Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Day in the Life: Sgt. Pepper Turns 40
It was forty years ago today: the release of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. "It's certainly a thrill," the Beatles sang; but listening today, much of the thrill is gone--except for one song. Still, it's easy to remember that day--June 1, 1967--when the first thing we saw was the cover: a collage featuring the Beatles surrounded by cut-out figures of their heroes and other celebrities, including wax figures of themselves two years earlier, when they were the lovable moptops. Rock had never been so smart.
As for the music, rock had never been so big, so free, with so many ideas and feelings and so many different sounds. The lads from Liverpool wanted to "raise a smile" with the irresistible whimsy of Paul McCartney's "When I'm Sixty-Four" and "Lovely Rita, Meter Maid." But they also told vivid and true stories like "She's Leaving Home," a song about the parents of a runaway girl.
Critics quickly ran out of superlatives: Geoffrey Stokes wrote in the Village Voice that "listening to the Sgt. Pepper album one thinks not simply of the history of popular music but the history of this century." In the Times of London, no less than Kenneth Tynan described Sgt. Pepper as "a decisive moment in the history of Western civilization." He didn't seem to be kidding.
Listening to the CD forty years later, the concept behind this concept album now seems a bit lame: The lads take on the identity of old-time music hall entertainers for a kaleidoscopic tour of popular styles of the century--marching bands, circus music, folk songs, jazz hits. Some of the cuts are pretty bad, particularly John Lennon's "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite," with elaborate circus sound effects and not much else. Lennon's song about the world of LSD, "where rockinghorse people eat marshmallow pies," is cloying.
But one song today seems stronger than ever: Lennon's "A Day in the Life." As the cut begins, "the curtain falls on Pepperland," Tim Riley wrote, "just as another is raised on the sobering stage of the real world." The opening line, "I read the news today, oh boy," is dense with meaning now, especially the way Lennon sings "oh boy," which sounds sad, vulnerable and puzzled. It makes me remember hearing the news of his murder on December 8, 1980, and also reading the news from Saigon the summer the album came out, and seeing the news from Baghdad today.
The singer is reading the newspaper, about a man killed in a car accident, while "a crowd of people stood and stared." One death, in a summer when thousands were dying in Vietnam. In place of the big rich sound of the rest of the album, the instrumentation here is stark and simple: guitar, bass, piano and percussion.
Then we hear a dissonant orchestral cacaphony, and then an alarm clock goes off, and the bewildered and subdued John is replaced by the perky Paul, waking up and heading out, blissfully ignorant of the world's terrors.
Then we're back with Lennon--is this just a nightmare? The next news story is about the puzzle of "four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire." Lennon tosses in a joke--"now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall"--but it's hard to laugh after the news about the man who was killed.
Lennon's last line is "I'd love to turn you on. " But this isn't the happy turn-on of Ringo's "I get high with a little help from my friends"--it's more like turning on to escape a hopeless world, to get away from the nightmare of "a day in the life."
Then comes that concluding orchestral crescendo, one of the most dissonant and most famous in popular music, followed by a crashing fortissimo piano chord in E major, followed by a long, slow fade--forty-three seconds of utter finality.
"A Day in the Life," with its confusion and quiet horror, follows the youthful fun of the rest of Sgt. Pepper. Together they express so much of what we call the '60s: As one speaker in the documentary Berkeley in the Sixties put it, "so much life, so much death; so much possibility, so much impossibility."
Jon Wiener, a contributing editor of The Nation and a professor of history at the University of California, Irvine, is the author of several books, including Gimme Some Truth: The John Lennon FBI Files, Professors, Politics and Pop and Historians in Trouble. He lives in Los Angeles.
© 2007 The Nation
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


15 Comments so far
Show AllAs I read this and other articles on the anniversary of Sgt Pepper, I'm reminded of where I was 20 years ago: in the weather office of an aircraft carrier, sitting with my good friend (and fellow Beatles afficiando). We were then singing "it was twenty years ago today."
I'll comment on the importance of this album, most of which everyone has heard or read previously.
Sgt. Pepper forever changed the face of Western Civilization, and even affected Eastern cultures, especially since George Harrison had blended his teachings of Shankar with the Rubber Soul recordings (and I propose the Beatles began the outward-bound journey as early as "Something New").
The studio changed, the orchestrations changed, and the content and form of popular music changed.
