Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
IRAQ: Blood, Sweat and Tears at New U.S. Embassy
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Justice Department is actively investigating allegations of forced labour and other abuses by the Kuwaiti contractor now rushing to complete the sprawling 592-million-dollar U.S. embassy project in Baghdad, numerous sources have revealed.
Justice Department trial attorneys Andrew Kline and Michael J. Frank with the civil rights division have been contacting former employees of First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting and other witnesses for interviews and documents, but declined to comment on the investigation other than to say they are looking into allegations of labour trafficking.
The two investigators are said to be looking for actual workers around the world who claim they were misled or pressured to work in Iraq against their will by the company.
Rumors of forced labour in Iraq have plagued First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting for several years, but U.S. government officials have discounted such allegations by workers from Nepal and the Philippines in the past, even as the company continued to rack up contracts now totaling several billion dollars from the Pentagon and U.S. State Department.
Late last year, several U.S. citizens also said they boarded separate chartered jets in Kuwait loaded with work crews from the Philippines, India, Pakistan and Africa holding boarding passes to Dubai, but the planes then flew directly to Baghdad.
More recently, another U.S. citizen told IPS that he was told by workers from Ghana on the embassy site that they thought they would have jobs in Dubai but were then taken to work in Iraq.
First Kuwaiti's general manager, Wadih al Absi, flatly dismisses the accusations as unfounded and false.
"I am telling you that First Kuwaiti has never violated any visa violations or forced people to work," he said during a telephone interview last January. "In the coming months you will see that First Kuwaiti is the best company working in the Middle East."
Since landing the Baghdad project, First Kuwaiti has won additional contracts worth roughly 200 million dollars more for embassy projects in Africa, India and Indonesia. The company also is believed to be competing for another large new U.S. embassy in Lebanon.
Soon after the State Department awarded the Iraq embassy contract to First Kuwaiti in July 2005, thousands of low-paid migrant workers recruited from South Asia, the Philippines and other nations poured into Baghdad to begin building the gargantuan new embassy within two years time. When completed later this summer, it will be the most fortified U.S. diplomatic mission ever constructed, spanning 104 acres on the banks of the ancient Tigris River and holding more than 20 buildings. It will be comparable in size to the Vatican.
But during First Kuwaiti's frenzied rush to the finish the project on schedule, U.S. managers and specialists involved with the project began protesting about the living and working conditions of lower-paid workers sequestered and largely unseen behind security walls bordering the embassy project inside the U.S.-controlled Green Zone.
Among those complaints: construction crews lived in crowded quarters, ate sub-standard food, and had little medical care. When drinking water was scarce in the blistering heat, coolers were filled at the banks of the Tigris, a river rife with waterborne disease, sewage and sometimes floating bodies.
Others questioned why First Kuwaiti held the passports of workers. Was it to keep them from escaping? Some labourers had turned up "missing" with little investigation. One U.S. citizen said labourers told him they had been misled about their job location. When recruited, they were unaware they were heading for war-torn Iraq.
After hearing similar allegations during much of 2006, Howard J. Krongard, the State Department's inspector general, flew to Baghdad for what he describes as a "brief" review on Sep. 15. His review was recently made public after inquires from Aljazeera about the embassy for an upcoming hour-long documentary, and he reported that the complaints had no substance.
"Nothing came to our attention," he wrote in a nine-page memorandum posted on the State Department's Web site. More importantly, after interviewing an unstated number of workers from the Philippines, India, Nepal and Pakistan, Krongard said no evidence was found of labour smuggling, trafficking or other abuses. Krongard makes no mention of an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Justice Department of First Kuwaiti and others for such alleged practices and other matters.
One former labour foreman at the embassy site who recently read Krongard's review called it "bulls**t." Another former First Kuwaiti employee viewed it as "a whitewash."
Had Krongard visited earlier than last September and unannounced, he may have witnessed something very different then what his memorandum relates.
"Most of the allegations (from the U.S. citizens) were true before he arrived," claims Juvencio Lopez, who says he was a high-level project manager under the U.S. State Department over the course of two years.
During a telephone interview, he said that protests over First Kuwaiti's bad food, abusive treatment from managers and unsafe working conditions were routine among many of the 2,700 workers during much of 2005 and 2006.
