EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Hillary's Mother-F'ing Tour Business
Before his untimely death in a plane crash, Commerce Secretary Ron Brown said,
"I'm not Hillary's mother-f****** tour guide!"
That wasn't a nice thing for a member of the President's cabinet to say about the First Lady, now my Senator, Hillary Clinton.
And it's probably not polite for me to bring it up now. But if I don't, surely the Karl Rovarians will - if Senator Mrs. Clinton nails the Presidential nomination.
Bill Clinton used to say that, once he became president, he finally earned more money than his wife. That was a carefully crafted bit of modesty to show Bill as an aw-shucks regular guy versus Richie Rich-kid George Bush.
But Bill's cute remark raised a question in my mind: How did Hillary get that big ol' salary? And another question arises: how has she stayed out of prison?
The story's a little complicated, involving a New Orleans power company, Indonesian billionaires, a New York nuclear plant and plain old influence peddling. But if we follow the money, we'll get the picture. And it ain't pretty.
But first, let's stop at Wal-Mart. Read an official biography of the Senator and you'll find her six-month stint on a child-protection task force. Yet you won't find her SIX YEARS on the board of directors of Wal-Mart Corporation. She may have earned a Grammy for "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child." But it takes a Governor's wife to provide cover for Wal-Mart's profiteering off systematic wage-enslavement of children in its factories in South America.
Sam Walton called Hillary, "My little lady." Sam paid her an eyebrow raising sum for a director - equal to 60% of her entire not-insubstantial salary as a lawyer. By contrast, Wendy Diaz (her real name), a 13-year-old in Honduras, was paid 25 cents an hour to make shirts for the "little lady's" label.
Hillary's rake-in was made possible by Wal-Mart's 100% union-free operation and out-sourcing of 100% of its manufacturing, some to prison factories in China. Now, you could say that Hillary couldn't hear the screams of the kiddies in Kamp Wal-Mart in Honduras. After all, she relied on the intelligence provided her by the President (of Wal-Mart).
Fast forward to 1994 and the Brown 'mother-f'ing tour guide' business. According to Nolanda Hill, the Commerce Secretary's long-time business partner and love interest, Brown, who died in 1996, endorsed a Hillary cash-for-access scheme ($10,000 for coffee with the President, $100,000 for a night in the Lincoln bedroom). However, Brown resented the discount rate the First Lady put on US executives joining Brown's lucrative trade missions. 'I'm worth more than $50,000 a pop!' he said.
One company more than happy to pony up for a cash joy-ride with Brown was Entergy International. This electric company, based in Little Rock, became one of the world's biggest power system operators on the planet under the Clinton regime. Interestingly, Bill Clinton began his political climb by running for Arkansas Attorney General campaigning on a pledge to fight Entergy's electric price hikes. His pro-consumer plan was defeated in court by Entergy's law firm - which included one Hillary Rodham.
There were more favors for Entergy. In 1998, I discovered, while working under cover for the Guardian and Observer, that Tony Blair was personally fixing the system to let Entergy to violate British policy on coal plants. Why? I picked up in my secret recordings of Blair's cronies that calls to take care of Entergy, rules be damned, had come in from the office of 'the Flotus' - the First Lady of the United States.
It gets creepier. In June of 1994, Entergy's partner in Asia, the Riady family of Indonesia paid recently-resigned Associate Attorney General Webster Hubbell a $100,000 consulting fee. Odd that: Hubbell was on his way to prison for the felony crime of inflating his legal bills. Why would Asians pay a lawyer for advice on Asia who was on his way to the pokey?
Maybe it had to do with his partner in crime. I've conducted investigations of lawyer over-billing. It is nearly impossible for a senior lawyer to pad billing records unless the junior partner also fraudulently monkeys with time logs to make sure the records don't give away the game. Who was Hubbell's "little lady" junior partner? Today we call her Madame Senator.
Hillary's logs were worth close inspection by authorities, no? But the funny thing about Hillary's billing records: when requested for disclosure in another suit, they disappeared. First, her law firm's computers went ka-blooey. Then the paper printouts vanished, but not before, during the 1992 Presidential campaign, they were secretly combed over, line by line, by … Web Hubbell.
