EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Latino Soldiers Who Refused Iraq Speak Out
SAN FRANCISCO - A U.S. Army medic who refused to load his gun in Iraq and then escaped through a base window in Germany rather than be deployed a second time returned home to Los Angeles this week after serving six months in a U.S. military prison.
Augustin Aguayo, 31, was born in Mexico and grew up in Southern California. After graduating from high school, he married and had twin daughters, but never got a college degree.
Aguayo told IPS he joined the military in November 2002 while he was working the night shift at a bank to support his wife and daughters, while he attended community college during the day.
"I'm working at night and I hear a radio announcement for the National Guard and that planted the first seed in my head: Work two weeks a year, one weekend a month, make some extra money, serve your country. That's exactly what I needed," he said.
So Aguayo went to a local Army recruiting office. The U.S. military had already toppled the Taliban in Afghanistan and President George W. Bush was talking about war with Iraq.
Aguayo said the recruiter downplayed the dangers of deployment.
"He was a veteran of the first Gulf War and he shared his experience with me," Aguayo said. "He said he was only there for four months, and that it wasn't bad. He said he mostly read books."
Aguayo's excitement started to wane, however, once he entered basic training. He said he was disturbed by boot camp chants like "left, right, left, right, KILL" and, although he had enlisted as an Army medic, he realised that he would still have to carry a weapon and fire it at other human beings when necessary.
That feeling of unease intensified after his unit received orders to deploy to Iraq. Before leaving for Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, they ran training exercises in Germany.
"We would drive around in convoys in the woods in Germany in a training area and constantly targets would pop up and we would fire out the window," he said. "We did this day after day [and] at nighttime. I was part of an infantry battalion. At that point it became clear to me that in today's army a medic isn't just someone who helps people. In all fairness, it's an infrantryman, a rifleman, that has some medical skills."
By the time Aguayo arrived in Tikrit, he had already appealed to be discharged from the Army as a conscientious objector. He said he realised that he couldn't kill anyone and went out on patrol and guard duty without loading his gun.
"It seemed like the whole point of these convoys was just to start a firefight," he said. "It's like a vicious circle that continues. We're there because there's conflict and there's conflict because we're there. It's a never-ending cycle."
He told IPS that what he saw in Iraq strengthened his opposition to killing and war.
"One time we were driving around the city setting up checkpoints and we heard an explosion so we went to see what was happening, and a vehicle of Iraqi police had been hit and my unit stayed back and I could see wounded people in the distance," he said.
"We just stayed back and that seemed weird to me. I couldn't understand why we just stood there. I couldn't understand why we couldn't randomly help people. We could only help people when we hurt them."
Aguayo rode out his deployment and returned to Germany. The next thing he knew, the military denied his application for conscientious objector status, and decided to send his unit back to Iraq for a second tour.
But Aguayo could not bear the thought of going to Iraq a second time. So he ran, climbing out a window on his base in Germany. A few weeks later, he turned himself in at Fort Irwin in California, hoping that would get him lenient treatment.
Instead, the military shackled him, put him in solitary confinement and flew him back to Germany for trial. He eventually served six months in a military prison.
"Initially it was that shocking moment," he said. "I had never gotten in trouble in any kind of way. Just two speeding tickets back when I started driving in 1990. But on the other hand it was also a moment of peace where I could reflect, and I'm really at peace because I finally have what I wanted for so long. I wanted to be separated from the military because this is wrong, because morally I couldn't continue down this path."
After his release from prison, Aguayo was joined on a California speaking tour by three other conscientious objectors from the Iraq war: Pablo Paredes, Camilo Mejia, and Robert Zabala.
Camilo MejÃÂa was one of the first Iraq combat veterans to refuse to return to Iraq and served almost nine months in prison for his stand against the war. Pablo Paredes refused to ship out to Iraq from the San Diego Naval Station in 2005. He is now a GI rights counselor and counter-recruitment activist. Robert Zabala is a Marine who recently won a discharge as a Conscientious Objector (CO) by a federal judge after fighting for nearly four years to be recognized as a CO.
Like Aguayo, Mejia, Paredes, and Zabala are all Latino.
