EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oh Right, We're Still At War
How Horrifying Is It When Bush's Unwinnable Disaster Becomes So Dreary and Forgettable?
I think it was Keith Olbermann who said it first, who said yes wow that Virginia Tech shooting rampage was horrible and shocking and brutal and oh my God we lost a lot of really good, honest American kids and Something Should Be Done.
And maybe let's start with the wide-eyed gun-rights maniacs and the conservative pseudo-cowboys and those twitchy Second Amendment paranoids who somehow still think that we all must cling to our nasty little Glocks 'cuz gosh, what might happen if our own government turns on us and nobody has their little handgun to protect their kids from the tanks and the missiles and the heat-ray guns? Right.
But hey wait (Olbermann went on to say), then again, in the 10 days prior to that horrific shooting, didn't we also lose nearly exactly that same number of young people over in Iraq (well over 30) to even more brutal idiocy and insanity, to cluster bombs and insurgent shootings and gruesome death and a hugely inept, warmongering American president who is so violently unable to see just what kind of bland, lackluster evil he has wrought upon the planet that he is now on the verge of entering the record books as the Worst President in History?
And maybe, just maybe, given how we are still losing double-digit numbers of good, honest American bodies every week in Iraq, just as we have for the past four solid years, perhaps we should be equally -- if not perhaps quite a bit more -- appalled and disgusted and shocked that this "war" is still raging, nonstop, to the tune of 3,400 dead Americans and tens of thousands wounded and counting fast?
What, in other words, is wrong with us? Where is our outrage? Where is the pain and wailing and the candlelight vigils? Why has it become so easy to let Iraq turn into this numb, forgettable, boring thing, a blip in media, a sad yawn in your day?
Yes, maybe you heard all that and, like many Americans, reacted by saying, well yes, Iraq is awful and all, but it's a war, and like it or not, kids are supposed to die in wars, in unspeakable and unrecorded and unbloggable ways, it's understandable and acceptable and even (tragically, morbidly) expected, whereas that's not supposed to happen in a nice upscale college where most kids can keep their nervous rage in check with iPods and drugs and beer bongs and lousy recreational sex.
Or perhaps you replied, well, it's easy to ignore Iraq because, unless you're in the family of a soldier, this might be the most painless, distant, unfelt war in our short history, so removed and so disconnected from our everyday lives that it's almost as if it's not happening at all, just some minor political irritant as opposed to a horrid, gory embarrassment that's costing us $100,000 per minute, or $275 million per day -- enough money, by the end of it all, to rebuild every school and every park and every free clinic in America and then go on to house every homeless person and solve the oil crisis and cure a few diseases and perform a thousand other social improvements you can't even imagine right now lest you feel disgusted and sour and sad for the rest of the month.
See, it's all about perspective. And when it comes to Iraq, we aren't really required to have a great deal of it anymore because, let's be honest, we're not really at war, are we? War requires a clear enemy, serious consequences, something powerful and vital must be at stake and there's nothing at stake in Iraq -- except, of course, our own crumbling identity.
What's more, no one except the most bitter die-hard neocon is actually claiming that America itself is actually under any sort of attack, and we're certainly not fighting and dying for anything, not really, unless you're naive enough to believe in the "march of democracy" thing and if you do, I have a time-share on some swampland in Florida, cheap.
Maybe it's merely the natural progression, the way it must be. Iraq has been going on for so long, will be going on for so long, maybe the only response possible is to become numb to it all, to tune out the dreary headlines as they trudge on by because every day it's a new bombing, a new helicopter shot down, five or six or 20 more American bodies ripped and gored and blown up and to feel every one would be to quickly induce trauma fatigue.
And then there's the horrible feeling, that deeper understanding that no one really wants to acknowledge but which everyone knows to be true: The terrorists have already won. Oh my good Allah, yes they have.
Bush has seen to it that America has become, post-Sept. 11, a reactionary, rogue, knee-jerk, hateful outpost of isolationism and thuggishness that no self-respecting developed nation really wants to deal with anymore. Just like the terrorists wanted. Disrupt America and make us paranoid and implosive and openly loathed by the few remaining shreds of the Middle East that didn't mistrust us already? Hey, mission accomplished.
