Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Millions Left Out
The United States may be the richest country in the world, but there are many millions — tens of millions — who are not sharing in that prosperity.
According to the most recent government figures, 37 million Americans are living below the official poverty threshold, which is $19,971 a year for a family of four. That's one out of every eight Americans, and many of them are children.
More than 90 million Americans, close to a third of the entire population, are struggling to make ends meet on incomes that are less than twice the official poverty line. In my book, they're poor.
We don't see poor people on television or in the advertising that surrounds us like a second atmosphere. We don't pay much attention to the millions of men and women who are changing bedpans, or flipping burgers for the minimum wage, or vacuuming the halls of office buildings at all hours of the night. But they're there, working hard and getting very little in return.
The number of poor people in America has increased by five million over the past six years, and the gap between rich and poor has grown to historic proportions. The richest one percent of Americans got nearly 20 percent of the nation's income in 2005, while the poorest 20 percent could collectively garner only a measly 3.4 percent.
A new report from a highly respected task force on poverty put together by the Center for American Progress tells us, "It does not have to be this way." The task force has made several policy recommendations, and said that if all were adopted poverty in the U.S. could be cut in half over the next decade.
The tremendous number of people in poverty is an enormous drag on the U.S. economy. And one of the biggest problems is the simple fact that so many jobs pay so little that even fulltime, year-round employment is not enough to raise a family out of poverty. One-fifth of the working men in America and 29 percent of working women are in such jobs.
Peter Edelman, a Georgetown law professor who was a co-chairman of the task force, said, "An astonishing number of people are working as hard as they possibly can but are still in poverty or have incomes that are not much above the poverty line."
So the starting point for lifting people out of poverty should be to see that men and women who are working are adequately compensated for their labor. The task force recommended that the federal minimum wage, now $5.15 an hour, be raised to half the average hourly wage in the U.S., which would bring it to $8.40.
The earned-income tax credit, which has proved very successful in supplementing the earnings of low-wage working families, should be expanded to cover more workers, the task force said. It also recommended expanded coverage of the federal child care tax credit, which is currently $1,000 per child for up to three children.
A crucial component to raising workers out of poverty would be an all-out effort to ensure that workers are allowed to form unions and bargain collectively. As the task force noted, "Among workers in similar jobs, unionized workers have higher pay, higher rates of health coverage, and better benefits than do nonunionized workers."
In a recent interview about poverty, former Senator John Edwards told me: "Organizing is so important. We have 50 million service economy jobs and we'll probably have 10 or 15 million more over the next decade. If those jobs are union jobs, they'll be middle-class families. If not, they're more likely to live in poverty. It's that strong."
The task force made several other recommendations, including proposals to ease access to higher education for poor youngsters, to help former prisoners find employment, to develop a more equitable unemployment compensation system, and to establish housing policies that would make it easier for poor people to move from neighborhoods of concentrated poverty to areas with better employment opportunities and higher-quality public services.
Mr. Edelman, an adviser on social policy in the Clinton administration, stressed that there is no one answer to the problem of poverty, and that in addition to public policy initiatives, it's important to address the "things people have to do within their own communities to take responsibility for themselves and for each other."
But he added, "It is unacceptable for this country, which is so wealthy, to have this many people who are left out."
Bob Herbert joined The New York Times as an Op-Ed columnist in 1993. His twice a week column comments on politics, urban affairs and social trends.
© 2007 The New York Times



26 Comments so far
Show AllIn another century or so, there will be no rich or poor people. Everyone will have plenty. The human race will be flourishing and at peace.
Honest, competent leaders who are for the people - social democracy where people are considered to be much more important than the heartless, greed oriented corporations that are currently F'ing up our world, will lead the way.
The time for imperialism, horribly corrupt politicians, and for rotten economic & political systems has past. They've all failed miserably! The people have the power and will rise up. We CD readers are just the tip of the iceberg.
Believe it or not. I know it's tough for many to believe it now, but you'll see.
____
"Without sharing there can be no justice;
without justice there can be no peace;
without peace there can be no future."
Maitreya, the World Teacher
http://www.Share-International.org
Aeon,
L A B O R L A W
U N I V E R S A L H E A L T H C A R E
Ditto: LaborLaw & Universal Health Care
"A crucial component to raising workers out of poverty would be an all-out effort to ensure that workers are allowed to form unions and bargain collectively"
Even if workers are "allowed" to form unions, the process should be painless and obvious to the ones that would like to form/participate in unions.
For example, before the nationwide "Do not call" program "made it easy for everyone" to stop annoying unsolicited phone calls, it was nearly impossible to stop them, even though most people really wanted to.