"It's hard to overlook," Paredes told IPS. "The evidence is pretty clear that there's a lot of Latino resistance. Part of it is that we're disproportionately targeted for jobs that are high risk -- combat roles, infantry roles. We make up a very small percentage of elite jobs like officers and Blue Angels [a naval aviation show squadron]. We make up only four percent of the officer corps but when the invasion started we were 20 percent of the infantry."
"So when it's time to question things, this population of Latinos is the ones who see what war is really about," he said.
Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

11 Comments so far
Show AllI admire all these young men, who by being honest with themselves, are helping to change people's ideas about war. I've followed all of their anti-war activities, unfortunately not in mainstream media, and am encouraged to see this new breed of veteran.
America needs to listen to its veterans. But not the WW2 veterans anymore. Korean vets, Vietnam vets, Grenada vets, Panama vets, and all the Iraqi vets need to be consulted. These vets add valuable wisdom in understanding war. These vets bring new perspectives to the definition of war. Korean vets were the first political vets. Vietnam vets were the first vets on the losing side. These were never part of the equation for WW2 vets. WW2 vets have made it too easy for America to continue going to war. It wouldn't be so easy if a new breed of veteran had more influence in defining war to this country.
Hoa binh
THANK YOU to all of the Iraq veterans who are making their voices of resistance heard. The price of your resistance is high. I honor you.
I would not say we lost Viet-Nam; just called off the occupation.
would not say we lost Viet-Nam; just called off the occupation."
The choice of words , won or lost , is pure semantics . A Vietnam Occupation correspondent stated that American military never "lost" a battle in Vietnam referring to the ratio of occupation casualties suffered by Americans compared to those suffered by the occupied Vietnamese.
The interviewed,retired Vietnamese,military officer calmly replied that the correspondent's "analysis was true but irrelevant".
Some day,maybe,when the Iraqi Occupation approaches the duration and casuality ratio of its predecessor,another occupation correspondent is going to pose the same ironical question to a retired occupation-resistance officer and he or she will give a similar answer " Your analysis is true but irrelevant "
The word " lost " is a really tough word for imperialists to get their tongues and teeth around,isn't it
It takes a real man to do what you did.
I salute you, walk easy bro'
The function of the Army (military) is to kill the enemy of the United States of America and destroy an aggressor's ability to cause us harm. Like it or not it is necessary function.
Augustin Aguayo is disingenuous and traitorous. He is obviously had no real intention of serving the country for which he owed so much and had paid nothing. It was obviously a dodge to him and a way to obtain citizenship or some other benefit without earning it. As a veteran, I am ashamed of him.
Hey, bfwe,
Augustin Aguayo said he joined the National Guard and was lied to by his recruiter. He got to Iraq and realized he was lied to by his president. He joined as a medic and was not allowed to even help his allies when they were wounded. Here is a thinking man and man of counciousness. Bfwe, you are a hater of humans and a follower of death. You should just go to Iraq on your own with your gun and be your own mad-man army of one and do some murdering. You'd like that - so go "brave warrior!"
bfwe:
"The function of the Army (military) is to kill the enemy of the United States of America and destroy an aggressor's ability...."
What if the United States is the agressor?
As a veteran, I am not ashamed of him. We all have our ways of looking at the world, and a who are we to denigrate his? I am just impressed that he went into a combat zone with an unloaded weapon.
And, finally, what did the young George Bush and "Dick" Cheney do for their country for which they owed so much and did so little? They got Daddy to ensure a unit posting that would not go to war, or they "had other priorities". At least Aguayo served one tour in a combat zone.
Please call your politicians ONCE A WEEK and tell them to end the war AND To IMPEACH the war criminals in the white house NOW. We really need to bug them on this til they do it.
Please don't forget to call: NANCY PELOSI's office too:
(202) 225-4965
Without justice, we'll never have peace.
If we want peace, we have to work for justice.
Medic's ought not to be armed. They are there not to fight but to heal, at least in any professional army but that of the USA. Traditionally shooting up ambulances, hospitals or medics is considered to be a really bad thing to do, but that is something yank troops do with abandon. The true disgrace for any former soldier, sailor or airman is to insult a medic as bwfe did. What does your acronym stand for? Bush Wars for Empire?
odale' carnad'! right on brother ! fight the good fight.. give unto caesar what is ceasars.... i for one, admire and salute these noble acts,, these courageous latinos........ viva du las rasas ! hooray for those like them !