Sgt Pepper is considered the first culmination of an evolution called the 'concept album,' wherein danceable music was to forever share the airwaves with emotion, intelligence and more creativity. Forget that the right-wingers and ultra-ignorant critics of counter-culture claim 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds' was about LSD (it was actually a drawing by Julian) or that "Mr. Kite" involved heroin-and acid-induced delusions of the 'Hippie Threat' (Lennon wrote the song almost verbatim from a circus poster). These are works of art designed to (finally?) get the audience to THINK, and to analyze. This was the modern 'program music,' akin to the Romantic Period concept of the tone-poem.
George Martin, the knighted "Fifth Beatle," certainly managed to transform the Boys' whims and desires into realities of sound and design, but overall the genius of the album (and every Beatles project) derived from the Beatles as a unit. This would be the very last time until "Abbey Road" that each man put his absolute ALL into the others' ideas.
The Beatles themselves changed the face of Western popular culture forever -- all before the age of 30.
And Sgt Pepper is the cornerstone -- the masterpiece -- of that fact.
Some interesting observations here, but Weiner ultimately misses the point. There is nothing "lame" about the Beatles' concept. It was precisely that concept that allowed them the freedom to create their masterpiece, without the baggage that accompanies being the biggest band in the world. "Mr. Kite" was a bold musical statement that contained a lot more than "circus sound effects," including multiple time signatures and an intriguing guitar solo (played by Paul). To call "Lucy in the Sky" cloying is patently ridiculous.
Obviously the thrust of this article is "A Day in the Life," but Weiner again resorts to Beatles stereotypes and lazy journalism when he plays the "John deep/Paul shallow" card. John's words are all the more meaningful because of the bridge that Paul wrote.
If you want to talk about the futility of war and senseless killing, I'm right there with you. But maligning one of the greatest albums ever is not the way to do it.
I heard Rubber Soul in it's entirety when I was five or six.
It shaped my psyche - it encompassed the world for me at that point.
There is an earnest quality about the Beatles. I think it still defines the music I like and look for.
It also defines my attitude. I stay away from the people who are disingenuous in their everydayness.
They shaped many people in the whole world, not just the west. They seemed to be looking forward for all of us. They are still symbols of progressiveness, because that was their attitude from the beginning, attributed in no small part to George.
It is those who decry their attitude, decry their music. Read a blog about Don McLean's American Pie and you will find those who cling to their caked hate.
They felt like Gods then. Although I only occasionally listen to Revolver and Rubber Soul, they feel like Gods even Now.
Oddly, it appears that Jon Weiner was critically snoozing through what he remembers as the momentous release of Sgt. Pepper. Or maybe he is snoozing now. I don't know where Weiner gets the idea that the story in "She's Leaving Home" was true. Lennon and McCartney could not have been privy to the dialogue in the lyric. "Mr. Kite" is a period piece, but it functions to carry the overall album concept along. Does so nicely in fact, evoking a 1900's carny barker and with sophisticated time signature changes and tape layering. "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" was not, repeat not about LSD. It was a children's song written for Lennon's son Julian, who came up with the title character. Weiner passes right over "It's Getting Better All the Time" with it's syncopated baseline, and it's sharp, pulsing 5th chord in the background (over the one and three and five chords in the arrangement). "Within you, Without you" had a time signature unheard of in pop or jazz at the time and despite the naive (but not totally naive) lyric, the sitar solo is accomplished (for George, a beginner) and melodically sophisticated. "Good Morning, Good Morning" was probably also a period piece but the crisp performance and burning guitar solo (rumored to be Paul, not George) were not weighed down by the special effects. Nobody else in pop music at that time was getting anything like these guitar sounds. Keith Richard didn't start to rock this hard until the following year, with "Honky-Tonk Women". As for "A Day in the Life", the member of Parliament who "blew his mind out in a car" and "didn't notice that the light had changed" didn't die; he was high on acid and just spaced out behind the wheel. He failed to go on the green. He was eventually carted off without harm by the bobbies. Unlike "She's Leaving Home", that verse was based on a real incident. Weiner gets the rest of it more or less right. Lennon was expressing some foreboding in "Day in The Life" and also some mordant, maybe impish humor.
