EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
President Heats Up The Cold War
WASHINGTON -- President Bush says the Cold War is over but his latest military move and the reaction of Russian President Vladimir Putin make me wonder.
Despite his reassuring words, Bush triggered a red-hot rhetorical exchange by pushing ahead with his plan to install an anti-missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland, a region that Russia has long viewed as within its sphere of influence.
Putin, in an interview released by the Kremlin, gave this assessment of the U.S. plan:
"If part of the strategic nuclear potential of the United States finds itself in Europe -- and according to our military experts, threatens us -- then we will have to take retaliatory steps."
Asked what those steps might be, Putin replied: "Of course, we have to have new targets in Europe."
Bush on Tuesday unloaded on Putin for backsliding on democratization in Russia.
Reforms that were once promised to empower Russians "have been derailed, with troubling implications for democratic development," Bush declared.
But on Wednesday Bush appeared eager to soften the rhetorical exchange on the eve of his scheduled meeting with Putin in Heiligendamm, Germany.
"Russia is not going to attack Europe," Bush told reporters. "Russia is not an enemy ... We're not at war with Russia."
Administration officials said Bush feels the missile shield is needed to defend against rogue regimes such as Iran and North Korea. But Putin questions why the anti-missile systems have to be installed in Eastern Europe. The Czechs are not too wild to have them on their soil, either, and some U.S. allies consider the missile project provocative.
Meanwhile, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been lecturing to world leaders such as Putin and Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Rice even slipped up recently and referred to the "Soviets" instead of the Russians.
Bush, invoking his own personal diplomacy, has invited Putin to spend a couple of days at the family summer home in Kennebunkport, Maine, next month so that the two leaders can talk about tattered U.S.-Russian relations in a more relaxed setting.
In addition to scratching the U.S.-Russian relationship, the Bush administration has developed a new rift with the U.N. chief nuclear inspector over a possible military strike against Iran.
At a news conference in Madrid last Friday, Rice jumped on ElBaradei for warning in a BBC interview against what he called the "new crazies" in the Bush administration who say, "Let's go bomb Iran."
ElBaradei's comments came amid reports that Vice President Dick Cheney favored a military confrontation with Iraq as a way to shut down that country's nuclear enrichment program.
There are no crazies in the Bush administration, Rice said, in effect.
"The president of the United States has made it clear that we are on a diplomatic course," Rice said. "That policy is supported by all the members of the Cabinet -- and by the vice president of the United States."
Meanwhile, the U.S. is backing up its hostility toward Iran with old-fashioned gunboat diplomacy by massing of a number of warships in the Hormuz Straits, smack in Iran's backyard.
With his time in the White House running out, the president should be thinking of ways to pull out of Iraq instead of rekindling an old feud with Russia and threatening Iran.
Helen Thomas is a columnist for Hearst Newspapers. E-mail: helent@hearstdc.com.
Copyright 2007 Hearst Newspapers.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



11 Comments so far
Show All"Rice even slipped up recently and referred to the "Soviets" instead of the Russians."
gee whiz is there even an iq that is above 50 in the entire administration?
This is just another "COLD WAR CONSTRUCT" to enable the wheels of the military industrial complex to continue rolling. Bush is taunting--actually pushing-- Putin into an arms race;
once Putin has no choice but to start an arms buildup, the neocons will justify ASTRONOMICAL DEFENSE SPENDING. The result of course is a LONGTIME EXTREME PROFIT GENERATING situation for the military industrial complex and all its WELL-POSITIONED WAR PROFITEERS!!!
This military-duty shirker is going around trying to start a fight. Is Bush drunk again? Or is he trying to get a hard-on? Either way we lose.
Hoa binh
So which is it? Ellen Goodman or Helen Thomas?
The Russians lost the first cold war. They will lose this one two, if they choose to start it. And, if they don't die off first due to their negative birth rate.
Pavrovian dog: Your point is right on! It's about sales for the military industrial complex, and war or threat of war insures more orders. Keep that military hardware pumping, fellas, it's oh, so American. Exactly what Eisenhower prophesied.
For bloggers everywhere:
too = also, in addition to.
to = directional preposition; particle
two = a number, usually follows one, and precedes three
Hope this helps....
hahah- I wondered the same, Helen or Ellen?
Looks like bush is just trying to start another trouble spot - two more wars at the same time, and he gets to be dictator in chief - In his dreams )o:
bush is the one who started this bs in the first place - not Putin. And like a spoiled bully boy has totally thrown G8 off course.
There are so many of us who are sick of bush's face, I wonder how the G8's feel?
I know most countries feel pity and compassion for Americans - but I'm sure they also shake their heads in amaze that he ever got any votes in the first place.
President Bush says the Cold War is over but his latest military move and the reaction of Russian President Vladimir Putin make me wonder.
"bush" should NEVER be referred to as the President. It provides his regime with a patina of legitimacy which it does not possess.
When you follow the link above, it is Helen Thomas.
I cannot understand why the Republican Party, why someone doesn't take the keys away from this guy. He's not safe to drive our nation.
All in all, it's grossly disquieting. I keep thinking, "It's about 18 months now--how much more damage can he do?"
And the answer is, "A lot!"
But why aren't any saner minds prevailing? Is this really the legacy Condi Rice wants for herself? Surely there are _some_ adults in his cabinet. Robert Gates? He cannot think this is the way to go.
God help us.
Godlessrant, the greater irony is that Russia is/was Condi's field of special expertise. But this is the classical Freudian slip and gives a window in to the mindset of the administration.