Hubbell knew his own logs were phonied, and he understood the consequences of exposure. Ultimately, bloated hours on those records caused him to lose his law license, his Associate Attorney General post and his freedom. He got 21 months in the slammer.
What did Hubbell see and know about Hillary's logs? Hubbell won't say, except for a cryptic remark, after seeing her bills, that 'every lawyer' fabricates records. Hubbell pleaded guilty, but refused to answer investigators' questions, a requirement in any plea bargain - so the judge had to sentence him to prison.
Why would Hubbell choose to do time on the chain gang over testifying about the First Lady? His prosecutors did not know at the time of the $100,000 Riady payment, the first of over half a million dollars Hubbell would receive from Clinton friends in the weeks up to his entering jail.
And those Hillary billing records? Hubbell lost them - how convenient. Then they reappeared two years later, just outside Hillary's office, right after Hubbell announced he would refuse to testify against her.
Maybe the Clintons knew nothing about the big money flowing to prison-bound Hubbell. Knowledge of the payments would suggest they were buying Hubbell's silence. In 1996, when the LA Times uncovered the payments, Mrs. Clinton's First Man Bill stone-cold denied he knew anything about it.
Then, in 2000, in a deposition by the Justice Department, the President changed his tune. Investigators confronted the President with this: on June 20, 1994, Hubbell met with Hillary. Two days later, James Riady, the Asian billionaire Entergy partner, met with Hubbell for breakfast. Just a few hours later, Riady returned to the White House, then met again with Hubbell, then made two more treks to the White House. Two days later, a videotape shows the beginning of another meeting in the Oval Office between Clinton and Riady -- but oddly, before they talk, the tape goes blank. Two days after that, Hubbell gets his $100,000 through a Riady bank.
Lying to journalists is a venal sin, but lying to the Feds is perjury. In his deposition, the President's denial transformed into amnesia. He couldn't remember if Riady mentioned the payment. Then, the President slyly opened the door to the truth. "I wouldn't be surprised if James told me," Clinton said. Neither would I.
What did Riady get? The Flotus herself, says Nolanda Hill, forced Brown to accept the appointment of Riady's bag man, John Huang, as a Commerce Department deputy. According to records of calls the Guardian obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, Huang's first order of business was to wheedle his way into confidential CIA briefings on Indonesia and China, then call Riady and his Entergy partners.
The same day Riady met the President, documents show he called on a Clinton crony at the top of the department's Export-Import Bank. "We just came over from the Oval Office," is a nice way to provide assurance of the 'political connection' required for help. These and other Riady team meetings at Commerce are marked 'social'. Yet, shortly thereafter, the department agreed to promote and fund the Riady-Entergy China venture.
Influence is not a victimless crime. Riady and his minions' visits to the White House (94 times!) included successful requests for the President to meet Indonesian dictator Suharto and to kill negative reports on East Timor and working conditions in Indonesia. Timorese and Indonesians paid for these policy flips with blood.
Has Entergy's investment in Hillary's jail-bird partner continued to pay dividends?
Code Pink and New York environmentalists have been pulling out their hair over Senator Clinton's backing of the operation of the creaky old Indian Point nuclear plant just above - and within irradiating distance of - New York City. The owner of the Indian Point nuke? Hillary's old buck buddies, Entergy.
Am I saying Hillary would arrange for a payoff to keep witnesses silent, to poison US foreign policy for the profit of corporate cronies, to vote in Washington loaded down with conflicts of interest? I would never say so. Even if the evidence will.
Greg Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller, ARMED MADHOUSE: From Baghdad to New Orleans -- Sordid Secrets and Strange Tales of a White House Gone Wild. www.GregPalast.com
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

64 Comments so far
Show AllSenator Hillary Clinton is a distraction and if elected will more quickly dismantle Social Security and Medicare than any Republican because she can.
The coming election has to be about common people and our needs and hopes.