"There were strikes and sit-downs every month," Lopez said. He left Iraq in November 2006 and is now home in San Antonio, Texas. "Sometimes there were almost riots."
Lopez vividly recalls a First Kuwaiti security guard unholstering his 9mm handgun and walking among the squatting protestors telling them to get back to work. Had the guard fallen or workers tackled him to the ground, the gun might have gone off. Lopez said he immediately reported the incident to First Kuwaiti. "Someone could gotten killed or injured," he said.
On another occasion, a company manager roughed up a Filipino worker, sources say. All of the other Filipinos nearby began loudly protesting as bewildered workers from other countries watched. "The workers were from 36 different countries and everyone spoke a different language," Lopez said.
Supplementing Krongard's review, the coalition Multi-National Force inspector general in Baghdad interviewed 36 workers from seven different countries at the new embassy site in December. The MNF-I IG claimed it found no evidence to indicate the presence of severe forms of labour trafficking, but did find that workers from Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka reported deceptive hiring practices by recruitment agencies in their home countries.
They said they had been promised higher pay, shorter hours and days off. "A large majority of workers" from the Indian subcontinent incurred recruiting fees of up to one year's salary.
Paul Chapman, a subcontractor working with First Kuwaiti, said he is also struck by the lack of interest in workers that First Kuwaiti had listed as "missing" on its company rosters. Now home in South Carolina, Chapman said seven workers from India, Pakistan and the Philippines "just disappeared."
Fearing they may have been killed and dumped into the Tigris, he began pressing embassy officials overseeing the project to investigate. "They told me to forget about it because the workers had probably found other jobs."
Chapman and others also claim that standard safety procedures on the project frequently went unobserved. Many worked without safety harnesses when off the ground and had no hardhats or boots. Work clothes were dirty and tattered. Those that had them had only one set of work clothes so they were rarely washed. They became dirty and tattered, causing rashes and sores.
Some worked in sandals, others in bare feet. "They had their toes curled around the rebar like birds," Lopez remembers.
"Every U.S. labour law was broken," charged one U.S. foreman, John Owens, who said that he never witnessed a single safety meeting. Once an Egyptian worker fell and broke his back and was sent home. No one ever heard from him again.
"The accident might not have happened if there was a safety programme and he had known how to use a safety harness," said Owen, who left the embassy project last June.
David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington, DC, whose work has appeared in The Los Angeles Times, New York Times and on ABC and PBS. He can be contacted at: phinneydavid@yahoo.com. An earlier version of this story appeared on iraqslogger.com.
Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service

23 Comments so far
Show AllThe U.S. Iraq embassy: "It will be comparable in size [and power] to the Vatican." And similarly built on the toil of the exploited.
The Vatican controls about a billion catholics. The U.S. Iraq embassy is intended to control about a billion muslims. And the methods of the Inquisition have been and are employed by both to control their "subjects".
It's only fitting that the imperial palace of an enslaved nation be built with the forced labor of the conquered. Many our own state capitals were built with slave labor.
No s_ _ t! Do you honestly think rich people are going to pay laborers $30/hr. plus benefits to build the damn fortress?? Do you think the neocons would have it any other way??
Yep... it's the widely accepted, "People are our cheapest resource" mindset so prevalent amongst many of those running the world today. Use 'em, up, kick 'em out the door... there's plenty more where they came from, and the way things are set up, the disposable "wage slaves" of today are in endless supply.
Labor. One of the least discussed/resolved, yet most important, issues of ALL times.
US continues its policy of slavery, just as it was before the civil war. How else do the rich get richer, but exploit the poor? They call this "democracy." I call it fascism.
We should also note that the US Capitol itself was built with the labor of African-American slaves, exploited African-American "freedman" and low-paid white laborers. Slavery and the exploitation of free labor is what founded this country and continues to be an essential thread in the fabric of our economic and cultural identities. This is the "freedom" that we are outsourcing to the world at the point of a gun. Many guns actually, and cluster weapons, and DU and fuel air explosives and hell-fire missiles and before too long - nukes...
