EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Son of Professor Opposed to War is Killed in Iraq
BOSTON - Boston University professor Andrew J. Bacevich has been a persistent, vocal critic of the Iraq war, calling the conflict a catastrophic failure. This week, the retired Army lieutenant colonel received the grim news that his son had been killed on patrol there.
First Lieutenant Andrew J. Bacevich , 27, of Walpole, died Sunday in Balad of wounds he suffered after a bomb explosion, the military said yesterday. The soldier, who graduated from BU in 2003 with a degree in communications, is the 56th service member from Massachusetts to be killed in Iraq.
His father, a veteran of the Vietnam and Gulf wars, has criticized the war in his writings and described President Bush's endorsement of such "preventive wars" as "immoral, illicit, and imprudent."
A West Point graduate and former faculty member at both West Point and Johns Hopkins University, Bacevich joined the BU faculty in 1998 and teaches in the history and international relations departments. He has written books on US diplomacy and military power and has contributed op-ed pieces on the Iraq war to newspapers and periodicals.
In an op-ed column published March 1 in the Globe, Bacevich wrote that "our reckless flirtation with preventive war qualifies as not only wrong, but also stupid. Indeed, the Bush Doctrine poses a greater danger to the United States than do the perils it supposedly guards against.
"We urgently need to abrogate that doctrine in favor of principles that reflect our true interests and our professed moral values," Bacevich wrote.
Katy Bacevich, 22, one of the soldier's three sisters, recalled her brother as a born leader who answered a calling to serve his country. Andrew Bacevich joined the Army in July 2004 and had been stationed in Iraq since October with the Third Brigade Combat Team, First Cavalry Division.
"He felt it was an important thing to do, regardless of the war that was going on," she said. Despite her father's strong feelings about the conflict, Katy Bacevich said, "he never would discourage my brother from doing what he wanted to do."
The family moved to Walpole in 1998 from the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., she said.
A former military comrade of the elder Bacevich was shaken by the news yesterday.
Retired Major General William Nash served with Bacevich, also known as Skip, in Kuwait. "Service to country was obviously a family trait," Nash said. "Skip was a great role model for young officers."
BU professor William Keylor, who also teaches history and international relations, supervised final exams for one of Bacevich's classes yesterday. He said faculty members were "devastated."
"They knew how close the two Andys had been and, particularly those of us who have children, just identified so strongly with him," Keylor said.
The students taking that final exam, Keylor said, were not told of their professor's loss so as not to distract them from other finals. The course, called The American Military Experience, included discussion of the relationship between citizenship and the obligation of military service, according to BU's website.
Professor Bacevich maintained contact with his son by e-mail, Keylor said. "Every time, the word was things are going well, no problems. Then I got a call from him last night with this terrible news," Keylor added.
"He resembled his father so closely that, when you saw him, you immediately thought of Andy Sr.," Keylor said. "His father and mother absolutely adored him."
Keylor described the younger Bacevich, whom he had taught in a two-semester class on international relations, as a good student who wanted to follow in his father's footsteps. "I had the impression of a very popular, likable, exuberant young man," he said. The younger Bacevich had been enrolled in the Army ROTC at BU.
When interviewed by the Globe recently, Professor Bacevich had requested that his son's service in Iraq not be mentioned -- both to limit unwanted attention on his son and to separate the father's professional opinion from the heavy personal stakes.
Behind that request, however, "I always had the impression that he was terribly proud of his son and the service he was providing," Keylor said.
The elder Bacevich was sounding his warnings about the war at the time of the US-led invasion in March 2003. Bacevich wrote in the Los Angeles Times that month that "if, as seems probable, the effort encounters greater resistance than its architects imagine, our way of life may find itself tested in ways that will make the Vietnam War look like a mere blip in American history."
Keylor said Bacevich appeared to come to his opinions about the Iraq war after much thought.
"He's a very learned man, and I think that he studied the background to the war very carefully, and only came out with his strong opinions after he had really, really looked it over," Keylor said. "He's not the kind of guy who shoots from the hip."
Bryan Bender of the Globe staff contributed to this report from Washington.
© Copyright 2007 The Boston Globe
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

29 Comments so far
Show AllBarbara and George Bush Sr., you should read this and weep with shame.
The Bushes do apparently sleep well at night; this in itself testifies to their absence of any human conscience.
How can the heart be full when a peice has been torn out? Tony 5/15/07
A TEAR COMES
A TEAR COMES FROM THOSE WHO KNOW AND REMEMBER HEARTS AND SOULS
PUT BEFORE GOD.
