals and their actions before giving it your blind support. Don't be ignorants. See if your values for free speech, freedom of religion, peace and racism match the Hamas ones.
Now that Hamas is physically separated from the corrupt pro-western Al-Fatah, the U.S, EU, and Israel can easily starve them to death--literally.
Reading this, a reader would only get one little hint that the US and Israel have been supporting Fatah with weapons and ammo. That hint is almost at the end where the story tells of a complaint from Fatah that they didn't get the aid from Israel they say they needed. You have to read between the lines a bit to ask why the Israelis would be giving arms and ammunition to the Palestinians in the first place.
Funny that they act like this is the death knell to the Oslo accords. They've been dead for sometime. The whole deal was always a bit phony, with Palestinians supposed to give what the Israelis wanted immediately, while everything the Palestinians wanted from the Israelis was put off to the "final status talks" at the end. And when the Palestinians tried to get there, they were told by the Isrealis that couldn't have what they wanted. No movement on return of refugees. No Palestinian capital in Jerusalem.
To me, Oslo died back then. At best, this is just putting flowers on an old grave.
And wow, those awful Palestinians actually want leaders who aren't as corrupt as Arafat's Fatah, and who are actually interested in getting a settlement for the Palestinians that gets them at least some of what they want. I don't like Hamas. I'm not very fond of fundamentalists of any stripe. But I can easily see why the Palestinians are sick of a Fatah government that basically trades away what the Palestinians want for US and Israeli support to keep them in a phony government which allows them to enrich themselves.
I guess now we'll get to see 'free elections' in a situation where the people are being starved to death by the US, the EU and Israel and told they'll continue to starve if they vote for the 'wrong' people.
This is very significant.
If it survives, the new state in Gaza is very threatening to existing Arab governments, really more so than to Israel. Here it is, next door to Egypt, where advocates of such a state are repressed.
It is governing a crowded, impoverished strip of land. It will be an example for the poor and politically repressed elements in many countries.
As grave as this may seem this may prove to be productive for all people of the region. There is a new kid on the block and he is a bit bigger and more influential, Israel may need to start talking more and shooting less.
I agree that most of the news coverage says very little about how the western powers support Fatah in their political and military campaigns.
That is why I like how Common Dreams now allows comments. We can expand on the article and share more information with each other.
I was reading an entry the other day on Wikipedia about virtual communities. It had a section that quoted researchers saying that virtual communities lead participants to have a greater understanding of the subject material being discussed and a greater connection to the world.
So thanks to everyone who is here sharing thoughts and information.
I have a hard time imagining that Israel will be shooting less with Hamas in power, especially given this indication that they are *actively hindering* Fatah (read the article again; it never suggested that Fatah expected arms *from* Israel, just that they would allow delivereies of arms to *pass through* Israel) - one must wonder why they would do that, if not in hopes of facing more militant leaders in Palestine. I don't think this is good news for people who support peace and justice.
Every newspaper mention of Hamas also states that it "refuses to recognize Israel or renounce violence." This clause
is a journalistic ball-and-chain. The fact that Israel likewise refuses to recognize Hamas and renounce violence against Palestinians is never mentioned. DOUBLE STANDARD!
Mahmoud Abbas is probably the most corrupt, bought off "leader" in the whole Middle East (a region full of corrupt, bought off leaders). It is easy to see why he is scared and why the US/UK/Israel is scared too. The Palestinians are finally rising up against him.
Hamas won the election and they have essentially been kept out of real power by the US etc. now they finally have it at least in Gaza, they should be governing all the palestinian territories wether we like it not, that is what democracy is all about as far as I can tell, the will of the people. Now when they get rid of Abbas maybe we can get on with making some real progress in Palestine. Good for Hamas!
see ali abumimah's article, "a setback for the bush doctrine in gaza" (electronicintifada.net), mark perry and paul woodward's piece in asia times, "document details u.s. plan to sink hamas," especially on the role of elliott abrams (www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East), and tony karon's article on the propping up of mohammad dahlan "palestinian pinochet making his move" on his website, rootless cosmopolitan (tonykaron.com)
As long as Israel and the U.S. oppose Hamas they will grow in popularity. An external threat always supports the internal dictator.
If after the election of Hamas cautious discussions were held while they tried to govern it is likely that the population would have gradually become disillusioned with this radical leadership.
We always look devious when our moronic leaders flap their gums about Democracy and then continue to overthrow any popular foreign government.
correction typo in my post of articles above, ali abunimah.
Non violent action will have more lasting positive results than the use of violence, especially when you're out powered.
I have to agree with shakker; a group which actually supports the Palestinians materially, was popularly elected and actually defends the Palestinian interests against those who in the past refused even to recognize that Palestinians existed, must be a very radical group! Can you imagine a government which so far has proven to be un-corrupted?
OK Saila,
If you support a fundamentalist regime that publicly calls for random killing of Jews, annihilate one of the UN members, stoning of homosexuals to death, discrimination against woman, eliminate freedom of religion speech and thoughts. And you also support violent military cope against government police forces... then I'll try to ignore you.
Thank you...
I wonder why the Jewish people moved to a place that could be attacked in the first place? To a spot that holds such controversy. Why would you move sixty years ago to a land below your enemy and piss them off when they have lived there 2000yrs? If violence begets violence, who do you support? To pick a side is stupid. Its like watching the ball game of the end of the world here, your Mom and Dad in a fight and your seven yrs old. Who are you going to starve? The corrupt rebel or the corrupt executioner? I'm just glad my Jewish friends get along with my Islamic friends. That is how democracy works on the street, between individuals. Leaders lead and Rulers rule and war measures out to be pretty petty.
Hey history buffs! 'WHO' put Israel on the map 'THERE'?