EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Air Strikes Kill 21 Civilians in Afghanistan
At least 21 civilians, including six children, have been killed in US air strikes in Afghanistan, leading to angry protests among locals. The deaths brought the total of civilian deaths to almost 100 in the past two weeks and followed President Hamid Karzai's declaration that his people "can no longer accept casualties the way they occur".
The new round of "collateral damage" also came a day after the US military said it was "deeply ashamed" of the killings of 19 civilians by marines in early March.
In the latest incident American special forces called for air strikes in the village of Soro near Sangin in Helmand, after coming under attack from around 200 Taliban fighters.
A spokesman for the US forces, Major William Mitchell, declared that the troops had killed a "significant" number of insurgents in firefights and the subsequent bombing.
"We don't have any reports of civilian casualties" he said. " There are enemy casualties - I think the number is significant." However, this was immediately contradicted by the governor of Helmand, who said: "Nato forces carried out an operation in Sangin and as a result of the bombing 21 civilians, including women and children, were killed."
Mohammed Asif, a resident of the village which came under Nato aircraft fire, said: "I know at least five homes were destroyed, there may be up to 38 people killed and 20 more were wounded. Foreign and Afghan troops are stopping people from some of the roads getting here."
Another resident claimed that a number of bodies had been taken to the British base in Sangin in an attempt to prove that they were civilians and not Taliban fighters. However, there was no confirmation of this from the British forces.
Following the apology over the casualties in March, Nato's British spokesman Nicholas Lunt said yesterday: "We know that our ability to operate here in support of the government of Afghanistan is dependent upon the support of the people of Afgha-nistan. We know very well that civilian deaths and injuries undermine this goodwill and support."
Nato has announced that in future it will engage the Afghan government much more in planning military operations and keep it fully informed about developments. There is unease, however, among some Western commanders that information about previous offensives has been leaked to the Taliban from official Afghan sources.
Meanwhile, Afghanistan's senate called on President Karzai's government to open direct talks with the Taliban in an effort to bring the bloodshed to an end.
There have been unconfirmed claims that the reason the Afghan capital, Kabul, has not experienced a serious suicide bombing for several months is because of an unofficial agreement between the government and Gulbuddin Hikmatayar, one of the insurgent leaders.
Many MPs are now demanding that similar pacts should be sought with the "local Taliban" in many areas.
In a separate incident, four civilians were killed yesterday when a suspected suicide bomber appeared to detonate his explosive device prematurely in the south-eastern province of Paktika. Afghan officials said the man had arrived from across the border in Pakistan along with a group of suspected insurgents.
Taliban fighters have stepped up attacks in recent weeks following a series of operations by Nato forces designed to prevent insurgents from gathering forces for a spring offensive.
Western commanders say that their tactics are working as the spring offensive promised by Taliban leaders has not yet materialised. But local Afghans in the south of the country say large numbers of men and weapons have crossed the border in recent weeks undetected by Nato forces.
© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

6 Comments so far
Show AllOoops! But can't you see we're killing you to help you???
see http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/443 for links
USA Under-Compensating Afghans for Civilian Deaths
http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/443
News: U.S. Pays and Apologizes to Kin of Afghans Killed by Marines - "I stand before you today, deeply, deeply ashamed and terribly sorry that Americans have killed and wounded innocent Afghan people," Colonel Nicholson said, recounting to reporters the words he had used in the meetings. In a videoconference to reporters at the Pentagon, he added, "We made official apologies on the part of the U.S. government" and paid $2,000 for each death."
According to the "Value of statistical life" (PDF), the average American life is worth approximately $6 million dollars. If we consider that the average GDP per capita in the United Sates is $43,500, and that in Afghanistan the average GDP is $800, then the compensation to Afghan families for the wrongful death of a family member by the US Military should be approximately $110,000. This means that the US government is under compensating the Afghani families by a factor of 55.
This is even an underestimate since the GDP figures in the CIA Fact Book do not consider the moneys earned through opium production. Since the US invasion of Afghanistan, the opium harvest has soared to record levels, which means that the average GDP in Afghanistan should be much higher then reported. This would mean that the $2,000 compensation to each family member is even more unjust then the 55 factor stated above.
So why is the US government underpaying Afghani citizens for the death of a family member by hundreds of thousands of dollars? Because they can and no one is going to do anything about it! Except of course the Taleban who have promised to increase attacks on coalition troops and make this the bloodiest year since its fall in 2001.
We must also not forget that the US military initially tried to hide the events of this massacre by deleting all photo and video evidence of the incident.
For an estimate of the number of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan please see Unknown News.
in the confusing days after 9/11 somehow someone got the idea that Afghanistan would be the place to bomb. Maybe they tought it was already bombed out so bad no one would notice. The few americans who knew anything about Afghanistan tried hard to stop it, but hardly anyone could act rational back then. so it was bombs away. after about 12 hours rumsfeld said the u.s. had secured the airspace over Afghanistan. imagine that. our airforce overwhelmed a country with no airforce.
since then though reports like these heve come flooding in- u.s. bombs something or somewhere there might be somebody possibly up to no good. next day they count the bodies and it's all civilians. oh well. on to the next target.
this should never have happened. there was never any real reason to attack Afghanistan and there still is no reason to keep doing it.
You can't have storm troopers running around doing their thing and officials offering fake apologies at the same time.
Why are there so many "air strikes" in Iraq? it seems every time u s soldiers hear a gun go off, they call in an air strike. At this rate they don't even have to be armed there self. Call in and air strike kill every body.
The initial problem was in Afghanistan but action was taken in Iraq, only has it migrated simultaneously mind you to Afghanistan and the killing of civilians is curtaining any progress the troops fake to achieve, i fell the Afgahns actually had some faith in the reform but are now more afraid of the US tha the taliban.