THAT WHAT IS THERE FOR ALL HAS BEEN GIVEN US BY SOME WHOSE SACRIFICE,
IN MIND AND BODY, GAVE MUCH UNDER THE ROD.
A TEAR COMES FOR THE LOVED ONES SENT TO WAR WITH DANGERS UNKNOWN
BEARING A COMMITMENT TO PROTECT AN IDEAL.
FOR OVER 200 YEARS HAS THIS BEEN THE AIM AND PURPOSE OF THE MANY
WHO WORE THE UNIFORM WITH FREEDOMS SEAL.
A TEAR COMES BRINGING TO MIND ALL SOULS KNOWN ONLY TO GOD WITH NOT
ANOTHER SOUL TO KNOW THEIR COMING OR GOING.
THESE GIVE AS MUCH FROM A HEART AS DEEP TO THE MANY WITH ONLY BUDDIES
AND AN ALL LOVING CREATOR KNOWING.
A TEAR COMES FOR HEARTS AND BODIES TORN BY STRIFE AT A PLACE PROTECTED
BY AMERICANS NOT RACES.
LET US GIVE THE LOVE AND THE THANKS TO ALL THAT HAVE GIVEN THE ULTIMATE
AND TO THOSE AMONG THE MANY FACES.
A TEAR COMES FOR ALL WHO FOLLOWED THE STANDARD,FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE AND
THOSE WHO WENT OR STAYED,IT IS ALL ONE PART.
ALL HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE CALLING MAY COME AND SO CARRY A TEAR IN THAT
SECRET PLACE OF THE HEART.
TO ALL VETERANS PAST AND PRESENT
If Andrew senior understood the profound criminality of our war on Iraq it is a mystery to me why he would not try to prevent his son from going there and killing people. Even if he made it home his life would be ruined.
This is all a game to Bush. He is the commander and we are his loyal subjects.
Agree with Dana Visalli. How much history does a parent need to know to understand the military madness that engulfs our culture ? My wife and I as parents have always tried to be honest with our children about the world that challenges, and possibly threatens their existence. My early twenties son would have posssibly severed his very close family bond if he had chosen to participate in this murderous military campaign. It is the parents duty to ensure options other than killing fields for their off-spring.
Did Big Oil send condolences or were they too busy counting plunder?
Tragic. However, our parents told us about the old lie. What's up with the military and this family?
As tragic as the loss of a child is, I cannot understand the disconnect between principles and actions that this tragedy represents. Of course I understand that the senior Bracevich's views did not necessarily mirror those of the younger. Nonetheless, as long as young people are revered for their "honor in serving their country" war will continue, including preemptive wars such as the immoral and illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq for plunder.
I don't know if Germans honored their warrior sons who fought for the Nazis in WWII, but that should forever serve as a warning against the dangers of uncritical patriotism and the abdication of personal responsibilty in the interests of "patriotism." Clearly in hindsight, the truly patriotic course would have been to refuse to serve in illegal wars that ultimately bring about the weakening or even destruction of one's own country.
As sorry as I feel for Professor Bracevich's loss, I cannot applaud the actions of someone who has helped to implement an illegal occupation that has already claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocents whose only crime was that they lived in a geographical region with resources that an inperialist US claims as its own.
The peace movement is never going to get anywhere if we resort to laying the blame on individual soldiers. I know Dr. Bacevich, and he is an honorable man who truly believes in a professionalized military under civilian command. Being under civilian command (an essential requirement of any democracy) means military officials are obliged to follow the orders their civilian superiors give them, just as individual soldiers are obliged to obey their military commanders.
All of this is to say that if you don't like the outcome in Iraq--and it is truly horrible, and the U.S. is guilty of all kinds of crimes--don't blame the individual soldiers. Blame the decisionmakers, and the people who elected them and have tolerated their decisions (that would be us).
The desire to serve one's country is in itself an honorable one. We have to understand however that once in the military, soldiers do not call the shots about what they are asked to do.
Thad,
The peace movement has gotten nowhere anyway or we wouldn't be on the brink of utter chaos in the Middle East and we wouldn't be facing increased hatred of the US throughout the world. And this has occurred in an environment in which support for the troops is sacrosanct among all groups, pro- or anti-war.