Me, I like to imagine the babies. I like to imagine all the children born back in 2003 (or 2001, if you count the equally failed Afghan campaign), the Year of Brutal Idiocy, the Year It All Went Wrong, the Year America Jumped the Shark.
All these children born at the war's beginning are well over 4 years old now. They are walking, talking, speaking in complete sentences with more complexity and coherence than the president himself. And for their entire lives, America has been at war. They have never known a day where we have been at peace, where we haven't lived under this bitter cloud of rampant incompetence, violence, a deep sadness, a sense that something has gone very, very wrong with the American idea, and no one really has any clue how to fix it. How will they be affected? What sort of perception of a broken, lost America will they have drilled into their baffled little bones?
Which leaves us right here, in this murky no-man's-land of vague dis-ease, this foul, anesthetized place where our brutal-war-that-isn't-really-a-war has become the norm, a time when it feels like we as a country should be getting stronger and should be leading the world in everything from peacekeeping to environmentalism to medicine to technology, and yet we have this giant, bloodstained monkey on our backs, violent and ugly and still shockingly strong, and he is laughing, cackling at our feeble attempts to shake ourselves free, even as he eats at our soul. Thoughts for the author? E-mail him. Mark Morford's Notes & Errata column appears every Wednesday and Friday on SFGate and in the Datebook section of the San Francisco Chronicle.
© The San Francisco Chronicle
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllWhat ComancheJoe said, yes, and the people of the United States are over the barrel. We are enamored of our SUVs and Sumo-trucks, and life has to go on. Congress isn't really on board to jerk the president's chain. Maybe they sense that most people in this country don't really care, or worse, privately applaud this crime for the reasons stated in above post. Until a significant portion of our populace actually STOP -- put together a couple of weeks of canned goods and STOP -- functioning, this will go on and on.
This says is far better than I could:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1834332/posts
To me, it looks as though the indifference is a good sign that many, many Americans are so fed up with this war and war in general, they have turned their attentions inward, not in an individual, narcissistic sense, but in a local community sense.
I think they're right to have tuned out, and feel as though the best thing war opponents and peace activists can do right now is ignore President Bush, the Congress and the Courts, beyond occasional mild suggestions that "perhaps enough meaningless blood has been shed - are you ready to stop now?"
The writing is already on the wall; the war was lost before it began, as millions of peace protestors worldwide (including me) knew long before "shock-and-awe."
We can support the troops with care packages, and support the victims of war the same way, through private donations to help them while our tax dollars continue to destroy them. But most of all, we can get very, very busy preparing our own local communities for life without centralized federal authority (gone since Katrina) and life without oil (financial and environmental costs growing every minute), because that's the only meaningful way to communicate with a power-mad, oil-controlled government.
It reminds me of Virginia Woolf, in Three Guineas:
"For psychology would seem to show that it is far harder for human beings to take action when other people are indifferent and allow them complete freedom of action, than when their actions are made the centre of excited emotion. The small boy struts and trumpets outside the window: implore him to stop; he goes on; say nothing; he stops. That the daughters of educated men then should give their brothers neither the white feather of cowardice nor the red feather of courage, but no feather at all; that they should shut the bright eyes that rain influence, or let those eyes look elsewhere when war is discussed—that is the duty to which outsiders will train themselves in peace before the threat of death inevitably makes reason powerless."
http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/w/woolf/virginia/w91tg/
The articulate Valenzuela piece (link) kindly contributed by ComancheJoe is as sobering and painfully heart-breaking as any I have read in a while.
Ironically, the Comanche people might have known a thing or two about the presence of an ovewhelming American military force, "coming in peace" to bring "freedom, stability and democracy".
How cripplingly sad....
PDFee,
I read your link and have to admit that progressives engage in dishonest arguments like that too. There was an article on CommonDreams just this Monday (about a guy named "Ron") using similar reasoning and generalizations. The typical argument is that because a significant percentage of Republicans believe something preposterous, e.g. that Saddam was behind 9/11 (Dems and progressives would say that the evidence that Bush had forewarning of 9/11 is "ironclad" compared to the evidence that Saddam was behind 9/11) or that there is no evidence of global warming, then that means Republicans are non compos mentis and all Republican ideas are suspect. Of course that sort of sloppy reasoning is what will get anyone into trouble, regardless of their basic belief system.
