Email List
Most Popular This Week
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Hundreds of Chicago Students Walk Out of Standardized Test
- The Same Motive for Anti-US 'Terrorism' Is Cited Over and Over
- What Does It Mean To Be An “American” Corporation?
Popular content
Today's Top News
China Overtaking US for Fast Internet Access as Africa gets Left Behind
Almost 300 million people worldwide are now accessing the internet using fast broadband connections, fuelling the growth of social networking services such as MySpace and generating thousands of hours of video through websites such as YouTube.
There are more than 1.1 billion of the world's estimated 6.6 billion people online and almost a third of them are now accessing the internet on high-speed lines. According to the internet consultancy Point Topic, 298 million people had broadband at the end of March and that is already estimated to have shot over 300 million. The statistics, however, paint a picture of a divided digital world.
While there are high levels of broadband penetration in western Europe, North America and hi-tech economies such as South Korea, usage in developing countries, and especially in Africa, is pitiful. Many of these emerging economies lack telephone services, let alone the sort of broadband internet access that has become available to every household in Europe.
In terms of total broadband users, the US leads the pack with more than 60 million subscribers. But second-placed China is fast closing the gap. From 41 million users a year ago, China now has more than 56 million and looks set to overtake the US as the world's largest broadband market this year.
Katja Mueller, research director at Point Topic, said: "What amazed me when compiling these figures is that China has leapt ahead and actually had more people sign up to broadband in the first three months of this year than in any other earlier quarter."
China's rampant growth is a result of economic changes and government intervention. The country's economic boom has helped create an affluent urban middle class clamouring for the social aspects of internet access, while the government has been driving the roll-out of internet access in rural areas.
Next year's Beijing Olympics has provided a fillip to the market with the government demanding that every household in the capital has high-speed internet access in time for the games.
Japan ranked third, with 26.5 million broadband users at the end of March this year, while Germany is fourth at more than 16 million. France scored the highest growth (9%) in take-up among the top 10 broadband nations to leapfrog South Korea - at 14.1 million - to take the fifth spot with 15.3 million.
The UK came in sixth with just under 14 million broadband users at the end of March, up 6.4%. Demand in the UK has been driven by fierce competition from the satellite broadcaster Sky, which launched its broadband service last year, and the introduction of "free" broadband offers from firms such as TalkTalk.
But in terms of broadband usage as a percentage of households, the UK's position in the global rankings slips to number 17, with 55.5% of households connecting to the internet at high speed.
Based on broadband penetration, South Korea is by far the world's top broadband user with nearly 90% of households online. Several small, economically vibrant and densely populated states are also high on the list such as Hong Kong, Monaco and Macau. The US, with broadband penetration at just under 53%, is in 24th place. Penetration in China, meanwhile, is 14.35% while in India penetration stands at just 1.15% of the country's estimated 200 million households.
Penetration levels in eastern Europe, meanwhile, may be low but the region scored the highest overall level of growth in take-up, becoming the only area to show growth of more than 10%.
The region's economic rehabilitation, in part thanks to the inclusion of several states in an expanded EU, is driving take-up, according to Point Topic. Poland saw growth in new broadband connections of 9% in the first quarter, with Hungary at 10.38%, Bulgaria at 10.94%, Ukraine at nearly 15% and Croatia at a staggering 25%.
"Penetration of broadband in eastern Europe was really low, but it is starting to catch up with Europe and we expect eastern Europe to continue to grow," said Ms Mueller.
In fact, Indonesia scored the highest growth across the world in the first quarter - almost 28% - but from a very low base. Greece, meanwhile was second with growth of over 26% due to the rather late introduction of broadband by incumbent operator OTE.
The figures, however, show just how large the gap is between the digital haves and have nots. Many sub-Saharan African states do not register in the figures at all: only South Africa, Sudan, Senegal and Gabon make it on to the list, with household broadband penetration running from 1.79% in South Africa - with 215,000 users at the end of March - to just 0.05% in Sudan with a mere 3,000. North African states fare slightly better with Morocco scoring 6.78% penetration with 418,000 users, and Egypt at 1.55% or 240,000. Many African states are now looking to mobile phone companies to provide access to the internet as they struggle to find a place at the digital table.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



6 Comments so far
Show AllIs Common Dreams avalilable in China, or is it censored?