I don't speak for the peace movement. I do not believe that anyone can really abdicate his or her personal moral responsibility for their actions. I don't object to the outcome of the occupaton, I object to its premise and its justification as a "preemptive war" and I object to its underlying aim: plunder of someone eles's resources.
Of course the "deciders" are to blame, the legislature is to blame, the voters are to blame. And so too are those who carry out orders to implement an illegal aggressive occupation. In such a case, "just following orders" does not absolve responsibility for any of us.
Do you really want a military culture in which the individual soldiers feel free not to carry out orders? That would undermine the very premise of democratic control over the military. The truth is that soldiers do essentially set aside individual judgment when they sign up, and it's hard to see how you could have a military if that wasn't the case.
This is not to defend the military (let alone the specifics of the orders given in Iraq)--the fact that individuals are asked to put aside individual judgment and conscience for the sake of aims defined by the state is one of the best reasons to push for a demilitarized world.
For all you or I know, young Bacevich hated what he was doing and was as sour about the war as his father. I have no idea whether that was the case, but it's possible, and it's an absolutely certainty than many of our soldiers over there hate what they are doing. But they are legally powerless to refuse orders, and it's unrealistic in the extreme to expect them to do so (given that doing so would jeopardize not only their careers but likely their very lives).
I repeat, it's up to us who have the liberty to speak out and act to take responsibility for ending the war. Individual soldiers do have a responsibility not to knowingly participate in illegal atrocities, and indeed to blow the whistle on such events when they occur. But they have neither the responsibility nor the practical ability to set the overall terms of policy.
To sold out Democrats:
End the war NOW! It's been said that you are not losing the war but ending the occupation. We're making a list and we will vote your military industrial complex asses out of office.
Please check out Gravel and let the people decide.
Thad:
I want a military culture that is based on the fundamental principle of defending the country, its people, and its principles, not one that is based on the Bush Doctrine of "preemptive war" or imperialist grabs for resources that belong to other people. This is 2007, not 1207, and the level of destruction that modern armies are capable of inflicting on civilians as well as other military forces must be factored into the calculus of war. With respect to defending the country, I will willingly participate in that military, not for "honor" but for self defense. There is nothing honorable about war.
I agree that many soldiers may hate this war and understand that they are legally powerless to refuse orders to fight in it. We also agree that "individual soldiers have a responsibility not to knowingly participate in illegal atrocities," but the entire venture is just that. There are probably close to one million dead Iraqis by now, several million more have been displaced, the country is in violent turmoil. The US is an occupying army. It is quite apparent that until the Iraqi parliament passes the oil law that virutally turns over their natural resources to Western control for 30 years, our military will not leave. That constitutes an atrocity.
I believe that it is not existentially possible for human beings to abidicate moral responsibility. We at home are responsible to do everything in our power to end this disaster, but it is our military that is engaging in an atrocity, and that cannot be excused on the grounds that they are "following orders."
Yet another tragedy brought to the American people by the decider in chief.. God, I wish there WAS a god..
jp.. Agree ++
Preemptive war is, by the bushnik "standards", totally immoral, illegal and aggressive. It is without legitimacy by any standards most sane and sentient people would apply.
It is a crime against humanity and should be recognised and punished as such.
pandering perry..
How would you stop your offspring doing what they thought was their duty? However much YOU disagree with/dissuade them, it it is still their decision. Let's us hope that your nasty balloon of smug self satisfaction doesn't get deflated by a similar, tragedy.
Dana Visalli..
Your comment is particularly unnecessarily unpleasant.
It is beyond me why this young man, a college graduate, would join the military in 2004; by then it was obvious what a criminal misadventure the war/occupation was from the beginning. My condolences go out to his family, but as others have noted, why would they be proud of his participation in such a horrific undertaking? I don't mean to beat up on the troops; they are certainly being horribly used by the war-mongers. At the same time, they are allowing themselves to be used, especially if they enlisted after the commencement of the war and continue to re-enlist.
Surely it's about time somebody called out the enormous lie that joining the military somehow means serving your country. Joining the military means serving a tiny group of power-hungry, megalomaniacal, theocratic extremist nutcases who pursue their own interests first and foremost, rarely those of the soldiers who serve them and never those of the country. That's the way it is now and (with minor variations) that's the way it always has been.
Unless there is actually a foreign army at your border about to invade, if you want to serve your country stay as far away from the military as you possibly can.
