Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Keep talking, Shawn
After a group of Mohawks from the Tyendinaga reserve blockaded the railway between Kingston and Toronto two weeks ago, a near unanimous cry rose up from the editorial pages of Ontario newspapers and talk radio: Get Shawn Brant. Earlier this month Brant, a beanpole of a man, walked into a packed courtroom with his wrists and ankles shackled after handing himself over to the Ontario provincial police.
According to court testimony, the arrest warrant - on charges of mischief, disobeying a court order, and breach of recognisance - violated an agreement between police and demonstrators, who were given immunity when they peacefully ended the blockade. But Brant worried that the warrant for him would be used as a pretext for raiding a gravel quarry that he and several other community members from Tyendinaga had been occupying for six weeks. "We don't want to bring that into the camp," he told me.
The court granted Brant bail on condition that he is not allowed to "plan, incite, initiate, encourage or participate in any unlawful protest", including those "that interfere in any way with commercial or non-commercial traffic on all public and private roads, airports, railways or waterways".
Why the determination to get Brant, and Brant alone? On the surface, the broken immunity agreement seems sure to inflame tensions. And whatever crimes Brant may have committed, he had plenty of company. But Brant has a theory. "Right now, I'm the voice. They think if they take away the people's voice, the people will stop. They'll see that they're wrong."
Brant is more than a voice. He has become a symbol for the new militancy that is spreading through first nations communities across Canada. Sitting beside the campfire at the occupied quarry a few days ago, he told me that since his childhood people in his community have been telling him to keep quiet. "It used to be, 'Shawn, shut up, don't say those things about the government, they'll cut off our funding'. Now it's 'Shawn, shut up, they'll walk away from the negotiating table'."
The reason Brant isn't willing to let the negotiations take their course is that these talks are designed to take decades. And as the time passes, the land disappears. Forests are clear-cut, mountains are carved up, suburbs creep outward. Ineffective negotiations do not hold the line on an already unacceptable status quo - they contribute to the losing of very real ground.
At the gravel quarry near Deseronto, the loss of land is painfully, insultingly literal. The quarry is on land never ceded by the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte, a fact the federal government has acknowledged. The only question is what form compensation for the theft will take. The Tyendinaga band council and Ottawa have been negotiating over that question since last November. The problem arose because, as the two parties talked, trucks were carrying 10,000 loads of newly crushed gravel out of the pit every year - an estimated 100,000 tonnes. While they bargained for the land, the land itself was disappearing.
It got worse. There was a pile of wood on the edge of the gravel pit that the people occupying the quarry used to feed their bonfire. As the pile depleted, it became apparent the wood had been covering up a large pile of garbage: old washing machines, leaking industrial batteries, oil filters, hydraulic fluid, bed frames, antifreeze. They explored some more and discovered it was all over the pit: piles of hastily covered junk, some of it half-burned, much of it toxic.
Not surprisingly, the mine has become a powerful metaphor, a vivid illustration of the failures of the negotiation process, and the problems with being patient. While the experts talk, good land is trucked out and toxic junk is trucked in. It's an image with resonance on reservations across the country. It's easy to see why more and more native people are telling Shawn Brant to keep talking.
The final insult came when the federal Tories handed down a budget with next to nothing new in it to address first nations' poverty. It prompted Assembly of First Nations Chief Phil Fontaine to call for a national day of action on June 29. Though Fontaine insists he is not calling for cross-country blockades, many first nations are already planning them, with talk of a coordinated targeting of key infrastructure, from rails to roads. "It's the same notion as a general strike," Brant explains with a smile.
Everything is lining up for June 29 to be a day for natives to act and the rest of us to whine about late trains and traffic jams. But listening to Brant, it struck me that it could be something else: a day of action on native rights for Canada as a whole, one when we all refuse to shut up.
Naomi Klein is the author of many books, including her most recent, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, which will be published in September.Visit Naomi's website at nologo.org.
© 2007 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


9 Comments so far
Show AllThe United States' version of
Shawn Brant is Leonard Peltier. To explore his story go to:
http://www.freepeltier.org/
The Nazi's were not the originators of the doctrine of "lebens raum" (living room)which is a nice way of saying exterminating a people in order to confiscate their land.
Keep talking Naomi. Seems that none of the news organizations (to my knowledge) have covered this story with a view towards Shawn Brant's real grievances. Opting instead (when they bother at all with covering this story) to sensationalize the protest (Oka anyone?) or paint Mr. Brant as a firebrand (which seems to the official line).
Why the hell is the Guardian carrying this story, not the Star, Globe, et all?
What a shock-Canada is just as discriminatory as any other big industrialized country(though much more boring).
They liked to drum up that story about the guy sent to Syria--but that was because they could blame the US for most of it.
Monopoly kills competition. Bust the trusts!
As a proud Canadian living in the U.S., reading this article was a humbling experience.
I admit it, I do get on my moral "high horse" and neglect to address our country's shortcomings. Even though Canada is more highly evolved in the human rights arena than its neighbours to the south, our treatment of the First Nations' peoples is absolutely atrocious and shameful. There's just no excuse for it.
I assert this type of discrimination and prejudice are still tacidly approved of and routinely practiced throughout Canadian society. That's why we're not hearing about it in the mainstream Canadian media...it's our national "blind-spot".
Thanks for bringing this particular instance to my attention, Naomi. I doubt I would have heard about it otherwise.
kelmer, I like the fact that Canada is "boring". I think it's totally cool that this country was created through negotiation, not revolution. How about that? No blood, no guns, just conversation -- totally boring and amazingly civilized. This does not mean, however, that there is not a colonial past to be redressed as far as our First Nations peoples are concerned.
Nelle, I think that the idea the country was created "through negotiation, not revolution. How about that? No blood, no guns, just conversation" is a persistent myth - and considering the subjectof the article it's kind of ironic than you mention it.
Many Canadians love to think that their country was peacably born, and that they are known worldwide as a nation of peacekeepers. Of course, the nation was born from an imperial possession and so it was violently wrought, the main victims being the First Nations peoples, hundreds of thousands of whom in Canada were killed, and millions of whom were disposessed.
I am not sure how anyone could get on their "moral high horse" about being from a aprticular country as this does not reflect who you are. But especially to associate yourself with the country that still to this day robs First Nations people where- and when- ever it can. As recently as last year the government broke the Kelowna accord - a $5 billion deal that woud lhave brought water and other basic amenities to many reserves across Canada. That was less than 6 onths after the agreement had been made. Good to see Canada is still doing what it has always done!
Andrew, Ottawa
The real shocking discovery for most Canadians is to learn that the brutal apartheid system of South Africa was modelled on the Canadian treatment of its Aborginals being confined to the Reservation. Even pass laws existed in Canada.
I believe it was Glen Blab (not sure of the spelling) the South African ambassador to Canada was so hostile he visited some of the northern Canadian reserves to point out the poverty existing there and commented that Canada internationally got high marks for its treatment of its First Nations peoples when if fact the treatment was terrible.
Ms. Naomi Klein is a breath of fresh air and honesty that is lacking in most of our media.
It is obvious that all levels of government are going to try to stall as long as they can. Their logic is based on the same principles that they used when they first arrived in North America and began their wave of imperila exploitation.
I know that this sounds very Marxist but that is not where I am coming from. The truth is the various levels of government are playing a game of starvation poker with the lives of the First Nations people in this country.