National Geographic, May 07 issue I believe has a great article on China's growth.
I remember accessing CD once when I visited China six years ago. I don't know if it's possible today. However, I have e-mailed some CD articles to friends in China (by cutting and pasting), and they've reported receiving them. They haven't been arrested yet!
CD is available in Shanghai. I log on and read it nearly every day. As far as I can tell the site is complete and uncensored. And yes, broadband is quite common here. The growth of Internet usage here is staggering.
Other technological changes are occurring rapidly as well. For example, when I arrived in 2002 hardly any restaurant workers had mobile phones. Now, virtually all do. Serviceable units using SIM card technology are available for about 30 to 50 USD. Very good used phones can be had for 6 to 12 USD. Billions of text messages are sent each week.
Many parts of China seem to have bypassed land line technology altogether in favor of cell technology. The pace of change is so rapid that it often feels as though Shanghai is a Virtual Reality zone.
"China's rampant growth is a result of economic changes and government intervention."
As Adam Smith pointed out - the invisible hand of the market works together with the visible hand of government intervention. Free market fundamentalists always forget the second bit.
I think they need to "start over" in regards to the internet. There are still way too many bugs and holes in the system.
God, I have DSL, and I still feel like I'm in the dark ages.
Don't forget ladies and gents of U.S. citizenship that we have already paid for fiber-optic cable to be brought to our house. And this article neglects to mention that the quality of broadband that is brought to the house is significantly different from country to country. Here in the U.S. we are getting shafted with (relatively) low speeds for (absolutely) high prices.
I have pretty good (5 Mbit downspeed, 10x slower on the uploads though) broadband myself, but 1 STRAND(!) of fiber can carry 8000 times that (the download speed that is, and 80,000 times the upload speed). Oh don't get me wrong, it's not like they've maxed out the ability of good ole coax (cable) or twisted pair (DSL) wires, so I have no illusions as to them maxing out the fiber either, but with a greater level of infrastructure SHOULD come a greater level of service.
Oh, and iwarrior:
The internet was designed to be resistant to destruction through multiple means. It's actully very nice the way it is, and alot of the 'bugs and holes' are actually well thought out features that are so powerful that they (of course) are misused. It doesn't need a redesign from the ground up (except for technological evolution of course, but that's being handled with IPv6) but it DOES need to be re-assessed for utilization.
The difference between the two is at what level you're looking to make changes. The bottom part of the internet (the protocols that describe how the wires send a signal and turn it into 1s and 0s (bits), the way those bits are arranged into a message (packet) and the way those packets are sent from one place to another in a more-or-less straight (infrastructurally speaking) line) is just peachy and brilliant. Works too, I can load a site from Europe in less than a second (that's fucking MAGIC people, or at least it's close enough, ain't that right Mr. Clarke) or send a message to many (how many people read Common Dreams?) without a printing press or my own distribution network. Where it needs to be redesigned is how we use it. HTML and HTTP have been so over-used and blown out of proportion that it's crazy. Gopher, FTP and IRC were, in my opinion, what the internet should have been about, but all were beat down by the cross usage of http for things it wasn't designed to do, especially gopher. It went from being a great search-and-retrieve library (gopher), an excellent data repository (FTP) and a meeting hall with unlimited (and instantly creatable) rooms (IRC) to a giant limitedly-interactive magazine rack (HTTP).
BitTorrent is an innovation that fits nicely into the current model, to go with my previous analogies it's like the data repository except that the repository doesn't hold the data, it just has a list of other people that have it (or some of it) in their PERSONAL repository and are willing to share it.
Okay, I could go on about this for a long time, but I'll stop and state my point.
The internet itself is fine, like the road network in utility but MUCH less environmentally destructive, much faster, and limited to information (which is okay because most of what we transfer around from place to place is information anyway). The problem is in how we use it.