To start, " Free universal healthcare and education are the inalienable rights of a civilized people."
Let's spend our time writing and talking about how we can get this done.
So Greg, be my friend and help move the argument forward of common people and our needs and hopes.
More people will vote against her than she has people to vote for her. Nothing she can say or do will change that. Egro, we lose.
aybayb.......DITTO!!!!!
Politicians bought and sold!? Say it aint so!
But she's a she, a woman, and a liberal! It cannot POthibly be!
Yet it is. Funny that?
See, what we need, is for wymn to.. oh hang, OK, if the liberals got in and... er... urm...
Hey, let's go back to religion!
Oh yeah. Mmmmm.
OK, let's... pass another law!
That'll work!
*sigh*
S.
Beware of wolf in sheep's clothing posing as snake in grass.
Maat, Best Wishes and Hope
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk1vEuhBuEU
aybayb,
I was quite disappointed to learn that NOW has decided to totally support Hillary. NOW has been an ostensibly progressive organization in the past, but it appears that when push comes to shove, NOW is just a divisive gender-based organization, supporting a non-progressive woman simply because she is a woman. I suppose the NOW membership believes that predatory mendacious warmongering fascists are monsters unless they are women. If they are women, then they are A-ok! Sad.
Don't forget, this....woman... has already stated that with respect a nuclear first strike against Iran, "no options are off the table".
Think of Bush, but with Cheney's brains and lack of morals. *gag*
This is typical Greg Palast: brilliant investigating and reporting, but written in his patented cryptic, infotainment style which tells the reader he's about entertainment as much as journalism. Hyperlinks to the documents, videotapes and news reports (even his own) he references are never included. If he would spend as much time on documentation as he does on wit, he would be both more persuasive and more difficult for the main stream media to ignore.
Smurfy,
Progressives caught onto Hillary Clinton long ago. Virtually all progressives recognize her as a fascist-lite Republican, similar to her husband, but even more so.
But your mischievous Republicans, and their allies in the right-wing echo chamber and the mainstream corporate media, will hold onto every incriminating bit of information they have about her until after she is nominated, if they feel confident the Republican nominee is an electable hardcore fascist.
All indications are that if Hillary wins the nomination, Democrats will lose the Presidency.
A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar.
HL Mencken
Be careful in suggesting, Bob K., that Greg does not do his homework, because he will show up with stacks and stacks of documentation. You see, Greg is a real reporter, in the most old school sense of the word. He actually utilizes hard research, not just virtual. Remember, not everything is available on the Internet.
By the way, if the government and the American mainstream press would have taken him seriously back in 2000, we might have fought the fraud that put the Bush family back in power.
Two things Hillary's supporters hate more than Republicans are deep-greens and progressives.
Hillary voted for the Iraq war and voted repeatedly to fund it. If you point out her support for coal, war, and the fact that she is a lapdog for AIPAC, the Israeli lobby, you will get kicked off of half the boards on the net.
Earlier somebody said: "All indications are that if Hillary wins the nomination, Democrats will lose the Presidency."
If Hillary wins the Presidential election the Democrats will lose the presidency. Expect her dark roots as a Goldwater Republican to come out once she's in power.
Kival writes >>>
Progressives caught onto Hillary Clinton long ago. Virtually all progressives recognize her as a fascist-lite Republican, similar to her husband, but even more so.
>>>>>>>>>
It galls me no end when I hear people (on both the left and the right) cite Hillary as a "liberal". She's no more liberal (or 'progressive') than Joe Lieberman.
How do we get stuck with always having to choose between TWO "Evils"? Why, in what calls itself the free-est country in the world, do we not have more choices...like maybe a REAL 'Opposition Party', instead of a political cabal whose 'platform' is made up of sound bytes created by armies of political strategists and marketing professionals?
Hillary Clinton is the consummate opportunist. Her concern is NOT with principles or policies, but with self-promotion and power-brokering. Looks like I'll be voting 3rd Party again.
I feel strange defending Hillary (who I am not a supporter of for 2008) and Walmart.