As for the specific allegation, I think only a very small percentage of Dems or progressives think Bush had anything to do with planning or executing 9/11. As the author of the piece states correctly, we do not have high regard for his abilities and think if Bush had been behind it the whole operation would have been a total failure.
However, there are quite a few Dems and progressives who think Bush might have had some forewarning and decided it was best not to do anything to prevent the attack, because it could later fit into his plans to invade Iraq. And that (the same may be true with regard to FDR and Pearl Harbor) the attack was probably worse than what he was led to expect from the information available. Nevertheless, probably more progressives and Dems believe that Bush was determined to be the un-Clinton and Clinton had been concerned with terrorism and Osama and so Bush was resolute in not considering any information of that nature.
Get yourselves a copy of ARMED MADHOUSE, updated and published a month or so ago - by Greg Palast, and spend a few days getting all those extra answers that fill in so many blanks about why we are in Iraq and the entwined skeins of people going back a long time that are the manipulating powers.
Years back such documented information would have caused a national crisis, impeachment, legal changes, and a general public uproar.
Now we read constantly the reasons for our global troubles and spend more time talking about them then doing anything about them or changing our own ways of living.
Jerry Falwell, certainly not going to be missed in our liberal and other camps, made a mission of his life, even though darkness of vision and hypocrisy surrounded him and his cohorts ... given their "discipleship" to the Prince of Peace.
We also have to make of our lives a mission to be the best we can be and work toward turning the tragic inequities on this planet around.
LOVE PEOPLE. SERVE PEOPLE. FEED PEOPLE. [hearts and souls as well as bodies] REMEMBER GOD. Maharaji Ji
LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF. [the Torah, Jesus, Muhammed, St. Francis of Assisi, Mother Teresa, Dorothy Day, Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, et al., and those folks in your own neighborhood who are always helping and serving and generally have open arms and a joyful smile on their faces ... and all the rest is commentary ...]
kivals May 16th, 2007 7:06 pm
Why do you even give a troll like PDFee the time of day?
"And for their entire lives, America has been at war."
This has always been the case. If you check your history, you will find that the US has been engaging in armed conflict with someone or other pretty much continuously through it's existence.
I read the blog PDFee cited also. And the blog comments. It's depressing to realize we share this country with people like that. Awful, dumb nasty, gullible people. I just hope I can live out my life and keep my family away from them.
To borrow a sentiment expressed there, and this may be a case of futile point-counterpoint: But now I feel like I should shower. No, actually I really do.
purvis ames,
I usually avoid con trolls, recognizing they are incorrigible and often ineducable, but I felt pity for him after reading the ridiculous drivel he linked to. What was really disturbing was that the driveler was someone he looked up to.
A very sad but very accurate article, unfortunately it is a matter of the gross ignorance that our populus is submerged in not to mention their appalling incompetence, otherwise how could we have such a government.
purvis ames:
regarding PJD ?
Stop your spluttering and read him . *smirk*
I mistook him at first and even dissed him mildly when he first began posting here.
His approach may be at times unconventional but trust me; you and he are on the same side. He was not encouraging us to become Freepers.
Relax, you're among friends :-)
Well, if you guys don't think we can stop our corrupt government from continuing its permanent "war on terror" with our little handguns and rifles then do you really believe we can stop them with our strong words in blogs like these?
Please do be reminded that a bunch of renegades armed with rifles and booby traps in a far away nation on the other side of the planet stopped 500,000 US troops armed with naplam, B-52s, F-4s, tanks and heavy artillery for about ten years.
Be reminded also that a bunch of insurgents armed with improvised explosive devices are cowing well trained well armed US divisions into hiding in their green zones to avoid coming home in wheel chairs or body bags.
And yes, I am reminded of Ghandi and King and respect them very much. But that was back in the good old days when you could resist the government without being branded "giving aid and comfort to the enemy."
You won't beat the New World Order with kind words alone. Notice how Republican leaders are scrambling to remove Ron Paul from the televised debates, even though Paul is very popular with the voters. If they won't let Paul address the nation, they won't let any of us get anywhere with words alone.