So we need to "make it easy for everyone" to form/participate in unions:
1) Standard mechanisms to sign up (Keep it simple)
2) National registry (So everyone knows where to go)
3) Real protection against retaliation
ok. mr. edelmen, first you have to take responsiblity for what you help to create. start by pushing the living wage through. it is tailored to the local economies and it supports the cunsumer driven economy. stop corporate welfare.
Don't Americans realize that labor creates all wealth and that almost all of our productivity gets taken by the richest 1% and what's left gets taxed, which doesn't even go to support our own well being, but to support the corporations owned by the richest 1% and various military adventures that promote the interests of the richest 1%. This richest 1% gets to decide how much of what the rest of us get to keep from what we produce and they get to keep the rest (almost all of it). We work to fill their tables with food and they've got us squabbling with each other over their crumbs. Without us, there wouldn't be any food on their tables. And we agree to this servitude. Why? We don't have to. We can organize and decide what we're willing to work for. How about a fair share?
Wow - a whole 9 bucks an hour! And in what city can one more than survive on that?
The term "living wage" is the wrong frame. First, we (yes, I'm one of the ninety million,) need a "survival wage." Food, clothing, shelter, health care. Let's start with that, then we'll work on the "living" part, where a trip to the movies isn't a bi-annual luxury.
The real problem is that we, the "workers," have been brainwashed to believe "this is the way it is" and "if you don't like it, go find a new job." Hell, we can't organize a lunch - forget unionizing. Because we see, everyday, that no matter how hard we work and fight and struggle, the same group of "winners" continue "winning" at alarming rates. According to the NYT, only 2 percent of us have a chance of rising above the "class" of our parents.
Workers, in other words, no longer value their contributions enough to join together in the good fight. No laws and trickle down wage increases will change that.
At some point in the future, political corruption, unbridled greed and poverty will be no more than sad aspects of mankind's dark past.
We'll reach that point when enough of us stand up and demand the necessary changes.
"Without sharing there can be no justice;
without justice there can be no peace;
without peace there can be no future."
Maitreya, the World Teacher
http://www.Share-International.org
Apparently, Herbert doesn't know yet that "the rich deserve to be rich," and "the poor deserve to be poor."
Sorry, guys, this country is not normal.
"The country is headed toward a single and splendid government of an aristocracy founded on banking institutions and monied corporations, and if this tendency continues it will be the end of freedom and democracy, the few will be ruling and riding over the plundered plowman and the beggar.... Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Dems better step up for IMPEACHMENT & going after the WAR CRIMINALS in office. HAD ENOUGH?
If you want change, then YOU have DO something to make it happen. First, we need to support the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) introduced by Sen. Edward Kennedy (S 1041) That means that everyone has to contact their Senators to support this bill. Repeatedly! Also, you can find out more by going to http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/takeaction/efca/updates.cfm. This bill has already been passed in the House.
Get moving! Make it happen in the Senate. Bush has already threatened to veto this bill when it gets to his desk. That means that Congressional support has to be large enough to over ride his veto. Keep the pressure on YOUR Senators. Make it clear that they will not be going back to Washington if they do not support this legislation.
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!
Hasn't 230 years of rewriting the Constitution demonstrated that the interests of corporate America take precedence over the interests of people. Trying to use the Constitution to change the system won't work. America needs a change in attitude. That has to come from individuals. Our dysfunctional society isn't about to unite, except like good sheep who willing accept being turned into a product.
Hoa binh
Howard Zinn showed us all how this country has always been for the enrichment of the rich and the profits of the corporations in his "Peoples History of the United States". If you have forgotten this book, re-read it. It is worth it.
Then, we all have to act and drive our Representatives and Senators nuts with our phone calls and letters if we expect anything to change.
Kitty, I don't understand your conclusion.
I doubt Zinn talks about driving Representatives and Senators
nuts.
I thought he talks more about people opposing the injustice, fighting the injustice, and driving the corporate bastards nuts.
Are you sure you read Zinn?
". . . the official poverty threshold, which is $19,971 a year for a family of four."
I think it's time economists revisited the way in which "the poverty threshold" is calculated.
I don't care if someone sweeps floors for a living or sits in a restroom handing out clean towels and breath mints or greets customers as they enter a department store, they deserve a LIVING WAGE. Even if they're part-time. Maybe then you'd get better service at fast food restaurants. Seriously. And would it really cut that much into profits? Maybe the increased quality of service that would go along with the increased pay would cause more people to frequent your establishments?
Education and health care should be FREE and should not be left to employers to provide.
Those things alone would raise many, many people out of poverty and perhaps even result in a more efficiently run society.