I am in the process of reading Col Bacevichs' book, and again I come to support a Ret Vet (like myself) who has seen the folly going on. I too have a military age son who was "thinking" of joining the military--even though I always discouraged that choice. Young men (and women) often choose a job that we may not approve of and we have only to live with it and wish them well. My own son finally decided not to join. As a slightly disabled VN vet, I was very relieved to hear that. My heart goes out to the
bacevich family and to all the other families who have lost their sons or daughters in this amoral, illegal rotten disaster of the Shrub Gang.
therzal:
"Let's us hope that your nasty balloon of smug self satisfaction doesn't get deflated by a similar, tragedy.
Dana Visalli..
Your comment is particularly unnecessarily unpleasant."
You continue to amaze with your self-contradictory posts. I wonder if you even see the irony.
Pandering perry:
How many times have I read about military-history families (I think we know whom I mean) with sons/daughters having consults about the benefits/drawbacks of military enlistment. (Usually this is post-mortem biographies about said enlistees.) I wish the old lpenek-ster could have pushed his big ass thru the door and offered some counterpoint. I guess I would have talked about Shakespeare and moonlit kisses and Hawaii vactions and, hell, scuba diving. I would exhaust them with stories about life...and I would leave them with one thought: flipping burgers is better than blowing away brown people for Halliburton. -at least before their red-neck dad knocked me on my ass.
_I_ know what you mean. Ignore the idiots.
My Condolences to the Family. You're in My Prayers.
My condolences to Professor Bacevich. How sad that the tragedy of this war should hit so directly the family of one of its sharpest critics.
A so called "preventive war" is by definition a war of aggression - the same kind of thing that the USA and our allies prosecuted Nazi leaders for at the end of WWII. To wage such a war is a war crime, and the perptrators should be punished. My heart goes out to this family, and all the families who have lost loved ones in this travesty. That said, I would guess that this young man recieved a 2nd Lt. commission upon graduation from BU as an ROTC student. He then had no choice about serving in the military - unlike Bush, Cheney et.al.
You can't leave your son / daughter, feel you don't support them 100% in what they do.
Fighting in battle is the same high as extreme sports, such as rock climbing. Total concentration! If you have the slightest reservations it could mean your life.
The aggressor/occupier is at a disadvantage in the first place if they have the slightest guilt of being wrong!
Fighting in self-defense, you don't even think about the morality of the issue.
If the Nazis pushed us back to our U.S. borders they would still of had to occupy us! We have no idea what it feels like to have an invading army on our land. Would we fight with the same ferocity as the insurgents?
We must end this war. I too served in the Vietnam War, 69-71 and I too have a wonderful son that thank God does not have to be in this fiasco. My heart goes out to you and my prayers are for peace.
A day or two to the invasion in 2003, I had written in a piece to Commondreams.org "nothing as painful as the loss of one dearest or closest to one's heart." I went further to suggest that a bill be passed to the effect that any President resolutely committed to prosecuting a needless war should be ready to have a close member of his family, preferably a son or daughter, in the line of fire.
Hardly a day passes without a report of tens of casualty in Iraq, to most of us they just add up to a figure. Until Americans come to terms that they are being held hostage in their own country by the blood-sucking hawks in the Oval House and their collaborators in Congress, I am afraid there is no end in sight to this debauchery and orgy of killings.
The military men's profession is war, and war means killing; the professor should have known that. All those who have identified with the professor in the loss of his son, did they also identify with the families of those possibly killed by his son? I bet they never even gave it a thought. And how would those parents feel about the loss of their loved ones in the hands of all other professors' sons in a preemptive crime of aggression? To be fair is a good thing. As you sow, so you shall reap. Notwithstanding, I feel deeply sorry for needless losses on both sides.
"All those who have identified with the professor in the loss of his son, did they also identify with the families of those possibly killed by his son? I bet they never even gave it a thought."
Wow, that's a presumptous statement. Here's one person at least who "identifies with the professor" and also identifies with the Iraqi victims of this war. I'm sure there are plenty of others.
If you volenteer to go to a distant land and murder innocent people, why cry when you pay the price yourself?
Since 1991, we have had a policy of bombing, starving and breaking the will of the Iraqis.
The Iraqi people were the most educated, secular and western thinking people under Saddam; compared to the rest of the Arab world. They were our best friends in the Arab world.
I heard about a million died from disease during sanctions, now another 600,000 from this war including horrific torture for being on the wrong side.
We won't let our friends in Iraq take refuge in this country when they are targeted for taking "our side".
This Civil War is about who helps us! Let us find alternative energy from the SUN!