It's called The American Way - immigrant farm labor at $4/hr with no benefits ring a bell? A minimum wage a cat in the ghetto couldn't survive on? Wal Mart locking illegal workers inside over night while cutting employees loose before benefits kick in and shorting others' hours for the same reason? Is there any worker bee in New Orleans earning enough to live on? Shipping all of the "good" jobs to countries where a dollar a day and a cup of water is all a greedy corporation needs to churn out the majority of crap we buy?
Yea, it's so damn surprising that the same venal, insanely greedy group of anti-Democracy corporations that spend an inordinate amount of time figuring out new and unique ways of screwing US royally would dare do the same to those damn ungrateful feriners we went and liberated without their asking.
We are as guilty as the contractors. We sit here and let Bush/Cheney steal elections and break every law they don't like with no fear of impeachment. Let the congress fund this largest Embassy in the world and fund this illegal Iraq war and how many people call or write their Rep. Or Senator or write letters to the newspapers and TV stations? The answer is very few.We are letting these criminal's destroy our constitution and way of life.So as long as we sit on our a--es and let these traitors do as they please,we are getting what we deserve.Most people don't know a thing about the Baghdad Embassy. I know that for a fact because when I mention it to people and I have to many they have no idea of what I'm talking about and the rest don't give a damn.You have heard very little if anything said about this disgrace in the media.Most of the media are controlled by the rightwing and if they continue to hide the truth from the citizens this Republic will fall. One important instance of this is Bush/Cheney not allowing the pictures of the caskets of our dead troops to be shown when they are returned to their greiving familys. We should be up in arms about this but we aren't.It may not do any good but I write letters to the editors, my Senator although he is a republican and call Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and email them on a regular basis. If millions of you will do the same at some point they will have to start listening to we the people or we need to vote them out of office.
AH-HA! So that's why the almighty Commander Guy went to visit the Vatican - he was looking for decorating ideas. /sarcasm
Yes, In five years (or less) this abomination will be owned by the Theocratic Government of Bagdahd (whatever the new country a third the size of the current agglomeration will be called.) The United States will have no diplomatic relations with this country. The Swiss will be our representatives because the, probably Shi'ite, rulers will reject the US. This will be the result of our nation destroying policy. Maybe we will have missions to Kurdistan and the Sunni nation but I doubt we will have much real influence.
The Neo-Cons will blame it on the folks who told them they were making a mistake in the first place and the mainstream (corporatocracy) media will foster this lie. At least a half a trillion dollars that could have rebuilt our infrastructure, funded education, provided healthcare and secured our land down the tubes.
Isn't this the way of all empires? Whether we are talking about the great wall of China, The Egyptian pyramids, or Roman aquaducts and highways--this will continue till enough of the "slaves" understand two things: this system "ain't the product of intelligent design" (thanks Bill Moyers!)and there are more of "us" than there are of "them". Then as Robert Fisk would say: Watch out!
As they say, "Great empires fall hard."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel#Apocalypse_of_Baruch
Apocalypse of Baruch
The Third Apocalypse of Baruch, known only from Greek and Slavonic copies, seems to allude to the Tower, and may be consistent with Jewish tradition. In it, Baruch is first taken (in a vision) to see the resting place of the souls of "those who built the tower of strife against God, and the Lord banished them."
"Those who gave counsel to build the tower, for they whom thou seest drove forth multitudes of both men and women, to make bricks; among whom, a woman making bricks was not allowed to be released in the hour of child-birth, but brought forth while she was making bricks, and carried her child in her apron, and continued to make bricks. And the Lord appeared to them and confused their speech, when they had built the tower to the height of four hundred and sixty-three cubits. And they took a gimlet, and sought to pierce the heavens, saying, Let us see (whether) the heaven is made of clay, or of brass, or of iron. When God saw this He did not permit them, but smote them with blindness and confusion of speech, and rendered them as thou seest." (Greek Apocalypse of Baruch, 3:5-8)
The "overseers" (officers), Architects and white contractors had better not be on the job site near the compleation, or they will be buired in the cattycomes and the walls of basements too maintain the long term secrets of Our "National Security" state.
But than again, wipeing out their memory with a drug-induced lobotomy is the standard for lower grade "retired" US State Department employees, and far simpler, IMExp.
clyde paige:
You are the first one other than me who actually uttered the words "vote them out of office" i.e. RECALL!! Finally!!!