According to this:
http://prorev.com/hillary.htm,
she was on the Walmart board from 86-92.
This was when Sam Walton was still in charge, and a good deal of the merchandise was "Made in U.S.A." and the employees were treated fairly well. Walmart got bad after Sam Walton's death in 92.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/wal-mart/sam-walton.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/transform/cron.html
The system that allows Hillary to remain a player is what needs to be changed. This is not professional wrestling. Without accountability for her actions she will never stop her manipulation of the system. Hillary isn't liberal or conservative -- she's a sell-out political whore.
Hoa Binh
namvet67,
But isn't a "sell-out political whore" pretty much the same thing as a predatory mendacious warmongering fascist? I mean no one grows up wanting to be a predatory mendacious warmongering fascist, but that is where the money and opportunity are, and so many end up there.
Hillary O' Hillary - O' have you met Hillary - Hillary the fascist lady...
Bush has Cheney and Clinton had Hillary...
Too many Hawks for me. I think I'm gonna vote for Kucinich in the primary.
Okay - I'm done...
I find Hillary very Offensive as a Politician, and as a Mother, and last but not least as a Woman.. I am a Grandparents Rights activist, and she is NOTHING but hot air ! I am the Proud Mom of three and Granny to 6 lovely grands.. She NOT walked a mile in our shoes, so I hope and Pray that She does NOT get Elected President, God Help us all if she does.. Myrna-Cross Plains Wisconsin (has not walked )
BobK--
Right on and my thoughts exactly. Greg Palast is kind of an upscale Matt Drudge--a smart-mouthed asshole who does more damage to any credibility he might have than the causes he seeks to expose.
I am wondering if Amy Goodman has spoken to him about this because the last time he was on there he had toned down his schtick quite a bit from previously.
Why does it have to be the lesser of two evils? It doesn't
NADER FOR PREZ 2008
How about a Gravel-Kucinich ticket?
Hillary's a corporate whore--always was and always will be.
Bob K.
Would it be nice if Greg did that? And wouldn't be incredibly stupid, too? Put himself in your shoes. I have and it looks like this: I want to give every lying, cheating politician the benefit of doubt and be able to produce the evidence to a prosecutor, and not the general public. Once eveidence is published then all bets are off.
Greg, you had me considering your rant against Hillary as plausible until your statement that:
"It is nearly impossible for a senior lawyer to pad billing records unless the junior partner also fraudulently monkeys with time logs to make sure the records don't give away the game."
Really? Your investigations revealled this? I can tell you flat out that this statement false. I am a lawyer in a decent size firm with numerous senior partners, junior partners, and lots of foot soldier associates. If a senior parter is the last person to look at a bill before it goes to the client, then that partner is the guy who can, theoretically, revise the bill any way he/she sees fit. Assuming the junior partner does the work that the senior directs, that junior does not have the last say. However, the reverse can be true if the junior asks the senior to do a specific task.
Additionally, depending on the expertise or complexity of legal work, $100,000 is not that big of a deal. Lastly, legal invoices are attorney-client privileged communications and not subject to disclosure expect upon few circumstances. Based on Greg's misstatements, I question whether Hillary's firm actually lost the bills or merely refused their disclosure.
This technical lawyer billing crap may be of little interest, but when anyone uses inaccurate facts to make a point, then the point might be just as innaccurate.
So there are only 2 things to take away from Greg's story:
1) he did an absolutely lousy and untrustworthy investigation; or
2) he manipulated purported facts in order to persuade readers of something that he cannot categorically prove.
Disappointed in Greg, but I remain a Kucinich supporter.
ezeflyer May 4th, 2007 1:20 pm
All indications are that if Hillary wins the nomination, Democrats will lose the Presidency. -- ezeflyer, All I can say is, "I hope so", and if you knew how much I fear the continuation of a Republican administration under any of the currently announced candidates you'd have a sense of my fears if HRC were to be President
Hillary haters on the right and the Left have a lot in common: scurrilous accusations, no facts; a wealth of innuendo, a dearth of data. I am so sick of seeing rightwing smears broadcast by sensation mongers on the left. But let's get real. The right doesn't have to do a thing to 'our' politicians and leaders, we eat our own--don'tcha know??