Kathyodat, et al,
There is an idea promoted on the website www.timesizing.com which is that we, the workers need to control the availability of our labour if we are to get a fair share of the wealth. Currently the rich manage a scarcity of jobs and the workers bid for them with low wages. What is suggested with timesizing is that we share the work by reducing the work week until the labour available balances the work that needs to be done. Once jobs are no longer scarce we can get a fair wage based on supply and demand. We will end up working fewer hours for more money. How well this would work in practice I do not know. It is an interesting idea though. No doubt there are other solutions we can find if we look for them. I would hope that when things get bad enough that we are ready to rebel that our leaders will have a breadth of understanding of what is possible.
kathy,
Good questions. Nobody in the world understands why.
But look at this forum.
How many people bother to look at a labor thread?
They find or create all sorts of distractions and diversions.
Everything, but what is truly important.
Herbert hasn't been as strident a voice against these things as he should be, either. The blame's a little thicker than just Bush who he usually focuses on.
I think RandB and his cited website are onto something. Industry and employers are now constantly yammering about "productivity, productivity, productivity". But why, exactly, should labor pay any attention whatsoever? How can productivity benefit the worker? More stress, more sweat, more blood. Only if you have the choice to increase it--or not to--and if the dollars you earn go up commensurately, would productivity benefit the worker, and often it doesn't. As far as I'm concerned what we need is LESS productivity, less hours, and generally less work and more leisure out of everyone (another way of saying the same thing).
Theoretically, people should value a person who changes their car tires as much as one who fills their cavities. Both are critical to their well being, so why the difference in remuneration? What would happen if all tire-changers suddenly said "I will work only for $50/hr"? And what would be needed for such a demand? Well, for one thing, convention...mere convention. Society says tire changers make $10/hr, and that's that. But what if you could suddenly imbue tire-changers with the insistence that they make $50/hr. Well, they'd damn well make $50/hr, that's what. But you'd never be able to do it.
It boils down to the traffic jam syndrome: if all cars moved forward at the same time there would be no jam, but they don't, they never will.
That is our dilemma.
Friends,
We must face an unpleasant reality. The Civil War is still on. The "South" never lost.
It's just not geographical now, but suffused throughout the entire population. Please note the faux Southern accents and Dixie Conferate flag stickers one encounters in Northern Michigan. And the war is being fought with dollars instead of rifles, and in abstract economic and ideological realms instead of on physical battlefields.
It's time we realize we are going to have to FIGHT to win this, not sit around and blog or preach to the converted, even on great, brilliant and encouraging Web sites like this one.
Stop thinking of it in the sense of whether either of the two sides _ extreme capital and labor _ are "right" or "wrong," because that's all subject to debate. It's a WAR. A FIGHT. Even if you're a Libertarian or Ayn Rand type out flogging free and open "competition," and the glorious infallibilitly of "the market" _ guess what? It's not just competition between sellers. Competition is also a force in the labor equation. And there are TWO SIDES to any "competition." Management and Labor. It's time for us on the Labor side to stop thinking or talking about Utopian, someday ideal systems that will be more "fair." There is no "fair."
Rich, powerful people have STOLEN _ or manipulated the law to enable them to "legally" steal _ our flesh, blood, work, minds, hopes, dreams and futures. Time to see it for what it is, and get angry, and get smart, and they're not going to give it back, we're going to have to TAKE it back. Stop confusing our values of "independence," "ingenuity" and "self-sufficiency" with being patsies who are being ripped off and milked for our debt, slowly bled to death every second of every minute out of every day. Stand up.
_Zell
To Zell;
I agree with you if you mean that abuses like the so called right to work laws have spread from the South.
I wonder if John Edwards' stated goal of seriously addressing poverty might be an effective rallying cry-especially him being a Southerner?
In addition to some of the statistics quoted above-"severe poverty has increased dramatically. With hedge fund managers getting billion dollar bonuses whil many millions have been marginalized into oblivion-how much further down this mad path of trickle down economics can we go?
I will have to forgive you guys that my beloved sarcasm will
rest today.
There are so many interesting points here, but I have to rush to some leadership thread (also important).
About the South.
I've been thinking about the Civil War for some time.
Are we sure that this was the right war?
Yes, we're all slaves now.
It's time to place signs ARBEIT MACHT FREI on every workplace. We still have only labor camps not extermination, but we're progressing.
Terran,
Correct. It's not Bush, it's a systemic problem.
These bums expect four people to live on twenty thousand while they vote themselves raises headed toward a hundred fifty thousand? Louis XVI wasn't that greedy. They think it can't happen here.
The worst "they" eat one hundred fifty thousand for breakfast.
The fact that you don't talk about them proves that they are correct in their thinking.
Communism failed, so has Imperialism. Social democracy, aka: Socialism is the way forward if we are to have a government that is for and by the people.
"These bums expect four people to live on twenty thousand while they vote themselves raises headed toward a hundred fifty thousand? Louis XVI wasn't that greedy. They think it can't happen here."
Oh yeah they do.. chess moves. They are already thinking 12 steps ahead of the rest of us, if not more. We the people have to start doing the same thing.