'Family-Values' Cloak Lifted From GOP
President Bush's budget-busting, spendthrift tactics have robbed the GOP of its claim to the title, "Party of Fiscal Conservancy."
Now the perverse antics of some high-level Bush appointees and his party's power elite are lifting the cloak of "family values" from the GOP, too.
The "D.C. Madam" scandal is the latest in a string of stories revealed during Bush's second term showing that the private lives of some of his most powerful appointees bear little resemblance to the Ozzie-and-Harriet-like ideal the party tries to mimic.
Deborah Jeane Palfrey is in court battling charges of running a high-class prostitution ring from California. She maintained a 46-pound Rolodex that has caused the resignation of one State Department potentate and reportedly contains the names of more elite administration officials and Republican Party donors. The first resignation was that of Randall Tobias, who last week fled a top State Department perch. While there, he not only managed foreign-assistance programs but also, according to The New York Times, "ran agencies that required foreign recipients of AIDS assistance to explicitly condemn prostitution, a policy that drew protests from some nations and relief organizations."
As "AIDS czar," Tobias alienated many AIDS-plagued, developing nations by requiring recipients of U.S. foreign aid to sign a pledge against prostitution. Donee nations complained the pledge effectively prevented organizations from befriending sex workers so as to teach them HIV/AIDS prevention. Tobias also promoted faithfulness and abstinence over condom use to prevent AIDS transmission.
Now the joke's on Tobias, who has the gall to claim his patronage of the D.C. Madam's women involved "no sex" and that he paid a reported $300 per session for "the gals" (as he put it) to give him massages. Yeah, right.
Even in pricy Washington, in my humble opinion, $300 seems like an awful lot for a garden-variety massage. And Bush is a uniter, not a divider.
Would that the D.C. Madam scandal were the only example of family-unfriendly behavior by powerful GOP Washingtonians. Let's ignore, for the moment, the congressional page scandal in which disgraced former Rep. Mark Foley traded lewd e-mails with young male pages. Let's ignore, too, the resignation of former Food and Drug Administration appointee -- and evangelical Christian gynecologist (whatever that is) -- Dr. W. David Hager.
Hager urged his female patients to pray for relief from medical conditions. Worse yet, The Nation Magazine reported that Hager's ex-wife said that while he publicly sermonized and moralized on sexual matters, he repeatedly sodomized her without her consent over a seven-year period.
Let's focus, instead, on the post-resignation antics of the man Bush appointed to lead the Office of Population Affairs. This office is in charge of doling out almost $300 million worth of contraceptives to low-income women. Yet appointee Eric Keroack once described contraceptives as "demeaning to women." And he came to the administration's attention due to his management of an affiliation with a string of crisis-pregnancy centers. These are the "centers" that lure pregnant women in by masquerading as women's health service providers. Instead, they proselytize and show women ultrasound images of fetuses to dissuade them from having abortions.
Keroack resigned abruptly about a month ago, after less than five months in the job, because (as The Boston Globe reported) he was "notified that the state's Medicaid office had launched an investigation into his private practice."
Don't get me wrong. Democrats have their famous foibles, too. I still say former President Clinton should have resigned for having oral sex with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office, rather than drag the nation through the trauma of impeachment proceedings. But the lesson of Bush's GOP and its agglomeration of perverse appointed and elected officials is that neither party should ever lay claim to that mantle again.
Bonnie Erbe is a TV host and writes this column for Scripps Howard News Service. E-mail bonnieerbe@CompuServe.com.
© 2007 The Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
9 Comments so far
Show AllCorrection: Clinton's resignation would have weakened the party as much as his lying did. He should have admitted to the oral sex episode.
At the time Clinton lied, the stock market was humming along, working class employment opportunities were better than ever, his popularity ratings were high, and everybody (including Hillary)was aware of his history of womanizing.
Had Clinton told the truth, the story would have disappeared, Clinton would have been able to put his energy into family-friendly programs (rather than defending himself aginst impeachment), Al Gore would have been the 43rd president and the trillions of dollars Bush has squandered on tax cuts, pork barrel projects and war would be available to nurture families.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong but a $300 dollar massage? Doesn't that merit the same coverage as a $400 haircut? Never having one makes me a bit skeptical for only just a "massage". IF there was nothing wrong then why the resignation? Shouldn't medical records had shown a need? This is what is totally wrong about this administration. No accountability to the tax payers. That and the psuedo-piety.
Recently retired Arizona congressman Jim Kolbe, a Republican, was being investigated by fired US Attorney Paul Charlton due to some not-so-family-friendly activities.
There are plenty of social conservative voters out there who are starting to realize that the GOP is nothing but a pack of liars election after election. Abortion will NOT be outlawed, affirmative action is here to stay, gays and lesbians will not be taken down, gun control is long history, big media/entertainment will continue getting bigger tax cuts for making their tv content more vulgar and violent, etc ... And in the meantime, these voters have given up what's left of their finances to the last penny buying into the lies of the Religious "right", GOP, Corporate America especially NASCAR, NRA (corporatist version and there are better advocates of gun rights who don't sellout), etc ... At some point more of these voters would have to say "Enough already !" However, as long as the "conservatives" keeping framing the debates and do everything they can to keep voters deceived with cloaks on their eyes, they won't have to worry about losing their cloaks.
I don't trust this. Why now? So sure, there will be some embarrassing moments when the "names are revealed" (right after this commercial break), we all get to roll our eyes and elbow poke our friends, but who really gives a rat's ass?
I smell a huge attention diversion from real scandals. Is this an attempt to throw a sex scandal out there, which is sure to dominate the MSM while all the other scandals get a pass until people forget about them. You remember, like that thing about the guy at the Justice Department, and that book by what's-his-name-again from the CIA, and those miscommunications about Pat Tilman and that little Rambo gal.
take a look at george lakoff's 'thinking points' on http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/thinkingpoints/. he gives the reasons why these people behave the way they do using two models. the strict father and the nuturing parent and the values they represent.
knowing your enemy is half the battle
America needs some serious therapy for its sexual obsession.
With all the problems and crimes, what people do with their units should be pretty far down the list of things I care about.
ha ha ha ... yup, that's right! Hipocrits!
But greed and debauchery go together so well, like strawberries and cream.
Mr. Erbe does not even go into what happens if Rudy Giuliani gets the Republican nomination. It's not like his family values transgressions are secret (well at least many of them are in the open, though there could be quite a few that he has still managed to keep hidden). I do not think even the most dense member of the Christian Right could fight off the cognitive dissonance for long.