Lin
Greg shortened an article that could run pages. I think a few better choices of words would of helped too.
I think it's important to understand how Suharto (NO HEART) came to power and allowed access to OIL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suharto#Overthrow_of_Sukarno_.281965.29
Greg's integrity as a reporter seems to be in question here. Is any of the stuff about the comings and goings in the White House true?
At any rate, I couldn't vote for Hillary before or since this article. I wouldn't care what ticket she tried to run on. I say we all vote for Kucinich in the primaries no matter what your party affiliation (register Democrat if you have to). Then dump your current registration as a Dem or Rep and re-register however you want. This should get the message accross to the Dems that we are sick of bought and sold candidates.
Okay, I'm done.....
Sorry, I forgot - Write Pelosi and your Congressional reps to support HR333 to impeach Cheney. We now have two co-sponsors in the House. This thing might actually get legs!!!
Nice idea, Ayyamarn. I'd vote Gravel / Kucinich. In either order. I won't vote Hillary or for anyone else who showed no spine in the post-911 runup to war. I'd rather "throw my vote away" on a third party candidate again. And I'm not alone. Listening, democratic leadership?
So what are ya gonna do, huh? The media has all but annointed Clinton. It's a done deal. Everyone else may as well go home. Even the vaunted Daily Show, which even Moyers seems to confuse with actual journalism, calls Kucinich "a small woodland creature" and Gravel a "coot."
Guess they didn't suck up to AIPAC enough. Next time, try kneepads, guys.
By the way Nader4prez, Ralph refers to it as the "evil of two lessers." Bingo.
Moyers believed Stewart was a journalist? At least to me, that interview conveyed a portrait of a political satirist. Which is a very useful thing to be.
I long for the MSM to drop all of their political sweethearts and focus on the issues, one by one, instead of the cursed money game. But then, almost all of that money goes to the MSM, doesn't it? Sweet deal, huh?
"I picked up in my secret recordings of Blair's cronies that calls..."
That is soooo not believable. It sounds more like an episode from 'Get Smart'...receiving info on his shoe-phone.
Regrettably, the entire article lacks credibility. What's so impossible about citing sources in an article?
I desperately want a woman president in my lifetime so it appears I may have to improve my health practices and quit smoking. I now have another reason not to vote for Hillary. I have never liked her or Bill much but you often have to make do.I thought I was being catty not liking Hillary,but life has taught me to trust my first instincts. Now that I have seen my new heart throb, Gravel, I donated to his campaign today, never did that for any one else.Just to have someone in the race who speaks the truth is rejuvenating. And Dennis is not bad either. What a hell of a ticket that would be.
I'll never forget the FBI investigator, interviewed on Sixty Minutes, who was assigned to the disappearing Rose Law Firm files case, which files magically reappeared after three years not ten feet from Hillary Clinton's desk, in a storage room across the hall from where she worked daily for years. When asked whether it was possible to explain away this sequence of events in a way that might exonerate Hillary, the austere thirty-something Asian Special Agent calmly replied "no".
Hillary is sold to the highest bidder. And right now the highest bidder is AIPAC. She has been more times to Tel Aviv than any other city in the US to campaign. I wonder whether she is running for the US of A or the US of I. This is also true for that two-timing rat Guliani, and all the other candidates except for Obama.
Why are we worried about Hill or 'Bama and their corporate ties. This Old Hippy believes that come September, after Hill and 'Bama have paid their war chests to the gods of MSM, Big Al, the last person elected president in a somewhat free election, will say "Deal me in" and all talk will then turn to deciding whether his running will be Wes Clark or Bill Richardson.
If I'm wrong I just may have to flee the country no matter who else wins.
The Old Hippy
"Behind every successful man is a woman." (just quoting something I heard)
Behind every successful corporation is a corrupt politician?
Hillary's goal is to become President period.
And with that thought in mind "she would do anything to become one.
This no "when you wish upom a star...".