This is news? The damn thing is probably being built by the bin Ladens, major league construction moguls and the second richest family in Saudi Arabia. It's no surprise that the imported slaves were supposedly headed for Dubai (controlled by the bin Ladens) and wound up in Baghdad. Well, accidents happen.
The USA is SUCH a shithole...I wonder if they torture their slaves as well as their prisoners?
Seriously, its like living next door to a damn crackhouse.
One positive thought has occurred to me: you get what you pay for. So it will be no surprise to read in the months and years ahead, that some very shoddy work was done. I wouldn't be the least surprised to read that these fortified walls built to resist mortar or missile attacks have been built not to spec. And the Green Zone won't be as safe as those who had it built would like.
It also wouldn't be any surprise to read in the months ahead that detailed plans of this massive Embassy are soon available on the Internet. After all, when workers are exploited, they have in their hands a very good knowledge of the building and all of its weak points.
The so called Green Zone won't be much safer than other parts of Iraq are today.
Once again, you get what you pay for and if you do it on the cheap, well, what you get is going to be anything but a safe Green Zone.
Another fine job done by the US of After the fact lousy job done - this time by real Brownies.
This mess is going on because American's allowed it to!!!! They have grown complaicent about their freedom, their countries welfare and their jobs too. As I recall it was similar instances that brought on the rise of organized labor in this country (unions)! But, boy if you mention union to American's anymore they go into a tizzy! A union member is next kin to a Communist or Athiest! You get a long speel about how corrupt they are, how they are outdated, how all union workers are useless and who needs a union anymore????? Most American's would rather work their a.. of for life with no retirement or health care than they would join a union! So, like I said before American's have what they have asked for. A government that considers them nonhuman, could care less about their welfare and expoits them every minute of the day! The only way the mess will ever be solved is when American's grow tired of being used to make someone else rich! They start demanding better and take to the streets if they don't get it!
Remember, folks, this is only one of FOURTEEN US installations in Iraq, four of them big and beautiful -- and not quite finished -- which is one of the bigger reasons why the Dems caved in and gave Bush the money to carry on. BushCo has indeed won this war, as they now have what they invaded for.
Here's a link to further articles about the U.S. embassy in baghdad (caps). It's a search I did within SmirkingChimp using criteria: u.s. embassy baghdad
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/search/node/u.s.+embassy+baghdad
This one was written May 29 and describes how this new embassy is constantly under mortar fire, and where flak jackets are now madatory:
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/7769
anyone want to apply for a job at the new embassy - is welcome to it. so far, they can only get underpaid workers by lying to them that the jobs are really in dubai ...
I think the embassy was built to house a proconsul, or American puppet regime. It's proven a little difficult to get one in there (and out, alive) but the structure, impressive as it seems, will make great target practice in the meantime.
Uh, does anyone around here remember Viet Nam? Camh Ran Bay? Da Nang? Giant military bases (also built by KBR) that no longer are available to the U.S. military-industrial complex. The last helicopter off the roof of the embassy in Iraq will be a picture to be remembered.
The picture of the U.S. embassy with military guard outside says it all. The U.S. attacked Iraq for no cause, under the pretense of faulty intelligence in order to colonize it and keep the U.S. military there indefinitely in order to guard the interests ($$$$$$) of greedy American war profiteers.
By the way, isn't killing civilians supposed to be a war crime? Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed by the U.S., women and young girls raped by the U.S. military, etc. Iraqis' bodies lie in the streets and are eaten by dogs. It doesn't sound like Iraq is better off now than it was under Saddam's rule. The Party of War Republicans keep repeating that things are going great there (for the war profiteers, that is).
Just "why?" Why are we building our largest embassy in Iraq, unless we have "plans" for that country that go beyond anything that's been discussed so far?
Why, inspite of their election victory, have the Dems caved in to the Administration on Iraq? Why is Cheney out of reach?
What's really happening and why can't the American people be told--even the ones who want to know?
One day, we'll wake up and it will be too late.
Fear of terrorism? Even more, I fear the end of the United States as we've known it for over two hundred years--not from the outside, but due to the greed, dishonesty and hubrus of corporate America and most of our elected officials and the state denial of most of the people of this country.
Wake up America! Denial is deadly!