And none of it holds up as well as most of Rubber Soul and Revolver, two records perhaps more revolutionary than Sgt. Pepper in terms of memorable tunes, production values and inventiveness. But what record from 1967 does truly hold up? Not just as influential, but as listenable music right now? I can't think of one.
To jareilly's comment: "But what record from 1967 does truly hold up? Not just as influential, but as listenable music right now? I can't think of one."
Uhhh, how about Are You Experienced?, Axis: Bold As Love, Magical Mystery Tour, the first Doors record, Something Else by the Kinks, and Cream Disraeli Gears?
or, James Brown? Stevie Wonder? Pink Floyd?
Music is subjective, but come on folks get serious, better give another listen.
Take a look at a Beatles songbook, it's hard to find a bad tune. these songs will be played for many more years.
Jeeze Louise! So much heavy thinking about a record that was meant to be, above all else, FUN!!! As we said at the time, it was a trip, with all kinds of layered meanings and possibilities. You'll never convince me that Lucy in the Sky wasn't about LSD- I've been there and I don't care what Lennon said, if that doesn't describe the experience then Lennon never dropped, which he confessed to doing over 1000 times. So it was an accident, mere synchronisity, that it came out that way. Ok, fine... What has been lost since that short, sweet time is the notion of spontaneous enjoyment of life without preconditions or preconceptions. This is why the 60's were so much radical fun and why that time is un-understood by so many hung-up people now. And one more for the history buffs: "All You Need Is Love" was the first song broadcast live via satellite to the world. It's as true now as it was then. And Sgt. Pepper's was the true expression of how that feeling gets lived and expressed. Turn off your minds, relax and float down stream...
Since the subject is the Beatles, I found it interesting that when members of the band went to India to "get enlightenment" and came back with mystical songs, and deeply healing chants like, "All you need is love" with allusions to the ONE-Ness of Creation, the Stones, their nemesis (on this polarity planet) did "Sympathy for the Devil." One band shone its light on LIGHT and unity, the other on macho images of power with quite a bit of sexism thrown into the mix. I am not entirely a critic of the Stones, but I always found the paradox reflected in the content and perspectives of these two almost equally popular bands intriguing.
I dunno. I think that both the Beatles and the Rolling Stones were/are overrated, along with most of the other stuff tossed under the umbrella of "classic rock". It's hard for me to get excited about stuff that's been well-worn by rock radio. I don't even own a Beatles record, but I think I've heard every song of theirs at least twice. And despite all of their mystique and controversy, I've always found them somewhat "safe". "Helter Skelter" is still a pretty cool song though.
But then again, people lambaste the music I like from all corners, stuffy moral majority types and hippies and shoegazers and hip-hop nationalists alike. :) So I guess I shouldn't talk.
It's difficult to take any article seriously that has "Beatles" and "lame" in the same sentence. I don't necessarily think that Sgt. Pepper was their best album, but it was certainly the most important and revolutionary.
The actual 'concept' for Sgt. Pepper came after most of the music had already been written.
As a former recording studio engineeer, I would love to see/hear a box-set (in completely unadorned packaging) with the songs of Rubber Soul, Revolver, and Sgt. Pepper in the compositional and production order in which they were actually done.
As for Mr. Weiner... er, Wiener... whatever... if his "Gimme Some Truth" book indulges in the same journalistic tap-dancing as what is written above, I think I'll read something else.
new comment
I am a second generation Beatle fan - I was 9 years old in 1967 and became devoted to their incredible career and legacy in my early teens and remain a huge fan. This article is, without a doubt, the most moronic take I have ever read on the seminal Pepper album. Mr. Kite is junk? You are junk, Mr. Weiner.
"I love everyone,
even those who disagree with me.
I love everyone,
even those who agree with me.
I love everyone,
rich and poor,
and I love everyone of different races,
including people who are indigenous,
wherever they live, in this country or elsewhere.
I love everyone,
whatever religion they are, and atheists too.
People who contemplate, wherever it leads them.
I love everyone,
both in my heart and in my daily life."
Dave Dellinger
Nice article with what i would call, valid points. Sorry some people who didn't like your article felt a need to lay their hate on you. Fanatic, mindless, devotion to persons, places or things isn't very pleasant to see. Sadly, it's very common in the USA. Just because we don't all see things from the exact same angles, and in the same light, doesn't mean that we have to pour hate on those we disagree with.
---------------------------------
All we are saying -
Is give peace a chance!