Its "the means justify the ends". Nothing personal folks. Its the terminator syndrome.
What a lovely bunch of comments. It would be heart-warming to any Republican to see how we hate our own.
Thank you, Mr. Palast for another fine bit of investigative journalism.
Sad truth is, this will not make the mainstream media.
Just like you don't read in our history books, what James Madison said during the constitutional convention about how the main goal of the new system has to be "to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority," and has to be designed so that it achieves that end.
Madison, it seems, might have proud of the Clinton's renting out of the Lincoln bedroom to wealthy friends.
"What a lovely bunch of comments. It would be heart-warming to any Republican to see how we hate our own."
We don't hate our own. But to state again, Hillary is not one of us. We are progressives, she is not. And unlike Republicans, we don't just voice support for someone simply because they are democrats. There is much more honesty on our side of the fence.
I predict (and hope) that Hillary will not be the nominee. And if she is, Progressives would do well to run a 3rd party candidate.
Palast delivers the news like my favourite sugar; Sweet 'n Low. Every fibre in my body hums "Bitch" every time I see that montage of facades pretending to be Mrs. Clinton.
To the one who who derided others' comments with "what a lively bunch of comments".
Here's a synoptic view.
Wake up America {americans]. Collectively a bunch of dual citizenships neocons [ostensibly including the socalled elite democrats and republicans] accomplished the following in the name of the USA.
Destroyed a nation of close to 25 million people. Forced the outmigtation of millions from their homes and towns.Plundered their historical relics. Killed over 660.000 according to estimates along with close to 4000 dead of their own and the crippling of an additional 60,000 young americans at a cost of 500 billion dollars.
The time when the merits of either major political pary or their adherents is long past. Neither political party speaks for what is best for all Americans. What is more important is the character, morality, amd conduct of the individual aspiring to become president.
Ignorance and arrogance whether in individual or societal interactions in the US as well as in relations to others makes political tags irrelevant. The best and most glaring example is the present so called 'republican' administration that speaks for all America.
Party tags are a sham that provides a lucrative means of making money out of individuals and corporations that in the end perpetuates the system of making money out supporting a political party.
Its like being told that in order to get to heaven, one has to ......
Somewhere up near the top someone remarked that all indications are that if Hillary gets the nomination, the Democrats lose the election. I came to that conclusion years ago - really.
This will be one of those moments, as when the majority of Americans realized that the administration is a pack of lying, murderous, scumbags. The day after the election when the DLC wakes up and realizes that McCain or Romney is president and not Hillary, they'll be stumbling around crying "how could this have happened." Hillary will never be president and thank goodness for that.
Thanks Greg Palast for another fine article. I think it's timely too, when mass media places her as the leading candidate in money. I also know what you wrote was accurate because I've read another book on her which stated the same stuff and fully documented. This nutshell version is handy.
I've said before
Democrats need to run a candidate who will unite Democrats for him, or her.
Democrats must not run a candidate who will unite Republicans - against him, or her.
"While we are distracted in this game of Three Card Monty our friends and foes alike are about to steal once again from the poor and the old as they slice more meat from the live body of Social Security and Medicare."
Dear Mr. Palast: Aren't you afraid? Should we be suprised to learn you end up in a crash or in some way ruined, or profoundly compromised as so many who dared speak, have before? Researching these matters is daunting, the truth well guarded. I & several others I know have been kicked off forums funded, owned, guarded or influenced by the obscenely powerful Clintons-- kicked off for simply trying!! to share the truth.
Thank you for your courage. I sincerely! wish you a long, & healthy life.
These facts are disheartening to learn. Hilary strikes me as a person of decent intentions, personal discipline and intelligence, who has earned the admiration of good people.
High-office politics truly is mud wrestling. Most politicians are afraid if they play it straight they will just lose to someone who plays dirty.
Greg Palast is doing great work. BTW there is a great interview with him in the May 07 issue of The Sun. We learn that he did post-graduate work in economics from the University of Chicago, and started out as a forensic economist - someone who analyzes damages and liability in legal cases.